桃園市特殊教育教師參與特殊教育專業團隊服務現況之研究

A Study on the Current Situation of Special Education Teachers to Participate in Special Education Collaborative Team in Taoyuan City

林秀慧(Hsiu-Hui Lin)；佘永吉(Yung-Ji Sher)

特殊教育教師 ； 專業團隊服務 ； 參與程度 ； 滿意程度 ； 困難程度 ； Special education teachers ； collaborative team service ； participation ； satisfaction ； difficulty

身心障礙研究季刊

18卷1期（2020 / 03 / 01）

58 - 81

繁體中文

探討桃園市國中特教教師對專團服務之參與、滿意與困難程度。採問卷調查法，對象為桃園市國中特教教師共188位，以自編「桃園市國民中學特殊教育教師參與專業團隊服務現況調查問卷」，以次數分配、百分比、平均數、標準差、t檢定、單因子變異數分析、Scheffe事後比較法、積差相關進行分析。研究結果顯示國中特殊教育教師對專業團隊服務有中上之參與程度，在整體參與程度之得分上其平均數為3.143，對於專業團隊服務的實施成效也有中等以上之滿意程度，在整體滿意程度的平均數為3.113。性別、年齡、最高學歷、特教專業背景、特教年資及擔任職務等不同背景變項，皆與特殊教育教師對專業團隊服務有密切關係。研究結果顯示特殊教育教師對專業團隊的「參與或滿意程度」各層面以「教學支援服務」得分較低。特教教師對專團服務參與的困難程度為中下程度，其中以家長的配合度低，無法確實執行相關專業人員所提供之建議的困難度最高。最後根據本研究之結果，提出對教育行政主管機關、師資培育單位、學校行政單位、特殊教育教師及未來研究等各方面提出相關建議。

The main purpose of this study was to investugate the participation, satisfaction and difficulties of special education teachers of junior high schools in special education collaborative team in Taoyuan City. The data was collected from 188 special education teachers by self-reported questionnaire, and then were analyzed by frequency distribution, percentage, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Scheffe, product-moment correlation. The conclusions of this study include the level of special education teachers' participation and satisfaction in the service of special education collaborative team was above average. The level of special education teachers' difficulties in the service of special education collaborative team was below average. The most difficult part was too lower degree of parents' participation in the recommended execution from special education collaborative team's staff. Different six, age, educational level, professional background, years of service and positions of special education teachers showed significant difference in the level of participation, satisfaction or difficulties on special education collaborative team's service. There was significant correlation among ＂the participation of special education teachers＂, the satisfaction of special education collaborative team's service＂, and ＂the difficulties faced by special education teachers in processing special education collaborative team's service＂ three aspects. The overall level of participation and satisfaction presented a medium positive correlation. The overall level of participation and difficulties presented a low negative correlation. The overall level of satisfaction and difficulties presented a high negative correlation.

1. 蔡昆瀛(2009)。論特殊教育與相關專業巡迴輔導之支援服務。國小特殊教育，48，13-22。
   連結：
2. 賴明莉,嚴倩霞(2006)。國小特殊教育教師對專業團隊運作之滿意度分析。身心障礙研究，4，18-31。
   連結：
3. Blanchett, W. J.(2001).Importance of teacher transition competencies as rated by special educators.Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Expetional Children,24(1),3-12.
4. Brownell, M. T.,Adams, A.,Sindelar, P.,Waldron, N.,Vanhover, S.(2006).Learning from collaboration: The role of teacher qualities.Exceptional Children,72(2),169-185.
5. Eccleston, S. T.(2010).Successful collaboration: Four essential traits of effective special education specialists.Journal of the International Association of Special Education,11(1),40-47.
6. Giangreco, M. F.,Edelman, S. W.,Dennis, R. E.(1991).Common professional practices that interfere with the integrated delivery of related services.Remedial and Special Education,12(2),16-24.
7. Hernandez, S. J.(2013).Collaboration in special education: Its history, evolution, and critical factors necessary for successful implementation.US-China Education Review B,3(6),480-498.
8. Reeve, P. T.,Hallahan, D. P.(1994).Practical question about Collaboration between general and special education.Focus on Exceptional Children,26(7),1-11.
9. Ritzman, M. J.,Sanger, D.,Coufal, K. L.(2006).A case study of a collaborative speech-language pathologist.Communication Disorders Quarterly,27(4),221-231.
10. Thomas, C. C.,Correa, V. I.,Morsink, C. V.(1995).Interactive Teaming: Consultation and Collaboration in Special Programs.Englewood Cliff, New Jersey:Prentice-Hall.
11. Thomas, C. C.,Jones, H. A.,Correa, V. I.,Morsink, C. V.(2005).Interactive Teaming: Enhancing Programs for Students with Special Needs.Upper Saddle River, N.J.:Merrill.
12. 王天苗(2003).特殊教育相關專業服務作業手冊.臺北市:教育部特殊教育工作小組.
13. 孫世恆,王天苗(2004)。臺灣地區特殊教育相關專業服務實施現況及意見調查之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，26，19-43。
14. 陳明德(2004)。相關專業人員在特殊教育專業團隊中的角色。特教園丁，19，35-42。
15. 陳姿秀,曹淑珊(1997)。物理治療師在啟智學校中的角色。特教園丁，12，15-21。
16. 陳素苓(2004)。特殊教育專業整合的回顧。特教園丁，19，7-14。
17. 陳麗如(2004).特殊教育論題與趨勢.臺北:心理.
18. 曾進興(1999)。也談專業團隊－兼談語言治療人力資源。特教新知通訊，6，1-4。
19. 鈕文英(2002)。國小階段融合教育實施模式與策略初探。特教園丁，18，1-20。
20. 蕭夙娟,王天苗(1998)。國中小啟智班實施專業整合之意見調查研究。特殊教育學刊，16，131-150。
21. 顏秀雯(2001)。「特殊教育教師」─在學校系統專業團隊中的角色。障礙者理解，1，17-22。

1. (2024)。美國的介入反應學習支持團隊如何改變特殊教育。特殊教育發展期刊，77，43-58。