促進鄉村學校和社區協同規劃社區發展計畫之行動研究：以台東利吉和富源社區爲例

An Action Research on Enhancing Partnership between Rural Schools and Communities for Planning of Community Development Projects-A Case Study of the Lichi and Fuyuan Communities, Taitung

10.6555/JEER.5.2.089

李光中(Kuang-Chung Lee)；張惠珠(Hui-Chu Chang)；王鑫(Shin Wang)；黃可欣(Ko-Sing Huang)；王鈴琪(Ling-Chi Wang)；蔡嘉玲(Chia-Ling Tsai)

學校社區夥伴關係 ； 環境教育與溝通 ； 協同規劃 ； 參與論壇 ； school-community partnership ； environmental education and communication ； collaborative planning ； participatory forum

環境教育研究

5卷2期（2008 / 03 / 01）

89 - 130

繁體中文

鄉村學校常常是偏遠社區的文教中心，不但影響著社區的教育發展，同時在經濟和社會發展上也都扮演著重要的角色。許多證據顯示，偏遠社區內的學校遭裁撤後，社區也喪失了存續的活力。在平衡城鄉差距、帶動社區總體營造的課題上，鄉村學校可以扮演重要角色。然而在國內研究中、小學學校與社區相關文獻中，尚缺乏有關鄉村小學參與社區發展並與其成爲夥伴關係的研究，本研究則擬探討此主題。 本研究探討鄉村社區發展所涉及之學校和社區夥伴關係的議題，選擇具有特殊地景和產業的台東利吉泥岩惡地鄰近的社區爲研究區。透過分析權益關係人的組成，並釐清他們關心的重要在地公共議題，進而探討如何設計和實施更有效的權益關係人參與方式，以增進權益關係人的夥伴關係和在地珍貴資源的永續經營。在權益關係人夥伴關係的研究問題上，本研究特別著眼於搭建社區和學校夥伴關係的方法，以及雙方共同規劃社區發展相關計畫的步驟，希望研究成果能貢獻於鄉村地區永續發展的研究和實務。 研究結果發現，「社區和學校夥伴關係工作平台」可以像一座新搭建的橋，重新連結和活化社區與學校之間的夥伴關係。夥伴關係工作平台的準備過程和討論方式係依據協同規劃理論的架構而設計，會議過程有助於增進權益關係人之間的知識力、社會力和行動力。本研究成果所提出的「促進鄉村社區與學校夥伴關係模式之行動研究架構」，可提供其它地區從事相關主題之參考。

Rural schools usually play an important role on the education, economic and social development of their communities in countryside areas. Evidence shows that many small rural communities have failed to remain robust after losing their schools. The purposes of this study are to explore the extent of the traditional and innovative contributions of rural schools to their community, to examine various interests of stakeholders related to their rural development, as well as to figure out the proper ways of participation and collaboration among them. An action research was conducted to design and implement various forms of 'school-community partnership platforms' such as workshops, communication forums, outdoor education activities, training courses, as well as committees composed of members of communities and schools in the light of Healey's theory of collaborative planning. The findings show that the school-community partnership platforms' are like new bridges connecting local communities and their schools. Through the discussion and working on the platforms, both members of communities and schools figured out a common ground of their interests and draw up proper community development projects collectively. The platforms prove to be a genuine assistance to promote knowledge resources, relational resources, and mobilization capacity among schools and communities.

1. Bowie, B.(1994).The impact of current policy trends in education on rural communities and their small schools.An International Conference on Issues Affecting Rural Communities: Proceedings of the Conference held by The Rural Education Research and Development Centre,Townsville, Queensland:
2. Bryson, J.,Crosby, B.(1992).Leadership in the Common Good.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
3. DFID(2002).Tools for Development-A Handbook for Those Engaged in Development Activities.London:Department of International Development.
4. Elcome, S.,Baines, J.(1999).Steps to Success-Working with Residents and Neighbors to Develop and Implement Plans for Protected Areas.Switzerland:IUCN, Commission on Education and Communication/European Committee for Environmental Education.
5. Falk, I.,Harrison, L.,Kilpatrick, S.(1998).How long is a piece of string? Issues in identifying, measuring and building social capital`. Keynote Address.Learning Communities, Regional Sustainability and the Learning Society: An International Symposium Conference Proceedings,Launceston:
6. Glen, M.,Cupitt, B.,Fairley, S.(1992).School-community collaboration and entrepreneurship in an economically depressed rural district of North Queensland.Rural Education: In Pursuit of Excellence: Proceedings of the Eight Annual National Conference,Armidale, NSW:
7. Healey, P.(1996).The communicative turn in planning theory and its implication for spatial strategy formation.Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design,23,217-234.
8. Healey, P.(1998).Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning.Environment and Planning A,30,1531-1546.
9. Healey, P.(1997).Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies.London:Macmillan.
10. Holladay, M.(1992).Economic and Community Development and Southern Exposure.Ohio:An Occasional Paper of the Kettering Foundation.
11. Huberman, A. M.,Miles, M. B.,N.K. Denzin,Y.S. Lincoln (eds.)(1994).Handbook of Qualitative Research.London:Sage.
12. IUCN,UNEP,WWF(1991).Caring for the Earth. A Strategy for Sustainable Living.London:Earthscan.
13. Johns, S.,Kilpatrick, S.,Falk, I.,Mulford, B.(2000).School Contribution to Rural Communities: Leadership Issues.CRLRA Discussion Paper Series ISSN 1440-480X. Centre for Research and Learning in Regional Australia.
14. Jolly, D.,Deloney, P.(1996).Integrating Rural School and Community Development: An initial Examination.Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the National Rural Education Association,San Antonio, Texas:
15. Kemmis, S.,McTaggart, R.(1988).The Action Research Planner.Victoria:Deakin University.
16. Kilpatrick, S.,Bell, R.(1998).Review of Research…VET for People from Rural/Non Metropolitan Areas.Adelaide:NCVER.
17. Kilpatrick, S.,Bell, R.,Falk, I.(1999).The role of group learning in building social capital.Journal of Vocational Education and Training,51(1),129.
18. Kuhne, G. W.,Quigley, B. A.(1997).Understanding and Using Action Research in Practice Settings.New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education,73,23-40.
19. Strengthening Community Networks: The Basis for Sustainable Community Renewal
20. Maxwell, J.(1996).Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach.London:Sage.
21. The Role of Rural Schools in Community Development: Policy Issues and Implications
22. Nachtigal, P.(1994).Rural schools, rural communities: An alternative view of the future`, Keynote Address.An International Conference on Issues Affecting Rural Communities: Proceedings of the Conference held by The Rural Education Research and Development Centre,Townsville, Queensland:
23. Nunn, J.(1994).The importance of the school to a rural town.Education in Rural Australia,4(1),1-7.
24. ODA(1995).Note on Enhancing Stakeholder Participation in Aid Activities.London:Overseas Development Administration.
25. ODA(1995).Guidance Note on How to Do Stakeholder Analysis of Aid Projects and Programmes.London:Overseas Development Administration.
26. Palmer, J. A.(1998).Environmental Education in the 21st Century: Theory, Practice, Progress and Promise.London:Routledge.
27. Palmer, J. A.,Goldstein, W.,Gurnow, A. (eds)(1995).Volume based on papers delivered at Workshop on Changing Personal Attitudes and Practices, held during the 19th Session of the IUCN General Assembly.Buenos Aires, Argentina:IUCN.
28. Putnam, R.(1993).The prosperous community: Social capital and public life.The American Prospect,4(13)
29. Silverman, D.(2000).Doing Qualitative Research-A Practical Handbook.London:Sage.
30. Squires, D.,Sinclair, R.(1990).Rural schools and their communities: Towards a more symbiotic relationship.'Think Tank' on Research into Rural Education: Proceedings of the Conference held by the Rural Education Research and Development Centre,Townsville, Queensland:
31. Stringer, E. T.(1996).Action Research: A Handbook for Practitioners.CA:Sage.
32. 王鑫(2000)。地景保育作業要點之研擬與示範計畫。農委會。
33. 王鑫(1996)。地景保育景點評鑑及保育技術研究計畫（八十五年度）。農委會。
34. 王鑫(1992)。花東海岸山脈地景調查（三）。農委會。
35. 李光中、張惠珠(2006)。促進東部鄉村學校和原住民部落協力推動社區林業之行動研究(I)。林務局。
36. 林明地(2002)。學校與社區關係。台北:五南書局。
37. 高熏芳、林盈助、王向葵譯(2001)。質化研究設計：一種互動取向的方法。台北:心理出版社。
38. 陳文山、王源(1996)。台灣東部海岸山脈利地質。台北:經濟部中央地質調查所。
39. 黃可欣(2007)。國立花蓮教育大學生態與環境教育研究所。
40. 葉鴻楨(2005)。國立花蓮教育大學生態與環境教育研究所。
41. 聯合報(1995/07/26)

1. 蔡嘉玲、李光中、王鑫(2012)。邁向協同治理？權益關係人參與自然地景保育的機會和限制。地理學報，65，27-52。
2. 劉潔心、張麗春、晏涵文(2010)。台灣地區健康促進學校教職員充能和學校與社區夥伴關係相關因素研究。健康促進與衛生教育學報，34，73-92。
3. (2015)。課程轉化與實踐之美感向度。教育研究月刊，252，18-32。
4. (2022)。地方教育如何為鄉村發展增能？兼論美濃如何使其可能。臺灣社會學刊，71，1-56。