香港使用普通話教授中國語文科課堂研究

Lesson Study on Using Putonghua as the Medium of Instruction in Chinese Language Teaching in Hong Kong

10.6393/JCLT.201209.0075

高寶玉(Po-Yuk Ko)

課堂語言 ； 普通話 ； 普教中 ； 語言轉譯 ； 課堂研究 ； Class room language ； Putonghua ； using Putonghua as the medium of instruction (PMI) ； language translation ； lesson study

華語文教學研究

9卷3期（2012 / 09 / 01）

75 - 99

繁體中文

香港學界對應否以普通話作為中文科教學語言（「普教中」）意見分歧，其中一個爭論就是「普教中」能否提升學生語文水平。過往的研究甚少深入「普教中」課堂探討教學過程與教學效果的關係，本文則詳析一節「普教中」課堂，並與一節以廣州話教授相同內容的課堂比較，探討課堂教學情況、及其與學生學習成果的關係。研究發現「普教中」班別受到語言轉譯問題而影響了教學成效。本文建議日後的研究應深入分析「普教中」課堂，多做粵普課堂教學的對照研究，探討可作改進之處，以及如何支援教師有效以普通話教授中文課。

There is a discrepancy in whether to use Putonghua as the medium of instruction in Chinese teaching (PMI) among scholars of the education circle in Hong Kong. One of the rationales points to the effectiveness of PMI on improving pupils' Chinese language level. In the past, there were few studies or the relationship between the teaching process and outcome in a PMI classroom. In this paper, a PMI lesson was analyzed and compared with a lesson with the same content but was taught in Cantonese (CMI). The relationship between teachers' instruction and students' learning outcome was explored. Evidence showed that there was adverse effect on students' learning in PMI class due to the problem of language translation between Cantonese and Putonghua. It is therefore concluded that there should be an in-depth analysis of PMI lessons and comparative study between PMI and CMI lessons so to make further improvements and support teachers to teach in Putonghua more effectively.

1. 語文教育及研究常務委員會. 2008. 《語常會加強協助學校推行以普通話教中文》，載2008年1月3日語文教育及研究常務委員會新聞，http://www.language-education.com/chi/news_08_0103.asp。[Standing Committee on Language Education and Research (SCOLAR). 2008. SCOLAR Intensifies support for Schools to Teach Chinese in Putonghua. retrieved from News of SCOLAR, Jan 3rd, 2008, http://www.language-education.com/chi/news_08_0103.asp.]
2. 傅坪萍、郭嘉寶. 1999.《普通話和廣州話在語法和詞彙方面的主要差異》，取自http://pth.linqi.org/yueyu-pth/yufacihuichayi.html [Fu, Ping Ping, and Ka Po Kwok. 1999. The Main Difference in Syntax and Lexicon Between Putonghua and Guangzhou Dialects. Retrieved from: http://pth.linqi.org/yueyu.pth/yufacihuichayi.html]
3. 語文教學顧問專責小組. 2009. 《綜述以普通話教授中國語文科的研究報告》，載2009年12月9日語文教學顧問專責小組「教師專業研習班：學與教的成效（上）」，http://cd1.edb.hkedcity.net/cd/languagesupport/。[Task Force on Language Support. 2009. Report on the Study of the 0verall Situation of Using Putonghua as the Medium of Instruction in Chinese Language Teaching, retrieved from "Teacher Professional Training Class─The Effectiveness of Teaching and Learning 1", Task Force on Language Support, Dec 9th, 2009, http://cd1.edb.hkedcity.net/cd/languagesupport/.]
4. 語文教育及研究常務委員會. 2008. 《「在香港中、小學以普通話教授中國語文科所需之條件」研究報告摘要》。載語文教育及研究常務委員會網站，http://cd1.edb.hkedcity.net/cd/scolar/html/inew01_tw.htm。[Standing Committee on Language Education and Research (SCOLAR). 2008. Report Abstract of Pre-requisites on Using Putonghua to Teach Chinese in Primary and Secondary Schools in Hong Kong, retrieved from SCOLAR website, http://cd1.edb.hkedcity.net/cd/scolar/html/inew01_tw.htm.]
5. Cochran-Smith, Marilyn,Lytle, Susan L.(2001).Beyond certainty; taking an inquiry stance on practice.Teachers Caught in The Action: Professional Development that Matters,New York:
6. Gao, Xuesong,Leung, Pamela Pui-Wan,Trent, John(2010).Chinese teachers' view on the increasing use of Putonghua as a medium of instruction in Hong schools.Australia Journal of Teacher Education,35(8),79-103.
7. Marton, Ference,Booth, Shirley(1997).Learning and Awareness.Mahwah, N.J.:L. Erlbaum Associates.
8. Stigler, James W.,Hiebert, James(1999).The Teaching Gap: Best Ideas from the World's Teachers for Improving Education in the Classroom.New York:Free Press.
9. 何偉傑(2003)。用普通話教中文一理論與研究。現代教育通訊，68，26-32。
10. 何國祥編(2002)。用普通話教中文的問與答。香港=Hong Kong:香港教育學院中文系=The Hong Kong Institute of Education, Department of Chinese。
11. 李樹英、高寶玉(2007)。課堂學習研究的國際展望。全球教育展望，1，52-56。
12. 張珮珊(2008)。香港=Hong Kong，香港大學=University of Hong Kong。
13. 梁佩雲(2006)。從中學教師的普通話教學觀念看「用普通話教中文」在香港的潛在問題。教育研究學報，21(2)，235-258。
14. 梁雅玲(1996)。普通話與廣州話常用句型對譯。香港=Hong Kong:香港文化教育出版社有限公司=Hong Kong Cultural and Educational Publisher Ltd.。
15. 單周堯編、陸鏡光編(2005)。語言文字學研究。北京=Beijing:中國社會科學出版社=China Social Sciences Press。
16. 普通話教育研究及發展中心(2006)。普通話教研通訊，18
17. 曾子凡編(2001)。廣州話‧普通話口語詞對譯手冊。香港=Hong Kong:三聯書店=Joint Publishing。
18. 語文教育及研究常務委員會(2002)。比較以普通話和以廣東話教授中文科對小學生中文能力的影響。香港=Hong Kong:語文教育及研究常務委員會=SCOLAR。
19. 劉筱玲(2005)。香港地區用普通話講授小學中國語文課的實驗與研究。香港=Hong Kong:小學中國語文教育研究學會=Chinese Language Education Research Association。
20. 課程發展議會(2002)。中國語文教育學習領域課程指引（小一至中三）。香港=Hong Kong:政府印務局=Government Printing Department。
21. 鄧城鋒(2008)。關於「普教中」討論的反思。基礎教育學報，17(2)，1-13。
22. 黎少銘(2010)。「普教中」的研究方向及架構分析。教育學報，38(2)，105-128。
23. 盧敏玲編、龐永欣編、植佩敏編、李樹英譯、郭永賢譯(2006)。課堂學習研究─如何照顧學生個別差異。北京:教育科學出版社。
24. 盧敏玲、李樹英、郭永賢(2009)。聚焦一課　超越一課─香港地區“優化課堂學習計畫＂。江蘇教育研究，5A，8-11。
25. 謝錫金、岑紹基、祈永華、徐碧美(2004)。發展母語教學　邁向優質教育─回顧與前瞻。香港=Hong Kong:香港大學教育學院母語教學教師支援中心=The University of Hong Kong, Education Faculty, CMI Support Centre。