國中中輟高危險學生中輟意圖及其相關因素模式之研究

The Study of Junior High School dropout-at-risk Students' Dropout Intention and Related Factors Model

10.7040/JGC.200705.0025

廖裕星(Yu-Zing Liao)；林清文(Chin-Wen Lin)

中輟高危險學生 ； 中輟意圖 ； 結構方程模式 ； dropout-at-risk students ； dropout intention ； structured equation model

輔導與諮商學報

29卷1期（2007 / 05 / 01）

25 - 45

繁體中文

本研究旨在瞭解台灣地區國中中輟高危險學生的中輟意圖及其相關因素模式，採調查研究法，及隨機抽樣之方式取得327名國中中輟高危險學生為樣本進行研究工具施測，並針對樣本在「學業表現」量尺、「學校人際」量尺、「其他行動」量尺、「中輟意圖」量尺、「外部定諾」量尺、「校外偏差同儕團體參與」量尺、「學業自尊」量尺與「行為表現」量尺之反應資料，採取描述性統計、Pearson積差相關t考驗、結構方程模式等統計方法進行統計分析工作。茲將研究結果摘要如下： 一、國中中輟高危險學生學業表現、學業自尊較一般國中生低落，偏差行為較一般國中生嚴重。 二、國中中輟高危險學生自評學校人際與一般國中生相較並無差異。 三、國中中輟高危險學生學業表現、偏差行為和學校人際有密切相關。 四、國中中輟高危險學生偏差行為和校外偏差同儕團體參與有密切相關。 五、國中中輟高危險學生學業表現、學校人際、偏差行為、其他行動和學業自尊有密切相關。 六、國中中輟高危險學生偏差行為、校外偏差同儕團體參與和外部有密切相關。 七、國中中輟高危險學生其他行動、外部定諾和中輟意圖有密切相關。 八、國中中輟高危險學生中輟意圖及其相關因素模式得到支持。 本研究係針對上述之結果進行討論，並提供具體建議以為相關實務工作或未來研究之參考。

The purpose of this study was to understand the junior high school dropout-at-risk students' dropout intention and related factors. The present study randomly surveyed 327 junior high school dropout-at-risk students. There were eight instruments applied in this study: ”academic performance” scale, ”school relationship” scale, ”others way” scale, ”dropout intention” scale, ”external commitment” scale, ”joining out-school deviant peer group” scale, ”academic self-esteem” scale and ”behavior” scale. The data were analyzed with a number of descriptive statistic methods, Person correlation t-test and structured equation model. The results of this study were listed as follows. 1. The junior high school dropout-at-risk students had lower performance than the general junior high school students on the academic performance and academic self-esteem, rather than on deviant behaviors. 2. There was no significant difference in the school relationship between the junior high school dropout-at-risk students and the general junior high school students. 3. The academic performance and deviant behaviors of junior high school dropout-at-risk students were highly related to the school relationship. 4. The deviant behavior of junior high school dropout-at-risk students was highly related to joining out-school deviant peer group. 5. The academic performance, the school relationship, the deviant behaviors, and other behaviors of the junior high school dropout-at-risk students were highly related to the academic self-esteem. 6. The deviant behavior, joining out-school deviant peer group of the junior high school dropout-at-risk students were highly related to the external commitments. 7. The other behaviors and the external commitments of the junior high school dropout-at-risk students were highly related to the dropout intention. 8. The junior high school dropout-at-risk students' dropout intention and its related factors model were supported. According to the results, a number of specific suggestions for clinical workers and future researches were provided.

1. 林杏足(2003)。青少年自尊量表編製報告。中國測驗學會測驗學刊，50(2)，223-256。
   連結：
2. Battin-Pearson, S.,Newcomb, M. D.,Abbott, R. D.,Hill, K. G.,Catalano, R. F.,Hawkins, J. D.(2000).Predictors of early high school dropout: A test of five theories.Journal of Educational Psychology,92(3),568-582.
3. Ekstrom, R.B.,Goertz, M. E.,Pollack, J.M.,Rock, D.A.(1986).Who drops out of high school and why？Findings from a national study.Teachers and College Record,87(3),356-373.
4. Enchautegul, M. E.(1997).Immigration and wage changes of high school dropouts.Monthly Labor Review,3,3-9.
5. Gottfredson, M.,Hirschi, T.(1990).A general theory of crime.Stanford:Stanford University Press.
6. Greenberg, M.(1983).The nature and importance of attachment relationships to parents and peers during adolescence.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,12,373-386.
7. Harter, S.,R.F. Baumeister (Ed.)(1993).Self-esteem-The puzzle of low self-regard.New York, NY:Plenum Press.
8. Harter, S.,W. Damon(1998).Handbook of child psychology: vol. 3, Social, emotional and personality development.New York, NY:John Wiley ＆ Sons.
9. Lee, W. L.,Ip, M.-L.(2003).Young School Dropouts: Level of Influence of Different Systems.Journal of Youth Studies,6(1),89-110.
10. Mallinctkrodt, B.(1988).Student retention, social support, and dropout intention: Comparison of black and white students.Journal of College Student Development,29(1),60-64.
11. Rumberger, R. W.(1987).High school dropouts: A review of issues and evidence.Review of Educational Research,57(2),101-122.
12. Rumberger, R. W.(1995).Dropping out of middle school: A multilevel analysis of students and schools.American Educational Research Journal,32(3),583-625.
13. Tinto, V.(1993).Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition.Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
14. Warr, M.(1996).Organization and instigation in delinquent groups.Criminology,34(1),11-38.
15. Wehlage, G. G.,Rutter R.A.(1986).Dropping out: How much do schools contribute to the problem？.Teachers College Record,87,374-392.
16. 王淑卿(2003)。國立嘉義大學家庭教育研究所碩士論文，未出版。
17. 余麗樺、郭乃文、陳九五、張娟鳳、張瑋文、辛淑萍(2002)。國中學生輟學傾向篩檢工具之編製初探。教育研究資訊，10(3)，169-181。
18. 吳芝儀(2000)。中輟學生的危機與轉機。嘉義市:濤石文化。
19. 吳美玲(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中原大學心理學研究所。
20. 李麗華、包希姮(1998)。資源教室教學對國中中輟復學生學習成效之研究。學生輔導，55，26-41。
21. 翁慧圓(1995)。東海大學社會工作研究所碩士論文，未出版。
22. 張春興(1995)。教育心理學：三化取向的思想與實踐。台北:東華。
23. 教育部(2004)。不信春風喚不回。台北市:教育部。
24. 許春金(1983)。赫胥的社會控制理論：兼評犯罪副文化理論和緊張理論。警政學報，4，131-147。
25. 連廷嘉(2003)。國立高雄師範大學輔導研究所博士論文，未出版。
26. 郭靜晃(2001)。中途輟學青少年之現況分析及輔導。台北:洪葉文化。
27. 陳佳琪(2000)。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商研究所碩士論文，未出版。
28. 黃德祥(1982)。青少年同輩團體與青少年幫派之探討。輔導月刊，18(11)，20-26。
29. 齊力、董旭英編(2003)。台灣青少年偏差行爲之剖析。嘉義:南華大學教教社會學研究所。
30. 劉安真(1991)。國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商研究所碩士論文，未出版。
31. 劉秀汶(1999)。國民中學中輟生問題及支援系統之研究。訓育研究，38(2)，63-80。
32. 鄭崇趁(1998)。輔導中輟學生的權責與方案。學生輔導通訊，55，16-23。

1. 張高賓(2017)。青少年中輟之危險因子及影響中輟之路徑分析。家庭教育與諮商學刊，20，1-31。