文化工具做為教與學之分析架構：一個文學圈的實例探討

Cultural Tools as Analytic Framework for Teaching and Learning: An Exploratory Case on Literature Circle

10.6151/CERQ.2010.1804.03

林意雪(Yih-Sheue Lin)

社會文化取向 ； 教學分析 ； 文化工具 ； 小組互動 ； 維高斯基學派 ； sociocultural approach ； analysis of teaching ； cultural tools ； small group interaction ； Vygotskian

當代教育研究季刊

18卷4期（2010 / 12 / 30）

79 - 119

繁體中文

本研究以社會文化取向（sociocultural approach）的文化工具（cultural tools）為分析架構，試圖理解一名六年級學生在文學圈中擔任組長的行為，並探討其與教師期待及所提供之工具權力間的關係。文化工具為維高斯基學派學者Wertsch提出的分析概念，用以瞭解社會中的行為及中介手段。本文闡述文化工具的起源、內涵及應用，並分析教師所提供之工具是否適切支持組長的角色任務，以瞭解學生取用工具或為工具所限制的情況。研究發現，學生所取用的文化工具，均是教師刻意或無心所提供的，目的都在於達成組長任務，並藉由工具所賦予的權力來補足自身權力的不足。本研究將教學放回師生互動及學生互動的社會脈絡中思考，有助於教師瞭解學生行為，並注意中介手段的重要性，對於教學改進具有相當程度的幫助。

The purpose of this research article is to understand a quiet student's leadership in small groups using ”cultural tools” as analytic framework. Cultural tools of James V. Wertsch's expanded Vygotsky's notion of mediation, deeply rooted in the sociocultural theory. This article illustrated the origins, meanings and applications of the cultural tools. The study took place in a sixth grade class of an urban and diverse middle school located in the Northwestern United States. In order to understand the subject's participation, teacher's instruction during literature circle, and the group interaction was analyzed and understood through the framework of cultural tools. The result showed that the student's leadership was mediated by tools the teacher provided, purposefully or unintentionally; yet the student needed further support in gaining power. The significance of the study is to provide perspectives on teaching and learning by placing them in the context and examining the intertwined relationship between teacher's instruction and student behaviors.

1. 吳靜芬(2004)。社會文化理論在通識教育中之應用。嘉義大學通識學報，2，237-256。
   連結：
2. 林文川、楊淑晴(2009)。從「社會文化」研究取向探究英語教師角色隱喻與教學信念。課程與教學季刊，12(2)，193-222。
   連結：
3. 曹開明(2008)。「異中求同」還是「同中存異」：語藝觀點下的「認同化」概念探索。傳播與管理研究，8(1)，53-84。
   連結：
4. 許家驊(2008)。不同策略教學及鷹架中介設計對個體數學文字題解題學習潛能開展效益影響之動態評量研究。教育心理學報，39(4)，513-532。
   連結：
5. 黃志賢、林福來(2008)。利用活動理論分析臺灣泰雅族國中生的數學學習並設計教學活動。科學教育學刊，16(2)，147-169。
   連結：
6. Atkinson, P.,Hammersley, M.(1998).Ethnography and participation observation.Strategies of qualitative inquiry,Thousand Oaks, CA:
7. Berbrier, M.(2004).Assimilationism and pluralism as cultural tools.Sociological Forum,19(1),29-61.
8. Berk, L. E.,Winsler, A.(1995).Scaffolding children's learning: Vygotsky and early childhood education.Washington, DC:National Association for the Education of Young Children.
9. Bernhard, J.(2007).Thinking and learning through technology: Mediating tools and insights from philosophy of technology applied to science and engineering education.Pantaneto Forum,27
10. Bruner, J. S.(2005).Past and present as narrative constructions.Narration, identity and historical consciousness,New York:
11. Burke, K.(1969).A grammar of motives.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
12. Burke, K.(ed.)(1966).Language as symbolic action: Essays on life, literature, and method.Berkeley, CA:University of California Press.
13. Cole, M.(ed.),Engestrom, Y.(ed.),Vasquez, O.(ed.)(2008).Mind, culture, and activity: Seminal papers from the laboratory of comparative human cognition.Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press.
14. Cole, M.,Wertsch, J. V.(1996).Beyond the individual-social antinomy in discussions of Piaget and Vygotsky.Human Development,39(5),250-256.
15. Cornelius, L. L.,Herrenkohl, L. R.(2004).Power in the classroom: How the classroom environment shapes students' relationships with each other and with concepts.Cognition and Instruction,22(4),467-498.
16. Erickson, F.(1999).Histories, cultural tools, and interactional co-construction in the zone of proximal development.Human Development,42(3),129-133.
17. Gauvain, M.(2001).Cultural tools, social interaction and the development of thinking.Human Development,44(2-3),126-143.
18. Goodnow, J. J.(1990).The socialization of cognition: What's involved?.Cultural psychology: Essays on comparative human development,New York:
19. Gottlieb, H.,Insulander, E.,Simonsson, H.(2004).Access in mind: Enhancing the relationship to contemporary art.the ICHM,Berlin, Germany:
20. Herrenkohl, L. R.(2006).Intellectual role-taking: An approach to support discussion in heterogeneous elementary science classes.Theory into Practice,45(1),47-54.
21. Herrenkohl, L. R.,Guerra, M. R.(1998).Participant structures, scientific discourse, and student engagement in fourth grade.Cognition and Instruction,16(4),433-475.
22. Herrenkohl, L. R.,Palincsar, A. S.,DeWater, L. S.,Kawasaki, K.(1999).Developing scientific communities in classrooms: A sociocognitive approach.Journal of the Learning Sciences,8(3&4),451-493.
23. Lin, Y. S.(2005).Seattle, WA,University of Washington.
24. Lin, Y.-S.(2004).What the heck are they doing in small group anyway?: A teacher's conception of small group learning.the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,San Diego, CA:
25. Maier, N. R. F.(1931).Reasoning in humans: II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness.Journal of Comparative Psychology,12,181-194.
26. Myers, W. D.(1990).Scorpions.New York:Harper Trophy.
27. Palincsar, A. S.(1986).The role of dialogue in providing scaffolded instruction.Educational Psychologist,21(1&2),73-98.
28. Palincsar, A. S.(1984).Reciprocal teaching: Working within the zone of proximal development.the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,New Orleans, LA:
29. Perusek, G. W.(2006).Shifting terrain: Essays on politics, history and society.New York:Peter Lang.
30. Rieber, R. W.(ed.),Wollock, J.(ed.)(1997).The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 3. Problems of the theory and history of psychology.New York:Plenum Press.
31. Sigel, I. E.(ed.)(1999).Development of menial representation: Theories and applications.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
32. Tappan, M. B.(2006).Moral functioning as mediated action.Journal of Moral Education,35(1),1-18.
33. Tappan, M. B.(2006).Reframing internalized oppression and internalized domination: From the psychological to the sociocultural.Teachers College Record,108(10),2115-2144.
34. Vygotsky, L. S.(1982).L. S. Vygotskii. Sobranie sochinenii. Tom pervyi. Problemy teorii I istorii psikhologii.Moscow, Moscow Russian Federation:Pedagogika.
35. Vygotsky, L. S.(1997).The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 3. Problems of the theory and history of psychology.New York:Plenum Press.
36. Vygotsky, L. S.,Minick, N.(trans.)(1987).The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology.New York:Plenum Press.
37. Wertsch, J. V.(1998).Mind as action.New York:Oxford University Press.
38. Wertsch, J. V.(2001).Narratives as cultural tools in sociocultural analysis: Official history in Soviet and post-Soviet Russia.Ethos,28(4),511-533.
39. Wertsch, J. V.(1985).Vygotsky and the social formation of mind.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
40. Wertsch, J. V.(1979).From social interaction to higher psychological processes: A clarification and application of Vygotsky's theory.Human Development,22(1),1-22.
41. Wertsch, J. V.(1996).The role of abstract rationality in Vygotsky's image of mind.Piaget-Vygotsky: The social genesis of thought,London, UK:
42. Wertsch, J. V.(1993).Voices of mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
43. Wertsch, J. V.(2007).Mediation.The Cambridge companion to Vygotsky,New York:
44. Wertsch, J. V.,Rupert, L. J.(1993).The authority of cultural tools in a sociocultural approach to mediated agency.Cognition and Instruction,11(3&4),227-239.
45. Williams, C.,Lundstrom, R. P.(2007).Strategy instruction during word study and interactive writing activities.The Reading Teacher,61(3),204-212.
46. 王雅瑩(2001)。維高斯基的社會文化理論於外語教育之應用。嘉南學報，27，370-381。
47. 任凱譯、Johnson, D. W.、Johnson, F. P.(2005)。團體動力：理論與技巧。臺北=Taipei:學富=Pro-Ed。
48. 余翎瑋(2004)。高雄=Kaohsiung，國立高雄師範大學科學教育研究所=National Kaohsiung Normal University。
49. 吳芝儀、李奉儒譯、Patton, M. Q.(2008)。質性研究與評鑑。嘉義=Chiayi:濤石文化=Waterstone。
50. 李維譯、Vygotsky, L. S.(2007)。思維與語言。臺北=Taipei:胡桃木文化=Argun。
51. 谷瑞勉譯、Dixon-Krauss, L.(2001)。教室中的維高斯基：仲介的讀寫教學與評量。臺北=Taipei:心理=Psychological Publishing。
52. 施頂清(2000)。維果斯基（Vygotsky）認知發展論在教學上之應用。教師之友，41(1)，9-14。
53. 洪新原、游雯茹、劉光隆、徐士傑(2009)。以活動理論探討電子化學習績效之研究—以嘉義縣教育網路爲例。資管評論，15(1)，71-99。
54. 紀慧君(1999)。新聞教科書中的「事實語言」。1999年中華傳播學會年會，新竹=Hsinchu:
55. 高清漢、蔡仕傑(2004)。以活動理論爲核心的未來產品開發模式研究。工業設計，32(2)，247-251。
56. 游淑芬譯、Paley, V. G.(2002)。孩子國的新約：不可以說你不能玩。臺北=Taipei:成長文教基金會=Healthy Growth Foundation。
57. 黃昌誠(1999)。師生合作的活動教學法：配合統整課程的教學法。教育研究，7，31-43。
58. 黃意真(2003)。屏東=Pingtung，屏東師範學院國民教育研究所=National Pingtung Teachers College。
59. 廖美淳(2004)。臺北=Taipei，國立臺北師範學院特殊教育學系=National Taipei Teachers College。
60. 蔡敏玲、彭海燕譯、Cazden, C. B.(1998)。教室言談：教與學的語言。臺北=Taipei:心理=Psychological。
61. 盧珍瑩(2007)。屏東=Pingtung，國立屏東教育大學數理教育研究所=National Pingtung University of Education。
62. 賴淑媛(2003)。嘉義=Chiayi，南華大學教育社會學研究所=Nanhua University。
63. 藍建文(2002)。嘉義=Chiayi，南華大學資訊管理學研究所=Nanhua University。
64. 羅亦超譯、Vygotsky, L. S.(2005)。心理學講座。臺北=Taipei:心理=Psychological。

1. I-Chun Julie Chen(2020)。INTEGRATING LITERATURE CIRCLES TO FACILITATE READING COMPREHENSION ON FACEBOOK GROUPS: QUESTIONING AND LEARNING PERCEPTIONS。Taiwan Journal of TESOL，17(2)，119-146。
2. 林盈均(2019)。國小教師擴展學習歷程之研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，12(2)，1-27。
3. (2024)。教材情境對學習低成就學生的反思型思維探討。當代教育研究季刊，32(2)，3-46。