學校創新氣氛、教師內在動機與教師創意教學表現關聯之研究：多層次調節式中介效果之探討

The Relationship between Schools' Climate of Creativity, Teachers' Intrinsic Motivation, and Teachers' Creative Teaching Performance: A Discussion of Multilevel Moderated Mediation

10.6151/CERQ.2011.1904.03

蕭佳純(Chia-Chun Hsiao)

多層次調節中介效果 ； 師內在動機 ； 創意教學表現 ； 學校創新氣氛 ； multilevel moderated mediation ； teachers' intrinsic motivation ； teachers' creative teaching performance ； schools' climate of creativity

當代教育研究季刊

19卷4期（2011 / 12 / 30）

85 - 125

繁體中文

本研究是在多層次中介效果模式的設定下，延伸到跨層次交互作用，檢驗多層次調節中介效果模式。實證資料以個體層次之內在動機與總體層次之學校創新氣氛為自變數，探討兩者對教師創意教學表現的影響，其中，教師內在動機包含專業自主、接受挑戰、福樂經驗等三大構面。透過對35所國小、216位教師的調查，使用HLM分析變數之間的關係。研究結果發現如下：一、專業自主、接受挑戰、福樂經驗及學校創新氣氛均對創意教學表現有顯著的直接正向影響效果；二、學校創新氣氛在接受挑戰與創意教學表現之間扮演負向調節效果；但在褔樂經驗與創意教學表現之間扮演正向調節效果；三、學校創新氣氛也可透過專業自主、接受挑戰、福樂經驗的中介作用而對創意教學表現產生影響，也就是說，專業自主是中介變項，而接受挑戰與福樂經驗除了是中介變項之外，也是被調節的變項。針對上述結果，本研究提出相關的討論與建議。

The proposed model was conceptualized by integrating the ideas of multilevel mediation together with an analysis of cross-level interaction. This study focused on the influences of intrinsic motivation and schools' climate of creativity on the creative teaching performance of teachers. The participants consisted of 216 teachers from 35 elementary schools in Taiwan. Findings include: (1) professional self-actualization, challenge tendency, flow experience, and schools' climate of creativity positively affected creative teaching performance. (2) schools' climate of creativity played a role of negative moderating effects in the explanation for the relationships among challenge tendency and creative teaching performance of teachers, but schools' climate of creativity also played a role of positive moderating effects in the explanation for the relationships among flow experience and creative teaching performance of teachers. (3) professional self-actualization, challenge tendency, and flow experience have a significant mediation effect on the prediction relationship of schools' climate of creativity on the creative teaching performance of teachers. In other words, autonomy, challenge tendency and flow experience played a role of mediation, and challenge tendency, flow experience played a role of moderation. Based on the results, the study also provided some discussions and suggestions.

1. 王文中、鄭英耀(2000)。創造力發展量表之編製與試題反應分析。測驗年刊，47(1)，153-173。
   連結：
2. 林偉文(2006)。學校創意守門人對創意教學與創造力培育態度與教師創意教學之關係。教育學刊，27，69-92。
   連結：
3. 邱皓政(2002)。學校組織創新氣氛的內涵與教師創造力的實踐：另一件國王的新衣。應用心理研究，15，191-224。
   連結：
4. 陳玉樹、胡夢鯨(2008)。任務動機與組織創新氣候對成人教師創意教學表現之影響：階層線性模式分析。教育心理學報，40(2)，179-198。
   連結：
5. 溫福星、邱皓政(2009)。組織研究中的多層次調節式中介效果：以組織創新氣氛、組織承諾與工作滿意的實證研究為例。管理學報，26(2)，189-211。
   連結：
6. 蔡啟通、高泉豐(2004)。動機取向、組織創新氣候與員工創新行為之關係：Amabilev動機綜效模型之檢驗。管理學報，21(5)，571-592。
   連結：
7. 鄭英耀、王文中(2002)。影響科學競賽績優教師創意行為之因素。應用心理研究，15，163-189。
   連結：
8. Amabile, T. M.(1997).Entrepreneurial creativity through motivational synergy.Journal of Creativity Behavio,31(1),18-26.
9. Amabile, T. M.(1983).The social psychology of creativity.New York:Springer-Verlag.
10. Amabile, T. M.(1996).Creativity in context: Update to The Social Psychology of creativity.Boulder, CO:Westview.
11. Amabile, T. M.(1989).The creative environment scales: Work Environment Inventory.Creativity Research Journal,2,231-253.
12. Amabile, T. M.,Conti, R.(1999).Changes in the work environment for creativity during downsizing.Academy of Management Journal,42,630-640.
13. Amabile, T. M.,Schatzel, E. A.,Moneta, G. B.,Kramer, S. J.(2004).Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support.The Leadership Quarterly,14,5-32.
14. Avolio, B. J.,Zho, W.,Koh, W.,Bhatia, P.(2004).Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of psychological empowerment and moderating role of structural distance.Journal of Organizational Behavior,25,951-968.
15. Baron, R. M.,Kenny, D. A.(1986).The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51,1173-1182.
16. Bryk, A. S.,Raudenbush, S. W.(1992).Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
17. Carron, A. V.,Spink, K. S.(1995).The group size-cohesion relationship in minimal group.Small Group Research,26,86-105.
18. Cheng, M. Y. V.(2001).Hong Kong,Hong Kong Baptist University.
19. Chiou, H.(2001).Creative climate and culture in organizations: From phenomenon observation to the development of measurement tool of creative organizational climate inventory(COCI).The Second International Symposium on Child Development,Hong Kong:
20. Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1996).Creativity: Flow and the psychological discovery and invention.New York:Harper Collins.
21. Fairchild, A. J.,McQuillin, S. D.(2010).Evaluating mediation and moderation effects in school psychology: A presentation of methods and review of current practice.Journal of School Psychology,48(1),53-84.
22. Gardner, H.(1993).Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, Gandhi.New York:Basic.
23. Heller, K. A.(ed.),Mork, F. J.(ed.),Sternberg, R. J.(ed.),Stubotnik, R. F.(ed.)(2000).International Handbook of Giftedness and Talent.New York:Elsevier.
24. Hunter, S. T.,Bedell, K. E.,Mumford, M. D.(2007).Climate for creativity: A quantitative review.Creativity Research Journal,19(1),69-90.
25. MacKinnon, D. P.(2008).Introduction to statistical mediation analysis.Mahwah, NJ:Earlbaum.
26. Madjar, N.,Oldham, G. R.,Pratt, M. G.(2002).There's on place like home? The contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees' creative performance.Academy of Management Journal,45,757-767.
27. Mathiue, J. E.,Taylor, S. R.(2007).A Framework for Testing Meso-Mediational Relationships in Organizational Behavior.Journal of Organizational Behavior,28,141-172.
28. McFvoy, A.,Welker, R.(2000).Antisocial behavior, academic failure, and school climate: A critical review.Journal of Emotional and Behavior Disorders,8(3),130-140.
29. Mensinger, J. L.(2005).Disordered eating and gender socialization in independent-school enviroment.Journal of Ambulatory Care Manage,28,30-40.
30. Montes, F. J. L.,Moreno, A. R.,Fernandez, L. M. M.(2003).Assessing the organizational climate and contractual relationship for perceptions of support for innovation.International Journal of Manpower,25(2),167-180.
31. Muller, D.,Judd, C. M.,Yzerbyt, V. Y.(2005).When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,89,852-863.
32. Oldham, G. R.,Cummings, A.(1996).Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work.Academy of Management Journal,39,607-634.
33. Podsakfoff, P. M.,MacKenzie, S. B.,Lee, J. Y.,Podsakfoff, N. P.(2003).Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.Journal of Applied Psychology,88(5),879-903.
34. Preacher, K. J.,Rucker, D. D.,Hayes, A. F.(2007).Assessing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and precriptions.Multivariate Behavioral Research,42,185-227.
35. Raudenbush, S. W.,Bryk, A. S.(2002).Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
36. Runco, M. A.,Walberg, H. J.(1998).Personal explicit theories of creativity.The Journal of Creative Behavior,32(1),1-17.
37. Ryan, R. M.,Deci, E. L.(2000).Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions.Contemporary Educational Psychology,25,54-67.
38. Schneider, B.(1990).Organizational climate and culture.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
39. Scott, S. G.,Bruce, R. A.(1994).Determinants of innovation behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace.Academy of Management Journal,43,313-332.
40. Shalley, C. E.,Gilson, L. L.,Blum, T. C.(2000).Matching creativity requirements and the work environment: Effects on satisfaction and intentions to leave.Academy of Management Journal,43,215-223.
41. Shally, C. E.,Zhou, J.,Oldham, G. R.(2004).The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here?.Journal of Management,30,933-958.
42. Sternberg, R. J.(ed.)(1999).Hangbook of creativity.New York:Cambridge University Press.
43. Sternberg, R. J.(ed.)(1999).Handbook of creativity.New York:Cambridge University Press.
44. Sternberg, R. J.,Lubart, T. I.(1995).Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity.New York:The Free Press.
45. Tett, R. P.,Burnett, D. D.(2003).A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance.Journal of Applied Psychology,88,500-517.
46. Tierney, P.,Farmer, S. M.,Graen, B. B.(1999).An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of trait and leaderships.Personnel Psychology,52,591-620.
47. Wegge, J.,Dicj, G. K.,Fisher, M. A.,Dawson, J. D.(2006).A test of basic assumptions of Affective event Theory(AET) in Call Centre Work.British Journal of Management,17,237-254.
48. Woodman, R. W.,Sawyer, J. E.,Griffin, R. W.(1993).Toward a theory of organizational creativity.Academy of Management Review,18,293-321.
49. Yuan, Y.,MacKinnon, D. P.(2009).Bayesian mediation analysis.Psychological Methods,14(4),301-322.
50. Zohar, D.,Luria, G.(2005).A multilevel model of safety climate: Cross-level relationships between organization and group-level climates.Journal of Applied Psychology,90,616-628.
51. 方杰、張敏強、邱皓政(2010)。基於階層線性理論的多層級中介效應。心理科學發展，18(8)，1329-1338。
52. 林碧芳、邱皓政(2008)。創意教學自我效能感量表之編製與相關研究。教育研究與發展期刊，4(1)，141-169。
53. 邱皓政、溫福星(2007)。脈絡效果的階層線性模型分析：以學校組織創新氣氛與教師創意表現為例。教育與心理研究，30(1)，1-35。
54. 陳玉樹、莊閔喬(2010)。創意個人認定與組織認同對創意教學表現之影響：多元組織認定的調節效果。教育政策論壇，13(3)，155-184。
55. 黃麗美(2005)。國民中小學組織創新氣氛內涵與教師知覺之研究。臺北市立教育大學學報，36(2)，171-210。
56. 蕭佳純(2007)。教師內在動機以及知識分享合作對創意教學行為關聯性之階層線性分析。當代教育研究，15(4)，57-92。

1. 范薷方(2017)。公立小學校長領導、教師組織公民行為與學校創新經營關係之研究 —以臺北市和南京市為例。清華大學教育與學習科技學系學位論文。2017。1-106。