校長教學視導、教師知識分享與教師專業發展之關係－運用中介效果模式驗證

Exploring the Relationship among Principal's Supervision of Instruction, Teachers' Knowledge Sharing and Teachers' Professional Development: A Test of the Mediated-Effects Model

10.6151/CERQ.2013.2102.03

陳建志(Chien-Chih Chen)；陳亭燏(Ting-Yu Chen)

中介效果模式 ； 知識分享 ； 教學視導 ； 教師專業發展 ； mediated-effects model ； knowledge sharing ； instructional supervision ； teachers' professional development

當代教育研究季刊

21卷2期（2013 / 06 / 01）

69 - 111

繁體中文

本研究旨在利用中介效果模式，分析國小校長教學視導、教師知識分享與教師專業發展之關聯性。以往相關研究大多運用直接效果模式進行，然而，其無法解決校長如何透過知識分享，影響教師專業發展之重要議題。因此本研究採取中介效果模式，進一步瞭解其關係。本次研究係針對屏東縣國小教師進行問卷調查，所得資料主要應用積差相關、迴歸分析以及結構方程模式進行統計分析。本次研究共得到兩個結論：（1）校長教學視導對教師知識分享具有正向的解釋作用；校長教學視導及教師知識分享對教師專業發展亦具正向的解釋作用。（2）校長教學視導能夠間接透過教師知識分享的中介作用，對教師專業發展造成正向的顯著影響。

This study aims to analyze the relationship between principal's supervision of instruction, teachers' knowledge sharing and teachers' professional development by using mediated-effects model. Previous studies normally use directed-effects model. However, the use of directed-effects model does not resolve the most important theoretical issues concerning the means by which principals achieve an impact on teachers' professional development through teachers' knowledge sharing. Therefore, we use mediated-effects model to analyze the relationship in this study. By using product-moment correlation, regression analysis and the structural equation modeling (SEM), this study examined the relationship between principal's supervision of instruction and teachers' professional development mediated by the condition of knowledge sharing. Three related questionnaires were used to measure the major variables while data was collected of teachers in Pingtung County. It was found that principal's supervision of instruction can predict teachers' knowledge sharing and principal's supervision of instruction and teachers' knowledge sharing can also predict teachers' professional development. Also, the result from mediated-effects model indicated that knowledge sharing had the significant mediated effects of supervision of instruction on teachers' professional development.

1. Chen, C.-T.,Su, C.-T.,Hsien, P.-J.,Lin, C.-H.(2009).An innovative framework applied to elementary schools: A case study of the gaps knowledge management.Bulletin of Educational Research,55(2),99-138.
   連結：
2. 丁一顧、張德銳(2006)。臨床視導對國小實習教師教學效能影響之研。師大學報：教育類，51(2)，219-236。
   連結：
3. 李重毅、廖晧圭(2011)。國民小學教師知識分享與專業成長關係之研究。學校行政，74，38-59。
   連結：
4. 秦夢群、吳勁甫(2009)。國中校長轉型領導、學校組織健康與組織效能關係之研究：中介效果模式之驗證。當代教育研究，17(3)，83-124。
   連結：
5. 潘慧玲、陳文彥(2010)。教師專業發展評鑑促進組織學習之個案研究。教育研究集刊，56(3)，29-65。
   連結：
6. 教育部統計處（2008）。97學年度國民小學校別資料。2009年3月5日，取自http://www.edu.tw/statistics/content.aspx?site_content_sn=%2018421 [Department of Statistics, Ministry of Education. (2008). The data of elementary schools in the semester of 2008 academic year. Retrieved March 5, 2009, from http://www.edu.tw/statistics/content.aspx?site_content _sn=%2018421]
7. Adams, R. D.(1982).Teacher development: A look at change in teacher perceptions and behavior across time.Journal of Teacher Education,33(4),40-43.
8. Baron, R. M.,Kenny, D. A.(1986).The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51,1173-1182.
9. Bentler, P. M.(1982).Confirmatory factor analysis via non-iterative estimation: A fast inexpensive method.Journal of Marketing Research,19,417-424.
10. Blase, J.,Blase, J.(2002).The micropolitics of instructional supervision: A call for research.Educational Administration Quarterly,38,6-44.
11. Blase, J.,Blase, J.(2000).Effective instructional leadership: Teachers' perspectives on how principals promote teaching and learning in schools.Journal of Educational Administration,38(2),130-141.
12. Collinson, V.,Cook, T. F.(2003).Learning to share, sharing to learn: Fostering organizational learning though teachers' dissemination of knowledge.Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,Chicago, IL.:
13. Cornelissen, F.,van Swet, J.,Beijaard, D.,Bergen, T.(2011).Aspects of school-university research networks that play a role in developing, sharing and using knowledge based on teacher research.Teaching and Teacher Education,27,147-156.
14. Dillman, D. A.(2007).Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method.New York:Wiley.
15. DiPaola, M. F.,Hoy, W. K.(2007).Principals improving instruction: Supervision, evaluation, and professional development.Boston, MA:Pearson.
16. Epstein, L. D.(2000).Barkeley, Oakland,University of California.
17. Glickman, C. D.(2002).Leadership for learning: How to help teacher succeed.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
18. Griffith, T. L.,Sawyer, J. E.,Neale, M. A.(2003).Virtualness and knowledge in teams: Managing the love triangle of organizations, individuals, and information technology.MIS Quarterly,27,265-287.
19. Harris, B. M.(1985).Supervisory behavior in education.New York:Prentice-Hall.
20. Hasan, A. A.-Z.(2011).Organizational citizenship behavior and impacts on knowledge sharing: An empirical study.International Business Research,4(3),221-227.
21. Herman, J. J.,Herman, J. L.(1994).Education quality management: Effective schools through systemic change.Lancaster, PA:Technomic.
22. Hu, L.-T.,Bentler, P. M.(1999).Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.Structural Equation Modeling,6,1-55.
23. Kline, R. B.(1998).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York:Guilford.
24. Kotz, S.(Ed.),Johnson, N. L.(Ed.),Read, C. B.(Ed.)(1985).Encyclopedia of statistical science, multivariate analysis to plackett and burman designs.New York:Wiley.
25. Mathieu, J. E.,Taylor, S. R.(2006).Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in organizational behavior.Journal of Organizational Behavior,27,1031-1056.
26. Mawhinney, L.(2010).Let's lunch and learn: Professional knowledge sharing in teachers' lounges and other congregational spaces.Teaching and Teacher Education,26,972-978.
27. McDonald, R. P.,Ho, M.-H.(2002).Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.Psychological Methods,7,64-82.
28. McDonald, R. P.,Marsh, H. M.(1990).Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit.Psychological Bulletin,107,247-255.
29. Moswela, B.(2010).Instructional supervision in Botswana Secondary Schools: An investigation.Educational Management Administration & Leadership,38,71-87.
30. Nonaka, I.,Takeuchi, H.(1995).The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation.New York:Oxford University.
31. Palandra, M.(2010).The role of instructional supervision in district-wide reform.International Journal of Leadership in Education,13,221-234.
32. Sobel, M. E.(1987).Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models.Sociological Methods & Research,16,155-176.
33. Zachariah, W.(2012).Instructional supervision in public secondary schools in Kenya.Educational Management Administration & Leadership,40,188-216.
34. 王元珊(2005)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺北師範學院教育政策與管理研究所=Department of Educational Policy and management, National Taipei Teachers College。
35. 何碧愉、盧乃桂(2010)。教師借調與教師專業發展。清華大學教育研究，31(4)，81-86。
36. 吳明隆(2000)。SPSS統計應用實務。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:松崗=Sung Gang。
37. 呂淑芝(2002)。南投縣=Nantou, Taiwan，國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政研究所=Department of Educational Policy and Administration, National Chi Nan University。
38. 李珀(2000)。教學視導。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan。
39. 阮靜雯(2000)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立政治大學教育學系=Department of Education, National Chengchi University。
40. 邱錦昌(2002)。教育視導─理論與實際。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan。
41. 姜禮琪(2008)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺北教育大學教育政策與管理研究所=Department of Educational Management, National Taipei University of Education。
42. 秦夢群、吳勁甫(2011)。國中校長教學領導、學校知識管理與教師教學 效能之多層次分析。教育與心理研究，34(2)，1-31。
43. 郭昭佑(1996)。教學視導─行政視導無法兼顧的層面。研習資訊，13(1)，25-29。
44. 郭淑芳(2005)。臺南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立臺南大學教育經營與管理研究所=Graduate Institute of Educaitonal Entrepreneurship and Management, National Tainan University of Education。
45. 郭靜妝(2004)。台北縣=Taipei City, Taiwan，輔仁大學教育領導與發展研究所=The Graduate School of Educational Leadership & Development, Fu Jen University。
46. 陳亭燏(2009)。屏東縣=Pingtung, Taiwan，國立屏東教育大學教育行政所=Graduate Institute of Education Administration, National Pingtung University of Education。
47. 陳美玉(1999)。教師專業學習與發展。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:師大書苑=National Taiwan Normal University Book。
48. 曾國鴻、朱耀明、陳榮宗、羅希哲、盧宜屏、許祐毓(2004)。國民小學教師進行知識分享的可行策略及其障礙因素之研究─臺南縣為例。高雄師大學報，16，415-435。
49. 黃芳銘(2010)。結構方程模式：理論與應用。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan。
50. 黃勢民(2004)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺北師範學院教育政策與管理研究所=Department of Educational Policy and management, National Taipei Teachers College。
51. 楊吉秀(2001)。彰化市=Changhua, Taiwan，國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所=Graduate Institute of Science Education, National Changhua Normal University。
52. 劉仲成(2005)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺北師範學院教育政策與管理研究所=Department of Educational Policy and management, National Taipei Teachers College。
53. 劉仲成(2003)。校長教學視導：提升教師有效教學的策略。南投文教，18，10-16。
54. 蔡棋安(2006)。桃園縣=Taoyuan, Taiwan，中原大學教育研究所=Graduate School of Education, Chung Yuan University.。
55. 鄭惠珠(2005)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，臺北市立師範學院國民教育研究所=Graduate Institute of Compulsory Education, Taipei Municipal Teachers College.。
56. 蕭佳純(2007)。教師內在動機以及知識分享合作對創意教學行為關聯性之階層線性分析。當代教育研究，15(4)，57-92。
57. 羅清水(2000)。教學視導在教師專業發展的意義。研習資訊，17(2)，1-9。
58. 饒見維(2003)。教師專業發展─理論與實務。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan。

1. 藍秀雯,張弘勳(2020)。教保服務人員知識分享與專業發展之研究。學校行政，128，296-318。
2. 藍秀雯,張弘勳(2022)。臺南市公立幼兒園教保服務人員知識分享與專業發展之調查研究。學校行政，140，261-297。
3. 莊念青,李亦欣,丁一顧(2019)。正向教學視導的理論基礎與實施程序之探究。課程與教學，22(1)，121-140。
4. (2021)。國小校長正向教學視導、教師專業學習社群與教學效能關係之研究。教育與心理研究，44(3)，69-97。
5. (2021)。臺北市優質學校之個案研究：以專業發展為例。教育研究月刊，332，4-21。
6. (2022)。國小校長正向教學視導對教師教學效能影響之研究。教育政策論壇，25(2)，77-110。