學業情緒為中介的自我調整學習模式：以數學領域為例

An Examination of the Mediating Role of Academic Emotion to Self-regulated Learning Model: Taking Math as Example

10.6151/CERQ.2013.2103.04

江民瑜(Min-Yu Chiang)

自我決定動機 ； 自我調整學習策略 ； 知覺教師自主支持 ； 學業情緒 ； academic emotion ； perception of teacher's autonomy support ； self-determination motivation ； self-regulated learning strategy

當代教育研究季刊

21卷3期（2013 / 09 / 01）

113 - 150

繁體中文

本研究旨在檢驗以學業情緒為中介之自我調整學習模式與觀察資料的適配情形，並進一步分析學生所知覺教師自主支持對本模式的調節效果。樣本選取高雄市11所國小22個班級共656名學生，蒐集的資料以結構方程模式與多樣本分析進行統計分析。研究結果如下：一、自主動機對學業情緒、自我調整學習策略均有顯著的正向效果；被控制動機對學業情緒有顯著的負向效果，但對自我調整學習策略則為正向效果；學業情緒對自我調整學習策略有顯著的正向效果；二、自主動機與被控制動機皆透過學業情緒間接影響自我調整學習策略，前者透過學業情緒的中介擴增對自我調整學習策略的正向效果；後者透過學業情緒的中介負向解釋自我調整學習策略，且降低被控制動機對自我調整學習策略的效果；三、自主動機對學業情緒的正向效果在高知覺教師自主支持組顯著較高；學業情緒對自我調整學習策略的正向效果在低知覺教師自主支持組顯著較高。據此，本研究針對教學實務與未來研究提出建議與討論。

The study aims at testing: (a) a structural model of the mediating role of academic emotion between the self-determination motivation and self-regulated learning strategy; (b) the moderating effect of students' perception of teacher's autonomy support on the self-regulated learning model. The sample consisted of 656 fifth and sixth graders represting 22 classrooms from 11 schools in Kaohsiung City. Data were analyzed using structural equation modeling and multi samples analysis. Results indicated: (a) autonomous motivation positively predicted academic emotion and self-regulated learning strategy, controlled motivation negatively predicted academic emotion but positively predicted self-regulated learning strategy, and academic emotion positively predicted self-regulated learning strategy; (b) the effects of autonomous and controlled motivation on self-regulated learning strategy were mediated by academic emotion, and academic emotion augmented the effect of autonomous motivation on self-regulated learning strategy but reduced the effect of controlled motivation on self-regulated learning strategy; (c) on the condition of high perception of teacher's autonomy support the positive effect of autonomous motivation on academic emotion was significantly higher than that on the condition of low perception of teacher's autonomy support, and on the condition of low perception of teacher's autonomy support the positive effect of academic emotion on self-regulated learning strategy

1. 林宴瑛、程炳林(2007)。個人目標導向、課室目標結構與自我調整學習策略之潛在改變量分析。教育心理學報，39，173-194。
   連結：
2. 蘇嘉鈴、程炳林(2005)。國中生行動導向、目標導向與動機調整策略之關係。教育心理學報，36，395-415。
   連結：
3. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Academic of Marketing Science,16,74-94.
4. Bandalos, D. L.(2002).The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling.Structural Equation Modeling,9,78-102.
5. Black, A. E.,Deci, E. L.(2000).The effects of instructor's autonomy support and students' autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self-determination theory perspective.Science Education,84,740-756.
6. Boekaerts, M.(Ed.),Pintrich, P. R.(Ed.),Zeidner, M.(Ed.)(2000).Handbook of selfregulation.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
7. Boekaerts, M.(Ed.),Pintrich, P. R.(Ed.),Zeidner, M.(Ed.)(2000).Handbook of self-regulation.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
8. Boggiano, A. K.(Ed.),Pittman, T. S.(Ed.)(1992).Achievement and motivation.New York:Cambridge University Press.
9. Bollen, K. A.(1989).Structural equations with latent variables.New York:John Wiley & Sons.
10. De Bilde, J.,Vansteenkiste, M.,Lens, W.(2011).Understanding the association between future time perspective and self-regulated learning through the lens of self-determination theory.Learning and Instruction,21,332-344.
11. Deci, E. L.,Ryan, R. M.(1985).Intrinsic motivation and self -Determination in human behavior.New York:Plenum Press.
12. Eccles, J. S.,Wigfield, A.(2002).Motivational beliefs, values, and goals.Annual Review of Psychology,53,109-132.
13. Edwards, J. R.,Lambert, L. S.(2007).Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis.Psychological Methods,12,1-22.
14. Hair, J. F.,Anderson, R. E.,Tatham, R. L.,Black, W. C.(1998).Multivariate data analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
15. Hall, R. J.,Snell, A. F.,Foust, M. S.(1999).Item parceling strategies in SEM: Investigating the subtle effects of unmodeled secondary constructs.Organizational Research Methods,2,233-256.
16. Jang, H.,Reeve, J.,Deci, E. L.(2010).Engaging students in learning activities: It is not autonomy support or stucture but autonomy support and structure.Journal of Educational Psychology,102,588-600.
17. Jöreskog, K. G.,Sörbom, D.(1996).LISREL 8: User's reference guide.Chicago, IL:Scientific Software International.
18. Lepper, M. R.,Corpus, J. H.,Iyengar, S. S.(2005).Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates.Journal of Educational Psychology,97,184-196.
19. Maas, C.,Hox, J.(2005).Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling.Methodology,1(3),86-92.
20. Maehr, M. L.(Ed.),Ames, C.(Ed.)(1989).Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation-enhancing environments.Greenwich, CT:JAI Press.
21. McDonald, R. P.,Ho, M. R.(2002).Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses.Psychological Methods,7,64-82.
22. Mouratidis, A. A.,Vansteenkiste, M.,Sideridis, G.,Lens, W.(2011).Vitality and interest-enjoyment as a function of class-to-class variation in needsupportive teaching and pupils' autonomous motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology,103,353-366.
23. Pekrun, R.(2006).The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice.Educational Psychology Review,18,315-341.
24. Pekrun, R.,Goetz, T.,Titz, W.,Perry, R. P.(2002).Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research.Educational Psychologist,37,91-105.
25. Pintrich, P. R.(1999).Taking control of research on volitional control: Challenges for future theory and research.Learning and Individual Differences,11,335-354.
26. Reeve, J.,Jang, H.(2006).What teachers say and do to support students' autonomy during a learning activity.Journal of Educational Psychology,98,209-218.
27. Ryan, R. M.,Connell, J. P.(1989).Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,57,749-761.
28. Ryan, R. M.,Deci, E. L.(2000).Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions.Contemporary Educational Psychology,25,54-67.
29. Schunk, D. H.(Ed.),Zimmerman, B. J.(Ed.)(2008).Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications.New York:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Schunk, D. H.,Pintrich, P. R.,Meece, J. L.(2008).Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.).Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson.
31. Schutz, P. A.(Ed.),Pekrun, R.(Ed.)(2007).Emotion in education.San Diego, CA:Academic Press.
32. Soenens, B.,Vansteenkiste, M.(2005).Antecedents and outcomes of selfdetermination in 3 life domains: The role of parents' and teachers' autonomy support.Journal of Youth and Adolescence,34,589-604.
33. Vansteenkiste, M.,Lens, W.,Deci, E. L.(2006).Intrinsic versus extrinsic goal contents in self-determination theory: Another look at the quality of academic motivation.Educational Psychologist,41,19-31.
34. Vansteenkiste, M.,Simons, J.,Lens, W.,Sheldon, K. M.,Deci, E. L.(2004).Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,87,246-260.
35. Vansteenkiste, M.,Zhou, M.,Lens, W.,Soenens, B.(2005).Experiences of autonomy and control among Chinese learners: Vitalizing or immobilizing?.Journal of Educational Psychology,97,468-483.
36. Wigfield, A.,Eccles, J. S.(2000).Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation.Contemporary Educational Psychology,25,68-81.
37. Williams, L. J.,Edwards, J. R.,Vanderberg, R. J.(2003).Recent advances in causal modeling methods for organizational and management research.Journal of Management,29,903-936.
38. Wolters, C. A.(2003).Regulation of motivation: Evaluating an underemphasized aspect of self-regulated learning.Educational Psychologist,38,189-205.
39. 李俊青(2007)。臺南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立成功大學教育研究所=National Cheng Kung University。
40. 施淑慎(2008)。學習情境中之自主支持與國中生成就相關歷程間關係之探討。教育與心理研究，31(2)，1-26。
41. 陳秀惠(2010)。臺南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立成功大學教育研究所=National Cheng Kung University。
42. 彭淑玲(2010)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系=National Taiwan Normal University。
43. 賴姿因(2005)。臺南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立成功大學教育研究所=National Cheng Kung University。
44. 簡嘉菱(2009)。臺南市=Tainan, Taiwan，國立成功大學教育研究所=National Cheng Kung University。

1. 陳怡炘,巫博瀚(2019)。自我效能、內控信念、性別與教師自主支持對國中生學習興趣的影響：個人與脈絡因素之多層次分析。課程與教學，22(1)，71-99。
2. 賴英娟,巫博瀚(2019)。課室目標結構、自我決定動機及學業情緒之關係。課程與教學，22(4)，151-173。
3. 賴英娟、巫博瀚(2016)。臺灣國中生「數學學習情緒量表」之發展與現況分析。測驗學刊，63(2)，83-110。
4. 賴英娟、巫博瀚(2018)。國中生所知覺到的教師自主支持、自我效能及自主動機對學業情緒之影響。課程與教學，21(2)，85-110。
5. 劉玉玲(2021)。運用MSE模式於國中數學補救教學之合作式行動研究。教育心理學報，53(2)，407-435。
6. 阮孝齊(2015)。國中學生學校歸屬感影響模式之研究。當代教育研究季刊，23(3)，81-123。
7. 蘇玲慧(2015)。國小學生學業情緒與幸福感之模式研究—以同儕互動為中介變項。教育經營與管理研究集刊，11，111-136。
8. 徐綺穗(2019)。自我調整學習與核心素養教學：以「自主行動」素養為例。課程與教學，22(1)，101-119。
9. 顏瓊芬、蔣佳玲、姚宗威(2015)。效化適用於漢族與廣義賽德克族學生科學調適學習問卷。科學教育學刊，23(4)，353-374。
10. (2016)。家長自主支持、基本心理需求、自主動機與國小學生學業情緒關係之探究。教育研究學報，50(1)，67-92。
11. (2017)。科技化學習模組對於國小數學歸納課程之應用效益探究。教育研究學報，51(1)，43-70。
12. (2019)。國小學童所知覺到的教師自主支持、教師心理控制、自我決定動機及學業情緒對學習投入之影響：以數學領域為例。教育與心理研究，42(4)，33-63。