翻轉教學應用於偏鄉網路課輔國小高年級數學之成效

APPLYING THE FLIPPED CLASSROOM INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL TO RURAL ONLINE TUTORING PROGRAM IN UPPER ELEMENTARY MATHEMATICS

10.6151/CERQ.201906_27(2).0001

陳麒(Qi Chen)；高台茜(Tai-Chien Kao)

高年級數學 ； 補救教學 ； 網路課輔 ； 翻轉教學 ； Upper Elementary Mathematics ； Remedial Instruction ； On-line Tutoring ； Flipped Classroom Instructional Model

當代教育研究季刊

27卷2期（2019 / 06 / 30）

1 - 37

繁體中文

研究目的：本研究旨在探討翻轉教學應用於偏鄉網路課輔國小高年級數學之成效。研究設計／方法／取徑：本研究採準實驗法之不等組前後測設計進行教學實驗，以教育部補助東華大學數位學伴網路課輔計畫為主要研究場域，參與者包括實驗組25位、對照組29位，共54位偏鄉高年級學童，以多因子共變數分析考驗實驗處理的效果。研究發現或結論：研究結果顯示，在控制了前測得分後，實驗組偏鄉學童在後測的整體學習表現上都顯著高於對照組，且皆達到至少中度以上的效果量，其中在公因數與公倍數單元中則是達到高度效果量。研究原創性／價值：翻轉教學在各領域、場域的應用與成效，為當代教學革新提出一個前瞻性的可能，其關鍵因素「科技運用」與「參與互動」的運作方式，符合當前網路課輔教學的特性，包括網路課輔的科技元素以及一對一教學模式的互動優勢，可以提供弱勢學童有意義的學習活動。本研究透過實徵資料的蒐集與分析，驗證了翻轉教學在網路課輔應用的可行性。

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to investigate the effectiveness of applying the Flipped Classroom Instructional Model to the rural online tutoring program for Upper Elementary Mathematics. Design/methodology/approach: The study took the unequal-group pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design to conduct the teaching experiment. The research setting was the Digital Partner Online Tutoring Program of National Dong-Hwa University, which was supported by the Ministry of Education of Taiwan government. The participants consist of 54 upper grade students from rural elementary schools, with 25 students in the experimental group and 29 students in the control group. The effectiveness of the experiment was detected by the factorial design of covariance with pretest as covariate and grade level as moderator. Findings: The results of the study indicated that the experimental group's overall learning performance on posttests was significantly better than the control group's after the effect of pretests had been controlled. And the differences all achieved medium effect size. Among the four mathematical concepts, the differences on the two more advanced ones, ＂Common Factor＂ and ＂Common Multiple＂ even achieved large effect size. Originality/value: The application of ＂Flipped classroom model＂ in various fields provides a prospective possibility for teaching innovation. Its critical factors, ＂using technology＂ and ＂participatory interaction＂, exactly match the characteristics of the on-line tutoring program, including the on-line learning environment and the one-on-one interaction. The study provides empirical evidence for the effectiveness of applying the Flipped Classroom Model to the online tutoring program.

1. 李俊豪, C. H.(2010)。解釋學生基測成績差異之個人因素與地區因素。地理學報，60，67-102。
   連結：
2. 李哲迪, C. D.(2016)。以 TIMSS 資料檢視 2003 至 2011 年臺灣八年級學生數學成就城鄉差異。教育研究集刊，62(4)，1-40。
   連結：
3. 林原宏, Y. H.,何欣玫, S. M.(2006)。因數與倍數之解題溝通能力測驗編製及其實證探究。測驗統計年刊，13，171-208。
   連結：
4. 徐新逸, H. Y.,項志偉, C. W.(2016)。翻轉教室融入國小六年級資訊課程對批判性思考能力之影響。課程與教學季刊，19(4)，23-60。
   連結：
5. 高台茜, T. C.,康以諾, Y. N.,陳玉葉, Y. Y.(2015)。網路課輔中層次性閱讀教學對偏鄉學童閱讀能力影響之研究。教育科學研究期刊，60(4)，191-221。
   連結：
6. 張迺貞, N. C.,徐暄淯, Y. H.(2016)。問題導向學習融入資訊素養與倫理創新教學之研究。教育資料與圖書館學，53(2)，171-209。
   連結：
7. 陳佩英, P. Y.,黃天仕, T. S.,許美鈞, M. C.,侯仲宸, C. C.(2016)。當「研究法」遇見數位學習 : 教與學翻轉的經驗談。數位學習科技期刊，8(1)，51-70。
   連結：
8. 陳姵蓉, P. J.,康以諾, Y. N.,英家銘, J. M.,唐功培, K. P.(2017)。翻轉教室學習模式下自我效能、內在價值及測試焦慮與學習成就之交互影響：以微積分課程為例。嘉大教育研究學刊，38，71-103。
   連結：
9. 陳淑麗, S. L.(2008)。國小弱勢學生課業輔導現況調查之研究。臺東大學教育學報，19(1)，1-32。
   連結：
10. 黃志雄, C. H.(2017)。翻轉教室模式在大學課程中的實踐與反思。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，10(1)，1-30。
    連結：
11. 劉光夏, K. H.,周宛瑜, W. Y.(2016)。翻轉教學融入國小高年級自然與生活科技領域課程學習成效之探討。教育傳播與科技研究，113，39-62。
    連結：
12. 蔡瑞君, J. C.(2014)。數位時代「翻轉教室」的意義與批判性議題。教育研究與發展期刊，10(2)，115-138。
    連結：
13. 戴文雄, W. S.,王裕德, Y. T.,王瑞, R.,陳嘉苓, J. L.(2016)。翻轉教學式合作學習對生活科技實作課程學習成效影響之研究。科學教育學刊，24(1)，57-88。
    連結：
14. 龔心怡, H. Y.,李靜儀, C. Y.(2016)。國中學生數學自我概念與數學學業成就相互效果模式之縱貫研究─性別差異與城鄉差距之觀點。科學教育學刊，24(S)，511-536。
    連結：
15. Aidinopoulou, V.,Sampson, D. G.(2017).An action research study from implementing the flipped classroom model in primary school history teaching and learning.Educational Technology & Society,20(1),237-247.
16. Anderson, W.(Ed.),Krathwohl, D. R.(Ed.)(2001).A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Blooms’ educational objectives.New York, NY:Longman.
17. Ausubel, D. P.(1968).Education Psychology: A cognitive view.New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
18. Ausubel, D. P.,Robinson, F. G.(1969).School learning.New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
19. Basal, A.(2015).The implementation of a flipped classroom in foreign language teaching.Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education,16(4),28-37.
20. Bergmann, J.,Sams, A.(2012).Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day.Washington, WA:International Society for Technology in Education.
21. Bishop, J. L.,Verleger, M. A.(2013).The flipped classroom: A survey of the research.120th ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (ASEE 2013),Atlanta, GA.:
22. Chao, C. Y.,Chen, Y. T.,Chuang, K. Y.(2015).Exploring students’ learning attitude and achievement in flipped learning supported computer aided design curriculum: A study in high school engineering education.Computer Applications in Engineering Education,23(4),514-526.
23. Cohen, J.(1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Cornick, J.,Guy, G. M.,Beckford, I.(2015).Integrating study skills and problem solving into remedial mathematics.Teaching Mathematics and its applications: An International Journal of the IMA,34(2),83-90.
25. Dillahunt, T. R.,Wang, B. Z.,Teasley, S.(2014).Democratizing higher education: Exploring MOOC use among those who cannot afford a formal education.Educational Technology & Society,15(5),177-196.
26. Egbert, J.,Herman, D.,Lee, H.(2015).Flipped instruction in English language teacher education: A design-based study in a complex, open-ended learning environment.The Electronic Journal for English as a Second Language,19(2),1-23.
27. Engin, M.(2014).Extending the flipped classroom model: Developing second language writing skills through student-created digital videos.Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,14(5),12-26.
28. Evseeva, A.,Solozhenko, A.(2015).Use of flipped classroom technology in language learning.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,206,205-209.
29. Forsey, M.,Low, M.,Glance, D.(2013).Flipping the sociology classroom: Towards a practice of online pedagogy.Journal of Sociology,49(4),471-485.
30. Gaughan, J. E.(2014).The flipped classroom in world history.The History Teacher,47(2),221-244.
31. Gilboy, M. B.,Heinerichs, S.,Pazzaglia, G.(2015).Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom.Journal of nutrition education and behavior,47(1),109-114.
32. Goodwin, B.,Miller, K.(2013).Evidence on flipped classroom is still coming in.Educational Leadership,70(6),78-80.
33. Guo, P. J.,Kim, J.,Rubin, R.(2014).How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos.frst ACM conference on Learning @ scale conference, L@S’14
34. Hoffman, E. S.(2014).Beyond the flipped classroom: Redesigning a research methods course for e3 instruction.Contemporary Issues in Education Research,7(1),51-62.
35. Hwang, G. J.,Lai, C. L.(2017).Facilitating and bridging out-of-class and in-class learning: An interactive E-book-based flipped learning approach for math courses.Journal of Educational Technology & Society,20(1),184-197.
36. Kong, S. C.(2015).An experience of a three-year study on the development of critical thinking skills in flipped secondary classrooms with pedagogical and technological support.Computers & Education,89,16-31.
37. Lai, C. L.,Hwang, G. J.(2016).A self-regulated flipped classroom approach to improving students’ learning performance in a mathematics course.Computers & Education,100,126-140.
38. Lai, C. L.,Hwang, G. J.(2014).Effects of mobile learning time on students’conception of collaboration, communication, complex problem–solving, meta–cognitive awareness and creativity.International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation,8(3/4),276-291.
39. LeFevre, J.A.,Smith-Chant, B.L.,Fast, L.,Skwarchuk, S-L.,Sargla, E.,Arnup, J.S.,Penner-Wilger, M.,Bisanz, J.,Kamawar, D.(2006).What counts as knowing? The development of conceptual and procedural knowledge of counting form kindergarten through Grade 2.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,93(4),285-303.
40. Lo, C. K.,Hew, K. F.(2017).Using "frst principles of instruction" to design secondary school mathematics flipped classroom: The findings of two exploratory studies.Educational Technology & Society,20(1),222-236.
41. MacKinnon, G.(2015).Determining useful tools for the flipped science education classroom.Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education,15(1),44-55.
42. McGowen, M. A.,Tall, D. O.(2013).Flexible thinking and met-befores: Impact on learning mathematics.The Journal of Mathematical Behavior,32(3),527-537.
43. Missildine, K.,Fountain, R.,Summers, L.,Gosselin, K.(2013).Flipping the classroom to improve student performance and satisfaction.Journal of Nursing Education,52(10),1-3.
44. Mok, H. N.(2014).Teaching tip: The flipped classroom.Journal of Information Systems Education,25(1),7-11.
45. Murray, L.,McCallum, C.,Petrosino, C.(2014).Flipping the classroom experience: a comparison of online learning to traditional lecture.Journal of Physical Therapy Education,28(3),35-41.
46. Naito, M.,Miura, H.(2001).Japanese Children's numerical competencies: Age-and schooling-related influences on the development of number concepts and addition skills.Developmental Psychology,37(2),217-230.
47. Nazarenko, A. L.(2015).Blended learning vs traditional learning: What works? (a case study research).Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,200,77-82.
48. Nwosisi, C.,Ferreira, A.,Rosenberg, W.,Walsh, K.(2016).A study of the flipped classroom and its effectiveness in flipping thirty percent of the course content.International Journal of Information and Education Technology,6(5),348-351.
49. Roach, T.(2014).Student perceptions toward flipped learning: New methods to increase interaction and active learning in economics.International Review of Economics Education,17,74-84.
50. Schwartz, T. A.(2014).Flipping the statistics classroom in nursing education.Journal of Nursing Education,53(4),199-206.
51. Sezer, B.(2017).The effectiveness of a technology-enhanced flipped science classroom.Journal of Educational Computing Research,55(4),471-494.
52. Shafique, M.,Irwin-Robinson, H.(2015).A study on the effectiveness of flipped teaching in college math classroom.International Journal of Education and Information Technology,1(2),29-33.
53. Tall, D.(2013).How humans learn to think mathematically: Exploring the three world of mathematics.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
54. Tall, D.(2008).The transition to formal thinking in mathematics.Mathematics Education Research Journal,20(2),5-24.
55. Torgesen, J. K.(2000).Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters.Learning Disabilities Research & Practice,15(1),55-64.
56. Vaughan, M.(2014).Flipping the learning: An investigation into the use of the flipped classroom model in an introductory teaching course.Education Research and Perspectives,41(1),25-41.
57. vich, D. M.(2018).U.S.A.,Montana State University.
58. 吳明隆, M. L,涂金堂, C. T.(2013).SPSS 與統計應用分析.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan.
59. 林玉娟, Y. C.(2015)。翻轉創意─談慈大護理的多元教學策略。志為護理─慈濟護理雜誌，14(3)，14-21。
60. 林君紅, C. H.(2015)。雲林縣=Yunlin, Taiwan，國立雲林科技大學=National Yunlin University of Science & Technology。
61. 林宗翰, Z. H.,姚如芬, R. F.(2011)。情境融入國一最大公因數與最小公倍數文字題補救教學之研究～下一站 ‧ 北港。臺灣數學教師電子期刊，28，21-39。
62. 張子貴, T. K.(2016)。翻轉教室應用在國小教育學程的數學課程之研究。教育與多元文化研究，14，81-122。
63. 張春興, C. H.(2013).教育心理學─三化取向的理論與實踐.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:東華=Tunghua.
64. 教育部（2018）。計畫團隊。取自 https://etutor.moe.gov.tw/zh/team/intro[Ministry of Education. (2018). Project team. Retrieved from https://etutor.moe.gov.tw/zh/team/intro]
65. 陳正昌, Z. C.(2013).SPSS 與統計分析.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan.
66. 陳佩玉, P. Y.(2012)。新北市欽賢國中數位學伴數學學習成效成果分析。第十六屆全球華人計算機教育應用大會（GCCCE 2012），屏東市=Pingtung, Taiwan:
67. 黃國禎（編）, G. J.(Ed)(2015).翻轉教室─理論、策略與實務.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:高等教育=Higher Education.
68. 黃國勳, K. H.,&劉祥通, S. T.(2003)。國小五年級學童學習因數教材困難之探討。科學教育研究與發展季刊，30，52-70。
69. 楊志堅, C. C.,陳麗婷, L. T.(2008)。數學概念與程序覺知的發展歷程：電腦化認知反應之實徵研究。教育研究與發展期刊，4(4)，121-150。
70. 簡麗瑜, L. Y.(2018)。護理系學生的生物統計翻轉教學成效：學習深度的改變。教學實踐與創新，1(1)，119-153。

1. 陳登廷,李育齊(2023)。師資生參與偏鄉數位教學服務的學習經驗與成效相關研究－以北部一所大學為例。服務學習與社會連結學刊，6，25-49。
2. 崔夢萍,呂慈涵,王思樺(2022)。大學生線上一對一同步教學對安置青少年社會支持之研究。教育傳播與科技研究，130，47-66。
3. 郭浩芸,范熾文(2023)。一所高中參與科技輔助自主學習計畫執行之個案研究。學校行政，148，244-265。
4. 賴慧敏,蕭育琳,陳清檳,張仁誠(2022)。高級中等學校教師實行翻轉教室行為意圖之跨層次研究。數位學習科技期刊，14(2)，81-109。
5. 林哲立(2021)。Examining Teachers' Acceptance of Flipped Learning by Using Technology Acceptance Model。數位學習科技期刊，13(4)，27-61。
6. 劉光夏(2022)。活化藝術教學：翻轉教室在大學攝影課堂之實踐探究。藝術教育研究，43，111-147。
7. 劉佳儒,張美珍,王裕宏(2020)。輔導偏鄉國中學生學習飛行科學知識之成效分析：以培訓參與競賽活動為策略。科學教育學刊，28(4)，327-351。
8. 謝傳崇,李孟雪(2021)。台灣國民小學教師翻轉教學之研究－TALIS的分析與驗證。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，14(1)，91-113。
9. 詹慧珊,黃美玲,周利娜(2022)。翻轉教學策略提升專科生國文高層次認知能力發展研究。聯大學報，19(2)，77-92。
10. (2023)。因材網互動式學習模式融入數學學習扶助教學之研究。國際數位媒體設計學刊，15(2)，49-61。
11. (2024)。虛實混成式翻轉學習對網頁設計基礎課程學習者學習投入與學習成效之影響。修平學報，48，129-151。