公司治理與公司績效關係之研究－以台灣上市電子工業為例

Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance of Listed Electronics Industry in Taiwan

10.29950/JHKUM.200407.0013

黃小玉(Shoue-Yu Huang)

公司治理 ； 公司績效 ； 所有權集中程度 ； 董監事會組成 ； 迴歸分析 ； corporate govemance ； corporate perforrnance ； ownership concentration ； board composition ； regression analysis

興國學報

3期（2004 / 07 / 01）

153 - 167

繁體中文

公司治理與公司績效間之關係，是目前最熱門的話題。本研究針對公司治理內部機制之相關議題，如所有權集中程度及董監事會組成，分別以每股盈餘、資產報酬率、股東權益報酬率及Tobin'sQ比率，做為公司績效的衡量指標，探討公司治理與公司績效間之關係。以台灣上市電子工業189家為研究對象，蒐集2000年至2002年之資料進行迴歸分析。結論有以下幾點：1、股權愈集中，董監事會規模愈小、持股比例愈高、常務董監事席次比例愈高、獨立董監事席次比例愈低。2、股權愈集中，公司績效愈差。3、董監事會規模、常務董監事席次比例與公司績效間無顯著關係；董監事持股比率愈高、獨立董監事席次比例愈高，則公司績效愈好。4、研究結果，顯示獨立董監事制度的引進是值得推廣的政策。

The relationships between corporate governance and corporate performance that is the most popular subject in recent years. The effect of ownership concentration, board composition on overall corporate performance is investigated. Performance is measured using the EPS, ROA, ROC and Tobin's Q ratio. The study including the calculation of 9 variables and regression analysis in the sample of 189 listed electronics industry from 2000 to 2002.Result: 1.The ownership of board directors, the percentage of general directors in the board positive react to the ownership concentration significantly. The sizes of the board, the percentage of independent directors in the board negative react to the ownership concentration significantly. 2. Evidence for a negative impact is found of a relationship between performance and ownership concentration. 3. There is no significant difference between the sizes of the board, the percentage of general directors in the board to the performance. The ownership of board directors, the percentage of independent directors in the board positive react to the corporate performance significantly.4.The independent directors system to recommend that is a policy worthy to popularize.

1. Anup, Agrawal,Knoeber, Charles R.(1996).Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems between Managers and Shareholders.Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis,377-397.
2. Barnhart, Scott W.,Rosenstein, S.(1998).Board composition, Managerial Ownership, and Firm Performance: An Empirical Analysis.The Financial Review,33,1-16.
3. Chen, S.,Dodd, J. L.(1997).Economic value added: An empirical examination of a new corporate performance measure.Journal of Managerial Issues,9(3),318-333.
4. Cosgrove, H.(1987).Evaluating Your CEO.Credit Union Magazine,53,34-36.
5. Denis, David J.,Sarin, Atulya(1999).Ownership and Board Structures in Publicly Traded Corporations.Journal of Financial Economics,187-223.
6. Fortuin, Leonard(1988).Performance Indicators-Why, Where and How.European Journal of Operational Research,34
7. Fremond, O.,Capaul, M.(2002).World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2858World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2858,未出版
8. Harrell, L. P.(1990).What Do National Council Members Have to Say About Their Boards of Directors?.Bottomline,7,21-25.
9. Hermalin, B. E.,Weisbach, M. S.(2003).Boards of Directors as an Endogenously Determined Institution: A Survey of the Economic Literature.Economic Policy Review,9(1)
10. Kaufman, Roger(1988).Preparing Useful Performance Indicators.Training & Development,1988(September),80.
11. Mallette, Paul,Fowler, K. L.(1992).Effects of Board Composition and Stock Ownership on the Adoption of Poison Pills.Academy of Management Journal,1010-1035.
12. McConnell, John J.,Servaes, Henri(1990).Additional Evidence on Equity Ownership and Corporate Value.Journal of Financial Economics,595-612.
13. McFarland, Henry(1988).Evaluating q as an alternative to the rate of return in measuring profitability.Review of Economics and Statistics,70,614-622.
14. Pond, J.(1988).Proxy Contests and The Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight.Journal of Financial Economics,20,237-265.
15. Randall, Morck,Shleifer, Andrei,Vishny, Robert W.(1988).Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis.Journal of Financial Economics,20,293-315.
16. van Ees, Hans,Postma, Theo J. B. M.,Sterken, Elmer(2003).Board Characteristics and Corporate Performance in the Netherlands.Eastern Economic Journal,29(1),41-58.
17. Westphal, James D.(1999).Collaboration in the Boardroom: Behavioral and Performance Consequences of CEO-Board Social Ties.Academy of Management Journal,42,7-24.
18. Yermach, D.(1996).Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors.Journal of Financial Economics,40,185-211.
19. 牛延苓(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中央大學企業管理研究所。
20. 周文賢(2002)。多變量統計分析─SAS/STAT使用方法。台北:智勝文化事業有限公司。
21. 張紹勳、張紹評、林秀娟(2000)。SPSS For Windows 統計分析─初等統計與高等統計。台北:松崗電腦圖書資料股份有限公司。
22. 鍾惠珍(2004)。2004年會計財經熱門議題探索。會計研究月刊，218，44-57。

1. 曾妙齡(2017)。公司治理對庫藏股宣告效果之影響。臺中科技大學企業管理系碩士班學位論文。2017。1-75。