教育部卓越師資培育獎學金計畫實施成效之個案研究

The Study on the Effect of the Scholarship Program of Excellent Teacher Education

溫羚勻(Ling-Yun Wen)；顏佩如(Pey-Ru Yen)；林政逸(Jeng-Yi Lin)

克柏屈四層次模式 ； 卓越師資培育獎學金計畫 ； 師資培育 ； Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Model ； the Scholarship Program of Excellent Teacher Education ； Teacher Education

臺中教育大學學報：教育類

30卷2期（2016 / 12 / 01）

39 - 62

繁體中文

本研究透過問卷調查法，探討教育部卓越師資培育獎學金計畫實施方案與實施成效之情形。以師資培育大學103學年度卓越師資培育獎學金學生為研究對象，共發出146份問卷，回收133份，有效問卷為112份，問卷可用率76.7%。研究工具為自編「卓越師資培育獎學金實施方案與實施成效」調查問卷，以平均數、標準差、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關及逐步多元迴歸等統計方法，進行資料分析。依據統計分析結果，得到以下結論：一、卓越師資培育獎學金計畫實施方案與實施成效現況為中上以上程度。二、卓越師資培育獎學金學生了解卓越師資培育獎學金計畫實施方案因年級、參與時間、教職志願、學程類科、教育相關工作經驗與家庭年收入不同而有差異。三、卓越師資培育獎學金學生知覺卓越師資培育獎學金計畫實施成效因年級、教職志願之不同而有差異。四、卓越師資培育獎學金計畫實施方案與實施成效有顯著正向相關。五、卓越師資培育獎學金計畫實施方案「培育作為」與「學校組織與資源」對實施成效具有預測力。

This study aims to explore the implementation scheme and the implementation effect of the scholarship program of excellent teacher education. The case study method is adopted, mainly on questionnaire survey. The participants of this study were the awarded students of the scholarship program of excellent teacher education in the case university in the 2nd semester of Academic Year 2014. Totally 146 questionnaires were sent out, and collected 133 questionnaires, of which 112 valid questionnaires were returned, with the return rate of 76.7%. The research tool is the questionnaire of ＂the implementation scheme and the implementation effect of the scholarship program of excellent teacher education＂. The data are analyzed with the statistical methods, including mean, standard deviation, t-test, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson product-moment correlation, and multiple stepwise regression. According to the results, this study ultimately drew up significant conclusions: 1. The situation of the implementation scheme and the implementation effect of the scholarship program of excellent teacher education in the case university is above average and good. 2. The understanding of the implementation scheme of the scholarship program of excellent teacher education of the awarded students of the scholarship program of excellent teacher education in the case university differs for grades, participation periods, the willingness of being a teacher, the category of educational courses, education-related work experience, and household income; however, there is no difference in gender, college, non-educational work experience, basic teaching test, qualified items, education levels of parents, and parents' occupations. 3. The perception of the awarded students of the scholarship program of excellent teacher education in the case university on the implementation effect of the scholarship program of excellent teacher education differs for grades and the willingness of being a teacher; however, there is no difference in gender, college, the category of educational courses, participation periods, non-educational work experience, education-related work experience, basic teaching test, qualified items, education levels of parents, parents' occupations, and household income. 4. The implementation scheme and the implementation effect of the scholarship program of excellent teacher education are positively correlated. 5. The ＂school organization and resources＂ and ＂practiced teacher education＂ of the implementation scheme of the scholarship program of excellent teacher education has predictive of the implementation effect.

1. 教育部(2012c)。教育部卓越師資培育獎學金試辦計畫（第2 期）。2015 年10 月9 日，取自http://www.edu.tw/EduFunding/detail.aspx?Node=1828&EFID=30150&WID=6635a4e8-f0de-4957-aa3e-c3b15c6e6ead
2. City Town Info. (2009). How to become an elementary school teacher. Retrieved July 25, 2016, from http://www.citytowninfo.com/education-articles/career-guides/how-to-become-anelementary-school-teacher
3. 教育部(2011)。教育部核發卓越儲備教師證明書作業規範。中華民國100 年3 月14 日臺中（二）字第1000025224C 號令。
4. 教育部(2014b)。教育部補助辦理卓越師資培育獎學金計畫作業要點。臺北市：作者。
5. Croninger, R. G.(2007).Teacher qualifications and early learning: Effects of certification, degree, and experience on first-grade student achievement.Economics of Education Review,26,312-324.
6. Fajet, W.(2005).Pre-service teachers' perceptions in beginning education classes.Teaching and Teacher Education,21,717-727.
7. Kirkpatrick, D. L.(1998).Evaluating training programs: The four levels.San Francisco, CA:Berrett-Koehler.
8. Kirkpatrick, D. L.(1959).Techniques for evaluating training programs.Journal of American Society of Training Directors,13,3-32.
9. Kirkpatrick, D. L.,Kirkpatrick, J. D.(2007).Implementing the four levels: A practical guide for effective evaluation of training programs.San Francisco, CA:Berrett-Koehler.
10. Kivinen,Rinne(1998).Methodological Challenges for Comparative Research into Higher Education.Interchange,29(2),121-136.
11. 王如哲(2010)。解析學生學習成效。評鑑雙月刊，27，62。
12. 李隆盛(2008)。向企業學習—克伯區的四層次評鑑。評鑑月刊，13，45-48。
13. 林政逸、呂錘卿、張育甄(2014)。教育部卓越師資培育獎學金試辦計畫實施現況與成效評析—以臺中教育大學實施經驗為例。2014 大陸教育學術研討會：海峽兩岸教師教育高端論壇，臺中市:
14. 林新發、王秀玲、鄧珮秀(2007)。我國中小學師資培育現況、政策與展望。教育研究與發展期刊，3(1)，57-79。
15. 祝懷新、許嘯(2009)。英國教師培訓管理體系改革探析。西南大學學報（社會科學版），35(3)，90-93。
16. 教育部(2012)。中華民國師資培育白皮書：發揚師道、百年樹人。臺北市:作者。
17. 教育部(2012)。第七次中華民國教育年鑑。臺北市:作者。
18. 教育部(2014)。重要師資培育政策說明會議資料。臺北市:作者。
19. 楊思偉編(2013)。各國小學師資培育制度與教育專業課程研究。臺北市:五南。
20. 楊深坑編、黃嘉莉編(2011)。各國師資培育制度與教師素養現況。臺北市:教育部。
21. 楊舜如(2012)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺中市，國立臺中教育大學。
22. 謝琇玲(1998)。博士論文(博士論文)。國立高雄師範大學教育學類研究所。