高中音樂教科書性別意識型態之內容分析

Analysis of Gender Ideology in Senior High School Music Textbooks

曾靜雯(Ching-Wen Tseng)

音樂教科書 ； 性別意識型態 ； 性別研究 ； 音樂教育 ； Music Textbook ； Gender Ideology ； Gender Studies ； Music Education

臺中教育大學學報：人文藝術類

31卷2期（2017 / 12 / 01）

41 - 66

繁體中文

本研究旨在檢視高中音樂教科書之性別意識型態，將性別意識型態分為「性別比例」、「性別刻板印象」與「性別關係」三個類目進行討論，針對華興版、育達版及泰宇版之國內高中音樂教科書進行內容分析。主要的研究發現如下：一、高中音樂教科書之性別比例男女失衡，專業女性音樂家及其成就被忽略與低估，尤以課文及歌曲作曲者的部分較為嚴重。二、高中音樂教科書人物之音樂專業類型，以男性作曲家的數量最多，女性人物之音樂專業以歌唱為主，在作曲、指揮與電子樂器等領域的數量，與男性人物相差最為懸殊，有明顯的性別刻板印象。三、高中音樂教科書性別關係在課文段落中，多以男性人物為主體，女性人物常以附屬於男性或陰柔的特質呈現，部分歌曲之歌詞呈現不平等的性別關係。四、整體而言，高中音樂教科書除了性別失衡，亦不見多元化性別的音樂經驗撰述，其性別意識型態之內涵與性別平等教育的理想尚有一段差距。最後本研究根據研究結果，分別針對高中音樂教科書作者、高中音樂教育工作者及音樂教育未來研究提出建議。

This study aims at exploring gender ideology in senior high school music textbooks. Three aspects of gender ideology, which are ＂sex proportion＂, ＂gender stereotype＂ and ＂gender relations＂, are thoroughly discussed through analyzing textbooks published by three publishers: Hua-Sing, Yu-Da and Tai-Yu. The findings are as follows: 1. Sex proportion in senior high school music textbooks is highly unbalanced. Professional female musicians and their achievements are neglected and underrated. 2. Male composers are the focus of music textbook writing. Women are almost absent in the realm of composition, conducting and electronic instrument playing, and they always appear as professional singers in textbooks. 3. In terms of gender relations, males are always the focus while females are constantly represented as feminine and subordinate to the former. Such finding can also be found in some of the song lyrics for singing lessons. 4. Overall, the senior high school music textbooks fail to meet the ideal of gender equality in education. Finally, according to the findings of this research, some suggestions are made for senior high school music textbook publishers and music educators for further practices and research.

1. 王雅玄(2015)。美國教科書眼中的臺灣意象：他者論述分析。教科書研究，8(1)，33-61。
   連結：
2. 全國法規資料庫(2013)。性別平等教育法。2016 年12 月10 日，取自http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawContent.aspx?PCODE=H0080067
3. Abeles, H. F.(2009).Are musical instrument gender associations changing?.Journal of Research in Music Education,57(2),127-139.
4. Bartleet, B.(2008).Women conductors on the orchestral podium: Pedagogical and professional implications.College Music Symposium,48,31-51.
5. Borwick, S.(2003).Reclaiming gender in modernist music.NWSA Journal,15(3),179-188.
6. Bowers, J. M.(1990).Feminist scholarship and the field of musicology: I.College Music Symposium,29,81-91.
7. Delzell, J. K.,Leppla, D. A.(1992).Gender association of musical instruments and preferences of fourth-grade students for selected instruments.Journal of Research in Music Education,40(2),93-103.
8. Doubleday, V.(2008).Sounds of power: An overview of musical instruments and gender.Ethnomusicology Forum,17(1),3-39.
9. Elliot, C. A.,Yoder-White, M.(1997).Masculine/feminine associations for instrumental timbres among children seven, eight, and nine years of age.Contributions to Music Education,24,30-39.
10. Firth, S.,McRobbie, A.(1990).Rock and sexuality.On record: Pop and the written word,London, UK:
11. Gould, E. S.(2004).Feminism theory in music education research: Grrl-illa games as nomadic practice (or how music education fell from grace).Music Education Research,6(1),67-80.
12. Green, L.(1997).Music, gender, education.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
13. Griswold, P. A.,Chroback, D. A.(1981).Sex-role associations of musical instruments and occupations by gender and major.Journal of Research in Music Education,29(1),57-62.
14. Hall, C.(2005).Gender and boys' singing in early childhood.British Journal of Music Education,22,5-20.
15. Harrison, A. C,O'Neill, S.(2000).Children's gender-typed preferences for musical instruments: An intervention study.Psychology of Music,28,81-97.
16. Harrison, S. D.(2007).A perennial problem in gendered participation in music: What's happening to the boys?.British Journal of Music Education,24(3),267-280.
17. Hess, J.(2014).Radical musicking: Toward a pedagogy of social change.Music Education Research,16(3),229-250.
18. Ho, W. C.(2003).Gender differences in instrumental learning, preferences for musical activities and musical genres: A comparative study on Hong Kong, Shanghai and Taipei.Research Studies in Music Education,20,60-77.
19. Howe, S. W.(1998).Reconstructing the history of music education from a feminist perspective.Philosophy of Music Education Review,6(2),96-106.
20. Howe, S. W.(2009).A history view of women in music education careers.Philosophy of Music Education Review,17(2),162-183.
21. Howe, S. W.(2001).A historical perspective on contributions of American women music educators.Journal of Historical Research in Music Education,XXII(2),147-158.
22. Kelly, S. N.(1997).An investigation of the influence of timbre on gender and instrument association.Contributions to Music Education,24(1),43-56.
23. Koza, J.(1992).Picture this: Sex equity in textbook illustration.Music Educators Journal,78(7),28-33.
24. Koza, J. E.(1994).Big boys don't cry (or sing): Gender, misogyny, and homophobia in college choral methods texts.The Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning,4,48-64.
25. Koza, J. E.(1994).Females in 1988 middle school music textbooks: An analysis of illustrations.Journal of Research in Music Education,42(2),145-171.
26. Kruse, A. J.,Giebelhausen, R.,Shouldice, H. N.,Ramsey, A. L.(2015).Male and female photographic representation in 50 years of Music Educators Journal.Journal of Research in Music Education,62(4),485-500.
27. Lamb, R.,Dolloff, L. A.,Howe, S. W.(2002).Feminism, feminist research, and gender research in music education: A selective review.The new handbook of research on music teaching and learning,Toronto, Canada:
28. Lindeman, C. A.(1992).Teaching about women musicians.Music Educators Journal,78(7),56-59.
29. McCarthy, M.(1999).Gendered discourse and the construction of identity: Toward a liberated pedagogy in music education.Journal of Aesthetic Education,33(4),109-125.
30. Regueiro, P. D.(2000).An analysis of gender in a Spanish music textbook.Music Education Research,2(2),57-73.
31. Reich, N. B.(1995).Women as musicians: A question of class.Musicology and difference: Gender and sexuality in music scholarship,Berkeley, MI:
32. Sadker, M.,Sadker, D.,Long, L.(1989).Gender and education equality.Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives,Boston, MA:
33. Scott, K. P.,Schau, C. G.(1985).Sex equity and sex bias in instructional materials.Handbook for achieving sex equity through education,Baltimore, MD:
34. Selden, R.,Widdowson, P.,Brooker, P.(2005).A reader's guide to contemporary literary theory.Edinburgh, UK:Pearson Education.
35. Taylor, P. H.,Richards, C. M.(1985).An introduction to curriculum.Windsor, Berkshire:NFER-Nelson Pub. Co.
36. Tick, J.,Ericson, M.,Koskoff, E.(2007).,未出版
37. 方德隆(2002)。國民小學教科書性別意識型態的檢視。性別平等教育─探究與實踐，臺北市:
38. 王美珠(1994)。女性作曲家：賓根聖女希兒德佳特（Heilige Hildegard von Bingen）。美育，51，49-50。
39. 王美珠(1994)。女性作曲家探尋。美育，49，53-56。
40. 王美珠(1997)。巴洛克時期義大利女性作曲家：弗蘭采斯卡．卡契尼、芭芭拉．施特洛齊與安東妮亞．汴伯。美育，80，47-56。
41. 王美珠(2003)。音樂或馬勒─女性作曲家阿爾瑪的痛苦抉擇。兩性平等教育季刊，24，24-30。
42. 王美珠(2000)。掙扎於十九世紀德國傳統婦女角色的女性作曲家芳妮．亨賽爾（Fanny Hensel, 1805-1847）。美育，117，30-39。
43. 李美枝(1996)。性別與性別角色析論。本土心理學研究，6，260-299。
44. 周倩漪(1996)。解讀流行音樂性別政治：以江蕙和陳淑樺為例。中外文學，25(2)，32-59。
45. 林麗珊(2013)。女性主義與性別關係。臺北市:五南。
46. 張春興(1997)。心理學。臺北市:東華。
47. 莊明貞(2005)。國立教育研究院籌備處研究報告國立教育研究院籌備處研究報告,臺北市:國立教育研究院籌備處。
48. 陳瓊花(2012)。藝術、性別與教育：六位女性播種者的生命圖像。臺北市:三民。
49. 彭淮棟譯、Said, E. W.(2010)。音樂的極境。臺北市:太陽社。
50. 曾靜雯(2011)。音樂教育性別研究的範疇與議題探析。藝術研究期刊，7，133-162。
51. 曾靜雯(2016)。博士論文(博士論文)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
52. 游美惠(2001)。性別意識與性別意識型態。兩性平等教育季刊，15，99-100。
53. 游美惠(2006)。性別主流化。性別平等教育季刊，34，108-111。
54. 黃光雄編、簡茂發編(1996)。教育研究法。臺北市:師大書苑。
55. 黃政傑(1988)。教育理想的追求。臺北市:心理。
56. 黃淑玲(2008)。性別主流化：臺灣經驗與國際的對話。研考雙月刊，32(4)，3-12。
57. 黃囇莉(2009)。性別歧視的多面性。性別向度與臺灣社會，臺北市:
58. 楊國樞編、文崇一編、吳聰賢編、李亦園編(1989)。社會及行為科學研究法（下冊）。臺北市:東華。
59. 劉泗翰譯、Connell, Raewyn(2009)。性別的世界觀。臺北市:書林。
60. 歐用生(2003)。課程典範再概念。高雄市:麗文。
61. 歐用生(1985)。我國國民小學社會科教科書意識型態之分析。新竹師專學報，12，91-125。
62. 蔣淑如(2012)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義縣，國立中正大學。
63. 蔡佩君譯、張志宇譯、Frith, Simoned.、Straw, Willed.、Street, Johned.(2005)。劍橋大學搖滾與流行閱讀本。臺北市:商周。
64. 藍順德(2010)。教科書意識型態：歷史回顧與實徵研究。臺北市:華藤文化。