英文摘要
|
Background and purpose: This project is to improve the N and N1 level Nurses who were promoted to a higher level. The rate of N promoted to N1 was 0%, and N1 promoted to N2 was 33.3% in 2017. Because the rate of N and N1 level nurses who were promoted to a higher level was lower than other ICU. Therefore cause our motivation. Methods: First of all, through the interview, surveys, and discussion, the following causes had been identified: All nurses had difficulties in writing certain reports and no one could teach them. The nurses did not know what projects they had to complete and also how to accomplish in order to get promoted. It is hard for the nurses to get related forms needed to get promoted. It is difficult for the nurses to participate the professional training programs. The nurses lacked motivation and vitality. We had implemented some relative measures as follows: first, we arranged suitable clinical advisers to teach those nurses to write the particular reports and to assist them to finish certain reports. Second, we arranged some people in charge who used the list to inform these N and N1 level nurses, and to make sure them be able to understand about the details of learning projects of the clinical ladder system. Next, folders of files and documents needed for nurses to get promoted were set and sorted; therefore, staff could easily find documents. Then, our hospital provided employees with 20 hours of official business leave per year so that the nurses would be able to participate in the on-the-job training program. Finally, we had used game-based learning theory, such as creating concept maps, and using communication software, like LINE group, to improve nurses' cohesion and learning motivation. Results: In 2018, the percentage of N being promoted to N1 raised from 0% to 28%, and N1 being promoted to N2 still 33%. But we implemented relative measures consistently, N1 being promoted to N2 raise from 33.3% to 50% in 2019. Conclusion: During the process of this project was improved the competence of nursing staff and helped to build self-confidence as well.
|
参考文献
|
-
張純純,李美英(2015)。實作導向的個案報告訓練成效評值。領導護理,16(4),66-75。
連結:
-
曾惠翎,李皎正(2015)。建構護理臨床教師教學專業能力指標。護理雜誌,62(2),57-65。
連結:
-
詹明峰,張鐵懷(2018)。遊戲學習分析架構。數位學習科技期刊,10(3),1-20。
連結:
-
Brull, S.,Finlayson, S.(2016).Importance of gamification in increasing learning.The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing,47(8),372-375.
-
Karadag, R.(2015).Pre-service teachers’ perceptions on game based learning scenarios in primary reading and writing instruction courses.Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice,15(1),185-200.
-
Zimmer, M. J.(1972).Rationale for a ladder for clinical advancement in nursing practice.Journal of Nursing Administration,2(6),18-24.
-
台灣護理學會(2018,11月10日)‧基層護理人員臨床專業能力進階制度規劃指引‧取自http://www.twna.org.tw/frontend/un10_open/welcome.asp#
-
林秋芬,高靖秋(2014)。臨床護理人力運用的演變與前瞻。護理雜誌,61(2),13-19。
-
陳小蓮,黃秀梨,黃翠媛(2014)。臨床護理人才培育問題與策略。領導護理,15(3),14-24。
-
陳幼貴(2014)。提升腫瘤科護理師臨床專業能力進階完成率。腫瘤護理雜誌,14(1),63-75。
-
黃惠美,洪麗玲,林麗英(2015)。新進護理人員學習型態與護理能力進階之調查。榮總護理,32(3),304-310。
-
楊雅雯(2017)。玩中學—數位遊戲式學習。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(9),300-302。
-
劉苑倩,劉瑋書(2019)。往進階的路上─談護理進階過程與收穫。志為護理─慈濟護理雜誌,18(2),16-23。
|