中部五縣市國民中學教育人員權力運作與組織氣氛關係之研究

The Relationship between Power Operation and Organizational Climate of Junior High School Staffs in Central Taiwan

10.6769/JENCUE.201206.0021

蔡仁政(Jen-Cheng Tsai)；龔心怡(Hsin-Yi Kung)

權力運作 ； 組織氣氛 ； 國民中學教育人員 ； power operation ； organizational climate ； educational personnel of junior high schools

彰化師大教育學報

21期（2012 / 06 / 01）

21 - 47

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討中部五縣市國民中學教育人員其學校內部權力運作與組織氣氛等變項的差異情形及關聯性。研究方法係以問卷調查為主，針對中部五縣市40所國民中學643位教育人員，包含校長、教師兼主任、教師兼組長、教師兼導師、專任教師與一般公職之行政人員等實施調查，並以描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、LSD事後比較、Pearson積差相關及多元迴歸分析等統計方法進行分析，歸納研究結論如下：（一）整體而言，不同職務之教育人員，在權力運作與組織氣氛兩向度，組間差異達顯著水準，顯示教育現場之校長、主任、組長、導師、專任教師與ㄧ般公職之行政人員，彼此之間對於學校內部權力運作以及組織氣氛的看法或實務操作確有明顯差異存在；其次有顯著差異則為性別、年齡與學校規模等三個變項；組間差異未達顯著水準則為服務年資。（二）權力運作與組織氣氛多個分層面達顯著相關。（三）權力運作之強制權力、法定職權、激勵獎賞與參照認同等分層面能顯著預測組織氣氛，其中以強制權力的預測力最高。本研究最後提出具體建議，以供學校行政人員、教師與後續研究之參考。

The purpose of this study was to explore the difference and relationship of power operation and organizational climate among principals, administrators and teachers of junior high schools in Central Taiwan. According to 643 educators of 40 junior high schools, questionaire survey has been adopted as the research method and descriptive statistics, independent sample t-test, One-way ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation, and multiple regression analysis were applied to analyze the data. The major findings were summarized as follows: first, in general, in terms of the power operation and organizational climate, there were significant differences in educational personnel of the different duty. There were partially significant differences in gender, age, and school size while no significant difference in the length of the period of service. Second, there were partially significant associations between power operation and organizational climate. Third, power operation can predict organizational climate significantly. The suggestions of the findings were made for educational administrators, school administrators, teachers and future researchers.

1. Barnes, B.(1994).Westchester colleges project on racism-free learning environments.
2. Brown, O. M.(2001).Nevada,University of Nevada.
3. Fairholm, G. W.,Fairholm, B. C.(1984).Sixteen power tactics principals can use to improve management effectiveness.NASSP Bulletin,68,472.
4. Foucault, M.(1980).Power/Knowledge.New York:Panthen Books.
5. Halpin, A. W.,Croft, G. R.(1962).U. S. Office of Education Research ProjectU. S. Office of Education Research Project,Washington D.C.:.
6. Hoy, W. K.(1996).,未出版
7. Hoy, W. K.,Clover, S. I. R.(1986).Elementary school climate: A revision of the OCDQ.Educational Administration Quarterly,22(1),93-110.
8. Hoy, W. K.,Miskel, C. G.(2008).Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice.New York:McGraw-Hill.
9. Hoy, W.、Miskel, C. G.、林明地譯(2003)。教育行政學。高雄:麗文。
10. Hoy, W.,Tarter, C.,Kottkamp, R.(1991).Open schools/healthy schools.London:Sage Publications.
11. Kimpston, R. D.,Anderson, D. H.(1985).Teacher and principal concerns: The implementation of benchmark testing.Planning and Changing,16,96-104.
12. Kottkamp, R. B.,Mulhern, J. A.,Hoy, W. K.(1987).Secondary school climate: A revision of the OCDQ.Educational Administration Quarterly,23(3),31-48.
13. Mentz, K.(1993).Organizational climate in schools in white communities in South Africa: A validation of the OCDQ-RS.Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association,Atlanta, GA:
14. Robbins, S. P.,Judge, T. A.(2009).Organizational Behavior.California:Prentice Hall.
15. Tagiuri, R.,Litwin, G. H.(1968).Organizational climate: Exploration of a concept.Boston:Harvard University.
16. Theunissen, J. M.(1994).The relation between organizational climate, staff development and job satisfaction of teachers: An educational management perspective..Dissertation Abstracts International,55(5),1164.
17. Yukl, G. A.(1994).Leadership in organizations.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
18. 李冠儀(2000)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。花蓮，國立花蓮師範學院。
19. 林君齡(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北，國立臺灣師範大學。
20. 林逸青(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北，國立臺北師範學院。
21. 洪裕欽(1994)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北，國立臺北師範學院。
22. 秦夢群(2005)。教育行政─理論部份。臺北:五南。
23. 曹學仁(1997)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北，國立臺灣師範大學。
24. 許世燦(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄，國立高雄師範大學。
25. 黃金茂(2005)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。屏東，國立屏東師範學院。
26. 黃毅叡(2007)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。嘉義，國立中正大學。
27. 黃耀卿(1985)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北，國立臺灣師範大學。
28. 鄭奇芳(2004)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺中，國立台中師範學院。
29. 鄭彩鳳(1992)。高級中等學校校長領導行為取向、教師角色衝突與學校組織氣氛關係之研究。研考雙月刊，16(5)，55-62。
30. 鄭進丁(1990)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北，國立政治大學。
31. 謝文全(2003)。教育行政學。臺北:高等教育。

1. 黃文三、陳姿吟、沈碩彬(2017)。臺北市國中校長服務領導與教師支持、學校效能之徑路模式探析。教育理論與實踐學刊，35，63-95。