參與專業社群對國小教師數學教學的影響

The Impact of Participating Professional Community on Elementary Teachers' Mathematics Teaching

10.6769/JENCUE.201212.0001

徐偉民(Wei-Min Hsu)；廖玉婷(Yu-Ting Liao)

國小教師 ； 專業社群 ； 教學改變 ； 數學教學 ； Elementary teacher ； Professional community ； Teaching change ； Mathematics teaching

彰化師大教育學報

22期（2012 / 12 / 01）

1 - 24

繁體中文

本研究在探討專業社群對國小教師數學教學的影響。採用個案研究法，以三位不同教學經驗和背景的教師為對象，透過社群會議、教學觀察和錄影、訪談等方法來蒐集資料，來瞭解個案教師參與專業社群對其數學教學的影響。結果發現，社群的參與對三位教師有不同的影響：資深教師由於有明確的教學觀點和豐富的教學經驗，同時在教學上偏向理論上的主張，因此社群對她的影響不大，不過使其瞭解不同教師的教學觀點，也尊重他們的教學決定；有經驗教師嘗試改變教學來符合理論的主張，但受限於學生上課的反應和教學的時間，因此決定恢復原有的教學方式，但希望未來有機會實施自己理想的數學教學；初任教師由於學生的學習表現佳，所以滿意自己目前的教學，不過由社群的對話中更瞭解自己的教學思考和決定。三位教師參與專業社群後，更了解自己數學教學的意識型態，但學生的學習表現和反應、教學的時間和進度等仍是他們數學教學時的主要考量。本研究發現，社群參與對教師的影響有內隱的觀點和外顯的教學表現兩部分，且教師教學現場所面臨的因素，是決定其教學表現的主要考量。

The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of the professional community on elementary teachers' mathematics teaching. The methodology adopted was case study. Three teachers with different teaching experience and background were chosen as study subjects. Community meetings, teaching videotaping and observations, and interviews were the main data sources for understanding the impact of professional community attending on their mathematics teaching. Findings of this study indicated that there were different impacts on teachers' mathematics teaching from the community attending: The senior teacher did not change her teaching performance due to have clearly arguments and rich experiences on mathematics teaching. Her teaching style was also close to theoretical arguments. From the other teachers' sharing their teaching perspective in the meeting, the senior teacher learned more different teaching viewpoints and respected for their decision. The experienced teacher tried to adjust his teaching for matching theoretical arguments, but constrained by students' reaction in class and the teaching time, he decided to back to his original teaching way and wish he could implement his ideal mathematic teaching in future. The novice teacher satisfied with her original teaching approach because of students had good performances on mathematics examination. But from the community meeting, she got more understanding about her teaching thinking and decision. Three teachers got more understanding about their teaching ideology by participating professional community. Their students' reactions and performance, teaching time and progress were still main considerations when they teaching. This study found there were impacts on three teachers from the community attending that included their inside viewpoints and outside performance on mathematics teaching. But the factors that they faced in the teaching field were the main considerations to decide their teaching performance.

1. 王玉品、徐偉民(2009)。一位國小教師面對數學教學改革的抗拒和改變。科學教育學刊，17(3)，233-253。
   連結：
2. 李源順(2005)。學生教師運用知識庫學習數學教學：理論與實務的連結。科學教育學刊，13(1)，53-70。
   連結：
3. 李源順、林福來(2003)。實習教師的學習動機、身分與反思互動下的成長。科學教育學刊，45(1)，1-25。
   連結：
4. 姚如芬(2006)。成長團體之「成長」─小學教師數學教學專業之探究。科學教育學刊，14(3)，309-331。
   連結：
5. 徐偉民(2011)。數學課程實施：一位國小資深教師的個案研究。科學教育學刊，19(2)，101-122。
   連結：
6. 徐偉民、張國綱(2010)。師資培育數學課程對國小教師數學教學意象影響之研究。當代教育研究季刊，18(4)，41-77。
   連結：
7. 陳英娥、林福來(2004)。行動研究促進初任數學教師的教學成長。科學教育學刊，12(1)，83-105。
   連結：
8. Agudelo-Valderrama, C.(2008).The power of Colombian mathematics teachers'conceptions of social/institutional factors of teaching.Educational Studies in Mathematics,68,37-54.
9. Artzt, A. F.,Armour-Thomas, E.(2002).Becoming a reflective mathematics teacher: A guide for observations and self-assessment.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Barmby, P.,Harries, T.,Higgins, S.,Suggate, J.(2009).The array representation and primary children's understanding and reasoning in multiplication.Educational Studies in Mathematics,70(3),217-241.
11. Boaler, J.,Brodie, K.(2004).The importance, nature and impact of teacher questions.Proceedings of the 26th conference of the Psychology of Mathematics Education,Toronto:
12. Burke, M. J.(Ed.),Curcio, F. R.(Ed.)(2000).Learning mathematics for a new century.Reston, VA:NCTM.
13. Cummins, J.(1986).Empowering Minority students: A framework for intervention.Harvard Educational Review,56(1),18-36.
14. Curriculum Planning and Development Division(2006).Mathematics syllabus primary.Singapore:MOE.
15. Gainsburg, J.(2008).Real-world connections in secondary mathematics teaching.Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,11(3),199-219.
16. Gamoran, A.(Ed.)(2003).Transforming: How schools and districts can support change.NY:Teachers College.
17. Grouws, D. A.(Ed.)(1992).Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning.New York:Macmillan.
18. Lester, F. K.(Ed.)(2007).Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning.Charlotte, NC:Information Age.
19. Lloyd, G.(2008).Curriculum use while learning to teach: One student teacher's appropriation of mathematics curriculum materials.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,39(1),63-94.
20. National Board of Education(2004).National core curriculum for basic education 2004: National core curriculum for basic education for intended pupils in compulsory education.Finland:NBE.
21. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2000).Principles and standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA:NCTM.
22. Raymond, A.,Leinenbach, M.(2000).Collaborative action research on the learning and teaching of algebra: A story of one mathematics teacher's development.Educational Studies in Mathematics,41(3),283-307.
23. Remillard, J.(2005).Examining key concepts in research on teachers' use of mathematics curricular.Review of Educational Research,75(2),211-246.
24. Rodriguez, A. J.(Ed),Kitchen, R. S.(Ed)(2005).Preparing mathematics and Science Teachers for diverse classrooms: Promising strategies for transformative pedagogy.Mahwah, NJ:Laurence Erlbaum.
25. Rodriguez, A. J.,Berryman, C.(2002).Using sociotransformative constructivism to teach for understanding in diverse classrooms: A beginning teacher's journey.American Educational Research Journal,39(4),1017-1045.
26. Romberg, T. A.(Ed.)(2004).Standards-based mathematics assessment in middle school.NY:Teacher College, Columbia University.
27. Royer, J. M.(Ed.)(2003).Mathematics cognition.Greenwich, CT:Information Age.
28. Schön, D. A.、夏林清譯(2004)。反映的實踐者。台北:遠流。
29. Senger, E. S.(1999).Reflective reform in mathematics: The recursive nature of teacher change.Educational Studies in Mathematics,37(3),199-221.
30. Sztajn, P.(2003).Adapting reform ideas in different mathematics: Beliefs beyond mathematics.Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,6(1),53-75.
31. Torbeyns, J.,De Smedt, B.,Ghesquiere, P.,Verschaffel, L.(2009).Acquisition and use of shortcut strategies by traditionally schooled children.Educational Studies in Mathematics,71(1),1-17.
32. Weiss, I. R.,Banilower, E. R.,McMahon, K. C.,Smith, P. S.(2001).Report of the 2000 national survey of science and mathematics education.Chapel Hill, NC:Horizon Research.
33. Wilson, M.,Goldenberg, M. P.(1998).Some conceptions are difficult to change: One middle school mathematics teacher's struggle.Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,1(3),269-293.
34. Wiske, M. S.(2005).Teaching for understanding with technology.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
35. 李源順、林福來(1998)。校內數學教師專業發展的互動模式。師大學報：科學教育類，43(2)，1-23。
36. 李源順、林福來(2000)。數學教師的專業成長。師大學報：科學教育類，45(1)，1-25。
37. 林碧珍(2000)。在職教師數學教學專業發展方案的協同行動研究。新竹師院學報，13，115-148。
38. 徐偉民(2004)。博士論文(博士論文)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學。
39. 教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要：數學學習領域。台北市:教育部。
40. 許德田(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立台北師範學院。
41. 陳均伊、張惠博、楊巽斐、鄭一亭(2006)。以學校為本位的合作式專業成長：一位資深教師的教學信念與教學改變。科學教育月刊，294，2-14。
42. 陳美玉(1996)。教師專業實踐理論與應用。台北市:師大書苑。
43. 鄭章華、邱守榕、王夕堯(2001)。影響國中數學教師進行建構式教學改變之因素：合作協助者之立場作為與成效分析。科學教育，12，127-146。
44. 鍾靜(2005)。論數學課程近十年來之變革。教育研究月刊，133，124-134。

1. 黃庭萱,吳璧如(2023)。自發、互動、共好：自主性教師專業學習社群之個案研究。臺北市立大學學報.教育類，54(2)，75-99。
2. 劉世雄,陳怡君(2023)。深化備觀議課內涵以促進教師分享式專業對話之研究。教育學誌，49，1-32。
3. 蕭佳純,邱憲義(2019)。高中教師教學風格與教學效能之相關研究－以教師專業發展為中介變項、學校組織文化為調節變項。當代教育研究季刊，27(1)，39-78。
4. 徐偉民(2019)。原住民文化融入數學課程的發展：以一所實驗小學為例。教育研究集刊，65(4)，77-116。
5. (2018)。國中校長學習領導、教師專業學習社群與學生學習表現關係之研究。教育與心理研究，41(1)，1-30。