题名

新進護理人員及護理臨床教師對二年期訓練計畫評量方式之滿意度

并列篇名

The Satisfaction of Newly Employed Nurse and Clinical Nursing Preceptor on the Assessment Method of a Two-year Training Program

DOI

10.6530/YYN/2015.1.01

作者

尹玓(Ti Yin);蔡育倫(Yu-Lun Tsai);洪愛琇(Ai-Hsiu Hung);陳淑貞(Shu-Chen Chen);李易靜(Yi-Ching Li);廖珍娟(Jen-Jiuan Liaw)

关键词

滿意度 ; 客觀結構式臨床測驗 ; 迷你演練評量 ; 360度評量 ; objective structured clinical examination ; mini-clinical evaluation exercise ; 360-degree-feedback

期刊名称

源遠護理

卷期/出版年月

9卷1期(2015 / 03 / 01)

页次

26 - 36

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

背景:行政院衛生署推動「二年期護理師(護士)訓練計畫」,期藉由有計劃的教育訓練與輔導,使新進護理人員能迅速適應臨床工作,逐步提昇自我專業知識、技能。目的:本研究旨在瞭解接受訓練計畫之新進護理人員及護理臨床教師,於訓練過程中對評量方式之滿意度。方法:本研究為橫斷式描述性研究設計,以接受訓練計畫同意受訪之新進護理人員及護理臨床教師為研究對象,使用客觀結構式臨床測驗(Objective Structured Clinical Examination, OSCE)/迷你演練評量(mini-Clinical Evaluation exercise, mini-CEX)/360度評量滿意度之自擬式結構性問卷進行資料收集。結果:新進護理人員對於OSCE / mini-CEX / 360度評量方式之滿意度量表得分為:69.3±8.5 / 66.3±8.6 / 65.9±10.2分;護理臨床教師對於OSCE / mini-CEX / 360度評量方式之滿意度量表得分為:73.2±8.1 / 72.1±8.3 / 72±8.4分。新進護理人員與護理臨床教師,在此三種評量方式得分皆有顯著差異(p<.001)。結論/實務應用:OSCE評量滿意度在此研究得分較高,期藉由此研究瞭解訓練計畫使用評量方式之合適度,作為未來訓練規劃參考。

英文摘要

Background: The Department of Health conducted a "Two-year Nursing Training Program" to help nurses adapt to clinical environment and to improve professional knowledge and skills within a defined period of time under a well-planned training and mentoring program. Objective: To determine the level of satisfaction of both newly employed nurses and their preceptors in this training program. Methods: This is a cross-sectional research design. Participants included both new nurses and preceptors in the training program who consent to and enroll in this research. Data was collected using a structured questionnaire developed by researchers in this study. It measured the degree of satisfaction among new nurses and preceptors on the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE), mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) and 360-degree feedback. Results: The scores reported by the newly employed nurses for OSCE, mini-CEX and 360-degree feedback were 69.3±8.5, 66.3±8.6 and 65.9±10.2. The scores reported by the clinical preceptors for OSCE, mini-CEX, and 360-degree feedback were 73.2±8.1, 72.1±8.3 and 72±8.4. All three assessment methods showed significant differences between both groups (p<.001). Conclusion and application: Both groups reported the highest score in the OSCE test. The results may be a reference for future training programs.

主题分类 醫藥衛生 > 預防保健與衛生學
醫藥衛生 > 社會醫學
参考文献
  1. Chen, W.,Lin, C. C.,Huang, C. C.,Tsai, C. C.,Tsai, C. H.(2006).Implementation of the mini-CEX (Clinical Evaluation Exercise): Experience and preliminary results.Journal of Medical Ed-ucation,10(3),232-239.
    連結:
  2. Chen, W.,Lin, C. C.,Huang, C. C.,Tsai, C. C.,Tsai, C. H.(2006).Implementation of the mini-CEX (Clinical Evaluation Exercise): Experience and preliminary results.Journal of Medical Ed-ucation,10(3),232-239.
    連結:
  3. Chen, W.,Tsai, C. H.,Huang, K. Y.(2005).Clini-cal medical education and mini-CEX (Clinical Evaluation Exercise).Journal of Medical Edu-cation,9(4),370-377.
    連結:
  4. 劉敏,劉克明(2006)。以客觀結構式教學測驗(OSTE)評量臨床教學技巧。醫學教育,10(2),98-104。
    連結:
  5. 蔡淳娟,林其和,陳琮琳,趙可式,葉宗烈,蔡景仁,張伊凡(2006)。OSCE之測驗結果分析:成功大學醫學院經驗。醫學教育,10(4),313-323。
    連結:
  6. 蔡詩力,陳震寰,方基存,蔡景仁,張上淳(2008)。客觀結構式臨床測驗。OSCE)執行指引.醫學教育,12(2),118-132。
    連結:
  7. 賴明美,陳偉德,陳信水,白培英,陳安琪,蔡宗璋,秋松(2008)。執行迷你臨床演練評量(mini-CEX)師生之滿意度與回饋調查。醫學教育,12(3),28-34。
    連結:
  8. Braend, A. M,Gran, S. F.,Frich, J. C.,Lindbaek, M.(2010).Medical students’ clinical perfor-mance in general practice – Triangulating as-sessments from patients, teachers and students.Medical Teacher,32(3),333-339.
  9. Byrne, E.,Smyth, S.(2008).Lecturers experiences and perspectives of using an objective struc-tured clinical examination.Nurse Education in Practice,8(4),283-289.
  10. Clarke, S.,Rainey, D.,Traynor, M.(2011).Using the objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) to assess orthopaedic clinical skills for the registered nurse.International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing,15(2),92-101.
  11. Cruess, R.,McIlroy, J. H.,Cruess, S.,Ginsburg, S.,Steinert, Y.(2006).The professionalism mini-evaluation exercise: A preliminary in-vestigation.Academic Medicine,81(10 suppl),S74-S78.
  12. Frankel, A. S.,Leonard, M. W.,Denham, C. R.(2006).Fair and just culture, team behavior, and leadership engagement: The tools to achieve high reliability.Health Services Research,4(2),1690-1709.
  13. Hatala, R.,Ainslie, M.,Kassen, B.O.,Mackie, I.,Roberts, J.M.(2006).Assessing the mini-clin-ical evaluation exercise in comparison to a national specialty examination.Medical Educa- tion,40(10),950-956.
  14. Kogan, J. R.,Holmboe, E. S.,Hauer, K. E.(2009).Tools for direct observation and assessment of clinical skills of medical trainees: A systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Asso-ciation,302(12),1316-1326.
  15. Mitchell, M. L.,Henderson, A.,Groves, M.,Dalton, N.,Nulty, D.(2009).The objective struc-tured clinical examination (OSCE): optimising its value in the undergraduate nursing curricu-lum.Nurse Education Today,29(4),398-404.
  16. Nicol, D.,MacFarlane-Dick, D.(2006).Rethink-ing formative assessment in HE: A theoretical model and seven principles of good feedback practice.Studies in Higher Education,31(2),199-218.
  17. Nulty, D. D.,Mitchell, M. L.,Jeffrey, C. A.,Hender-son, A.,Groves, M.(2011).Best practice guidelines for use of OSCEs: maximizing value for student learning.Nurse Education Today,31(2),145-151.
  18. Paskin, Z.,Peile, E.(2010).Final year medical students’ views on simulated-based teaching: A comparison with best evidence medical educa-tion systematic review.Medical Teacher,32(7),569-577.
  19. Rees, C.,Shepherd, M.(2005).The acceptability of 360-degree judgements as a method of as-sessing undergraduate medical students’ person-al and professional behaviors.Medical Educa-tion,39(1),49-57.
  20. Sargent, J.,Mann, K.,Sinclair, D.,van der Vleuten, C.,Metsemakers, J.(2007).Challenges in multisource feedback: Intended and unintended outcomes.Medical Education,41(6),583-591.
  21. Sham Bhat, M.,Anand, S.(2006).Objective struc-tured clinical examination (OSCE).Nursing Journal of India,97(1),14-16.
  22. Topping, K. J.(2005).Trends in peer learning.Jour-nal of Educational Psychology,25(6),631-645.
  23. Walsh, M.,Bailey, P. H.,Koren, I.(2009).Objec-tive structured clinical evaluation of clinical competence: an integrative review.Journal of Advanced Nursing,65(8),1584-1595.
  24. Yang, Y. Y.,Lee, F. Y.,Hsu, H. C.,Lee, W. S.,Ch-uang, C. L.,Chang, C. C.,Huang, C. C.(2013).Validation of the behavior and concept based assessment of professionalism compe-tence in postgraduate first-year residents.Jour-nal of the Chinese Medical Association,76,186-194.
  25. 王采芷(2014)。OSCE在護理教育的應用。台灣護理教育學會會訊,19,16。
  26. 吳姿蓉,鄧慶華,池美華,淑梅,袁素娟(2007)。某醫學中心護理人員護理能力及其相關因素之探討。中山醫學雜誌,18,303-316。
  27. 周照芳(2008)。護理評鑑與護理臨床能力進階制度。護理臨床能力進階制度繼續施行性之護理論壇,台南:
  28. 林玉娟(2011)。談護理教育的客觀結構式臨床能力測驗。慈濟護理雜誌,10(3),19-27。
  29. 林秋芬,盧美秀,康偉玲(2004)。護理能力標準:國際版與台灣版之比較。新臺北護理期刊,6(2),11-22。
  30. 財團法人醫院評鑑暨醫療品質策進會(2007年7月6日).行政院衛生署教學醫院教學費用補助計畫.2009年3月18日取自 http://www.tjcha.org.tw/newsDetail.asp?newsid=66
  31. 張念中,謝銘勳,陳榮邦,朱秀娟,蔡純娟,曾啟瑞(2010)。客觀結構式臨床測試之規劃及執行。北市醫學雜誌,7,1-12。
  32. 張碧芬,余玉眉,胡毓雯,陳淑月(2008)。好的護理—病人與家屬的觀點。護理雜誌,55(1),33-42。
  33. 張慧甄,陳佩英,郭素青(2004)。醫院設立分院時新進護理人員工作壓力源及其影響因素。健康管理學刊,2(1),37-50。
  34. 陳小蓮,盧美秀,陳品玲(2001)。臨床護理輔導員制度對新進護理人員輔導成效之探討。新臺北護理期刊,3(1),35-44。
  35. 陳怡如,陳俞琪,黃淑鶴,盧純華(2003)。新進護理人員面對壓力之成長經驗。慈濟醫學雜誌,15(6),391-398。
  36. 葉秀真(2006)。我的工作我的痛我的愛-新進護理人員的調適與成長。志為護理雜誌,5(4),56-58。
被引用次数
  1. 張雯雯(Wen-Wen Chang);張芸甄(Yun-Chen Chang);林盈秀(Ying-Siou Lin);胡文郁(Wen-Yu Hu)(2022)。臨床教師執行可信賴專業活動於畢業後學員評量與回饋。台灣醫學。26(6)。740-749。