题名

學生美感經驗、創意自我效能與創造力:教師創造力教學有效嗎?

并列篇名

Students' Aesthetics Experience, Creative Self-Efficacy and Creativity: Is Creativity Instruction Effective?

作者

張原誠(Yuan-Cheng Chang);蕭佳純(Chia-Chun Hsiao)

关键词

美感經驗 ; 創造力 ; 創造力教學 ; 創意自我效能 ; aesthetic experience ; creative self-efficacy ; creativity ; creativity instruction

期刊名称

教育實踐與研究

卷期/出版年月

29卷2期(2016 / 12 / 01)

页次

65 - 104

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究主旨在探討學生美感經驗及創意自我效能對創造力的影響,並以教師的創造力教學做為調節變項,以創造力成分理論、創造力系統理論及創意自我效能理論為理論基礎,建立研究模式。研究對象為大專院校設計學門的畢業專題學生與專題指導老師,取樣50組畢業專題團隊,共50位指導老師與338位學生,並運用階層線性模式(HLM)來分析教師與學生層次間各變項的影響。研究結果發現,教師的提升創造力意向教學方式有助於學生美感經驗,而學生的美感經驗會影響創造力與創意自我效能;教師增進創造力技能的教學方式會透過學生審美的態度、對美的理解力與完整經驗,提升學生創意成品信念,但是透過學生對美的快感,則會降低學生創意成品信念;教師創造力教學在學生創意自我效能與創造力之間不會產生調節效果。根據以上發現,本研究認為學校為了學生創造力的發展,應該重視學生美感經驗的培養,而且也要重新檢討教師的創造力教學方式。

英文摘要

Based on creativity component theory, creativity system theory and creative self-efficacy theory, this study aims to explore the influence of college students' aesthetics experience and creative self-efficacy on their creativity and the role of creativity instruction as a mediator variable. The participants were 338 college design majors in 50 teams who were working on their graduation exhibitions, and 50 advising professors from departments related to design. Hierarchical Linear Models were applied for analysis. The result showed that instruction on enhancing students' creative intention positively affect students' aesthetics experience. Students' aesthetics experience affects their creativity and creative self-efficacy. Creativity instruction with focus on creativity skills by means of promoting aesthetic attitude, aesthetic understanding, and offering complete experiences had a moderating effect on students' perception toward creative product. However, there was a negative moderating effect of creative instruction on perceived aesthetic pleasure and students' perception toward creative product. There was no moderating effect of creative instruction on the relationship between students' creative self-efficacy and creativity. Accordingly, the study concluded that in order to enhance students' creativity, universities should stress on the development of students' aesthetics experiences and re-evaluation of approaches to creativity instruction.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 周淑卿(2010)。學習歷程中美感經驗的性質:藝術與科學課堂的探究。課程與教學季刊,14(1),19-40。
    連結:
  2. 洪素蘋、黃宏宇、林珊如(2008)。重要他人回饋影響創意生活經驗:以模式競爭方式檢驗創意自我效能與創意動機的中介效果。教育心理學報,40(2),303-322。
    連結:
  3. 陳玉樹、胡夢鯨(2008)。任務動機與組織創新氣候對成人教師創意教學表現之影響:階層線性模式分析。教育心理學報,40(2),179-198。
    連結:
  4. 陳玉樹、郭銘茜(2013)。成就目標影響創意教學。教育科學研究期刊,58(3),85-120。
    連結:
  5. 陳玲璋(2013)。全觀性美感體驗對學校教學意涵之探究。藝術教育研究,25,109-135。
    連結:
  6. 彭台光、林鉦棽(2008)。組織現象和層次議題:非獨立性資料的概念和實徵。組織與管理,1(1),95-121。
    連結:
  7. 彭台光、高月慈、林鉦棽(2006)。管理研究中的共同方法變異:問題本質、影響、測試和補救。管理學報,23(1),77-98。
    連結:
  8. 溫福星、邱皓政(2009)。組織研究中的多層次調節中介效果:以組織創新氣氛、組織承諾與工作滿意的實證研究為例。管理學報,26(2),189-211。
    連結:
  9. 葉玉珠、李若瑜、賴思齊(2015)。「設計產品美感生活體驗量表」之發展。設計研究學報,8,64-80。
    連結:
  10. 蕭佳純(2012)。國小學生內在動機、學科知識與創造力表現關聯之研究:教師創造力教學的調節效果。特殊教育研究學刊,37(3),89-113。
    連結:
  11. 蕭佳純(2011)。學校創新氣氛、教師內在動機與教師創意教學表現關聯之研究:多層次調節式中介效果之探討。當代教育研究,19(4),85-125。
    連結:
  12. 教育部統計處(2014)。大專校院科系別概況。取自:http://www.edu.tw/pages/detail.aspx?Node=3752&Page=26208&Index=7&WID=31d75a44-efff-4c44-a075-15a9eb7aecdf。[Department Statistics in Ministry of Education (2014). Situation of academic departments in university colleges. Retrieved from: http://www.edu.tw/pages/detail.aspx?Node=3752&Page=26208&Index=7&WID=31d75a44-efff-4c44-a075-15a9eb7aecdf.]
  13. Abbott, D. H.(2010).Experiencing creative self-efficacy: A case study approach to understand creativity in blogging.Journal of Media and Communication Studies,2,170-175.
  14. Aliakbari, F. H.(2015).A comparison between self-efficacy and creativity of students in ordinary and smart schools.Journal of Educational and Management Studies,5(1),92-97.
  15. Amabile, T. M.(1983).The social psychology of creativity.New York, NY:Springer-Verlag.
  16. Amabile, T. M.(1996).Creativity in context.Colorado, CO:Westview Press.
  17. Bammens, Y. P. M.(2016).Employees' innovative behavior in social context: A closer examination of the role of organizational care.Journal of Product Innovation Management,33(3),244-259.
  18. Baron, R. M.,Kenny, D. A.(1986).The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51,1173-1182.
  19. Beghetto, R. A.(2009).Correlates of intellectual risk taking in elementary school science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,46,210-223.
  20. Beghetto, R. A.,Kaufman, J. C.(2013).Fundamentals of creativity.Educational Leadership,70,10-15.
  21. Biswas, G.,Jeong, H.,Kinnebrew, J.,Sulcer, B.,Roscoe, R.(2010).Measuring self-regulated learning skills through social interactions in a teachable agent environment.Research and Practice in Technology-Enhanced Learning,5(2),123-152.
  22. Carroll, N.(2015).Defending the content approach to aesthetic experience.Metaphilosophy,46(2),171-188.
  23. Chamberlin, S. A.,Moon, S.(2005).Model-eliciting activities: An introduction to gifted education.Journal of Secondary Gifted Education,17,37-47.
  24. Chuang, L. M.(2007).The social psychology of creativity and innovation: Process theory perspective.Social Behavior and Personality,35(7),875-88.
  25. Cuieford, J. P.(1965).Fundamental statistics in psychology and education.New York, NY:McGraw Hill.
  26. Daly, S. R.,Mosyjowski, E. A.,Seifert, C. M.(2014).Teaching creativity in engineering courses.Journal of Engineering Education,103,417-449.
  27. Davidovitch, N.,Milgram, R. M.(2006).Creative thinking as a predictor of teacher effectiveness in higher education.Creativity Research Journal,18,385-390.
  28. Davies, S.,Higgins, K.,Hopkins, R.,Stecker, R.,Cooper, D.(2009).A companion to aesthetics.Malden, MA:Wiley-Blackwell.
  29. Dewey, J.(Ed.)(1981).John Dewey: The later works.Carbondale, IL:Southern Illinois University Press.
  30. Fenner, D. E. W.(2003).Aesthetic experience and aesthetic analysis.Journal of Aesthetic Education,37(1),40-53.
  31. Gallagher, J. J.(1994).Teaching the gifted child.Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon.
  32. Girod, M.,Twyman, T.,Wojcikiewicz, S.(2010).Teaching and learning science for transformative, aesthetic experience.Journal of Science for Teacher Education,21(7),14-28.
  33. Gong, Y.,Huang, J. C.,Farh, J. L.(2009).Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy.Academy of Management Journal,52(4),765-778.
  34. Guilford, J. P.(1968).Intelligence, creativity and their educational implications. San Diego, CA: R. R. Knapp..San Diego, CA:R. R. Knapp.
  35. Heller, K. A.(Ed.),Monks, F. J.(Ed.),Sternberg, R. J.(Ed.),Subotnik, R. F.(Ed.)(2000).International handbook of giftedness and talent.Nailsea, UK:Elsevier Science.
  36. Hsu, M. L. A.,Hou, S. T.,Fan, H. L.(2011).Creative self- efficacy and innovative behavior in a service setting: Optimism as a moderator.Journal of Creative Behavior,45(4),258-272.
  37. Hunter, S. T.,Bedell, K. E.,Mumford, M. D.(2007).Climate for creativity: A quantitative review.Creativity Research Journal,19(1),69-90.
  38. Isaksen, S.(Ed.)(1987).Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics.Buffalo, NY:Bearly Limited.
  39. James, L. R.,Demaree, R. G.,Wolf, G. R.(1993).Rwg: An assessment of within- group interrater agreement.Journal of Applied Psychology,78,306-309.
  40. Jung, C.,Rothgeb, C. L.(Trans.),Clemens, S. M.(Trans.)(1973).Experimental researches: Collected works of Carl Jung.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
  41. Kark, R.,Shamir, B.,Chen, G.(2003).The two faces of transformational leadership: Dependence and empowerment.Journal of Applied Psychology,88(2),243-255.
  42. Kaufman, J. C.、Sternberg, R. J.、黃曉嵐譯、蔡淑君譯(2014)。創造力:理論與當代議題面面觀。台北=Taipei:華騰文化=Farterng。
  43. Kear, M.(2000).Concept analysis of self-efficacy.Graduate Research in Nursing,2(2),33-45.
  44. Kinnebrew, J. S.,Biswas, G.(2011).Modeling and measuring self-regulated learning in teachable agent environments.Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society,7(2),19-35.
  45. Kreft, I. G. G.、Leeuw, J.、邱皓政譯(2009)。多層次模型分析導論。台北=Taipei:五南=WuNan。
  46. Livingston, L.(2010).Teaching creativity in higher education.Arts Education Policy Review,111(2),59-62.
  47. Lubart, T. I.,Getz, I.(1997).Emotion, metaphor, and the creative process.Creativity Research Journal,10(4),285-301.
  48. Lussier, C.(2010).Aesthetic literacy: The gold medal standard of learning excellence in dance.Physical and Health Education,76(1),40-44.
  49. Maquet, J.、武珊珊譯、王慧姬譯(2003)。美感經驗:一位人類學者眼中的視覺藝術。台北=Taipei:雄獅=Lionart。
  50. Mathisen, G. E.,Bronnick, K. S.(2009).Creative self-efficacy: An intervention study.International Journal of Educational Research,48(1),21-29.
  51. Millar, G.,Dahl, C.(2011).The power of creativity.The Alberta Teacher' Association Magazine,91(3),16-21.
  52. Podsakoff, P. M.,MacKenzie, S. B.,Lee, J. Y.,Podsakoff, N. P.(2003).Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.Journal of Applied Psychology,88(5),879-903.
  53. Ramachaudran, V. S.(Ed.)(1994).Encyclopedia of human behavior.New York, NY:Academic Press.
  54. Richards, R.、賴麗珍譯(2009)。日常創造力與人類特質新論。台北=Taipei:五南=WuNan。
  55. Robbins, T. L.,Kegley, K.(2010).Playing with thinkertoys to build creative abilities through online instruction.Thinking Skills and Creativity,5,40-48.
  56. Rufo, D.(2012).Building forts and drawing on walls: Fostering student-initiatedcreativity both inside and outside the elementary classroom.Art Education,65(3),40-47.
  57. Runco, M. A.(1996).Creativity and development: Recommendations.New Directions for Child Development,72,87-90.
  58. Runco, M. A.、邱皓政譯、丁興祥譯(2008)。創造力:當代理論與議題。台北=Taipei:心理=Psychological。
  59. Shriki, A.(2013).A model for assessing the development of students' creativity in the context of problem posing.Creative Education,4(7),430-439.
  60. Shusterman, R.(Ed.),Tomlin, A.(Ed.)(2008).Aesthetic experience.New York, NY:Routledge.
  61. Simonton, D. K.(2004).Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  62. Starko, A. J.(2000).Creativity in the classroom: School in the curious delight.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:LEA.
  63. Sternberg, R. J.(1999).Handbook of creativity.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  64. Sternberg, R. J.(Ed.)(1999).Handbook of creativity.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  65. Sternberg, V. S.(Ed.)(1999).The handbook of creativity.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
  66. Tatarkiewicz, W.、劉文潭譯(2001)。西洋六大美學理念史。台北=Taipei:聯經=Linking。
  67. Tierney, P.,Farmer, S. M.(2002).Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance.Academy of Management Journal,45(6),1137-1148.
  68. Torrance, H.(1995).Evaluating autheneic assessment: Problems and possibilities innew approaches to assessment.Buckingham, UK:Open University Press.
  69. Turner, S.(2013).Teachers' and pupils' perceptions of creativity across different key stages.Research in Education,89,23-40.
  70. Vista, C.(2000).Teaching classroom educators how to be more effective and creative teacher.Education,120(4),675-680.
  71. Yang, H. L.,Cheng, H. H.(2009).Creative self-efficacy and its factors: An empirical study of information system analysts and programmers.Computers in Human Behavior,25,429-438.
  72. 朱光潛(2003)。談美。台中=Taichung:晨星=Morning Star。
  73. 吳清山(2002)。創意教學的重要理念與實施策略。台灣教育,614,2-8。
  74. 林素卿(2009)。美感經驗對課程美學建構之啟示。東海教育評論,3,43-70。
  75. 林偉文(2011)。創意教學與創造力的培-以「設計思考」為例。教育資料與研究雙月刊,100,53-74。
  76. 林碧芳、邱皓政(2008)。創意教學自我效能感量表之編製與相關研究。教育研究與發展期刊,4(1),141-170。
  77. 崔光宙(1992)。美感判斷發展研究。台北=Taipei:師大書苑=Shtabook。
  78. 張世慧(2011)。創造力教學、學習與評量之研究。教育資料與研究,100,1-22。
  79. 張世慧(2007)。創造力-理論、技法與教學。台北=Taipei:五南=WuNan。
  80. 馮莉雅(2006)。餐旅美學教育成效之調查研究-以國立高雄餐旅學院為例。高餐通識教育學刊,3,1-26。
  81. 楊忠斌(2009)。美感經驗理論對教師的啓示。教育資料與研究,88,49-68。
  82. 溫福星(2006)。階層線性模式的原理、方法與應用。台北=Taipei:雙葉=Yeh Yeh。
被引用次数
  1. 陳薇暄,陳又菱,孫之元(2020)。行動社群應用軟體融入美感教育活動對大學生的美感經驗與情境興趣之影響:以Instagram為例。數位學習科技期刊,12(2),1-24。
  2. 黃博聖,陳學志,陳姵臻,張雨霖,林緯倫,吳清麟(2021)。中文版遠距聯想測驗在創造力研究之應用:回顧與展望。教育實踐與研究,34(1),1-44。
  3. 賈志琳,李政軒(2020)。人工智慧的實踐:對話式日語學習智慧家教系統進行日語補救教學之研究。教育實踐與研究,33(2),1-41。
  4. 劉光夏(2021)。大學藝術類數位影像創作課程學習者創意自我效能構念分析之探究。藝術教育研究,41,73-108。
  5. 孫良誠(2022)。教保服務人員美感經驗教學量表建構。藝術教育研究,43,1-30。
  6. 王亭文(2022)。CDIO體育課程設計與傳統體育課程設計對大專生學習成效之比較。大專體育學刊,24(2),204-220。
  7. (2018)。創意自我效能、組織創新氣候對國中教師創意教學表現影響之跨層次研究。教育學報,46(1),143-164。