提升職前教師校園霸凌辨識能力的訓練介入成效

The Effectiveness of Interventions to Improve Preservice Teachers' Bullying Identification

宋宥賢(Yu-Hsien Sung)；陳利銘(Li-Ming Chen)

介入 ； 校園霸凌 ； 職前教師 ； 霸凌定義 ； 霸凌辨識 ； Bullying identification ； Definition of school bullying ； Inventions ； Preservice teachers ； School bullying

教育實踐與研究

30卷2期（2017 / 12 / 01）

35 - 65

繁體中文

本研究旨在探究不同介入方式對於職前教師校園霸凌辨識能力之影響，包含1.5小時霸凌辨識訓練（第一組）、僅有定義（第二組）、定義與特徵要件檢覈表（第三組）三種方式。研究對象為427 位職前教師，其皆參與前後測情境式霸凌個案辨識問卷施測，以確認訓練介入成效。問卷資料主要經由混合模式二因子變異數分析法分析。結果顯示：經介入後，第一組職前教師之霸凌情境正確辨識得分顯著高於第二組、第三組、及控制組，效果量分別為.88、.82、.91；同時第一組職前教師對霸凌情境之過分警戒類型的錯誤辨識得分顯著低於第二組、第三組、控制組，效果量分別為-.95、-.59、-.90；而第二組、第三組、控制組職前教師於霸凌情境正確辨識得分與過分警戒類型之錯誤辨識得分間則未存有顯著差異。關於霸凌辨識，本研究發現僅提供書面霸凌定義與特徵並無法收立竿見影之效，建議仍需透過霸凌防制專業訓練方可進一步提升其辨識成效。

This study aimed to investigate whether different types of interventions could enhance preservice teachers' ability to identify bullying incidents. Participants included 427 preservice teachers in Taiwan who were assigned to four groups. The first group received a 1.5-hour training on bullying identification; The second group was given a written definition of bullying and its features. The third group received a written definition with a checklist of three bullying characteristics. The fourth group, the control group, was not given information on bullying. Pretest–posttest designs were employed in this study. The results of the mixed-model two-way ANOVA analysis indicated that the preservice teachers in the first group had significantly higher correct identification scores than those in the second group (d = .88), the third group (d = .82), and the control group (d = .91). Moreover, those in the first group had significantly lower incorrect identification scores than those in the second group (d = -.95), the third group (d = -.59), and the control group (d = -.90). There was no significant difference among the correct and incorrect identification scores of the second group, the third group, and the control group. This study suggests that administrators and policymakers should provide bullying identification training for preservice teachers, rather than merely offer the definition and characteristics of school bullying.

1. Hsieh, Y. P.,Shen, C. T.,Wei, H. S.,Feng, J. Y.,Huang, C. Y.,Hwa, H. L.(2016).Multidimensional victimization and internet addiction among Taiwanese children.Chinese Journal of Psychology,58(4),217-231.
   連結：
2. 吳文琪、陸玓玲、李蘭(2013)。台灣地區國中學生霸凌角色之分佈及其與個人和家庭因素之分析。台灣公共衛生雜誌，32(4)，372-381。
   連結：
3. 吳文琪、陸玓玲、李蘭(2013)。台灣地區國中學生霸凌角色之分佈及其與個人和家庭因素之分析。台灣公共衛生雜誌，32(4)，372-381。
   連結：
4. 吳文琪、陸玓玲、李蘭(2013)。台灣地區國中學生霸凌角色之分佈及其與個人和家庭因素之分析。台灣公共衛生雜誌，32(4)，372-381。
   連結：
5. 杜淑芬(2015)。國小導師成功處理兒童欺凌行為的輔導策略分析。教育實踐與研究，28(1)，99-130。
   連結：
6. 邱珍琬、張麗麗(2012)。中小學教師之校園霸凌行為辨識、嚴重性與介入評估之研究。應用心理研究，54，203-250。
   連結：
7. 馮嘉玉、晏涵文(2013)。國中校園霸凌與同儕性騷擾防治介入課程設計與介入效果。台灣性學學刊，19(1)，21-52。
   連結：
8. 顏正芳(2010)。兒童青少年校園霸凌經驗和心理健康之關連性。台灣精神醫學，24(1)，3-13。
   連結：
9. 教育部（2012 年7 月26 日）。校園霸凌防制準則。取自https://csrc.edu.tw/bully/rule_view.asp?Sno=1542 [Ministry of Education. (2012, July 26). Regulations on the prevention of school bullying. Retrieved from https://csrc.edu.tw/bully/rule_view.asp?Sno=1542]
10. Aluede, O.(Ed.),Mceachern, A. G.(Ed.),Kenny, M. C.(Ed.)(2005).Peer victimization in schools: An international perspective.New Delhi, IN:Kamla-Raj Enterprises.
11. Barbero, J. A. J.,Hernández, J. A. R.,Esteban, B. L.,Garcia, M. P.(2012).Effectiveness of antibullying school programmes: A systematic review by evidence levels.Children and Youth Services Review,34(9),1646-1658.
12. Bauman, S.(2008).The role of elementary school counselors in reducing school bullying.The Elementary School Journal,108(5),362-375.
13. Bauman, S.,Del Rio, A.(2006).Preservice teachers' responses to bullying scenarios: Comparing physical, verbal, and relational bullying.Journal of Educational Psychology,98(1),219-231.
14. Bauman, S.,Del Rio, A.(2005).Knowledge and beliefs about bullying in schools comparing pre-service teachers in the United States and the United Kingdom.School Psychology International,26(4),428-442.
15. Bauman, S.,Toomey, R. B.,Walker, J. L.(2013).Associations among bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students.Journal of Adolescence,36(2),341-350.
16. Benitez, J. L.,Garcia-Berben, A.,Fernandez-Cabezas, M.(2009).The impact of a course on bullying within the pre-service teacher training curriculum.Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology,7(1),191-208.
17. Bennett, D. A.(2001).How can I deal with missing data in my study?.Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health,25(5),464-469.
18. Beran, T.(2006).Preparing teachers to manage school bullying: The hidden curriculum.The Journal of Educational Thought,40(2),119-128.
19. Bond, T.,Fox, C.(2007).Applying the Rasch Model: Fundamental measurement in the human sciences.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
20. Boulton, M. J.,Hardcastle, K.,Down, J.,Fowles, J.,Simmonds, J. A.(2014).A comparison of preservice teachers' responses to cyber versus traditional bullying scenarios: Similarities and differences and implications for practice.Journal of Teacher Education,65(2),145-155.
21. Campbell, M. A.,Slee, P. T.,Spears, B.,Butler, D.,Kift, S.(2013).Do cyberbullies suffer too? Cyberbullies' perceptions of the harm they cause to others and to their own mental health.School Psychology International,34(6),613-629.
22. Cannings, T. R.,Talley, S.(2002).Multimedia and online video case studies for preservice teacher preparation.Education and Information Technologies,7(4),359-367.
23. Carney, J. V.(2005).Factor structure of the bullying situations identification (BSI) instrument.Journal of School Violence,4(3),77-91.
24. Chen, L. M.,Cheng, Y. Y.(2013).Prevalence of school bullying among secondary students in Taiwan: Measurements with and without a specific definition of bullying.School Psychology International,34(6),707-720.
25. Chen, L. M.,Sung, Y. H.,Cheng, W.(2017).How to enhance teachers' bullying identification: A comparison among providing a training program, a written definition, and a definition with a checklist of bullying characteristics.The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,26(6),351-359.
26. Cheng, Y. Y.,Chen, L. M.,Ho, H. C.,Cheng, C. L.(2011).Definitions of school bullying in Taiwan: A comparison of multiple perspectives.School Psychology International,32(3),227-243.
27. Cheng, Y. Y.,Chen, L. M.,Liu, K. S.,Chen, Y. L.(2011).Development and psychometric evaluation of the school bullying scales: A Rasch measurement approach.Educational and Psychological Measurement,71(1),200-216.
28. Cohen, J.(1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
29. Craig, K.,Bell, D.,Leschied, A.(2011).Pre-service teachers' knowledge and attitudes regarding school-based bullying.Canadian Journal of Education,34(2),21-33.
30. Curb, L. A.(2014).Norman, Oklahoma,University of Oklahoma.
31. Davis, C. L.(2015).Minneapolis, Minnesota,Walden University.
32. Dedousis-Wallace, A.,Shute, S.,Varlow, M.,Murrihy, R.,Kidman, T.(2014).Predictors of teacher intervention in indirect bullying at school and outcome of a professional development presentation for teachers.Educational Psychology,34(7),862-875.
33. Hazler, R. J.,Miller, D. L.,Carney, J. V.,Green, S.(2001).Adult recognition of school bullying situations.Educational Research,43(2),133-146.
34. Inhat, L.,Smith, J. D.(2013).Solutions for bullying: Intervention training for pre-service teachers.Journal of Teaching and Learning,9(1)
35. Jutengren, G.,Kerr, M.,Stattin, H.(2011).Adolescents' deliberate self-harm, interpersonal stress, and the moderating effects of self-regulation: A two-wave longitudinal analysis.Journal of School Psychology,49(2),249-264.
36. Khamis, V.(2015).Bullying among school-age children in the greater Beirut area: Risk and protective factors.Child Abuse & Neglect,39,137-146.
37. Lam, L. T.,Li, Y.(2013).The validation of the E-Victimisation Scale (E-VS) and the E-Bullying Scale (E-BS) for adolescents.Computers in Human Behavior,29(1),3-7.
38. Latané, B.,Darley, J. M.(1970).The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn't he help?.New York, NY:Appleton-Century Crofts.
39. Linacre, J. M.(2006).A user's guide to WINSTEPS: Rasch model computer program.Chicago, IL:Winsteps.
40. Menesini, E.,Fonzi, A.,Smith, P. K.(2002).Attribution of meanings to terms related to bullying: A comparison between teacher's and pupil's perspectives in Italy.European Journal of Psychology of Education,17(4),393-406.
41. Messias, E.,Kindrick, K.,Castro, J.(2014).School bullying, cyberbullying, or both: Correlates of teen suicidality in the 2011 CDC youth risk behavior survey.Comprehensive Psychiatry,55(5),1063-1068.
42. Migliaccio, T.(2015).Teacher engagement with bullying: Managing an identity within a school.Sociological Spectrum,35(1),84-108.
43. Mishna, F.(2004).A qualitative study of bullying from multiple perspective.Children & Schools,26(4),234-247.
44. Mishna, F.,Pepler, D.,Wiener, J.(2006).Factors associated with perceptions and responses to bullying situations by children, parents, teachers, and principals.Victims and Offenders,1(3),255-288.
45. Mishna, F.,Scarcello, I.,Pepler, D.,Wiener, J.(2005).Teacher's understanding of bullying.Canadian Journal of Education,28(4),718-738.
46. Mok, M. M. C.,Wang, W. C.,Cheng, Y. Y.,Leung, S. O.,Chen, L. M.(2014).Prevalence and behavioural ranking of bullying and victimisation among secondary students in Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Macao.The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,23(3),757-767.
47. Nicolaides, S.,Toda, Y.,Smith, P. K.(2002).Knowledge and attitudes about school bullying in trainee teachers.British Journal of Educational Psychology,72(1),105-118.
48. Novick, R. M.,Isaacs, J.(2010).Telling is compelling: The impact of student reports of bullying on teacher intervention.Educational Psychology,30(3),283-296.
49. Oldenburg, B.,Bosman, R.,Veenstra, R.(2015).Are elementary school teachers prepared to tackle bullying? A pilot study.School Psychology International,37(1),64-72.
50. Olweus, D.(1993).Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do.Cambridge, MA:Blackwell Publishers.
51. Pytash, K. E.(2013).Using YA literature to help preservice teachers deal with bullying and suicide.Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy,56(6),470-479.
52. Raven, S.,Jurkiewicz, M. A.(2014).Preservice secondary science teachers' experiences and ideas about bullying in science classrooms.Science Educator,23(1),65-72.
53. Rickard, A.,McAvinia, C.,Quirke-Bolt, N.(2009).The challenge of change: Digital video-analysis and constructivist teaching approaches on a one year preservice teacher education program in Ireland.Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,17(3),349-367.
54. Schafer, J. L.(1999).Multiple imputation: A primer.Statistical Methods in Medical Research,8(1),3-15.
55. Smith, H.,Varjas, K.,Meyers, J.,Marshall, M. L.,Ruffner, C.,Graybill, E. C.(2009).Teachers' perceptions of teasing in schools.Journal of School Violence,9(1),2-22.
56. Ttofi, M. M.,Farrington, D. P.(2011).Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic review.Journal of Experimental Criminology,7(1),27-56.
57. Vaillancourt, T.,McDougall, P.,Hymel, S.,Krygsman, A.,Miller, J.,Stiver, K.,Davis, C.(2008).Bullying: Are researchers and children/youth talking about the same thing?.International Journal of Behavioral Development,32(6),486-495.
58. Vreeman, R. C.,Carroll, A. E.(2007).A systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent bullying.Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine,161(1),78-88.
59. Wright, B. D.,Linacre, J. M.(1994).Reasonable mean-square fit values.Rasch Measurement Transactions,8(3),370.
60. Yen, C. F.,Liu, T. L.,Ko, C. H.,Wu, Y. Y.,Cheng, C. P.(2014).Mediating effects of bullying involvement on the relationship of body mass index with social phobia, depression, suicidality, and self-esteem and sex differences in adolescents in Taiwan.Child Abuse & Neglect,38(3),517-526.
61. Yilmaz, H.(2010).An examination of preservice teachers' perceptions about cyberbullying.Eurasia Journal of Mathematic, Science & Technology Education,6(4),263-270.
62. 邱珍琬(2002)。國小校園欺凌行為實際－學生觀點。初等教育學刊，11，219-250。
63. 邱珍琬(2002)。國小國中校園欺凌行為比較研究。彰化師大教育學報，3，99-129。
64. 教育部(2011)。校園重大偏差或霸凌事件之預防與處理建議－防制校園霸凌案例彙編。台北=Taipei:作者=Author。
65. 陳利銘、王佳琪、馮綉雯(2015)。國民小學高年級校園霸凌現況之研究。教育學刊，45，127-157。

1. 郭葉珍(2020)。認識、評估與回應幼兒人際性行為。教育實踐與研究，33(1)，107-137。
2. 趙淑珠,何忻蓓,Shaofan Bu,Ada L. Sinacore(2022)。Teachers' Perceptions of the Implementation of the Bullying Prevention Policies in Taiwan。中華輔導與諮商學報，65，63-91。
3. (2024)。不同網路霸凌情境的旁觀者反應傾向探究：網路霸凌辨識能力、道德疏離與受害者行為的影響。教育心理學報，55(3)，491-511。