專業學習的建構：「設計本位學習」創新教學之行動探究

Framing Professional Learning: An Action Research on Teachers' Pedagogical Empowerment of Design-based Learning for Innovative Teaching

陳偉仁(Wei-Ren Chen)；黃楷茹(Kai-Ju Huang)；吳青陵(Ching-Ling Wu)；呂金燮(Chin-Hsieh Lu)

在職教師 ； 設計本位學習 ； 專業學習 ； 創新教學 ； Design-Based Learning ； innovative teaching ； in-service teacher ； professional learning

教育實踐與研究

31卷2期（2018 / 12 / 01）

25 - 57

繁體中文

在這個強調創新的紀元中，如何支持教師創新教學是重要但未被系統性探究的議題。本研究採合作式行動研究，以教師學習理論為基礎，透過參與式觀察、訪談、文件分析等方式，探究教學培力團隊如何設計出專業的學習方式，引動一所國小教師社群實踐「設計本位學習」（Design-Based Learning[DBL]）課程，培力團隊並從反思中嘗試建構出創新教學師資培力的可行方式。研究發現教學培力團隊以參與式學習為理念，提升教師的專業自主性，並透過體驗活動、課程案例原型分享等方式，導入DBL創新教學的語彙。國小教師社群從中嘗試解構習慣，重新定位教學者角色，師生共構出轉動教學的情境知能，並深刻體會到真實展演是重構專業成長的契機。教學培力團隊從反思中提出創新教學師資培力的方式，導引出未來行動探究的方向：以平行學習的理念為基礎，和教師共同探究以品賞與識讀學生學習表現為核心的專業學習之路。

In this innovation era, offering support for teachers' innovative teaching has been an important but neglected issue. Based on teacher learning theory, the purpose of this study is to explore a teaching empowerment team's design of professional learning for elementary school teachers who learned Design-Based Learning[DBL]. The team attempted to empower teachers based on the reflections of the collaborative action research through participatory observation, interviews and document analysis. The findings indicated that the teaching empowerment team regarded participatory learning as a fundamental rationale to elicit teachers' professional autonomy. The team also guided teachers to make sense of the key elements of DBL by experiential activities and used a DBL exemplar curriculum as protocol. Consequently, the teacher community in an elementary school tried to deconstruct teaching habits and redefined their teaching roles. The teachers collaborated with students to develop contextual pedagogical competencies, and found that presenting learning outcomes in real context made professional growth possible. A teacher empowerment framework for innovative teaching and future studies was further proposed: through parallel learning for pedagogical transformation, the team and teachers might work together to develop a sustainable professional learning pathway based on the connoisseurship and evaluation of student learning performance.

1. 林佩璇(2009)。課程行動研究的實踐論述：從自我到社會文化。教育實踐與研究，22(2)，95-122。
   連結：
2. 陳美玉(2008)。教師學習—有效教學的關鍵動力。課程與教學季刊，11(1)，173-192。
   連結：
3. 黃琴扉、劉嘉茹(2012)。利用結構式引導反思工具探討在職科學教師之專業成長。教育實踐與研究，25(2)，163-194。
   連結：
4. 簡馨瑩、宋曜廷、張國恩(2009)。變與不變：兩位國小教師學習自詢策略教學之歷程分析。教育心理學報，40(4)，619-640。
   連結：
5. 顧瑜君(2002)。實踐取向之教師專業成長—在職教師進修模式之變革解析。課程與教學季刊，5(4)，1-18。
   連結：
6. Bransford, J.,Brown, A.,Cocking, R.(2000).How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school.Washington, D.C:National Academies Press.
7. Brown, T.、吳莉君譯(2013)。設計思考改造世界。台北:聯經。
8. Cross, N.(1982).Designerly ways of knowing.Design Studies,3(4),221-224.
9. Darling-Hammond, L.(Ed.),Sykes, G.(Ed.)(1999).Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
10. Davis, M.(1998).Making a case for design-based learning.Arts Education Policy Review,100(2),7-15.
11. Davis, M.,Hawley, P.,Spilka, G.(1997).Learning through design.Design as a catalyst for learning,Alexandria, VA:
12. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York, NY: Putnam.
13. Drago-Severson, E.(2011).How adults learn: Forms the foundation of the learning designs standard.Journal of Staff Development,32(5),10-12.
14. Drago-Severson, E.(2002).School leadership in support teachers' transformational learning: The dramatic differences resources make.annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association,New Orleans, LA:
15. Ericsson, K.A.,Krampe, R. Th.,Tesch-Romer, C.(1993).The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance.Psychological Review,100,393-394.
16. Feiman-Nemser, S.(2012).Teachers as learners.Cambridge, MA:Harvard Education Press.
17. Graue, M. E.,Walsh, D. J.(1998).Studying children in context: Theories, methods, and ethics.Thousand Oaks, CA:SAGE.
18. Hoban, G. J.(Ed.)(2002).Teacher for educational change.Buckingham, UK:Open University Press.
19. Joyce, B.,Calhoun, E.(2016).What are we learning about how we learn?.Journal of Staff Development,37(3),42-44.
20. Koh, J. H. L.,Chai, C. S.,Wong, B.,Hong, H.-Y.(2015).Design thinking for education: Conceptions and applications in teaching and learning.Singapore, SG:Springer.
21. Meinel, C.(Ed.),Leifer, L.(Ed.),Plattner, H.(Ed.)(2012).Design thinking research: Measuring performance in context.London, UK:Springer.
22. Miller, J. P.(1987).Transformation as an aim of education.Journal of Curriculum Theorizing,7(1),94-152.
23. Nelson, D. (2004). Design based learning delivers required standards in all subjects, K-12. Retrieved from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Web site: https://www.csupomona.edu/~dnelson/documents/jis_vol17_fall04.doc
24. Nelson, D. (n. d.). The 6 ½ steps of backwards thinking. Retrieved from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Web site: https://www.cpp.edu/~dnelson/methodology/6.5steps.html
25. Nelson, D. (n. d.). How does design-based learning work? Retrieved from California State Polytechnic University, Pomona Web site: https://www.cpp.edu/~dnelson/methodology/index.html
26. Perkins, D.(1986).Knowledge as design.Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
27. Puntambekar, S.,Kolodner, J. L.(2005).Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: Helping students learn science from design.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,42(2),185-217.
28. Royal College of Art for the Secretary of State for Education and Science(1979).Design in general education: The report of an enquiry.London, UK:Royal College of Art.
29. Sawyer, R. K. (Ed.)(2014).The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences.New York, NY:Cambridge University Press.
30. 佐藤學、黃郁倫譯(2017)。邁向專家之路：教師教育改革的藍圖。台北:高等教育。
31. 張瀞文(2015)。三股力量翻轉臺灣公校。親子天下，73，146-163。
32. 甄曉蘭(1995)。合作行動研究—進行教育研究的另一種方式。嘉義師院學報，9，297-318。
33. 廣達文教基金會(2012)。廣達文教基金會成果年報。台北=Taipei:廣達文教基金會=Quanta Cultural & Education Foundation。
34. 羅寶鳳(2007)。教師的職場學習：強化教師學習與教育改革之連結。成人及終身教育學刊，9，127-158。

1. 曾淑賢(2021)。學前融合教育課程調整模式之探討。教育實踐與研究，34(2)，125-147。
2. 洪菁惠(2021)。正念導向健康管理通識教育之教學實踐行動研究。通識教育實踐與研究，29，53-104。
3. 許馨云,林宇凡(2020)。資優素養導向課程設計教師案例探究－堅持中有柔軟，統整後有自己。資優教育論壇，18(2)，75-85。
4. 黃囇莉,陳文彥(2023)。努力有用乎？教師能力觀、努力觀、社群共學觀及學習者中心教學觀對課程變革行為意向之影響。教育實踐與研究，36(1)，39-72。
5. 賈志琳,李政軒(2020)。人工智慧的實踐：對話式日語學習智慧家教系統進行日語補救教學之研究。教育實踐與研究，33(2)，1-41。
6. 劉鎮寧(2020)。國民小學校長與教師領導者的協作教學領導個案研究。教育實踐與研究，33(1)，33-69。
7. 潘彥瑾,陳嘉怡(2022)。網路世代使用跨國同步視訊學習在華語聽力表現上的成效。嘉大教育研究學刊，48，31-65。
8. 沈永祺(2022)。應用設計導向學習於新產品管理課程以提升學生關鍵能力。科技管理學刊，27(3)，75-111。
9. 王明旭(2023)。協作學習理論發展團隊協作四部曲之跨域教學成效評估：以設計思考課程為例。教育實踐與研究，36(1)，73-120。
10. 顏于智(2021)。十九世紀初美國麻州師資培育的形成與發展。教育實踐與研究，34(2)，83-123。
11. (2024)。議題融入資優教育教學設計的職前師資培育實踐與成效。特殊教育研究學刊，49(1)，63-95。