什麼才是他／她要的幸福？從能動性角度探討新住民子女教育的可能性

What Kind of Wellbeing Does He/She Want? Educational Possibilities for Children of New Immigrants From the Perspective of Agency

黃騰(Teng Huang)

主觀幸福感 ； 身體感知 ； 社群實踐 ； 能動性 ； 新住民子女 ； agency ； children of new immigrants ； community of practice ； embodiment ； subjective well-being

教育實踐與研究

35卷1期（2022 / 06 / 01）

75 - 111

繁體中文

經濟學家指出，我們需要超越過去客觀幸福生活的指標，更重視主觀幸福感、能動性、能力來做為移民政策的基礎。然而，台灣目前的相關新住民子女研究卻很少從主觀幸福感和能動性的角度切入研究。而由於能動性的概念仍然有許多爭論存在，因此本研究進一步從Giddens能動性的理論為基礎，來思考現有的研究發現，並探討未來研究的可能方向。結果發現，現有的研究偏向新住民子女如何「適應」主流社會，而不是發展其「能動性」的能力。本文藉由進一步的探討，提出二種未來研究的重要具體方向。第一是透過微觀的身體經驗感受，來理解新住民子女所處社會位置中的問題，藉此提昇他們的意識反思，以協助達到其主觀幸福感。第二是透過中觀的社群實踐，來理解新住民子女與社會特定社群成員的實踐互動，借此理解其所受到的限制或展現能動性的策略，來做為未來教育政策與實踐的重要依據。

According to economists, we should think beyond the objective well-being indicators and pay more attention to the subjective well-being, agency, and capability of immigrants as the basis of immigration policy. However, few studies on the children of new immigrants in Taiwan have been conducted from the perspective of subjective well-being and agency. Since the concept of agency is still controversial, this study further considers the current research findings based on Giddens' theory of agency and explores possible directions for future study. It was found that current studies have focused on how children of new immigrants adapt to mainstream society rather than on developing their agency. This paper proposes two concrete directions for future studies through further investigation. First is to understand, at the micro level, the problems of the social position of the new immigrant children through their embodied experience and feelings to raise their conscious reflection and achieve their subjective well-being. Second is to understand, at the meso level, the interactions of new immigrant children with specific community members in communities of practice, so as to understand their constraints and the agentic strategies they utilize, which will serve as an important reference for future educational policies and practices.

1. 林純燕, C. -Y.,賴志峰, Z. -F.(2014)。國民小學新住民子女學校適應與幸福感相關之研究。學校行政，92，205-230。
   連結：
2. 唐文慧, W. -H.,王宏仁, H. -R.(2011)。結構限制下的能動性施展：台越跨國婚姻受暴婦女的動態父權協商。台灣社會研究季刊，82，123-170。
   連結：
3. 陳怡君, Y. -J.,林恩存, E. -C.,王聖安, S. -A.,李盈瑩, Y. -Y.,吳芝儀, Z. -Y.(2018)。從多元文化觀點探討新住民諮商議題。諮商與輔導，388，44-47。
   連結：
4. 黃彥宜, Y. -Y.,王櫻芬, Y. -F.,陳昭榮, Z. -R(2019)。埔里新住民的社會復原力：以 921 地震為例。台灣社會福利學刊，15(1)，87-124。
   連結：
5. 黃騰, T.,歐用生, Y. -S.(2009)。失去的信任能找回來嗎：一個關於教師與課程改革的故事。課程與教學季刊，12(2)，161-192。
   連結：
6. 廖婉余, W. -Y.(2020)。Iris Marion Young 之差異政治在新住民子女教育政策上的啟示。嶺東學報，46，225-252。
   連結：
7. 廖錦文, C. -W,鄭博文, P. -W(2019)。經濟弱勢學生學習態度與學業表現之縱貫研究。教育實踐與研究，32(1)，71-106。
   連結：
8. 鄧宗聖, T. -S.(2021)。反思 Covid-19 的虛假訊息：大學生批判框架轉化設計之實踐行動研究。教育實踐與研究，34(3)，31-72。
   連結：
9. 謝智玲, Z. -L.(2012)。新住民子女社會支持、自尊與行為適應之研究。測驗統計年刊，20，53-75。
   連結：
10. 鍾鎮城, Z. -C.(2020)。臺灣國民教育場域裡的新住民語言教育政策。教育科學研究期刊，65(1)，201-219。
    連結：
11. 顏于智, Y. -C.(2021)。十九世紀初美國麻州師資培育的形成與發展。教育實踐與研究，34(2)，83-124。
    連結：
12. 魏麗敏, L. -M.,陳嘉慧, J. -H.(2012)。新住民子女生活適應量表編製及應用。諮商與輔導，317，26-29。
    連結：
13. Agee, M. D.,Crocker, T. D.(2013).Operationalizing the capability approach to assessing well-being.The Journal of Socio-Economics,46,80-86.
14. Anand, P.,Krishnakumar, J.,Tran, N. B.(2011).Measuring welfare: Latent variable models for happiness and capabilities in the presence of unobservable heterogeneity.Journal of Public Economics,95(3-4),205-215.
15. Archer, M.(2000).Being human: The problem of agency.Cambridge, UK:The Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.
16. Billett, S.(2006).Relational interdependence between social and individual agency in work and working life.Mind, Culture, and Activity,13,53-69.
17. Boler, M.(1999).Feeling power: Emotions and education.London, UK:Routledge.
18. Brizuela, B. M.,Garcia-Sellers, M. J.(1999).School adaptation: A triangular process.American Educational Research Journal,36(2),354-370.
19. Bucknell, K. J.,Kangas, M.,Crane, M. F.(2022).Adaptive self-reflection and resilience: The moderating effects of rumination on insight as a mediator.Personality and Individual Differences,185,11234-11234.
20. Craib, I.(1992).Anthony Giddens.London, UK:Routledge.
21. Crocker, D. A.(1995).Functioning and capability: The foundations of sen’s and nussbaum’s development ethic. In women, culture, and development.Oxford, UK:Oxford University Press.
22. Durand, M.,Smith, C.(2013).The OECD approach to measuring subjective well-being.World happiness report(2013)
23. Emirbayer, M.,Mische, A.(1998).What is agency?.American Journal of Sociology,103(4),962-1023.
24. Farnsworth, V.,Kleanthous, I.,Wenger-Trayner, E.(2016).Communities of practice as a social theory of learning: A conversation with Etienne Wenger.British Journal of Educational Studies,64(2),139-160.
25. Ferguson, P. P. (Ed.),Ferguson, P. P.(Trans.),Emanuel, S.(Trans.),Johnson, J.(Trans.),Waryn, S. T.(Trans.)(1999).The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
26. Galinha, I. C.,Pais-Ribeiro, J. L.(2012).Cognitive, affective and contextual predictors of subjective well-being.International Journal of Wellbeing,2(1),34-53.
27. Giddens, A.(1991).Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age.Stanford, CA:Stanford University Press.
28. Giddens, A.(1990).The consequences of modernity.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
29. Giddens, A.(1984).The constitution of society.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
30. Giddens, A.(1979).Central problems in social theory.London, UK:The MacMillan Press.
31. Graham, C.(2011).The pursuit of happiness: An economy of well-being.Washington, D. C.:Brookings Institution Press.
32. Graham, C. L.(Ed.),Lora, E.(Ed.)(2009).Paradox and perception: Measuring quality of life in Latin America.Washington, D. C.:Brookings Institution Press.
33. Graham, C.,Nikolova, M.(2015).Bentham or Aristotle in the development process? An empirical investigation of capabilities and subjective well-being.World Development,68(1),163-179.
34. Hall, J.(2013).From capabilities to contentment: Testing the links between human development and life satisfaction.World happiness report(2013),New York, NY:
35. Huang, T.(2010).Teaching unawareness: The curriculum of desire and love in the risk society.Asia Pacific Education Review,11(4),477-487.
36. Huang, T.(2016).Integrating the ontological, epistemological and socio-cultural aspects: A holistic view of teacher education.Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice,22(8),947-964.
37. Huang, T.(2015).Reflexive risk-education and cosmopolitanism in the risk society.Globalizations,12(5),744-757.
38. Jary, D.,Jary, J.(1997).The transformations of Anthony Giddens.Anthony Giddens: Critical assessment,London, UK:
39. Mcveigh, R.(2020).The body in mind: Mead’s embodied cognition.Symbolic Interaction,43(3),493-513.
40. Meštrović, S. G.(1998).Anthony Giddens: The last modernist.London, UK:Psychology Press.
41. Mouzelis, N.(1995).Sociological theory: What went wrong?.London, UK:Routledge.
42. Nikolova, M.,Graham, C.(2020).The economics of happiness.GLO Discussion Paper,640,1-34.
43. Nikolova, M.,Graham, C.(2015).In transit: The well-being of migrants from transition and post-transition countries.Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization,112,164-186.
44. Nussbaum, M.(2000).Women and human development: The capabilities approach.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
45. Nussbaum, M.,Sen, A.(1993).The quality of life.London, UK:Oxford University Press.
46. Packer, M. J.,Goicoechea, J.(2000).Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology.Educational Psychologist,35(4),227-241.
47. Reay, D.(2005).Beyond consciousness? The psychic landscape of social class.Sociology,39(5),911-928.
48. Schutz, A.,Luckmann, T.(1973).The structures of the life-world.Evanston, IL:Northwestern University Press.
49. Scribner, S.,Tobach, E.(1997).A sociocultural approach to the study of mind.Mind and social practice: Selected writings of Sylvia Scribner,Cambridge, UK:
50. Sen, A.(2008).The idea of justice.Journal of Human Development,9(3),331-342.
51. Sen, A.(1985).Well-being, agency and freedom: The Dewey lectures 1984.The journal of philosophy,82(4),169-221.
52. Stein, D.,Grant, A. M.(2014).Disentangling the relationships among self-reflection, insight, and subjective well-being: The role of dysfunctional attitudes and core self-evaluations.The Journal of Psychology,148(5),505-522.
53. Stone, A. A.,Mackie, C. E.(2014).Subjective well-being: Measuring happiness, suffering, and other dimensions of experience.Washington, DC:National Academies Press.
54. Tanaka, S.(2015).Intercorporeality as a theory of social cognition.Theory & Psychology,25(4),455-472.
55. Urry, J.(1997).Duality of structure: Some critical issues.Anthony Giddens: Critical assessment,London, UK:
56. Van Galen, J. A.(2017).Agency, shame, and identity: Digital stories of teaching.Teaching and Teacher Education,61,84-93.
57. Wenger-Trayner, E.,Wenger-Trayner, B.(2014).Learning in landscapes of practice: A framework.Learning in landscapes of practice: Boundaries, identity, and knowledgeability,London, UK:
58. 吳貞宜, Z. -Y.,吳娟芳, J. -F,張素真, S. -Z.,吳永靖, Y. -J,詹念峰, N. -F.,柯志賢, Z. -X.(2017)。新住民子女的學校適應。教育脈動，12，1-4。
59. 夏曉鵑（2018）。解構新自由主義全球化下的「台灣第五大族群──新住民」論述。取自 https://www.thenewslens.com/article/107733 [Xia, X. -J. (2018). A treatise on destructing the “fifth-nation - new immigrant” under neoliberal globalization. Retrieved from https://www.thenewslens.com/article/107733.]
60. 張智嵐, Z. -L.,徐西森, X. -S.(2019)。新住民家庭跨文化適應歷程之個案研究－現象學觀點。輔導季刊，55(3)，1-13。
61. 教育部（2020）。各級學校新住民子女就學概況。取自 https://reurl.cc/xGWl2z [Ministry of Education. (2020). Overview of school attendance for new immigrant children in schools of all levels. Retrieved from https://reurl.cc/xGWl2z.]
62. 陳秉璋, B. -Z.(1982).實證社會學先鋒—涂爾幹.台北=Taipei:允晨=Asian Culture Publishing.
63. 陳麗君, L. -J.(2016)。「日久他鄉是故鄉」之後呢？─談新住民的語言教育發展的可能性。語文教育論壇，10，21-27。
64. 劉育瑄, Y. -X.(2021).身為在台灣的新二代,我很害怕.台北=Taipei:PCuSER 電腦人文化=PCuSER PRESS Co..
65. 戴台馨, T. -X.(2012)。公平對待新住民－以沈恩的「能力分析法」來詮釋。輔仁社會研究，2，55-79。