批判種族理論：以台灣原住民族特殊學童出現率為例

Critiquing the Prevalent Rates of Aboriginal Students Requiring Special Needs Education: A Perspective of Critical Race Theory.

10.6502/SEF.2015.18.57-65

吳啟誠(Chi-Cheng Wu)；張俊紳(Chun-Sheng Chang)

批判種族理論 ； 原住民族 ； 特殊教育 ； aboriginal ； critical race theory ； special education

特教論壇

18期（2015 / 06 / 01）

57 - 65

繁體中文

本文旨在介紹批判種族理論的學理基礎，並以台灣原住民族中特殊兒童的出現率為例說明其在特殊教育的運用。文中首先介紹批判種族理論的基本主張;接著探討原住民族中身心障礙類與資賦優異類特殊學童的出現率，分析與非原民族間的差異，並暸解缺陷理論對該現象詮釋時對原住民族學童可能產生的影響。批判種族理論認為教育體制隱含種族意識與種族主義，主張透過發掘少數族群所遭受的不公平教育經驗，喚起主流族群對種族主義的意識以促進族群間彼此的平等關係。另一方面，國內資料顯示：原住民族在身心障礙類別的特殊學童出現率高於非原住民族，資賦優異類學童的比例卻比非原住民族來得低。原住民族的生理或文化的缺陷是常被用來解釋這種差異的論述方式，然而這種詮釋卻可能塑造主流族群與少數族群間的從屬階層關條。文末則針對原住民特殊教育的缺點提出改善措施。

This paper introduces the theoretical basis regarding critical race theory (CRT); and uses it as a framework to exam the rate of aboriginal students who are identified as requiring special needs education in Taiwan. In the beginning, it introduces the philosophical and methodological ideas regarding CRT. CRT assumes that race is socially constructed. Having explored the counter-stories of the minority, the majoritarian stories could be challenged and racial equality may be improved. Then it discusses the ＂rate＂ disparity between aboriginal and non-aboriginal students who are identified as experiencing disabilities or being gifted and talented. The data show that the rate of aboriginal students being identified as having disabilities is higher than non-aboriginal groups of students; whereas the rate of the aboriginal students being identified as being gifted or talented is lower than non-aboriginal groups of students. Finally, it discusses the discourse that explains the rate disparity. It is indicated that a deficit discourse is conventionally used to explain the phenomenon which is worth of massive concern because it might disadvantage aboriginal group of students. Finally, some measure are suggested to improve the educational practice of aboriginal students who have special educational needs.

1. 吳啟誠(2013)。檢視融合教育之論述與研究：以台灣為例。特教論壇，15，20-32。
   連結：
2. National Association of School Psychologists, (2013). Racial and ethnic disproportionality in Education [Position Statement]. Bethesda, MD: Author..
3. Averill, O. H. & Rinaldi, C. (2011). Research brief: Multi-tier system of supports (MTSS). Retrieved from: https://www.urbancollaborative.org/sites/urbancollaborative.org/files/mtssbrieffinalmodified1.pdf
4. Denzin, N.(Ed.),Lincoln, Y.(Ed.)(2000).Handbook of Qualitative Research.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage Publications.
5. Fulcher, G.(1989).Disability Policies? A comparative approach to education policy and disability.London:The Falmer Press.
6. Jett, C.C.(2012).Critical Race Theory Interwoven with Mathematics Education Research.Journal of Urban Mathematics Education,5(1),21-30.
7. Ladson-Billings, G.(1998).Just what is critical race theory and what's it doing in a nice-field like education.International Journal of Qualitative Studies In education,11(1),7-24.
8. Ladson-Billings, G.,Tate, W. F.(1995).Toward a critical race theory of education.Teachers College Record,97,47-68.
9. Levinson, B. A.U. (Ed.)(2011).Beyond Critique: Critical Social Theories and Education.Boulder, CO:Paradigm Publishers.
10. Litowitz, D.E.(1997).Some Critical Thoughts on Critical Race Theory.Notre Dame Law Review,72(2),503-529.
11. Love, B. J.(2004).Brown Plus 50 Counter-storytelling: A Critical Race Theory Analysis of the "Majoritarian Achievement Gap" Story.Equality &Excellence in Education,37,227-246.
12. Martin, D. B.(2009).Researching race in mathematics education.Teachers College Record,111,295-338.
13. Milner, H. R.(2007).Race, culture, and researcher positionality: Working through dangers seen, unseen, and unforeseen.Educational Researcher,36(7),388-400.
14. Ortiz, L.,Jani, J.(2010).Critical race theory: a transformational model for teaching diversity.Journal of Social Work Education,46(2),175-193.
15. Parker, L.,Lynn, M.(2002).What's race got to do with it? Critical race theory's conflicts with and connections to qualitative research, methodology and epistemology.Qualitative Inquiry,8(1),7-22.
16. Solórzano, D. G.(1998).Critical race theory, race and gender microaggressions, and the experience of Chicana and Chicano scholars.Qualitative Studies in Education,11,121-136.
17. Solórzano, D. G.(1998).Critical race theory, race and gender microaggressions, and the experience of Chicana and Chicano scholars.Teachers College Record,97(1),47-67.
18. Solórzano, D.G.,Yosso, T. J.(2002).Critical Race Methodology: Counter- Storytelling as an Analytical Framework for Educational Research.Qualitative Inquiry,8(1),23-44.
19. Tyson, L.(2006).Critical Theory Today: A User-Friendly Guide.NY:Routledge.
20. Yosso, T. J.(2005).Whose Culture Has Capital? A Critical Race Theory Discussion of Community Cultural Wealth.Race Ethnicity and Education,8,69-91.
21. 王淑惠(2006)。國小原住民學習障礙兒童與非原住民學習障礙兒童在魏氏兒童智力量表的表現分析。東台灣特殊教育學報，8，191-214。
22. 阿撒克．阿復(2011)。原住民族電視台vs.公廣價值？─原視法與原住民族獨立自主電視台之建構。臺灣原住民族研究季刊，4(1)，67-115。
23. 陳克惠(2003)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。花蓮市，國立東華大學。
24. 陳枝烈(2004)。牡丹社─多元文化教育的觀點。原住民教育季刊，35，109-128。
25. 廖永堃(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。台北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
26. 蔡懷卿(2005)。美國批判法學研究運動與種、女性主義法學互動之淺論。玄奘法律學報，4，287-314。
27. 魏貽君(2009)。臺灣原住民文學的「莎赫札德」─「原運世代作者」的形成辯證及文學實踐。中國現代文學，16，67-96。
28. 譚光鼎(2007)。正義何處覓─批判種族理論及其對台灣弱勢族群教育之啟示。教育資料集刊，36，1-24。
29. 譚光鼎、葉川榮(2011)。高學業成就原住民高中生學習現況之研究。嘉大教育研究學刊，27，141-188。

1. 黃之棟(2016)。批判種族理論的批判性反思。政治與社會哲學評論，58，53-128。
2. (2017)。由批判種族理論論美國技職教育政策發展中的族群議題。比較教育，82，39-70。