题名

民衆就醫經驗與健保知能對於健保政策滿意度之研究

并列篇名

The Research of Impact of Citizens' Medical Experience and Policy Literacy on Health Insurance Policy Satisfaction

DOI

10.30174/JSS.201012.0003

作者

劉宜君(I-Chun Liu)

关键词

全民健保 ; 就醫經驗 ; 政策知能 ; 滿意度 ; National Health Insurance ; Medical Experience ; Policy Literacy ; Policy Satisfaction Rate

期刊名称

國家與社會

卷期/出版年月

9期(2010 / 12 / 01)

页次

67 - 109

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

〔研究背景〕健保自實施以來,雖然持續有高達七成以上的民眾滿意度,但在調整保險費或是調整給付範圍時,仍受到民眾或是其他利害關係人的反對。過去政府對於健保滿意度之調查,較未討論病患就醫行為與健保滿意度的關係,事實上所謂的民眾參與健保政策,本來民眾就是有區分的,有健康的、有常看病的、有認識健保的、有不清楚的。 〔研究目的與方法〕本研究透過電話調查瞭解民眾就醫行為、健保知能與其對於健保滿意度的關係。電話調查題目的設計,除了參考過去與健保政策民意調查相關的題目內容外,主要是根據研究目的,整理為問卷調查題目,並將文字修正為民眾能夠理解的表達方式。民意調查詢問受訪民眾的就醫經驗、政策知能與健保滿意度之關係,包括:多久之前到醫院或診所看過病,與對其看病服務的滿意度、不滿意當時看病經驗的原因、當時看病經驗對於健保滿意度的影響等。第二部分為調查受訪民眾的健保知能與資訊與健保滿意度。 〔研究發現與建議〕研究發現民眾的看病經驗的滿意度與其就醫經驗有關,而看病經驗滿意度雖然並非與健保滿意度直接與密切相關,但仍有部分民眾將就醫與健保視為同樣範圍的概念,多數民眾仍能理性地加以區隔。但民眾對於健保的政策知能仍有強化理解的必要,例如民眾對於健保虧損的實際情形認知有限。尤其由民眾針對開放題提出的意見,可發現民眾對於健保的認知是有限且十分片段的,建議健保的政策資訊應適時揭露,增進民眾的健保知能。

英文摘要

The government conducts regular studies based on polls to determine public satisfaction with National Healthcare Insurance and health care in general. Since the implementation of health insurance, the satisfaction rates have fluctuated between 70% and above. However, many still oppose some of the reform policies regarding the adjustment of premium rates. One reason for this is that some people are insufficiently policy literate and thus unable to fully understand government policy. As a result, this paper attempts to examine the linkages between policy literacy and the level of satisfaction felt by individual members of the populace with their overall experience of the medical system. Further policy design will be advised to take into consideration any linkages highlighted by this paper. The paper defines policy literacy as a form of popular education on public policy issues involving people, environment, economy and society. Recently, a number of interventions have been shown to be effective in building health literacy, promoting patient involvement in treatment decisions and educating patients to play an active role in self-management of chronic conditions. Noticeably, the population can already be divided levels of health status and policy knowledge. Some people are healthy, others often see doctors. Some people have good understanding of health insurance policy, others do not. With this purpose, the study implements a telephone opinion survey to collect public opinion and to understand the relationship between policy satisfaction and policy literacy. The research finds that individuals with higher policy literacy tended to have a higher satisfaction with their health insurance policy than people with less. The research also finds that the majority of the population has a reasonably accurate perception of the national health insurance policy. However, there are some people that still need to receive education regarding matters of governmental policy. The research recommends that the government present strategies to improve policy literacy of citizens, in order to enhance their participation in the assessment of the impacts of policies and in the formulation of alternatives to current policies.

主题分类 社會科學 > 社會科學綜合
社會科學 > 社會學
参考文献
  1. 劉宜君(2009)。從民眾觀點建立健保政策績效指標:重要性-績效分析法之應用。社會政策與社會工作學刊,13(2),143-186。
    連結:
  2. 鄧宗業、吳嘉苓(2004)。法人論壇: 新興民主國家的公民參與模式。台灣民主季刊,1(4),35-56。
    連結:
  3. TVBS民意調查中心,2005,全民健保及醫療資源民調。http://www.tvbs.com.tw/FILE_DB/DL_DB/yijung/200501/yijung-20050114094733.pdf,取用日期:2010年6月12日。
  4. Friedland, R., 2002, “What Did the Doctor Mean? Estimating the Direct Health Costs of Low Functional Literacy.” Working Paper.
  5. 中央健康保險局,2010,健保財務狀況認知民調結果。http: / /www.health99.doh.gov.tw/Hot_News/h_NewsDetailN.aspx?TopIcNo=5530,取用日期:2010年6月12日。
  6. TVBS民意調查中心,2010,健保費新方案民調。http://www.tvbs.com.tw/FILE_DB/DL_DB/yijung/201003/yijung-20100319184755.pdf,取用日期:2010年6月12日。
  7. 李旻貞,1996,全民健保基層醫療服務品質之研究-以病人滿意度為評估方法。http://ir.ym.edu.tw/ir/bitstream/987654321/8961/1/he-study-on-the- quality-of-prima_abstract.pdf,取用日期:2010年4月22日。
  8. 內政部戶政司,2009,歷年人口統計之人口數。http://www.ris.gov.tw/version96/ population_01_C_02.html,取用日期:2010年5月12日。
  9. Joint Committee on National Health Education Standards, 1995, “National Health Education Standards. Available from the American School Health Association, Kent, OH, USA..
  10. TVBS民意調查中心,2002,全民健保滿意度調查。http://www.tvbs.com.tw/code/tvbsnews/poll/2002-07/20020701/020701.asp,取用日期:2010年7月12日。
  11. TVBS民意調查中心,2003,全民健保費用調漲四個月後民調。http://www.tvbs.com.tw/MyDoc/files/heidi/heidi20030117111631.doc,取用日期:2010年7月12日。
  12. National Institute for Literacy, 2002, Report on Activities and Accomplishments, FY 1993-FY 2002, http://www.nif.gov/publications.html (Date visited: July 19, 2010)
  13. Baker, D.W.,Parker, R. M.,Williams, M. V.,Clark, W. S.,Nurss, J.(1997).The Relationship of Patient Reading Ability to Self-reported Health and Use of Health Services.American Journal of Public Health,87(6),1027-1030.
  14. DiMatteo, M. R.,Giordani, P. J.,Lepper, H. S.(2002).Patient Adherence and Medical Treatment Outcomes: A Meta-analysis.Medical Care,40,794-781+788.
  15. Donabedian, Avedis(1988).The Quality of Care: How Can It Be Assessed?.Journal of American Medical Association,260(12),1743-1748.
  16. Donabedian, Avedis(1978).The Quality of Medical Care.Science,200(4344),856-864.
  17. Golembiewski, R.(Ed.),Widawsky, A.(Ed.)(1984).Ontario, in the Costs of Federalism.New Brunswick, N.J.:Transaction Books.
  18. Lomas, J.(2001).Past Concerns and Future Roles for Regional Health Boards.The Canadian Medical Association Journal,164(3),356-357.
  19. Nielsen-Bohlman, L.(Ed.),Panzer, A. M.(Ed.),Kindig, D. A.(Ed.)(2004).Health Literacy: A prescription to End Confusion.Washington, D.C.:Institute of Medicine.
  20. Nutbeam, Don(2000).Health Literacy As a Public Health Goal: A Challenge for Contemporary Health Education and Communication Strategies Into the 21st Century.Health Promotion International,15(3),259-267.
  21. Oliver, S.,Clarke-Jones, L.,Rees, R.,Milne, R.,Buchanan, P.,Gabbay, J.,Gyte, G.,Oakley, A.,Stein, K.(2004).Involving Consumers in Research and Development Agenda Setting for the NHS: Developing an Evidencebased Approach.Health Technology Assessment,8(15),1-148.
  22. Parker, R. M.,Ratzan, S. C.,Lurie, Nicole(2003).Health Literacy:A Policy Challenge for Advancing High-Quality Health Care.Health Affairs,22(4),147-153.
  23. Parker, R.M.,Williams, M. V.,Weiss, B. D.,Davis, T.,Doak, C.(1999).Health Literacy: Report of the Council of Science Affairs.Journal of the American Medical Association,281(6),552-557.
  24. Schillinger, D.,Grumbach, K.,Piette, J.,Wang, F.,Osmond, D.,Palacios, C. Daher,J. ,Sullivan, G. D.,Bindman, A. B.(2002).Association of Health Literacy with Diabetes Outcomes.Journal of the American Medical Association,288(4),475-482.
  25. Thompson, A. G. H.(2007).The Meaning of Patient Involvement and Participation in Health Care Consultation: A Taxonomy.Social Science and Medicine,64,1297-1310.
  26. Vuori, H.(1987).Patient Satisfaction-An Attribute or Indicator of the Quality of Care?.Quality Review Bulletin,13(3),106-108.
  27. Weiss, P.S.,Bumm, L. A.,Dunbar, T. D.,Burgin, T. P.,Tour, J. M.,Allara, D. L.(1998).Probing Electronic Properties of Conjugated and Saturated Molecules in Self-Assembled Monolayers.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,852,145-168.
  28. 吳靜美(2008)。全民健保的推動與實施,台灣民眾滿意度高 台灣健保美國發光。全民健康保險,75,24-25。
  29. 呂宗謙(2010)。行政院衛生署委託研究計畫報告行政院衛生署委託研究計畫報告,行政院衛生署。
  30. 周玫玲(2002)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。高雄,中山大學人力資源管理研究所。
  31. 林昭吟、陳敦源、劉宜君、蕭乃沂(2007)。二代健保保費改革方案預評估-民眾與菁英對改革方案之認知與偏好的比較。行政暨政策學報,44,1-30。
  32. 張紘炬(1997)。行政院衛生署委託研究計畫行政院衛生署委託研究計畫,行政院衛生署。
  33. 傅立葉(2006)。中央健康保險局委託研究計畫中央健康保險局委託研究計畫,中央健康保險局。
  34. 彭麗蓉、潘麗卿(2006)。總額支付制度卓越計劃實施後門診病患滿意度研究─以某區域醫院為例。2006弘光科技大學學術研究發表會,台中:
  35. 董鈺琪(2005)。行政院衛生署委託研究計畫行政院衛生署委託研究計畫,行政院衛生署。
被引用次数
  1. 蔡淑玲、劉潔心、董頁吟、張誠、張家臻、張昭誼、殷蘊雯、施淑芳、林亞萱(2016)。全民健保議題國小學生認知與行爲現況分析-以雲林縣爲例。學校衛生,69,1-19。
  2. 陳緯靜,陳敏郎,張琇茹(2020)。醫護人員工作環境、醫療服務品質與健保財務認知因素之探討-以台中市某地區民眾為例。弘光學報,86,19-35。
  3. 林純雯(2011)。兒童教保人員審議式教育政策參與之準備與行動:高屏地區的鉅觀與微觀分析。人文社會科學研究,5(2),1-33。
  4. 謝京辰,莊欣怡,李伯璋,吳宜蓁,王宗曦(2022)。新型冠狀肺炎疫情下健保重大政策及滿意度之探討。台灣公共衛生雜誌,41(6),666-677。
  5. (2021)。產業政策執行評估初探:以太陽光電發展為例。空大行政學報,35,1-36。