19、20世紀之交美國中學歷史單獨設科與社會合科演變的歷史分析

An Historical Analysis of the Transformation of Secondary Level History from a Single Subject to its Incorporation into Social Studies in the United States at the Turn of the 19th and 20th Centuries

10.6481/JTR.201708_10(2).02

單文經(Wen-Jing Shan)

美國中學歷史課程 ； 歷史十人報告 ； 歷史七人報告 ； 社會科報告 ； 課程史 ； secondary level history curriculum in the USA ； History Ten ； History Seven ； Social Studies Report ； curriculum history

教科書研究

10卷2期（2017 / 08 / 15）

33 - 66

繁體中文

本文旨在以19、20世紀之交的美國為場域，就著歷史十人報告（1893年）、歷史七人報告（1898年）及社會科報告（1916年）等三個與文題有直接關聯的課程文件，配合有關的研究文獻，採取歷史研究的方法追本溯源，敘述其所提建議由中學歷史單獨設科轉變為社會合科的演進過程，並評析其意義。在指出這些課程文件的推陳出新，乃是受到社會情況的更迭、教育思潮的遞移、學術團體的角力、關鍵人物的推動等多重因素所影響，而表現在各方人士對於中學生應該學習什麼樣的歷史與社會等方面的知識，所持不同主張的多方折衝與協商之後，本文歸結：儘管1916年的社會科小組早已建議「社會學習」作為一個科目，但是，百餘年後今日的美國中學教學現場，「歷史」仍為「社會學習」這個較廣域課程組織中的多個科目之一。

This paper analyzes the transformation of secondary level history from a single subject to its incorporation into social studies, a fused broad-field subject, in the United States of America at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries. This study is based on a critical survey of curriculum documents initiated by ＂History Ten＂ (1893), ＂History Seven＂ (1898), ＂Committee on Social Studies＂ (1916), and other related literature. By explicating the processes of initiation and write-up of the documents, the author confirmed that the transformation of curriculum proposals was influenced by several factors, including change in the social atmosphere, evolution of educational thought, the struggles of various academic groups, and promotion by key figures. On the other hand, the change resulted in contradictions and compromises regarding the different views on what exactly secondary school students should be taught in regard to history and society. Although ＂social studies＂ as a named subject was recommended in a 1916 report, ＂history＂ is still one of several subjects within the broad-field curriculum organization taught for more than one hundred years in the United States.

1. 單文經(2005)。美國中小學歷史課程標準爭議始末（1987-1996）。師大學報─教育類，50(2)，1-25。
   連結：
2. Sullivan, J. E. (1905). Introductory remarks in history roundtable conference. Journal of Proceedings and Addresses, 43, 460-461.
3. Nash, G. (1997). Reflections on the National History Standards. National Forum, Summer. Retrieved from http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mlassite/discussions261/nash.html
4. Robinson, J. H. (1912). The new history: Essays illustrating the modern historical outlook. New York, NY: Macmillan.
5. 伍振鷟（2000）。學校系統改革案。取自http://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1314464/?index=30
6. National Education Association. (1893). Report of the Committee of Ten on Secondary School Studies, with the Reports of the conferences arranged by the Committee. Washinton, DC: U.S. Goverment Printing Office.
7. Maxwell, W. H. (1905). Education for efficiency. Journal of Proceedings and Addresses, 43, 59-67.
8. Ely, R. T. (1885). On methods of teaching political economy. In G. S. Hall (Ed.), Methods of teaching history (2nd ed., pp. 61-72). Boston, MA: D. C. Heath.
9. 十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱（2014）。
10. American Historical Association. (1911). The study of history of secondary schools: Report to the AHA by a committe of five. New York, NY: Macmillan.
11. Johnson, H. (1940). Teaching of history in elementary and secondary schools with applications to allied studies (Rev. ed.). New York, NY: Macmillan.
12. California Department of Education. (2016). State minimum course requirements. Retrieved from http://www.cde.ca.gov/ci/gs/hs/hsgrmin.asp.
13. American Historical Association. (1899). The study of history in schools: A report to the AHA by the Committee of Seven. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/studyofhistoryin01amer
14. Dunn, A. W. (1907). The community and the citizen. Boston, MA: D. C. Heath.
15. U.S. Bureau of Education. (1917). The social studies in secondary education. History Teacher's Magazine, 8(1), 4-25.
16. Barnard, J. L. (1915). The teaching of community civics. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/teachingofcommun00natiuoft
17. Jones, T. J. (1906). Social studies in the Hampton curriculum. Hampton, VA: Hampton Institute Press.
18. Blewett, J.(Ed.)(1960).John Dewey: His thought and influence.New York, NY:Fordham University Press.
19. Cremin, L. A.(1961).The transformation of the school: Progressivsm in American education, 1876-1957.New York, NY:Vitage Books.
20. Evans, R. W.(2004).The social studies wars: What should we teach the children?.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
21. Fallace, T. D.(2008).Did social studies really replace history in American secondary schools?.Teachers College Record,110(10),2245-2270.
22. Fraser, J. W.(2007).Preparing America's teachers: A history.New York, NY:Teachers College Press.
23. Glatthorn, A. A.(1987).Curriculum leadership.Glenview, IL:Scott Foresman.
24. Goodlad, J. I.(1979).Curriculum inquiry: The study of curriculum practice.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
25. Hickman, L.(Ed.).The collected works of John Dewey, 1882-1953.
26. Hiner, N. R.(1973).Professions in process: Changing relations among social scientists, historians, and educators, 1880-1920.History Teacher,6(2),201-218.
27. Hiner, N. R.(1972).Professions in process: Changing relations between historians and educators, 1896-1911.History of Education Quarterly,12(1),34-56.
28. Hofstadter, R.(1968).The progressive historians: Turner, Beard, Parrington.New York, NY:Knopf.
29. Jorgensen, C. G.(2012).John Dewey and the dawn of social studies: Unraveling conflicting onterpretations of the 1916 report.Charlotte, NC:Information Age.
30. Kliebard, H. M.(2004).The struggle of the American curriculum, 1893-1958.Boston, MA:Routeledge & Kegan Paul.
31. Lybarger, M. B.(1983).Origins of the modern social studies: 1900-1916.History of Education Quarterly,23(4),456-460.
32. Nelson, M. R.(1994).The social studies in secondary education: A reprint of the seminal 1916 report with annotations and commentaries.Bloomington, IN:ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education.
33. Novick, P.(1988).That noble dream: The "objectivity question" and the American historical profession.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
34. Orrill, R.,Shapiro, L.(2005).From bold beginnings to an uncertain future: The discipline of history and history education.The American Historical Review,110,727-751.
35. Ravitch, D.(Ed.)(1985).The school we deserve: Reflections on the educational crisis.New York, NY:Basic Books.
36. Reese, W. J.(1995).The origins of the American high school.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
37. Ross, D.(1990).The origins of American social science.Cambridge, MA:Cambridge University Press.
38. Saxe, D. W.(1991).Social studies in schools: A history of the early years.Albany, NY:State University of New York Press.
39. Sizer, T. R.(1964).Secondary schools at the turn of the century.New Haven, CT:Yale University Press.
40. Taylor, T.(Ed.),Guyver, R.(Ed.)(2012).History wars and the classroom: Global perspectives.Charlotte, NC:Information Age.
41. Tyack, D.,Cuban, L.(1995).Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
42. 方德隆譯、Ornstein, A. C.、Francis, P. H.(2004)。課程基礎理論。臺北市:高等教育。
43. 司琦(2003)。概述小學課程標準演進（下）。研習資訊，20(5)，35-43。
44. 司琦(2003)。概述小學課程標準演進（上）。研習資訊，20(3)，7-18。
45. 司琦(2003)。概述小學課程標準演進（中）。研習資訊，20(4)，6-15。
46. 何炳松譯、Johnson, H.。歷史教學法。上海市:上海古籍。
47. 林慈淑(2010)。歷史，要教什麼─英、美歷史教育的爭議。臺北市:臺灣學生。
48. 殷超(2014)。論美國中學歷史教育的發展歷程。教育教學論壇，30，60-61。
49. 張卓鴻(2015)。博士論文(博士論文)。長春市，東北師範大學。
50. 齊思和譯、Robinson, J. H.(1964)。新史學。北京市:商務印書館。
51. 劉美慧(1996)。美國社會科課程標準之評介。花蓮師院學報，6，129-145。
52. 瞿立鶴(1985)。中等教育。臺北市:教育文物。

1. 單文經(2019)。杜威在19、20世紀之交美國中學歷史與社會設科演變過程中所扮演的角色。課程與教學，22(2)，173-203。
2. 單文經(2019)。美國新社會科運動及其有關教材改革計畫評析（1950－1970年代）。教科書研究，12(1)，69-109。