國小三年級社會領域教科書「探究任務」內涵之分析－以探究為本的觀點

Content Analysis on Inquiry Tasks in Taiwan's Elementary Social Studies Textbooks From the Perspective of Inquiry-Based Design

10.6481/JTR.202112_14(3).02

洪麗卿(Li-Ching Hung)；劉美慧(Mei-Hui Liu)；陳麗華(Li-Hua Chen)

社會領域 ； 探究任務 ； 探究本位 ； 教科書分析 ； social studies ； inquiry task ； inquiry-based ； textbook analysis

教科書研究

14卷3期（2021 / 12 / 15）

43 - 77

繁體中文

臺灣社會領域課程綱要規定的「探究任務」設計是國小社會領域新版教科書的特色之一，包括每個單元至少一個「探究活動」和各冊一個「主題探究與實作」單元。本文旨在從探究為本的觀點，探究國小社會教科書如何詮釋探究任務。本文運用內容分析法，以依十二年國教社會領綱編輯且審定通過之社會領域版本第一冊和第二冊教科書為分析對象，分析其探究任務設計。研究發現：一、各版本主題探究與實作單元傾向於統整性內容，議題融入不高；二、各探究主題多以問題導入的形式，但探究路徑以教師導向居多；三、探究歷程採個人探究甚於協同探究，且協同形式僅在局部步驟進行；四、各版本探究任務多為結構式探究，較少引導學生參與規劃。最後，本文根據研究發現提出數項建議，提供國小社會領域探究任務編寫之參考。

The use of inquiry tasks is one of the features of the latest elementary social studies textbooks, and according to Taiwan's Curriculum Guidelines for Social Studies, at least one inquiry activity for each unit and one thematic inquiry and practice unit for each volume should be designed. This study, based on the perspective of inquiry-based design, explored how inquiry tasks are articulated in elementary social studies textbooks. Qualitative content analysis was adopted to analyze three versions of textbooks developed on the basis of the new Curriculum Guidelines for Social Studies. The findings were as follows: First, the content of the ＂thematic inquiry and practice unit＂ emphasized integrative materials and lacked the integration of social issues. Second, the inquiry tasks employed a question-oriented approach, but the inquiry paths and answers were too limited to encourage students' active exploration. Third, the inquiry tasks in the textbooks favored individual inquiry over collaborative inquiry, and peer collaboration was only included in part of the inquiry process. Finally, the inquiry tasks failed to prompt the active participation of students with a preference for structured inquiry forms. This paper also provided several suggestions for the design of inquiry tasks in elementary social studies textbooks.

1. 周淑卿、章五奇（2016）。從實驗教材到官方課程─小學社會科板橋模式教材與改編本教科書的發展。教科書研究，9（1），37-70。https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR.201604_9(1).02[Chou, S.-C., & Chang, W.-C. (2016). From the transformation of experimental materials to becoming official curriculum: The “Banqiao model” and adapted version of elementary social studies textbook development. Journal of Textbook Research, 9(1), 37-70. https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR.201604_9(1).02]
   連結：
2. 洪麗卿、劉美慧、陳麗華（2020）。國中社會領域教科書「跨科活動」之分析─素養導向設計的觀點。教科書研究，13（3），1-32。https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR.202012_13(3).01[Hung, L.-C., Liu, M.-H., & Chen, L.-H. (2020). Analysis of cross-curricular activities in social studies textbooks for junior high schools: A competence-oriented design perspective. Journal of Textbook Research, 13(3), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.6481/JTR.202012_13(3).01]
   連結：
3. 陳麗華（2019）。書評：社會學習領域課程標準的想像及啟示─評介《美國社會領域課程標準》及《C3 美國社會領域州課程標準架構》。教育研究集刊，65（2），117-135。https://doi.org/10.3966/102887082019066502004[Chen, L.-H. (2019). Book review: National curriculum standards for social studies: A framework for teaching, learning, and assessment & college, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards. Bulletin of Educational Research, 65(2), 117-135. http://doi.org/10.3966/102887082019066502004]
   連結：
4. 十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校─社會領域（2018）。[Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education: Social studies domain for elementary, junior high school and upper secondary school education. (2018).]
5. 十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱（2014）。[Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education: General guidelines. (2014).]
6. 李健輝（2020）。主題性探究式教案的設計與嘗試─以〈日治時期義務教育的實施〉為例。清華歷史教學，27，5-33。[Lee, C.-H. (2020). A teaching plan for thematic inquiry: “Implementation of compulsory education under the Japanese colonial rule.” Tsing Hua Journal for History Education, 27, 5-33.]
7. 洪振方（2003）。探究式教學的歷史回顧與創造性探究模式之初探。高雄師大學報，15，641-662。[Hung, J.-F. (2003). The historical review of inquiry teaching and preliminary exploration of creative inquiry model. Kaohsiung Normal University Journal, 15, 641-662.]
8. 洪麗卿（2020）。議題融入課程。載於陳麗華、詹寶菁（主編），國小社會教材教法（頁 63-78）。教育部。[Hung, L.-C. (2020). Issue-based curriculum integration. In L.-H. Chen & P.-J. Chan (Eds.), Teaching materials and methods of social studies in primary school (pp. 63-78). Ministry of Education.]
9. 國家教育研究院（2020）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校議題融入說明手冊。https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/file/29143/83847.pdf [National Academy for Educational Research. (2020). Curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education: Handbook of issue-based curriculum integration. https://cirn.moe.edu.tw/Upload/file/29143/83847.pdf]
10. 鄭麗玉（2000）。認知與教學。五南。[Cheng, L.-Y. (2000). Cognition and instruction. Wu-Nan.]
11. Barrow, L. H. (2006). A brief history of inquiry: From Dewey to Standards. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(3), 265-278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-006-9008-5
12. Beane, J. A. (2005). A reason to teach: Creating classrooms of dignity and hope: The power of the democratic way. Heinemann.
13. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press.
14. Chambliss, M. J., & Calfee, R. C. (1998). Textbooks for learning: Nurturing children’s minds. Blackwell.
15. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (n.d.). About the standards: Development-process. Retrieved June 1, 2021, from http://www.corestandards.org/about-the-standards/development-process/
16. De Corte, E. (2012). Constructive, self-regulated, situated, and collaborative learning: An approach for the acquisition of adaptive competence. Journal of Education, 192(2-3), 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022057412192002-307
17. Dewey, J. (1966). Democracy and education. Free Press.
18. Donohoo, J. (2013). Collaborative inquiry for educators: A facilitator’s guide to school improvement. Corwin.
19. Gergen, K. J. (1995). Social construction and the educational process. In L. P. Steffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education (pp. 17-40). Routledge.
20. Gómez Gutiérrez, A. J. (2016). Collaborative inquiry as a way to promote elementary students’ reflections in the EFL classroom [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas.
21. Grant, S. G., Swan, K., & Lee, J. (2017). Inquiry-based practice in social studies education: Understanding the inquiry design model. Routledge.
22. Griffin, S. (2013). The development of the C3 framework. Social Education, 77(4), 220-221. https://www.socialstudies.org/social-education/77/4/development-c3-framework
23. Herczog, M. M. (2013). The links between the C3 framework and the NCSS National Curriculum Standards for Social Studies. Social Education, 77(6), 331-333. https://www.socialstudies.org/social-education/77/6/links-between-c3-framework-andncss-national-curriculum-standards-social
24. Lawson, A. E. (1995). Science teaching and the development of thinking. Wadsworth
25. Marschall, C., & French, R. (2018). Concept-based inquiry in action: Strategies to promote transferable understanding. Corwin.
26. Martin-Hansen, L. (2002). Defining inquiry: Exploring the many types of inquiry in the science classroom. The Science Teacher, 69(2), 34-37.
27. McGuinness, C., Swartz, R., & Sproule, L. (2016). Student thinking and learning in the PYP transdisciplinary framework: Case studies from PYP schools. International Baccalaureate Organization.
28. Minstrell, J. (2000). Implications for teaching and learning inquiry: A summary. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds.), Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science (pp. 471-496). American Association for the Advancement of Science.
29. Murdoch, K. (1998). Classroom connections: Strategies for integrated learning. Eleanor Curtain.
30. National Council for the Social Studies. (2013). College, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K-12 civics, economics, geography, and history. https://www.socialstudies.org/sites/default/files/2017/Jun/c3-framework-for-social-studies-rev0617.pdf
31. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Preparing our youth for an inclusive and sustainable world: The OECD PISA global competence framework. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/aboutpisa/Global-competency-for-an-inclusive-world.pdf
32. Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.). (2012). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/13398
33. Short, K. G., Harste, J. C., & Burke, C. (1996). Creating classrooms for authors and inquirers (2nd ed.). Heinemann.
34. Silander, P. (2015, December 10). Phenomenon based learning rubric. Phenomenal Education. http://nebula.wsimg.com/c58399e5d05e6a656d6e74f40b9e0c09?AccessKeyId=3209BE92A5393B603C75&disposition=0&alloworigin=1
35. Swan, K., Lee, J., Mueller, R., & Day, S. (Eds.). (2014). Teaching the college, career, and civic life (C3) framework: Exploring inquiry-based instruction in social studies. National Council for the Social Studies.
36. Tomal, N., & Yilar, M. B. (2019). An evaluation of social studies textbooks in Turkey: A content analysis for curriculum and content design. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 9(2), 447-457. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.579946
37. Törnroos, J. (2005). Mathematics textbooks, opportunity to learn and student achievement. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31(4), 315-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2005.11.005
38. Wallace, V. L., & Husid, W. N. (2017). Collaborating for inquiry-based learning: School librarians and teachers partner for student achievement (2nd ed.). Libraries Unlimited.
39. Weber, N. (2014). Didactic or dialogical? The shifting nature of INGO development education programming in England and Canada. International Journal of Development Education and Global Learning, 6(1), 27-51. https://doi.org/10.18546/IJDEGL.06.1.03
40. Wells, G. (1995). Language and the inquiry-oriented curriculum. Curriculum Inquiry, 25(3), 233-269. https://doi.org/10.2307/1179907
41. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a socio-cultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605895
42. Wells, G. (2000). Dialogic inquiry in education: Building on the legacy of Vygotsky. In C. D. Lee & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Vygotskian perspectives on literacy research: Constructing meaning through collaborative inquiry (pp. 51-85). Cambridge University Press.
43. Zion, M., & Mendelovici, R. (2012). Moving from structured to open inquiry: Challenges and limits. Science Education International, 23(4), 383-399

1. (2023)。日本小學中年級社會學習指導要領和教科書探究取向設計之分析－以「變遷與因果」單元為例。教科書研究，16(3)，159-196。
2. (2024)。社會領域教育之探究為本的實踐－理解探究設計模式（第二版）。教科書研究，17(1)，209-217。
3. (2024)。提問？還是探究？檢視問句式課綱下的公民與社會教科書。教科書研究，17(1)，1-34。