開創實習諮商心理師專業督導的新可能：談沙盤治療結合區辨模式之個別沙盤督導

Creating a New Possibility on Clinical Supervision with Counselor-in-Training: An Individual Sandtray Supervision Method Integrating Sandtray Therapy and Discrimination Model

蔡美香(Mei-Hsiang Tsai)；王孟心(Mon-Hsin Wang Flahive)

沙盤治療 ； 沙盤督導 ； 區辨模式 ； 實習諮商心理師

輔導季刊

56卷1期（2020 / 03 / 01）

13 - 24

繁體中文

本文旨在探討沙盤治療概念結合區辨模式督導之個別沙盤督導模式。首先，探討沙盤治療的意涵及其使用理念。其次，探討區辨模式之臨床督導，亦即三種督導焦點和三種督導角色的矩陣、九種督導介入的取向，並論述區辨模式之督導模式運用於全職實習諮商心理師之專業督導適切性。再者，探討沙盤治療的六大步驟結合區辨模式之個別沙盤督導模式，並提供可運用於全職實習諮商心理師的專業督導歷程中，使用區辨模式沙盤督導之沙盤題目範例，期能為個別沙盤督導的發展與運用提供一個新的可能及未來發展性。為因應現階段台灣每年約400－450位實習諮商心理師進行全職實習所需的個別專業督導，結合沙盤治療理念運用於諮商督導歷程的實務及研究，亦能從發展的、理論的、及教育的觀點，豐厚沙盤督導的領域。

1. 吳秀碧(2012)。受督者知覺有意學習的督導關係內涵之探究。中華輔導與諮商學報，33，87-118。
   連結：
2. 李明峰(2017)。台灣諮商督導研究主題與方法之分析—以2000-2015年為例。諮商心理與復健諮商學報，30，97-119。
   連結：
3. 張佳鈴,徐西森(2015)。受督者諮商困境及其受督討論歷程對督導關係發展影響之初探研究。諮商心理與復健諮商學報，28，93-118。
   連結：
4. 許韶玲(2004)。受督導者於督導過程中的隱而未說現象之探究。教育心理學報，36(2)，109-125。
   連結：
5. 蔡秀玲(2012)。影響督導工作同盟發展之要素：督導雙方之觀點。教育心理學報，43(3)，547-566。
   連結：
6. 心理師法（2020）。心理師法。取自http://law.moj.gov.tw/LawClass/LawAll.aspx?PCode=L0020098
7. Anekstein, A.,Hoskins, W.,Astramvich, R.,Garner, D.,Terry. J(2014).Sandtray supervision: Integrating supervision models and sandtray therapy.Journal of Creative and Mental Health,9(1),122-134.
8. Armstrong, S. A.(2008).Sandtray therapy: A humanistic approach.Dallas, TX:Ludic Press.
9. Badenoch, B.(2008).Being a brain-wise therapist: A practical guide to interpersonal neurobiology.New York:W. W. Norton & Company.
10. Bernard, J. M.(1979).Supervisor training: A discrimination model.Counselor Education and Supervision,19,60-68.
11. Bernard, J. M.,Goodyear, R. K.(2014).Fundamentals of clinical supervision(5th ed.).Person Education, Inc..
12. Borders, L. D.,Brown, L. L.(2005).The new handbook of counseling supervision.New York, NY:Lawrence Erlbaum.
13. Carnes-Holt, K.,Meany-Walen, K.,Felton, A.(2014).Utilizing sandtray within the discrimination models of counselor supervision.Journal of Creative and Mental Health,9(4),497-510.
14. Eberts, S.,Homeyer, L.(2015).Processing sand trays from two theoretical perspectives: Gestalt and Adlerian.International Journal of Play Therapy,24(3),134-150.
15. Ellis, M. V.(2010).Bridging the science and practice of clinical supervision: Some discoveries, some misconceptions.The Clinical Supervisor,29,95-116.
16. Foster, J. M.,Leppma, M.,Hutchinson, T. S.(2014).Students' perspectives on gatekeeping in counselor education: A case study.Counselor Education & Supervision,53,190-203.
17. Friedman, H. S.,Mitchell, R. R.(2007).Supervision of sandplay therapy.New York, NY:Routledge.
18. Graham, M. A.,Scholl, M. B.,SmithAdcock, S.,Wittmann, E.(2014).Three creative approaches to counseling supervision.Journal of Creative and Mental Health,9(3),415-426.
19. Grant, J.,Schofield, M. J.,Grawford, S.(2012).Managing difficulties in supervision: Supervisors' perspectives.Journal of Counseling Psychology,59(4),528-541.
20. Homeyer, L. E.,Sweeney, D. S.(2017).Sandtray therapy: A practical manual.New York, NY:Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
21. Lowe, I. N.(2008).A thesis for the degree of Doctor.
22. Lowenfeld, M. (1939). The world pictures of children: A method of recording and studying them. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 18 , 65-73 101. d o i: 10.1111/j.2044-8341.1939.tb00710.x
23. Luke, J.,Bernard, J. M.(2006).The school counseling supervision model: An extension of the discrimination model.Counselor Education and Supervision,45,282-295.
24. Luke, J.,Ellis, M. V.,Bernard, J. M.(2011).School counselor supervisors’ perceptions of the discrimination model of supervision.Counselor Education and Supervision,50,328-343.
25. Markos, P. A.,Coker, J. K.,Jones, W. P.(2007).Play in supervision: Exploring the sandtray with beginning practicum students.Journal of Creative and Mental Health,2(3),3-15.
26. McCurdy, K. G.,Owen, J. J.(2008).Using sandtray in Adlerian-based clinical supervision: An initial empirical analysis.The Journal of Individual Psychology,64(1),96-112.
27. Newsome, D. W.,Henderson, D. A.,Veach, L. J.(2005).Using expressive arts in group supervision to enhance awareness and foster cohesion.Journal of Humanistic Counseling, Education and Development,44,145-157.
28. Ronnestad, M. H.,Skovholt, T. M.(2003).The journey of the counselor and therapist: Research findings and perspectives on professional development.Journal of Career Development,30,5-44.
29. Stark, M. D.,Frels, R. K.(2014).Using sandtray as a collaborative assessment tool for counselor development.Journal of Creative and Mental Health,9(4),468-482.
30. Stark, M.,Garza, Y.,Bruhn, R.,Ane, P.(2015).Student perception of sandtray in solution-focused supervision.Journal of Creative and Mental Health,10(1),2-17.
31. Watkins, C. E., Jr.(Ed.)(1997).Handbook of psychotherapy supervision.New York, NY:John Wiley.
32. Wells, H. G. (1911). Floor games. New York: Arno Press. (Originally published in England. First U.S. edition, 1912, Boston, MA).
33. 台灣輔導與諮商學會（2016）。專業督導認證辦法。取自：h t t p://w w w.guidance.org.tw/rule_new0910.pdf
34. 吳宛璇(2012)。嘉義市，國立嘉義大學。
35. 林怡萱(2011)。嘉義市，國立嘉義大學。
36. 曾仁美(2010)。專題計畫成果報告專題計畫成果報告,未出版
37. 黃宗堅(2014)。科技部補助專題計畫成果報告科技部補助專題計畫成果報告,未出版
38. 廖偉成(2013)。嘉義市，國立嘉義大學。
39. 賴十光(2011)。嘉義市，國立嘉義大學。
40. 謝政廷(2009)。嘉義市，國立嘉義大學。
41. 蘇盈儀,姜兆眉,陳金燕(2015).自我覺察督導模式訓練手冊：新手督導訓練.台北市:雙葉書廊.