原住民身分認定法規沿革與25年兩性原住民人口增加之構成

The Amendments of Indigenous Status Identification Regulations and the Compositions of Male and Female Indigenous Populations from 1991 to 2015

10.29910/TJIS.201706_10(1).0004

王前龍(Chien-Lung Wang)

兩性原住民人口 ； 原住民身分法 ； 從姓原則 ； 通婚家戶 ； 身分登記 ； Indigenous Population ； Indigenous Status Act ； Surname-based Status Inheritance Rule ； Intermarried Households ； Status Registration

台灣原住民族研究

10卷1期（2017 / 06 / 01）

107 - 146

繁體中文

民國80、90年施行的法規逐步放寬因結婚、生育、收養等而取得或回復身分的認定標準，原住民人口也隨社會民主開放從34.6萬人增至民國104年的54.7萬人，然而在戶籍登記「取得或回復身分人數」並未見諸政府統計，因而本研究目的為探究民國80-104年兩性原住民人口增加之構成，應用「人口簿記」的方法，以政府已公布民國91-104年戶籍登記原住民出生與死亡人數來估算取得或回復身分人數，再回推民國80-89年的情況。本研究發現:民國91-104年原住民出生人數性別比為108、死亡人數性別比高達145，使「自然增加」男性1.4萬人、女性2萬人，再以總增加人數減去之，可估算出民國90-104年男、女性「取得或回復身分」各有4萬、6.1萬人；兩性巨幅差距形成於壯、中年期，也受女性平均餘命較長之影響。再估算民國80-89年男性「取得或回復身分」約有1.3萬人，歷年人數反映政治民主化與原住民族正名運動的過程，女性2.2萬人更包含依法規回復身分的早期外婚女性，加上新增外婚女性不再喪失身分，所形成約2萬「原妻漢夫通婚戶」在民國90年後依「從姓原則」可使子女從母姓而取得身分，對人口大幅增加有重要影響。本研究建議再釐清改從母姓而取得身分的人數在兩性間與兩世代間的差距。

The standards dealing with the Indigenous Status obtaining or restoring in the conditions of intermarriage, child breeding and adoption were broadened progressively in the regulations promulgated in 1991 and in 2001, while Indigenous population increased by 58% from 1991 to 2015 in the context of democratization of Taiwan. However, the government did not reveal the increasing numbers of those obtaining or restoring status. This study aims to explore the compositions of male and female Indigenous population increase during 1991 and 2015. The method of ＂demographic bookkeeping＂ was adopted, using the released households registration numbers of birth and death to uncover the numbers of people obtaining or restoring status from 2001 to 2015, and then estimate the relevant numbers from 1991 to 2000. The findings are as follows: First, with the sex ratio of 108 for birth registrants and 145 for death registers, male's natural increase number is 140,000 and female's is 200,000 approximately, with which 400,000 males and 610,000 females obtaining or restoring status can be estimated. Second, the gap of 210 thousand mainly derived from the 30-64-year-old which also reflected the gap of life expectancies between the two sexes. Third, the estimated 130,000 males' status obtaining or restoring were motivated mainly by the Indigenous Movement in 1990s, while the number of 220,000 for female included the previous out-married ones. The approximate 200,000 intermarried households with Indigenous females formed during 1991 and 2000 were the main source of population increase after 2001, of which the children following maternal surname can obtain status according to the ＂Surname-based Status Inheritance Rule＂ of the Indigenous Status Act. The findings imply that the number of those who change to follow maternal surname to obtain Indigenous Status between the two sexes and between the two generations have to be further clarified.

1. 王泰升(2015)。台灣法律史上的原住民族：作為特殊的人群、地域與法文化。台大法學論叢，44(4)，1639-1704。
   連結：
2. 劉千嘉、章英華(2011)。2000年普查資料在台灣原漢通婚研究之潛力與應用。調查研究─方法與應用，27，7-51。
   連結：
3. 鄭川如(2015)。誰有權決定誰是原住民？─從兩人權公約及相關國際文件檢視原住民身分認定問題。法令月刊，66(9)，81-108。
   連結：
4. 謝若蘭、彭尉榕(2007)。族群通婚的身分認定與認同問題之研究：以花蓮地區原客通婚為例。思與言，45(1)，157-196。
   連結：
5. 內政部。2002。〈原住民簡易生命表〉(http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/life.aspx)(2017/7/16)
6. 原住民族委員會。2013。《102年原住民族人口及健康統計年報》(http://www.apc.gov.tw/portal/getfile?source)(2017/5/20)
7. 內政部。2002。〈內政統計名詞定義〉(http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/list.aspx)(2017/7/16)
8. 新北市政府民政局。2011。〈六都發放生育獎勵金措施對生育率影響淺論─以新北市為例〉(http://www.ca.ntpc.gov.tw/Content/Upload/Editor/Files/2015-10/6358172335189062506831154.pdf)(2017/7/12)
9. Furi, Megan, and Jill Wherrett. 2003. "Indian Status and Membership Issues." (https://lop.parl.ca/content/lop/researchpublications/bp410-e.pdf)(2017/7/16)
10. 行政院主計總處（編）。2010。《99年人口及住宅普查原住民族補充報告提要分析》(http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Data/34311565071.pdf)(2017/5/20)
11. 行政院主計總處（編）。2006。《社會指標統計年報》(http://ebook.dgbas.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=33680&ctNode=3971&mp=103)(2017/7/16)
12. 行政院主計總處（編）。2012。《99年人口及住宅普查總報告統計結果提要分析》(http://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/Attachment/711214759ZX60WRYE.pdf)(2017/7/16)
13. 原住民族委員會。2015。〈原住民族社會福利與健康政策執行情形〉(www.ey.gov.tw/DL.ashx?u...dea3-4539-82ce-93e9b8923acf.pdf)(2017/7/16)
14. 教育部。2006。〈原住民學生升學優待及原住民公費留學辦法第三條修正條文〉(mt.hct.tw/mt555/program_download/policy/201402071428421659.doc)(2017/5/22)
15. Statistics NZ, 2013b. "Number of Electorates and Electoral Populations: 2013 Census." (http://www.stats.govt.nz/browse_for_stats/population/census_counts/NumberofElectoratesandElectoralPopulations_HOTP2013Census/Definitions.aspx)(2017/7/16)
16. Statistics NZ, 2013a. "2013 Census QuickStats about Māori." (http://www.stats.govt.nz/Census/2013-census/profile-and-summary-reports/quickstats-about-maori-english.aspx)(2017/7/16)
17. Indian and Northern Affairs Canada. 2011. "The Indian Register." (https://www.aadnc-aandc.gc.ca/eng/1100100032475/110010032476)(2017/7/16)
18. Fletcher, Matthew L. M.(2011).Race and American Indian Tribal Nationhood.Wyoming Law Review,11(2),295-327.
19. Guimond, Eric,Kerr, Don,Beaujot, Roberic(2004).Charting the Growth of Canada's Aboriginal Population: Problems, Options and Implications.Canadian Studies in Population,3(1),55-82.
20. Haupt, Arthur,Kane, Thomas T.,Haub, Carl(2011).Population Reference Bureau's Population Handbook.Washington, DC:Population Reference Bureau.
21. Isacc, Thomas(2004).Aboriginal Law: Commentary, Cases and Materials.Saskatoon, SK:Purich Publishing Ltd..
22. Johnstone, Kim(2011).Indigenous Fertility Transitions in Developed Countries.New Zealand Population Review,37,105-123.
23. Kukutai, Tahu(2011).Māori Demography in Aotearoa New Zealand: Fifty Years On.New Zealand Population Review,37,45-64.
24. McHugh, Paul G.(2004).Aboriginal Societies and the Common Law: A History of Sovereignty, Status, and Self-determination.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
25. McSweeney, Kendra,Arps, Shahna(2005).A 'Demographic Turnaround': The Rapid Growth of the Indigenous Populations in Lowland Latin America.Latin American Research Review,40(1),3-29.
26. New, Nell Jessup(ed.)(2004).Cohen's Handbook of Federal Indian Law.Newark, NJ:LexisNexis.
27. Perz, Stephen G.,Warren, Jonathan,Kennedy, David P.(2011).Contributions of Racial-Ethnic Reclassification and Demographic Processes to Indigenous Population Resurgence: The Case of Brazil.Latin American Research Review,43(2),7-33.
28. Peterson, Nicholas,Taylor, John(2002).Aboriginal Intermarriage and Economic Status in Western New South Wales.People and Place,10(4),11-16.
29. Taylor, John(2009).Indigenous Demography and Public Policy in Australia: Population or Peoples?.Journal of Population Research,26,115-130.
30. Ziker, John P.,Axelsson, Per,Sköld, Peter,Anderson, David G.(2010).Indigenous Peoples and Demography.Anthropology News,51(5),10-12.
31. 林修澈、王雅萍、黃季平、王鈺婷(1999)。原住民身分認定的研究。台北:行政院原住民族委員會。
32. 原住民族委員會(2015)。原住民身分法解釋彙編。
33. 原住民族委員會編(2016)。台灣原住民族正名運動政府體制文獻史料彙編。台北:原住民族委員會。
34. 孫得雄、薛承泰、江東亮、姜蘭虹、黃佳媛、陳寬政、董宜禎(2014)。人口與健康。台北:五南。
35. 黃樹民編、章英華編(2010)。台灣原住民政策變遷與社會發展。台北:中央研究院民族學研究所。
36. 劉千嘉、章英華(2014)。原漢通婚家庭子女的族群認同與身分從屬。台灣社會學刊，54，131-180。
37. 潘朝成編、劉益昌編、施正峰編(2003)。台灣平埔族。台北:前衛出版社。

1. 王前龍(2018)。從自決權與身分權論原住民族大學的定位與招生對象。教育脈動，16，1-6-002。
2. 張如慧,卓勤怡,王前龍(2021)。原住民身分認定、升學保障與族群認同發展：原漢通婚家庭子女的個案研究。高雄師大學報：教育與社會科學類，51，25-47。