题名

探討建模教學對國小學童環境素養之影響

并列篇名

Exploring the Impact of Modeling-based Instruction on Elementary School Students' Environmental Literacy

DOI

10.3966/207136492020081302005

作者

莊秋蘭(Chiu-Lan Chuang)；李文瑜(Silvia Wen-Yu Lee)

关键词

建模教學 ； 環境素養 ； 濕地生態 ； Modeling-based instruction ； environmental literacy ； wetland ecological environment

期刊名称

師資培育與教師專業發展期刊

卷期/出版年月

13卷2期（2020 / 08 / 01）

页次

115 - 143

内容语文

繁體中文
中文摘要

本研究探討建模教學對國小學生環境素養及建構人類活動與濕地生態環境關係模型的影響。研究採用便利取樣，以台灣中部一所國小26位四年級及24位五年級的學生為對象；並以單組前、後測設計進行實驗，意即學生在接受12節課的建模教學前、後，分別填寫「環境素養問卷」和繪製「人類活動與濕地生態環境關係」模型，之後研究者利用相依樣本t檢定、卡方檢定與質性分析方法分析資料。結果顯示，在教學前後，環境素養有顯著提升；學生繪圖結果顯示，對環境的負向行為，及在濕地所存在的人造物件數量變少。由此可知，建模教學可能可以提升國小學生的環境素養、環境生態保育的概念。文末討論本研究之限制，並對國小階段未來實施有關環境議題方面的教學提出相關建議。
英文摘要

This study explored the impact of modeling-based teaching on elementary school students' environmental literacy and constructed models of the relationship between human activities and wetland ecological environment. Convenient sampling was used, and participants included 26 fourth- grade and 24 fifth-grade students in central Taiwan. The study utilized a single group pre-and post-test design. The students completed the ＂Environmental Literacy Questionnaire＂ and drew models of ＂the relationship between human activities and wetland ecological environment＂ before and after the modeling-based instruction. Paired sample t test, chi-square test, and qualitative analysis methods were used for analyses. Results showed that the students' environmental literacy improved significantly before and after instruction; and as shown in the students' drawings, ＂negative behaviors toward the environment＂ and ＂the number of manmade objects in wetlands＂ decreased. We infer that modeling-based instruction could improve the concepts of environmental literacy and environmental conservation in elementary school students. At the end of the article, research limitations are discussed and suggestions for future instruction of environmental topics in elementary schools are provided.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 李如偉, J. W.,蘇明洲, M. C.,黃湃翔, P. H.,呂仲誠, C. C.,高慧蓮, H. L.(2012)。以科學讀寫模式提升國小學童論證能力之研究。科學教育學刊，20(6)，483-514。
    連結：
  2. 林明瑞, M. C.,王聖賢, S. H.(2006)。「福寶濕地自然保育課程」實驗教學對國小中、高年級學童在濕地自然保育認知、態度之影響。環境教育研究，4(1)，103-146。
    連結：
  3. 洪萱芳, H. F.,顏瓊芬, C. F.,張妤萍, Y. P.,洪韶君, S. C.(2016)。以偏鄉國小為場域之地方本位環境教育課程省思。科學教育學刊，24(3)，299-331。
    連結：
  4. 徐瑛黛, Y. T.,李文瑜, Silvia W. Y.(2019)。電腦輔助環境融入科學建模教學對學生模型建立之影響。數位學習科技期刊，12(2)，25-53。
    連結：
  5. 張正杰, C. C.,羅綸新, L. S.(2016)。分析海洋教育議題學習內涵之重要性。課程與教學季刊，19(2)，53-82。
    連結：
  6. 莊秋蘭, Q. L.,李文瑜, Silvia W. Y.,蕭淳浩, C. H.,曾一偵, Y. Z.,黃耀萱, Y. X.(2018)。以建模導向課程促進海洋永續觀點發展之初探。環境教育研究，14(1)，117-158。
    連結：
  7. 許世璋, S. J.,徐家凡, C. F.(2012)。池南自然教育中心一日型方案「天空之翼」對於六年級生環境素養之成效分析。科學教育學刊，20(1)，1-26。
    連結：
  8. 許世璋, S. J.,黃怡華, Y. H.(2017)。林務局池南自然教育中心環境教育遊戲方案對於六年級生環境素養之成效分析。科學教育學刊，25(2)，169-196。
    連結：
  9. Alerby, E.(2000).A way of visualising children's and young people's thoughts about the environment: A study of drawings.Environmental Education Research,6(3),205-222.
  10. Bamberger, Y.,Davis, E.(2013).Middle-school science students' scientific modelling performances across content areas and within a learning progression.International Journal of Science Education,35(2),213-238.
  11. Barraza, L.(1999).Children’s drawings about the environment.Environmental Education Research,5(1),49-67.
  12. Bernardini, C.(Ed.),Tarsitani, C.(Ed.),Vincentini, M.(Ed.)(1995).Thinking physics for teaching.New York:Plenum Press.
  13. Bodzin, A.M.(2008).Integrating instructional technologies in a local watershed investigation with urban elementary learners.The Journal of Environmental Education,39(2),47-58.
  14. Cheng, C. H.,Monroe, M. C.(2010).Connection to nature: Children’s affective attitude toward nature.Environment and Behavior,44(1),31-49.
  15. Chu, S. L.,Deuermeyer, E.,Quek, F.(2018).Suppor ting scientific modeling through curriculum-based making in elementary school science classes.International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction,16,1-8.
  16. Cooper, M. M.,Stieff, M.,DeSutterc, D.(2017).Sketching the invisible to predict the visible: From drawing to modeling in chemistry.Topics in Cognitive Science,9,902-920.
  17. Damon, W.(Ed.),Lerner, R. M.(Ed.),Renninger, K. A.(Ed.),Sigel, I. E.(Ed.)(2006).Handbook of child psychology.Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley and Sons.
  18. diSessa, A. A.(2004).Meta-representation: Native competence and targets for instruction.Cognition and Instruction,22(3),293-331.
  19. Donovan, M. S.(Ed.),Bransford, J. D.(Ed.)(2005).How students learn.Washington, DC:National Research Council.
  20. Dove, J. E.,Everett, L. A.,Preece, P. F. W.(1999).Exploring a hydrological concept through children’s drawing.International Journal of Science Education,21,485-497.
  21. Environmental Literacy Council(2003) What is environmental literacy? Retrieved from http://www.environmentliteracy.org/
  22. Funkhouser, B. J.,Mouza, C.(2013).Drawing on technology: An investigation of preservice teacher beliefs in the context of an introductory educational technology course.Computers & Education,62,271-285.
  23. Gerlach, J. D.(2009).The conservation reserve program: A tool for public participation in biodiversity management and conservation.Journal of Extension,47(5),186-188.
  24. Gilbert, J. K.(Ed.)(1993).Models and modelling in science education.Hatfield, UK:Association for Science Education.
  25. Gilbert, J.K.(Ed.),Boulter, C.J.(Ed.)(2000).Developing models in science education.Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  26. Grace, M.(2009).Developing high quality decision-making discussions about biological conservation in a normal classroom setting.International Journal of Science Education,31(4),551-570.
  27. Grosslight, L.,Unger, C.,Jay, E.,Smith, C.(1991).Understanding models and their use in science conceptions of middle and high school students and experts.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,28(9),799-822.
  28. Halloun, I.(1996).Schematic modeling for meaningful learning of physics.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,26(11),1365-1378.
  29. Harrison, A. G.,Treagust, D. F.(1998).Modelling in science lessons: Are there better ways to learn with models?.School Science and Mathematics,98(8),420-429.
  30. Hay, D.,Pitchford, S.(2016).Curating blood: How students’ and researchers’ drawing bring potential phenomena to light.International Journal of Science Education,38(17),2596-2620.
  31. Hsieh, W. M.,Tsai, C. C.(2017).Exploring students’ conceptions of science learning via drawing: a cross-sectional analysis.International Journal of Science Education,39(3),274-298.
  32. Hsieh, W. M.,Tsai, C. C..Learning illustrated: an exploratory cross-sectional drawing analysis of students’ conceptions of learning.The Journal of Educational Research,1-12.
  33. Hungerford, H.R.,Volk, T.(1990).Changing learner behavior through environmental education.Journal of Environmental Education,21(3),8-21.
  34. Jonassen, D.,Strobel, J.,Gottdenker, J.(2005).Model building for conceptual change.Interactive Learning Environments,13(1-2),15-37.
  35. Jong, J.P.,Chiu, M-H.,Chung, S-L.(2015).The use of modeling-based text to improve students’modeling competencies.Science Education,99(5),986-1018.
  36. Jonssona, G.,Sarrib, C.,Alerby, E.(2012)."Too hot for the reindeer"- voicing Sami children’s visions of the future.International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education,21(2),95-107.
  37. Khine, M. S.(Ed.),Saleh, I. M.(Ed.)(2011).Models and modeling: Cognitive tools for scientific enquiry.New York:Springer-Verlag.
  38. Kozma, R. B.,Russell, J.(2005).Students becoming chemists: Developing representational competence.Visualization in science education,Dordrecht, the Netherlands:
  39. Kozma, R. B.,Russell, J.(1997).Multimedia and understanding: expert and novice responses to different representations of chemical phenomena.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,34(9),949-968.
  40. Leeming, F. C.,Dwyer, W. O.,Porter, B. E.,Cobern, M. K.(1993).Outcome research in environmental education: A critical review.The Journal of Environmental Education,24(4),8-21.
  41. Lesh, R.(Ed.),Doerr, H. M.(Ed.)(2003).Beyond constructivism: Models and modeling perspectives on mathematics teaching, learning, and problem solving.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc..
  42. Libarkin, J.C.,Thomas, S.R.,Ording, G.(2015).Factor analysis of drawings: Application to college student models of the greenhouse effect.International Journal of Science Education,37(13),2214-2236.
  43. Lindemann-Matthies, P.(2002).The influence of an educational program on children’s perception of biodiversity.Journal of Environmental Education,33(2),22-31.
  44. Machado, A. E.(2019).Can we teach environmental literacy? Educators in California public schools have launched an ambitious program to make the natural world relevant to all students K-12 grades.Bay Nature,23-27.
  45. Marcinkowski, T.(1989).An analysis of cor relates and predictors of responsible environmental behavior.Dissertation Abstracts International,49(12),3677-A.
  46. Mayer, F. S.,McPherson Frantz, C.,Bruehlman-Senecal, E.,Dolliver, K.(2009).Why is nature beneficial? The role of connectedness to nature.Environment and Behavior,41(5),607-643.
  47. Mellar, H.(Ed.),Bliss, J.(Ed.),Boohan, R.(Ed.),Ogborn, J.(Ed.),Tompsett, C.(Ed.)(1994).Learning with artificial worlds: Computer based modeling in the curriculum.Hong Kong:Graphicraft Typesetters.
  48. Morgan, M. S.(Ed.),Morrison, M.(Ed.)(1999).Models as mediators: Perspectives on natural and social sciences.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  49. Moseley, C(2000).Teaching for environmental literacy.The Clearing House,74(1),23-24.
  50. Mulder, Y.G.,Bollen, L.,de Jong, T.,Lazonder, A.W.(2016).Scaffolding learning by modelling: the effects of partially worked-out models.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,53(3),502-523.
  51. National Research Council(2007).Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K–8.Washington, DC:The National Academies Press.
  52. Novick, S.,Nussbaum, J.(1978)."Junior high school pupils’" understanding of the particulate nature of matter: An interview study.Science Education,62,273-281.
  53. Ozsoy, S.(2012).Investigating elementary school students’ perceptions about environment through their drawings.Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice,12(2),1132-1139.
  54. Ozsoy, S.,Ahi, B.(2014).Elementary school students’ perceptions of the future environment through artwork.Educational Sciences: Theor y & Practice,14(4),1570-1582.
  55. Papaevripidou, M.,Constantinou, C. P.,Zacharia, Z. C.(2007).Modeling complex marine ecosystems: an investigation of two teaching approaches with fifth graders.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,23(2),145-157.
  56. Roth, C. E.(1992).Environmental literacy its roots. Evolution and Directions in the 1990s.Columbus, Ohio:ERIC/CSMEE.
  57. Roth, C. E.(1968).On the road to conservation.Massachusetts:Audubon.
  58. Saglam, M.(2016).Exploring fifth-grade Turkish children’s solutions and future plans for environmental pollution through their drawings.Science Learning and Teaching,17(2),1-16.
  59. Schwarz, C. V.,Gwekwrere, Y. N.(2006).Using a guided inquire and modeling instructional framework (EIMA) to support preservice K-8 science teaching.Science Education,91(1),158-186.
  60. Schwarz, C. V.,Reiser, B. J.,Davis, E. A.,Kenyon, L.,Acher, A.,Fortus, D.,Shwartz, Y.,Hug, B.,Krajcik, J.(2009).Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,46(6),632-654.
  61. Scott, G. W.,Turnbull, S.,Spencer, J.(2008).Promoting engagement: Using species action plans to bring together students and conservation professionals.Bioscience Education,12
  62. Sessa, A. A.,Sherin, B. L.(2000).Meta-representation: An introduction.Journal of Mathematical Behavior,19(14),385-398.
  63. Simmons, D.(2001).Understanding environmental issues.Environmental Education and Information,20,51-58.
  64. Sins, P. H. M.,Savelsbergh, E. R.,van Joolingen, W. R.(2005).The difficult process of scientific modeling: An analysis of novices’ reasoning during computer-based modeling.International Journal of Science Education,14(18),1695-1721.
  65. Slominski, T. N.,Momsen, J. L.,Montplaisir, L. M.(2017).Drawing on student knowledge of neuroanatomy and neurophysiology.Advances in Physiology Education,21,212-221.
  66. Stern, M. J.,Powell, R. B.,Ardoin, N.M.(2008).What difference does it make? Assessing outcomes from participation in a residential environmental education program.Journal of Environmental,39(4),31-43.
  67. Stevenson, K. T.,Peterson, M. N.,Bondell, H.D.,Mertig, A.G.,Moore, S.E.(2013).Environmental, institutional, and demographic predictors of environmental literacy among middle school children.Predictors of Environmental Literacy,8(3),1-12.
  68. Thompson, K.(2007).CoCo Research Centre, Faculty of Education and Social Work, The University of Sydney.
  69. Tsevreni, I.(2011).Towards an environmental education without scientific knowledge: an attempt to create an action model based on children’s experiences, emotions and perceptions about their environment.Environmental Education Research,17(1),53-67.
  70. Van Driel, J. H.,Verloop, N.(2002).Experienced teachers’ knowledge of teaching and learning of models and modeling in science education.International Journal of Science Education,24(12),1255-1272.
  71. Van Driel, J.H.,Verloop, N.(1999).Teachers’ knowledge of models and modeling in science.International Journal of Science Education,21(11),1141-1153.
  72. Vasilia, C.,Vassilia, H.,Anastasia, D.(2009).Children’s drawings about environmental phenomena: The use of visual codes.The International Journal of Science in Society,1(1),107-117.
  73. Wang, H.Y.,Tsai, C.C.(2012).An exploration of elementary school students’ conception of learning: A drawing analysis.Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,21(3),610-617.
  74. Wells, N. M.,Evans, G. W.(2003).Nearby nature: A buffer of life stress among rural children.Environment and Behavior,35,311-330.
  75. Wells, N. M.,Lekies, K. S.(2006).Nature and the life course: Pathways from childhood nature experiences to adult environmentalism.Children, Youth and Environments,16,1-24.
  76. Wilson, K. A.,Bedwell, W. L.,Lazzara, E. H.,Salas, E.,Burke, C. S.,Estock, J. L.(2009).Relationships between game attributes and learning outcomes: Review and research proposals.Simulation & Gaming,40(2),217-266.
  77. Windschitl, M.,Thompson, J.,Braaten, M.(2008).Beyond the scientific method: Model-based inquiry as a new paradigm of preference for school science investigations.Science Education,92(5),941-967.
  78. Yilmaz, Z.,Kubiatko, M.,Topal, H.(2012).Czech children’s drawing of nature.Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice,12(4),3111-3119.
  79. Zelezny, L. C.(1999).Educational interventions that improve environmental behaviors: A meta-analysis.The Journal of Environmental Education,31(1),5-14.
  80. 內政部營建署=Construction and Planning Agency of Ministry of the Interior(2008)。內政部營建署 (2008)。台灣國家重要濕地地圖。臺北。[Construction and Planning Agency of Ministry of the Interior.(2008). Map of Taiwan’s wetlands. Taipei, Taiwan.]。
  81. 王文科, W. K.,王智宏, C. H.(2014).教育研究法.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南圖書=Wunan Book.
  82. 吳明珠, M. Z.(2008)。科學模型本質剖析：認識論面向初探。科學教育月刊，306，2-8。
  83. 吳明穎, M. Y.,林明聖, M. S.(2011)。海洋課程教學設計－以「非濱海」國小六年級為例。國教新知，58(2)，56-65。
  84. 邱美虹, M. H.,劉俊庚, C. K.(2008)。從科學學習的觀點探討模型與建模能力。科學教育月刊，314，2-20。
  85. 封中興, C. H.,洪振方, J. F.(2011)。「以建模為基礎的論證教學模式」之初探研究。物理教育學刊，12(1)，1-24。
  86. 張志康, C. K.(2009)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學科學教育研究所=National Taiwan Normal University。
  87. 張長義, C. Y.(1995)。臺大地理學研究所研究報告臺大地理學研究所研究報告,臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:臺大=National Taiwan University。
  88. 教育部 (2014)。十二年國民基本教育自然領域課程綱要。臺北：教育部國家教育研究院。[ Ministry Of Education. (2014). Curriculum Guidelines of 12-Year Basic Education_General Guidelines of Science. Taipei, Taiwan：National Academy for Educational Research.]
  89. 游雅如, Y. J.(2001)。花蓮市 Hualien, Taiwan，國立花蓮師範學院國小科學教育研究所=National Hualien Teachers College。
  90. 黃菁菁 (2010 年，5 月 26 日 )。兒時多接觸自然學歷收入雙高，中國時報。[Huang, C. C. (2010, May, 26). Childhood exposure to nature leads to high education and income. Chinatimes]
  91. 楊冠政, G. Z.(1993)。環境素養。環境教育季刊，19，2-14。
  92. 楊冠政, G. Z.(1998).環境教育.臺北=Taipei, Taiwan:明文書局=Min Wen Book.
  93. 趙家民, C. M.,林郁鳴, Y. M.(2010)。環境實驗教學方案對國小六年級學童環境知識、環境態度與環境行為影響之研究。遠東學報，27(1)，59-74。
  94. 薛美莉, M. L.,黃書彥, S. Y.(2012)。七股研究中心沿海濕地生態教育之推動。濕地學刊，1(1)，75-82。
被引用次数
  1. (2024)。探討繪圖導向科學建模教學對國小六年級學童模型建立及系統思考能力影響之研究。科學教育學刊，32(1)，33-61。
print cancel