探究式教學融入教育心理學課程之行動研究

Action Research of Integrating Inquiry-based Instruction in an Educational Psychology Course

10.53106/207136492022081502001

王佳琪(Chia-Chi Wang)

行動研究 ； 師資培育 ； 探究式教學 ； Action Research ； Teacher Education ； Inquiry-Based Instruction

師資培育與教師專業發展期刊

15卷2期（2022 / 08 / 01）

1 - 34

繁體中文

本研究以行動研究的方式，探討探究式教學融入教育心理學課程的實施情形，以及對師資培育者專業成長的影響。研究對象為某師資培育中心修教育心理學課程的師資生20名，共歷時一學期。研究過程中，研究者以「學生探究能力學習單」、「課堂學習氣氛問卷」、「課堂觀察紀錄表」、「教學研究日誌」、「學生作業」與「教學意見回饋」等方式蒐集資料。結果發現，藉由核心問題與層次性提問能有效營造教室探究文化，提高師資生的學習投入，進而展開自主探究學習；在探究步驟中，善用多元評量與具體回饋，讓師資生的學習變得可見；師生亦從探究中形成專業知識與理念，產生理論與實務的連結與意義。再者，研究者亦從反思中強化了探究教學信念，弭平教學壓力與成果的衝突，進而建構出探究教學轉化模式，其結果能提供師資培育課程之探究教學建議。

This research explored the implementation of an inquiry-based instruction integrated into the curriculum and its impact on the professional growth of the teacher educator using action research. Participants in this study were 20 pre-service teachers who attended an Educational Psychology course. The researcher collected multiple data from the participants' responses for Student Inquiry Ability Checklist, the class learning atmosphere questionnaire, the teaching and reflection journals, and the pre-service teachers' reports in class. The findings indicated that essential questions and questioning regarding Educational Psychology could be used to effectively create a classroom with a culture of inquiry, increase pre-service teachers' engagement in class, and carry out self-directed inquiry learning. During the process, the researcher made good use of multiple assessments and specific feedback to raise pre-service teachers' performance. It can be seen that the researcher and pre-service teachers constructed professional knowledge and ideas and generated connections and meanings between theory and practice. During this process, the researcher strengthened their belief in inquiry-based instruction from reflection, reduced the conflict between teaching pressure and student learning outcome and constructed a transforming model of inquiry-based instruction. Suggestions for implementing a similar curriculum were proposed for future studies.

1. 吳清山, C. S.(2018)。素養導向教師教育內涵建構及實踐之研究。教育科學研究期刊，63(4)，261-293。
   連結：
2. 洪承宇, C. Y.,王淳瑩, C. Y.(2021)。新制師資培育課程基準下的課程發展：「合作教學」與「教師專業社群」融入「教育實踐課程」設計。當代教育研究季刊，29(2)，33-60。
   連結：
3. 張英琦, Y. C.,林建隆, J. L.,鄭孟斐, M. F.,張誌原, J. Y.(2017)。多面向概念改變架構融入 5E 探究式教學策略對概念改變成效的探討－以轉動與力矩單元為例。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，10(3)，87-117。
   連結：
4. 張景媛, C. Y.,呂玉琴, Y. C.,何縕琪, Y. C.,吳青蓉, C. J.,林奕宏, Y. H.(2002)。多元思考教學策略對國小教師數學教學之影響暨教師專業成長模式之建構。教育心理學報，33(2)，1-22。
   連結：
5. 符碧真, B. J.(2018)。素養導向國教新課綱的師資培育：國立臺灣大學「探究式─素養導向的師資培育」理想芻議。教育科學研究期刊，63(4)，59-87。
   連結：
6. 陳佩英, P. Y.(2008)。從培力的對話觀點探討教師的專業成長。高雄師大學報 : 教育與社會科學類，24，21-48。
   連結：
7. 曾崇賢, C. H.,段曉林, H. L.,靳知勤, C. C.(2011)。探究教學的專業成長歷程－以十位國中科學教師的觀點為例。科學教育學刊，19(2)，143-168。
   連結：
8. 黃嘉莉, J. L.,陳學志, H. C.,王俊斌, C. P.,洪仁進, J. C.(2020)。師資職前教師專業素養與課程基準之建構及其運用。教育科學研究期刊，65(2)，1-35。
   連結：
9. 楊秀停, H. T.,王國華, K. H.(2007)。實施引導式探究教學對於國小學童學習成效之影響。科學教育學刊，15(4)，439-459。
   連結：
10. 蔡明致, M. C.,林菀如, W. J.,葉辰楨, C. J.,張文華, W. H.,王國華, K. H.(2011)。試行 AA Vee 圖融入三階段探究教學模式對科學教師專業成長之影響。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，4(1)，87-116。
    連結：
11. 盧秀琴, C. C.,洪榮昭, J. C.,陳月雲, Y. Y.(2011)。設計體驗式探究鷹架教學應用於非制式科學教育－不同探究能力學童的學習比較。科學教育學刊，19(4)，359-381。
    連結：
12. 盧秀琴, C. C.,徐于婷, Y. T.(2016)。國小師資生在自然領域的專業成長─以探究式教學為例。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，9(1)，115-142。
    連結：
13. 賴志忠, C. C.,段曉林, H. L.(2020)。以 ARCS 動機模式融入引導式探究教學提升九年級生學習動機之行動研究。科學教育學刊，28(1)，25-48。
    連結：
14. Aceytuno, M.,Barroso, M.(2015).The development of inquiry-based learning (IBL) methodology in undergraduate higher education.Proceedings of the Multidisciplinary Academic Conference
15. Anderson, R. D.(2002).Reforming science teaching: What research says about inquiry?.Journal of Science Teacher Education,13(1),1-12.
16. Brand, B. R.,Moore, S. J.(2011).Enhancing teachers' application of inquiry-based strategies using a constructivist sociocultural professional development model.International Journal of Science Education,33(7),889-913.
17. Bruner, J. S.(1966).Toward a theory of instruction.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
18. Carillo, L.,Lee, C.,Rickey, D.(2005).Enhancing science teaching by doing MORE: A frame work to guide chemistry students' thinking in the laboratory.The Science Teacher,72(7),60-64.
19. Deci, E. L.(Ed.),Ryan, R. M.(Ed.)(2002).Handbook of self-determination research.Rochester, NY:University of Rochester Press.
20. Denzin, N. K.(1978).Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
21. Earl, L.(2003).Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximise student learning.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
22. Hanley, P.,Maringe, F.,Ratcliffe, M.(2008).Evaluation of professional development: Deploying a process-focused model.International Journal of Science Education,30(5),711-725.
23. Hurd, P. D.,Bybee, R. W.,Kahle, J. B.,Yager, R. E.(1980).Biology education in secondary schools of the United States.American Biology Teacher,42(7),388-410.
24. Kagan, D. M.(1992).Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers.Review of Educational Research,62(2),129-169.
25. Kazemi, E.,Hubbard, A.(2008).New directions for the design and study of professional development: Attending to the coevolution of teachers' participation across contexts.Journal of Teacher Education,59(5),428-441.
26. Kazempour, M.(2009).Impact of inquiry-based professional development on core conceptions and teaching practices: A case study.Science Educator,18(2),56-68.
27. Kim, M. C.,Hannafin, M. J.,Bryan, L. A.(2007).Technology-enhanced inquiry tools in science education: An emerging pedagogical framework for classroom practice.Science Education,91(6),1010-1030.
28. Lawson, A. E.(1995).Science teaching and the development of thinking.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth Publishing Company.
29. Lederman, N. G.(Ed.),Abell, S. K.(Ed.)(2014).Handbook of research on science education.New York, NY:Routledge.
30. Lotter, C.,Harwood, W. S.,Bonner, J. J.(2006).Overcoming a learning bottleneck: Inquiry professional development for secondary science teachers.Journal of Science Teacher Education,17(3),185-216.
31. Magnusson, S. J.,Palincsar, A. M.(1995).The learning environment as a site of science education reform.Theory into Practice,34(1),43-50.
32. Maxwell, J. A.(1992).Understanding and validity in qualitative research.Harvard Educational Review,62(3),279-300.
33. McTighe、 J.,Wiggins, G.,侯秋玲（譯）, C. L.(Trans.),吳敏而（譯）, M. R.(Trans.)(2016).核心問題：開啟學生理解之門.新北市=New Taipei, Taiwan:心理出版社=Psychological Publishing.
34. Miles, M. B.,Huberman, A. M.(1994).Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook.Thousand Oaks, CA:SAGE.
35. Programme for International Student Assessment., & Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2006).Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006.Paris:OECD.
36. Reiff, R.(2002).If inquiry is so great, why isn’t everyone doing it?.Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science,Charlotte, NC:
37. Rossouw, D.(2009).Educators as action researchers: Some key considerations.South African Journal of Education,29,1-16.
38. Saribas, D.(2015).Pre-service elementary teachers' preferences and competencies in relation to inquiry-based instruction and high quality questions.Anthropologist,22(2),227-236.
39. Stanfield、 B.,陳淑婷（譯）, S. T.(Trans.),林思玲（譯）, S. L.(Trans.)(2010).學問：100 種提問力創造 200 倍企業力.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:開放智慧引導科技=Open Quest Facilitation Technology.
40. Tawfik, A. A.,Graesser, A.,Gatewood, J.,Gishbaugher, J.(2020).Role of questions in inquiry-based instruction: Towards a design taxonomy for question-asking and implications for design.Educational Technology Research and Development,68(2),653-678.
41. Trowbridge, L. W.,Bybee, R. W.(1986).Becoming a secondary school science teacher.Columbus, Ohio:Merrill.
42. Trowbridge, L.W.,Bybee, R.W.(1990).Becoming a secondary school science teacher.Columbus, OH:Merrill.
43. Vorholzer, A.,von Aufschnaiter, C.(2019).Guidance in inquiry-based instruction-an attempt to disentangle a manifold construct.International Journal of Science Education,41(11),1562-1577.
44. Wang, J.(2020).Compare inquiry-based pedagogical instruction with direct instruction for pre-service science teacher education.International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,18,1063-1083.
45. Wilson, C. D.,Taylor, J. A.,Kowalski, S. M.,Carlson, J.(2010).The relative effects and equity of Inquiry-based and commonplace science teaching on students' knowledge, reasoning, and argumentation.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,47(3),276-301.
46. Windschitl, M.(2003).Inquiry projects in science teacher education: What can investigative experiences reveal about teacher thinking and eventual classroom practice?.Science Education,87(1),112-143.
47. Wood, D.,Bruner, J. S.,Ross, G.(1976).The role of tutoring in problem solving.Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,17(2),89-100.
48. 吳裕益, Y. Y.,陳英豪, Y. H.(1991).測驗與評量.高雄市=Kaohsiung, Taiwan:復文書局=Fu Wen.
49. 張仁家, J. C.,林癸妙, K. M.,彭儀雯, I. W.,周全鋒, C. F.(2017)。實務專題課程應用探究式教學對電資相關系科大學生探究能力與創造思考能力之影響。科技與工程教育學刊，48(2)，17-43。
50. 教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要。取自 https://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/288/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%95%99%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E7%B6%B1%E8%A6%81%E7%B8%BD%E7%B6%B1.pdf[Ministry of Education. (2014). Curriculum guidelines of 12-Year basic education general guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.naer.edu.tw/upload/1/16/doc/288/%E5%8D%81%E4%BA%8C%E5%B9%B4%E5%9C%8B%E6%95%99%E8%AA%B2%E7%A8%8B%E7%B6%B1%E8%A6%81%E7%B8%BD%E7%B6%B1.pdf]
51. 黃澤洋, T. Y.(2016)。運用 5E 學習環模式建構資優教育師培課程之教學策略。中華民國特殊教育學會年刊，2016，165-174。
52. 甄曉蘭, H. L.(2008)。促進學習的課堂評量概念分析與實施策略。中等教育，59，92-109。