教師專業成長之個案研究：一個國中自然教師探究教學觀點的轉變

A Case Study of a Teacher's Professional Development: A Junior High School Teacher's Views on Inquiry Teaching

陳均伊(Jun-Yi Chen)

科學探究 ； 探究教學 ； 專業成長 ； scientific inquiry ； inquiry teaching ； professional development

教育科學研究期刊

55卷2期（2010 / 06 / 01）

233 - 264

繁體中文

本研究為個案研究，採開放編碼進行資料分析，探討專業成長情境中一位國中自然教師對於探究教學觀點的轉變，以及專業成長情境對其轉變的成效。蒐集會議錄影、問卷、訪談、課室觀察與文件等資料，發現個案教師在參與專業成長計畫初期，認為探究教學的實施必須是開放、具有固定程序，進行科展是最佳策略。歷經專業成長計畫的參與，個案教師對於探究教學的觀點產生轉變，認為探究教學具有不同的開放程度與實施方式，課前體驗活動能有效解決時間不足的問題，惟，科學本質仍受到忽略。在專業成長情境中，合作、對話、反思是促進教師專業發展的重要元素，影響個案教師產生轉變的策略有：閱讀具有實例的文獻、撰寫與討論教案、教學觀摩等。

This case study was conducted as part of a professional development project. A science teacher's views on inquiry teaching and the effect of this professional development project were investigated. The data included meeting records, an open-ended questionnaire, formal and informal interviews, classroom observations and artifacts. The method of open coding was adopted to analyze the data. It was found that the case teacher thought that inquiry teaching had to be open-ended and initially include routine procedures. She indicated that the science fair was the only way to implement inquiry teaching in schools. After participating in this professional development project, she interpreted inquiry teaching in a more flexible and extensive manner. Activities before classes were planned to increase teaching efficiency. However, the subject's inquiry teaching had a weak relationship with the nature of science. Collaboration, discussion and review were viewed as critical elements of professional development. Case discussion, lesson plan writing and discussion as well as field observations were effective ways to improve the case teacher's views of inquiry teaching.

1. 林淑梤、張惠博、段曉林(2009)。促進實習教師教學學習的夥伴式實習輔導。教育科學研究期刊，54(1)，23-53。
   連結：
2. 楊巧玲(2008)。教育改革對教師專業認同之影響：五位國中資深教師的探索性研究。師大學報：教育類，53(1)，25-54。
   連結：
3. 蘇素慧、詹勳國(2005)。實施九年一貫課程後國小教師數學教學信念與行爲之研究。師大學報：教育類，50(1)，27-51。
   連結：
4. Abrams, E.(ed.),Southerland, S. A.(ed.),Silva, P.(ed.)(2007).Inquiry in the classroom, Realities and opportunities.Charlotte, NC:Information Age.
5. American Association for the Advancement of Science(1993).Benchmarks for science literacy.New York:Oxford University Press.
6. American Association for the Advancement of Science(1989).,Washington, DC:American Association for the Advancement of Science.
7. Apple, D. K.(ed.),Beyerlein, S. W.(ed.)(2005).Faculty guidebook: A comprehensive tool for improving faculty performance.Lisle, IL:Pacific Crest.
8. Bell, R. L.,Blair, L. M.,Crawford, B. A.,Lederman, N. G.(2003).Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students' understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,40,487-509.
9. Bidle, B. J.(ed.),Good, T. L.(ed.),Goodson, I. F.(ed.)(1997).The international handbook of teachers and teaching.Dordrecht, Netherlands:Kluwer.
10. Byers, A.,Fitzgerald, M. A.(2002).Networking for leadership, inquiry and systemic thinking: A new approach to inquiry-based learning.Journal of Science Education and Technology,11,81-91.
11. Carin, A. A.,Bass, J. E.,Contant, T. L.(2005).Teaching science as inquiry.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Pearson Education.
12. Crawford, B. A.(2007).Learning to teach science as inquiry as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,44,613-642.
13. Crawford, B. A.(2000).Embracing the essence of inquiring: New role for science teachers.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37,916-937.
14. Driver, R.,Asoko, H.,Leach, J.,Mortimer, E.,Scott, P.(1994).Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom.Educational Researcher,23(7),5-12.
15. Dunkhase, J. A.(2003).Coupled-inquiry cycle: A teacher concerns-based model for effective student inquiry.Science Education,12,10-15.
16. Fraser, B. J.(ed.),Tobin, K. G.(ed.)(1998).International handbook of science education.Dordrecht, Netherlands:Kluwer.
17. Furtak, E. M.(2006).The problem with answers: An exploration of guided scientific inquiry teaching.Science Education,90,452-467.
18. Gengarelly, L. M.,Abrams, E. D.(2009).Closing the gap: Inquiry in research and the secondary science classroom.Journal of Science Education and Technology,18,74-84.
19. Gerber, B. L.,Price, C.,Barnes, M.,Hinkle, V.,Barnes, L.,Gordon, P.(2003).Excellence in rural science teaching: Examining elements of professional development models.The annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching,Philadelphia, PA:
20. Gess-Newsome, J.(ed.),Lederman, N. G.(ed.)(1999).Examining pedagogical content knowledge.Dordrecht, Netherlands:Kluwer.
21. Gibson, H. L.,Chase, C.(2002).Longitudinal impact of an inquiry-based science program on middle school students' attitudes toward science.Science Education,86,693-705.
22. Haney, J. J.,Czerniak, C. M.,Lumpe, A. T.(1996).Teacher beliefs and intentions regarding the implementation of science education reform strands.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,33,971-993.
23. Hiebert, J.,Carpenter, T. P.,Fennema, E.,Fuson, K.,Human, P.,Murray, H.(1996).Problem solving as a basis for reform in curriculum and instruction: The case of mathematics.Educational Researcher,25(4),12-21.
24. Hinrichsen, J.,Jarrett, D.(1999).Science inquiry for the classroom: A literature review.Portland, OR:Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory.
25. Howes, E. V.,Lim, M.,Campos, J.(2009).Journeys into inquiry-based elementary science: Literacy practices, questioning, and empirical study.Science Education,93,189-217.
26. Jeanpierre, B.,Oberhauser, K.,Freeman, C.(2005).Characteristics of professional development that effect change in secondary science teachers' classroom practices.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,42,668-690.
27. Kanari, Z.,Millar, R.(2004).Reasoning from data: How students collect and interpret data in science investigations.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41,748-769.
28. Keeves, J. P.(ed.)(1988).Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An international handbook.Oxford:Pergamon.
29. Keys, C. W.,Bryan, L. A.(2001).Co-constructing inquiry-based science with teachers: Essential research for lasting reform.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,38,631-645.
30. Khishfe, R.,Abd-El-Khalick, F.(2002).Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,39,551-578.
31. Lavonen, J.,Jauhiainen, J.,Koponen, T. I.,Kurki-Suonio, K.(2004).Effect of a long-term in-service training program on teachers' beliefs about the role of experiments in physics education.International Journal of Science Education,26,309-328.
32. Lederman, N. G.,Abd-E1-Khalick, F.,Bell, R. L.,Schwartz, R. S.(2002).Views of nature of science questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,39,497-521.
33. Lee, O.,Hart, J. E.,Cuevas, P.,Enders, C.(2004).Professional development in inquiry-based science for elementary teachers of diverse student groups.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41,1021-1043.
34. Lotter, C.,Harwood, W. S.,Bonner, J. J.(2007).The influence of core teaching conceptions on teachers' use of inquiry teaching practices.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,44,1318-1347.
35. Loucks-Horsley, S.,Hewson, P. W.,Love, N.,Stiles, K. E.(1998).Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
36. Martin-Hansen, L.(2002).Defining inquiry: Exploring the many types of inquiry in the science classroom.The Science Teacher,69(2),34-37.
37. Marx, R. W.,Blumenfeld, P. C.,Krajcik, J. S.,Fishman, B.,Soloway, E.,Geier, R.(2004).Inquiry-based science in middle grades: Assessment of learning in urban systemic reform.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,41,1063-1080.
38. Merriam, S. B.(1988).Case study research in education.Thousand Oaks, CA:Jossey-Bass.
39. Minstrell, J.,van Zee, E. H.(2000).Inquiring into inquiry learning and teaching in science.Washington, DC:American Association for the Advancement of Science.
40. National Research Council(2000).Inquiry and the national science education standards.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
41. National Research Council(1996).National science education standards.Washington, DC:National Academic Press.
42. Oliver-Hoyo, M.,Allen, D.,Anderson, M.(2004).Inquiry-guided instruction: Practical issues of implementation.Journal of College Science Teaching,33(6),20-24.
43. Pataray-Ching, J.,Roberson, M.(2002).Misconceptions about a curriculum as inquiry framework.Language Arts,79,498-505.
44. Radford, D. L.(1998).Transferring theory into practice: A model for professional development for science education reform.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,35,73-88.
45. Reiff, R.,Harwood, W. S.,Phillipson, T.(2002).A scientific method based upon research scientists' conceptions of scientific inquiry.Paper presented at the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science,Charlotte, NC:
46. Roehrig, G. H.,Luft, J.(2004).Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons.International Journal of Science Education,26,3-24.
47. Sandoval, W. A.,Morrison, K.(2003).High school students' ideas about theories and theory change after a biological inquiry unit.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,40,369-392.
48. Schwartz, R. S.,Lederman, N. G.(2008).What scientists say: Scientists' views of nature of science and relation to science context.International Journal of Science Education,30,727-772.
49. Schwartz, R. S.,Lederman, N. G.,Khishfe, R.,Lederman, J. S.,Matthews, L.,Liu, S. Y.(2002).Explicit/reflective instructional attention to nature of science and scientific inquiry: Impact on student learning.Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science,Charlotte, NC:
50. Shymansky, J. A.(2008).Teachers helping teachers teach science inquiry: The "just ask" project.The international conference of Professional Development and Student Learning for Innovative Science Curricula,Taipei, Taiwan:
51. Strauss, A. L.,Corbin, J. M.(1998).Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
52. Sweeney, A. E.,Bula, O. A.,Cornett, J. W.(2001).The role of personal practice theories in the professional development of a beginning high school chemistry teacher.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,38,408-441.
53. Thakkar, U.,Bruce, B. C.,Hogan, M. P.,Williamson, J.(2001).Extending literacy through participation in new technologies.Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy,45,212-219.
54. Thompson, S. L.(2003).Development of a framework to measure science teachers' inquiry perceptions and practices.The annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers of Science,St. Louis, MO:
55. Trautmann, N.,MaKinster, J.,Avery, L.(2004).What makes inquiry so hard? (And why is it worth it?).The annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching,Vancouver, BC, Canada:
56. Trowbridge, L. W.,Bybee, R. W.(1990).Becoming a secondary school science teacher.New York:Merrill.
57. van Driel, J. H.,Beijard, D.,Verloop, N.(2001).Professional development and reform in science education: The role of teachers' practical knowledge.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,38,137-158.
58. Wee, B.,Shepardson, D.,Fast, J.,Harbor, J.(2007).Teaching and learning about inquiry: Insights and challenges in professional development.Journal of Science Teacher Education,18,63-89.
59. 張清濱(2000)。探究教學法。師友，395，45-49。
60. 教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程總綱綱要。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:教育部=Ministry of Education。
61. 教育部(2003)。科學教育白皮書。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:教育部=Ministry of Education。
62. 黃鴻博(2000)。兒童科學探究活動遭遇問題的探討。臺中師院學報，14，389-409。
63. 蘇麗涼(2002)。彰化市=Changhua, Taiwan，國立彰化師範大學科學教育研究所在職進修專班=National Changhua University of Education。

1. 陳均伊(2013)。國小自然與生活科技教科書的語句類型分析─因果性解釋與預測性解釋的探討。教科書研究，6(1)，57-85。
2. 陳明聰,吳雅萍(2019)。科學探究專業成長方案對國小集中式特教班教師實施探究教學專業知能改變之個案研究。特殊教育研究學刊，44(2)，1-27。
3. 洪菁穗,吳心楷(2022)。高中科學教師對「探究與實作」課程的概念：課程特徵、挑戰、教學目標與教學活動。科學教育學刊，30(1)，1-26。
4. 盧秀琴(2017)。大學「昆蟲學」轉化為國小師資生的師培課程。教育實踐與研究，30(1)，105-138。
5. 羅廷瑛(2015)。多元文化探究教學模組實施國小學生數理成就及文化學習之行動研究。人文社會學報，11(4)，307-335。
6. 蘇意雯(2015)。遺產分配問題的數學探究活動。國教新知，62(3)，30-39。
7. 楊肅健,張家榮,林秋斌(2021)。HiTeach平臺支援國小自然科5E探究式學習對不同成就學生學習成效之研究。數位學習科技期刊，13(4)，95-121。
8. 張宇樑(2014)。運用專業成長活動促進高職教師探究教學知覺轉變之個案研究。科學教育學刊，22(4)，363-388。
9. 周淑卿,王佩蘭(2020)。科技實作課程發展中教師實務知識建構之個案研究。課程與教學，23(4)，27-57。
10. (2012)。引導教師同儕合作提升資訊科技融入教學的素養之研究。教育研究月刊，215，40-53。
11. (2019)。培育師資生使用PO+E教學法研發國小奈米科技教案與教學。教育研究學報，53(2)，31-56。