教師閱讀教學行為與學生閱讀態度和閱讀能力自我評價對於閱讀成就之跨層次影響：以PIRLS 2006為例

The Cross-Level Effects of Teachers' Reading Instruction, Students' Reading Attitude, and Self-Assessment in Reading Proficiency on Students' Reading Achievement: A Multilevel Study of PIRLS 2006

張毓仁(Yu-Jen Chang)；柯華葳(Hwa-Wei Ko)；邱皓政(Haw-Jeng Chiou)；歐宗霖(Tsung-Lin Ou)；溫福星(Fur-Hsing Wen)

促進國際閱讀素養研究 ； 階層線性模式 ； 資料庫 ； 跨層次交互作用 ； 閱讀成就 ； PIRLS ； hierarchical linear modeling ； database ； cross-level interaction ； reading achievement

教育科學研究期刊

56卷2期（2011 / 06 / 01）

69 - 105

繁體中文

本研究旨在探究教師閱讀教學行為（閱讀教學活動和閱讀策略教學頻率）與學生閱讀態度、閱讀能力自我評價對於學生閱讀成就的影響。研究資料為臺灣地區「促進國際閱讀素養研究」（PIRLS 2006），研究者挑選128名教師和相配對的3,472位學生，以多層次線性模式進行分析。結果顯示，個體層次的學童家庭教育資源、閱讀態度、閱讀能力自我評價對於閱讀成就皆具有顯著的正向影響。其次，總體層次的教師閱讀教學活動頻率和閱讀策略教學頻率對於學童閱讀成就則沒有顯著的脈絡效果。第三，跨層次交互作用可能具有特定性，教師閱讀活動教學頻率可能對於學生閱讀態度產生強化作用。最後，本文提出對於閱讀教育的省思和資料庫分析研究的建議。

The purposes of this study is to probe the impacts of the frequencies of Reading Instruction Activities (RIA) and Reading Strategies Teaching (RST) implemented by teachers, as well as students' Home Education Resources (HER), Reading Attitude (RA), and Self-Assessment (SA) regarding their reading proficiency to students' reading achievement. A two-level database of 128 teachers (macro-level) and matched 3,472 fourth-graders (micro-level) was selected from the Taiwan PIRLS 2006 Database. Multilevel linear modeling (MLM) was then applied to analyze the data. The results indicated that in micro-level, HER, RA, and SA can significantly explain students' reading achievement in a positive way. In the macro-level, neither RIA nor RST showed a significant contextual effect on students' reading achievement. Additionally, the specific interaction among the cross-level analysis was likely to involve the frequencies of RIA, enhancing the relationship between students' RA and their reading achievement. Based on the research findings, the researcher also addresses issues pertaining to the limitations of the study and suggestions for future research.

1. 宋曜廷、邱佳民、劉欣宜、曾芬蘭、陳柏熹(2009)。以國中基本學力測驗成績探討班級規模效應。教育科學研究期刊，54(2)，59-83。
   連結：
2. 宋曜廷、劉佩雲、簡馨瑩(2003)。閱讀動機量表的修訂及相關因素研究。測驗學刊，50(1)，47-72。
   連結：
3. 李仁豪、余民寧(2008)。二層次結構方程式模型的應用：以教育心理學為例。師大學報：教育類，53(3)，95-123。
   連結：
4. 劉潔玲(2009)。香港中學生在國際學生評估計畫的閱讀表現對與文課程改革的啟示。教育科學研究期刊，54(2)，85-105。
   連結：
5. 蕭佳純、董旭英、饒夢霞(2009)。以結構方程式探討家庭教育資源、學習態度、班級互動在學習成效的作用。教育科學研究期刊，54(2)，135-162。
   連結：
6. Willms, J. D., & Smith, T. M. (2005). A manual for conducting analyses with data from TIMSS and PIS a report prepared for the UNESCO institute for statistics. Retrieved October 13, 2010, from http://www.unb.ca/crisp/hlm/htm
7. International Association for the Evaluation of Educaional Achievement. (2008). The PIRLS 2006 international database files. Retrieved August 20, 2009, form http://pirls.bc.edu/pirls2006/user_guide.html
8. Barry, A. L.(2002).Reading strategies teachers say they use.Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy,46(2),132-141.
9. Blocks, C.(1993).Strategy instruction in a literature-based reading program.The Elementary School Journal,94(2),139-151.
10. Cohen, J.(1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.Hillsdale, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Davies, F.(1995).Introducing reading.London:Penguin.
12. Dole, J. A.,Duffy, G. G.,Roehler, L. R.,Pearson, P. D.(1991).Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction.Review of Educational Research,61(2),239-264.
13. Duffy, G. G.,Roehler, L. R.(1993).Improving classroom reading instruction: A decision-making approach.New York:McGraw-Hill.
14. Enders, C. K.,Tofighi, D.(2007).Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue.Psychologyical Methods,12(2),121-138.
15. Farstrup, A. E.(ed.),Samuels, S. J.(ed.)(2002).What research has to say about reading instruction.Newark, DE:International Reading Association.
16. Foy, P.,Kennedy, A. M.(2008).PIRLS 2006 international user guide for international database.Chestnut Hill, MA:TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
17. Gettys, C. M.,Fowler, F.(1996).The relationship of academic and recreational reading attitudes schools wide: A beginning study.The annual meeting of the Mid-South Regional Education Association,Tuscaloosa, AL:
18. Guthrie, J. T.,Schafer, W. D.,Huang, C.(2001).Benefits of opportunity to read balanced instruction on the NAEP.Journal of Educational Research,94(3),145-162.
19. Guthrie, J. T.,Schafer, W. D.,Wang, Y. Y.,Afflerbach, P.(1995).Relationships of instruction to amount of reading: An exploration of social, cognitive, and instructional connections.Reading Research Quarterly,30(1),8-25.
20. Guthrie, J. T.,Van Meter, P.,McCann, A. D.,Wigfield, A.,Bennett, L.,Poundstone, C.(1996).Growth of literacy engagement: Changes in motivations and strategies during concept-oriented reading instruction.Reading Research Quarterly,31(3),306-332.
21. Hittleman, D. R.(1988).Developmental reading, K-8 teaching from a whole-language perspective.Columbus, OH:Merrill.
22. Hofmann, D. A.(1997).An overview of the logic and rational of hierarchical linear models.Journal of Management,23(6),723-744.
23. Hofmann, D. A.,Gavin, M. B.(1998).Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations.Journal of Management,24(5),623-641.
24. Lau, K. L.(2006).Reading strategy use between Chinese good and poor readers: A think-aloud study.Journal of Research in Reading,29(4),383-399.
25. Lau, K. L.,Chan, D. W.(2003).Reading strategy use and motivation among Chinese good and poor readers in Hong Kong.Journal of Research in Reading,26(2),177-190.
26. Lerner, J. W.(1997).Learning disabilities.Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin.
27. Martin, M. O.(ed.),Mullis, I. V. S.(ed.),Kennedy, A. M.(ed.)(2007).PIRLS 2006 technical report.Chestnut Hill, MA:Boston College Press.
28. Mathiue, J. E.,Taylor, S. R.(2007).A framework for testing meso-mediational relationships in organizational behavior.Journal of Organization Behavior,28(2),141-172.
29. McKenna, M. C.,Kear, D. J.,Ellsworth, R. A.(1995).Children's attitudes toward reading: A national survey.Reading Research Quarterly,30(4),934-956.
30. Mullis, I. V. S.,Martin, M. O.,Kennedy, A. M.,Foy, P.(2007).PIRLS 2006 international report: IEA's progress in international reading literacy study in primary schools in 40 countries.Chestnut Hill, MA:TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College.
31. Pearson, P. D.(ed.)(1984).Handbook of reading research.New York:Longman.
32. Pressley, M.,Gaskins, I. W.,Cunicelli, E. A.,Burdick, N. J.,Schaub-Matt, M.,Lee, D. S.(1991).Strategy instruction at Benchmark school: A faculty interview study.Learning Disability Quarterly,14(1),19-48.
33. Rasinski, T. V.(1994).Fast start: A parental involvement reading program for primary grade students.The annual meeting of the College Reading Association,New Orleans, LA:
34. Raudenbush, S. W.,Bryk, A. S.(2002).Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
35. Raudenbush, S. W.,Bryk, A. S.,Cheong, Y. F.,Congdon, R. T., Jr.(2004).HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling.Lincolnwood, IL:Scientific Software International.
36. Richek, M.,Caldwell, J.,Jennings, J.,Lerner, J.(1996).Reading problems: Assessment and teaching strategies.Needham Heights, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
37. Rubin, D.(1987).Multiple imputation for nonresponse in sample surveys.New York:John Wiley.
38. Rutkowski, L.,Gonzalez, E.,Joncas, M.,von Davier, M.(2010).International large-scale assessment data: Issues in secondary analysis and roporting.Educational Researcher,39(2),142-151.
39. Samuelstuen, M. S.,Braten, I.(2005).Decoding, knowledge, and strategies in comprehension of expository text.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology,46(2),107-117.
40. Smith, M. C.(1990).A longitudinal investigation of reading attitude development from child to adulthood.The Journal of Educational Research,83(4),215-219.
41. Spedding, S.,Chan, L. K. S.(1993).Metacognition, word identification, and reading competence.Contemporary Educational Psychology,18(1),91-100.
42. Teachman, D. J.(1987).Family background, educational resource, and educational attainment.American Sociological Review,52(4),548-557.
43. von Davier, M.(ed.),Hastedt, D.(ed.)(2009).IERI monograph series: Issues and methodologies in large scale assessments.Princeton, NJ:IEA-ETS Research Institute Press.
44. Wigfield, A.,Guthrie, J. T.(1997).Reading engagement: Motivation readers through integrate instruction.Newark, DE:International Reading Association.
45. 方子華(2003)。屏東縣=Pingtung County, Taiwan，國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所=National Pingtung University of Education。
46. 李婉榕(2003)。臺中市=Taichung, Taiwan，國立臺中師範學院語文教育研究所=National Taichung University of Education。
47. 沈佳蓉(2005)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，臺北市立師範學院課程與教學研究所=Taipei Municipal University of Education。
48. 林憲治(2004)。嘉義縣=Chiayi County, Taiwan，國立嘉義大學國民教育研究所=National Chiayi University。
49. 柯華葳、詹益綾、張建妤、游婷雅(2008)。,桃園縣=Taoyuan County, Taiwan:中央大學=National Central University。
50. 張怡婷(2002)。屏東縣=Pingtung County, Taiwan，國立屏東師範學院國民教育研究所=National Pingtung University of Education。
51. 張春興(1999)。教育心理學。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:東華=Tung Hua。
52. 連啟舜(2002)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學教育心理與輔導研究所=National Taiwan Normal University。
53. 陳李綢(1995)。『學習策略訓練方案』對國中生閱讀理解學習之影響。教育心理學報，28，77-98。
54. 陳怡華(2001)。高雄市=Kaohsiung, Taiwan，國立高雄師範大學教育學系=National Kaohsiung Normal University。
55. 陳雅文(2004)。臺中市=Taichung, Taiwan，國立臺中師範學院教育測驗統計研究所=National Taichung University of Education。
56. 黃靜芳(2003)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立政治大學教育研究所=National Chengchi University。
57. 蔡淑玲(2007)。嘉義縣=Chiayi County, Taiwan，國立嘉義大學家庭教育研究所=National Chiayi Univeristy。
58. 謝錫金、林偉業、林裕康、羅嘉怡(2005)。兒童閱讀能力進展：香港與國際比較。香港=Hong Kong:香港大學=Hong Kong University Press。
59. 蘇宜芬、林清山(1992)。後設認知訓練課程對國小低閱讀能力學生的閱讀理解能力與後設認知能力之影響。教育心理學報，25，245-268。

1. 張世賢(2017)。國中生參與線上閱讀認證與閱讀態度、閱讀理解之相關研究--以高雄市某國中為例。義守大學資訊管理學系學位論文。2017。1-110。