國小二至六年級朗讀流暢度篩檢準確度及切截點分析

Assessment Accuracy and Cut-Off Points of Oral Reading Fluency for Grade 2-6 Students

10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(4).02

蘇宜芬(Yi-Fen Su)；張祐瑄(You-Hsuan Chang)；李孟峰(Meng-Feng Li)；黃鈺茜(Yu-Chien Huang)

切截點 ； 朗讀流暢度 ； 國小學童 ； 閱讀理解 ； ROC分析 ； cut-off points ； elementary-school students ； oral reading fluency ； reading comprehension ； receiver operating characteristic analysis

教育科學研究期刊

61卷4期（2016 / 12 / 01）

33 - 57

繁體中文

本研究主要目的是以閱讀的自動化理論為基礎，為國小二至六年級朗讀流暢度做篩檢準確度及最佳切截點分析。研究中，以閱讀理解答對率作為效標變項，朗讀流暢度z 分數作為預測變項，然後採用「接受者操作特徵」（Receiver-Operating-Characteristic, ROC）分析，根據「ROC 曲線下面積」之大小，來檢測採用朗讀流暢度篩檢因認字效能不足導致閱讀理解困難之學童的準確度。此外，也根據χ2 值、命中率、敏銳度、錯誤拒絕率及錯誤接受率等數據，對朗讀流暢度做最佳切截點的分析。研究結果顯示，以朗讀流暢度來篩檢因認字效能不足導致閱讀理解困難的學童，具有中等的準確度。而且以二至六年級上下學期的資料而言，朗讀流暢度z分數最佳切截點都是-0.5。本研究也提供國小二至六年級上下學期的朗讀流暢度平均值資料，以供教育研究者及教師瞭解二至六年級學童認字效能平均成長情形之參考。

This study evaluated the assessment accuracy of oral reading fluency. Additionally, this study focused on determining the cut-off point for identifying poor reading comprehension caused by low decoding efficiency in students of grades 2-6. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was adopted to evaluate the assessment accuracy of oral reading fluency. The area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC indicated that oral reading fluency exhibited medium accuracy in screening. Based on analyses of χ 2 , the hit rate, sensitivity, false negative rate, and false positive rate, a z score of oral reading fluency below -0.5 was identified as the optimal cut-off point for screening students with poor reading comprehension caused by low decoding efficiency. In addition, the mean scores of oral reading fluency for students in grades 2-6 are provided to inform teachers and researchers of the level of oral reading fluency in elementary-school students.

1. 王天苗、廖華芳(2007)。嬰幼兒綜合發展測驗之判定準確度及切截點分析。特殊教育研究學刊，32(2)，1-15。
   連結：
2. 王梅軒、黃瑞珍(2005)。國小課程本位閱讀測量方法之信度與效度研究。特殊教育研究學刊，29，73-94。
   連結：
3. 洪儷瑜、陳秀芬、王瓊珠、張郁雯(2012)。常用字流暢性測驗編製研究。測驗學刊，59(2)，247-276。
   連結：
4. 陳惠琴、楊憲明(2008)。國小學童文本朗讀速度分析之研究。特殊教育與復健學報，18，1-30。
   連結：
5. 蘇宜芬、陳學志(2007)。認字自動化指標之建立與信效度研究。教育心理學報，38(4)，501-514。
   連結：
6. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Eaton, S., & Hamlett, C. L. (2000). Relation between reading fluency and reading comprehension as a function of silent versus oral reading mode. Unpublished manuscript..
7. Chall, J.(1996).Stages of reading development.Orlando, FL:Harcourt Brace.
8. Daane, M. C.,Campbell, J. R.,Grigg, W. S.,Goodman, M. J.,Oranje, A.(2005).Fourth-grade students reading aloud: NAEP 2002 special study of oral reading (NCES 2006-469).Washington, DC:National Center for Educational Statistics, U. S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Science.
9. Deno, S. L.(1985).Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative.Exceptional Children,52(3),219-232.
10. Ekwall, E. E.,Shanker, J. L.(1993).Reading inventory.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
11. Farstrup, A. E.(Ed.),Samuels, S. J.(Ed.)(2002).What research has to say about reading instruction.Newark, DE:International Reading Association.
12. Fuchs, L. S.,Fuchs, D.,Hosp, M. K.,Jenkins, J. R.(2001).Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis.Scientific Study of Reading,5(3),239-256.
13. Fuchs, L. S.,Fuchs, D.,Maxwell, L.(1988).The validity of informal reading comprehension measures.Remedial and Special Education,9(2),20-28.
14. Hoover, H. D.,Dunbar, S. B.,Frisbie, D. A.(2001).Iowa tests of basic skills.Itasca, IL:Riverside.
15. Jenkins, J. R.,Fuchs, L. S.,Espin, C.,van den Broek, P.,Deno, S. L.(2000).Effects of task format and performance dimension on word reading measures: Criterion validity, sensitivity to impairment, and context facilitation.Pacific Coast Research Conference,San Diego, CA.:
16. Jenkins, J. R.,Fuchs, L. S.,van den Broek, P.,Espin, C.,Deno, S. L.(2003).Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency.Journal of Educational Psychology,95(4),719-729.
17. Johns, J. L.(1997).BASIC reading inventory: Pre-primer through grade twelve and early literacy assessments.Dubuque, IA:Kendall/Hunt..
18. LaBerge, D.,Samuels, S. J.(1974).Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading.Cognitive Psychology,6(2),293-323.
19. Leslie, L.,Caldwell, J.(2006).Qualitative reading inventory-4: A valid research-based measure of reading improvement.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
20. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development(2000).Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read.Washington, DC:U.S. Government Printing Office.
21. Norman, D. A.,Bobrow, D. G.(1975).On data-limited and resource-limited processes.Journal of Cognitive Psychology,7(1),44-64.
22. Perfetti, C. A.(1985).Reading ability.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
23. Posner, M. I.,Snyder, C. R. R.(1975).Attention and cognitive control.Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium,Hillsdale, NJ:
24. Rathvon, N.(2004).Early reading assessment: A practioner's handbook.New York, NY:Guilford Press.
25. Rice, N. K.(1981).Lansing, MI.,Michigan State University.
26. Samuels, S. J.(1997).The method of repeated readings.The Reading Teacher,50(5),376-382.
27. Samuels, S. J.(1988).Decoding and automaticity: Helping poor readers become automatic at word recognition.The Reading Teacher,41(8),757-760.
28. Schwanenflugel, P. J.,Meisinger, E. B.,Wisenbaker, J. M.,Kuhn, M. R.,Strauss, G. P.,Morris, R. D.(2006).Becoming a fluent and automatic reader in the early elementary school years.Reading Research Quarterly,41(4),496-522.
29. Shiffrin, R. M.,Schneider, W.(1977).Controlled and automatic human information processing: Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory.Psychological Review,84(2),127-190.
30. Stanovich, K. E.(1980).Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency.Reading Research Quarterly,16(1),32-71.
31. Taylor, B.,Harris, L. A.,Pearson, P. D.,Garcia, G.(1995).Reading difficulties: Instruction and assessment.New York, NY:McGraw-Hill.
32. Torgesen, J. K.,Wagner, R. K.,Rashotte, C. A.(1999).Test of word reading efficiency.Austin, TX:PRO-ED.
33. Valencia, S. W.,Smith, A. T.,Reece, A. M.,Li, M.,Wixson, K. K.,Newman, H.(2010).Oral reading fluency assessment: Issues of construct, criterion, and consequential validity.Reading Research Quarterly,45(3),270-291.
34. 王文婷、蘇宜芬(2005)。國小二年級學童認字自動化指標之研究。台灣心理學會第四十四屆年會，桃園市=Taoyuan, Taiwan:
35. 王瓊珠編、陳淑麗編(2010)。突破閱讀困難：理論與實務。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological。
36. 吳宜貞(2007)。重複閱讀在教學的實用性。師友月刊，478，69-71。
37. 林傑斌、林川雄、劉明德(2004)。SPSS 12統計建模與應用實務。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:博碩文化=DrMaster Press。
38. 柯華葳、詹益綾(2006)。國民小學二至六年級閱讀理解篩選測驗。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:教育部特殊教育小組=Department of Student Affairs and Special Education, Ministry of Education。
39. 洪儷瑜、張郁雯、王瓊珠、陳秀芬(2006)。識字量評估測驗。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:教育部特殊教育小組=Department of Student Affairs and Special Education, Ministry of Education。
40. 葉靖雲(1993)。課程本位閱讀測驗的效度研究。特殊教育學報，8，273-323。
41. 葉靖雲(1998)。課程本位閱讀測驗的效度研究。特殊教育與復健學報，6，239-260。
42. 路君約(1989)。心理測驗。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:中國行為科學社=Chinese Behavioral Science Corporation。
43. 蘇宜芬(2004)。閱讀理解的影響因素及其在教育上的意義。教師天地，129，21-28。
44. 蘇宜芬、洪儷瑜、陳心怡、陳柏熹(2015)。閱讀理解成長測驗（四至六年級版）。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:中國行為科學社=Chinese Behavioral Science Corporation。
45. 蘇宜芬、陳柏熹、洪儷瑜(2010)。閱讀理解成長指標之建立。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:國立臺灣師範大學教育評鑑與發展研究中心=Center for Educational Research and Evaluation, National Taiwan Normal University。

1. 孔淑萱(2019)。同儕輔助學習策略對提升國小三年級學生語文能力表現之研究：差異化教學之本土實踐。課程與教學，22(2)，205-233。
2. 劉義翔、黃瑞珍(2017)。國小中年級閱讀障礙兒童伴隨語言問題之研究。特殊教育學報，46，31-54。
3. 石明玉,孔淑萱(2019)。運用同儕學習策略提升國小學生閱讀能力成效之研究。特教論壇，26，1-23。
4. 蘇宜芬,張祐瑄(2023)。國小六年級數學低成就學生是否伴隨閱讀能力落後在數學文字題解題歷程的表現差異。當代教育研究季刊，31(1)，41-73。
5. 楊憶婷,陳育新,張美珍(2022)。國小學生參與博物館小記者播報活動口語表現之研究。科技博物，26(2)，139-167。
6. 詹益智,洪右真(2020)。國小一、二年級典型聽力和聽力障礙學童之唸讀速率與閱讀理解表現分析。特殊教育學報，52，29-47。
7. 張郁雯(2018)。朗讀流暢性測驗標準文本之發展研究。教育實踐與研究，31(2)，1-24。
8. 張郁雯(2021)。國小二、三年級學童朗讀流暢能力之成長模式探究。教育心理學報，53(2)，463-479。
9. (2018)。以PIRLS 架構和Rasch 模式建構閱讀理解測驗。市北教育學刊，60，1-30。
10. (2019)。以同儕輔助學習策略之次級介入提升國小學生語文能力：試探性研究。臺東大學教育學報，30(1)，33-72。