在職進修教師創意教學自我效能發展之縱貫性研究

Longitudinal Research on In-Service Trainee Teachers Development of Self-Efficacy for Creative Teaching

10.6209/JORIES.2017.62(3).02

蕭佳純(Chia-Chun Hsiao)

創意教學 ； 創意教學自我效能 ； 縱貫性研究 ； creative teaching ； longitudinal research ； self-efficacy for creative teaching

教育科學研究期刊

62卷3期（2017 / 09 / 01）

25 - 55

繁體中文

本研究以在職進修碩士學位的教師及其同事為對象，分析創意教學自我效能的成長趨勢，以及五大人格特質、進修與否對於創意教學自我效能的初始狀態及成長趨勢的影響。本研究在2年期間一共進行四次調查，分析結果顯示：一、抗壓信念呈現線性上升的成長趨勢，負向自覺為線性下降的發展趨勢；而正向肯定呈現先上後下發展的成長趨勢。二、進修教師的正向肯定、抗壓信念的成長趨勢明顯優於未參與進修的教師，負向自覺也明顯低於未進修的教師。三、五大人格特質的外向性與神經質對於創意教學自我效能成長趨勢有影響，其中神經質對於正向肯定的成長曲率為負向調節，但對於負向自覺的成長速率則為正向調節，而外向性對於抗壓信念的成長速率有正向影響。

Self-efficacy for creative teaching is a primary antecedent for the development of creative teaching. In consideration of the current emphasis on creative teaching, in-service trainee teachers studying for master's degrees and their colleagues were surveyed regarding their growth of self-efficacy for creative teaching. The effect of personality traits and in-service training on initial state of self-efficacy for creative teaching and the time dependence of this self-efficacy were determined in this study. A total of 252 teachers were recruited and completed four surveys over a 2-year period; 126 of the participants were studying for master's degrees. Analysis through hierarchical linear modeling revealed the following: (1) The stress-resistance faith of teachers' self-efficacy for creative teaching linearly increased with time, whereas negative self-consciousness linearly decreased. Positive appreciation first increased and then decreased. (2) In-service trainee teachers were found to clearly outperform their colleagues who were not receiving training with regards to growth of positive appreciation and stress-resistance faith and mitigation of negative self-consciousness. (3) The personality traits of extraversion and neuroticism affected the growth trend of self-efficacy for creative teaching: neuroticism was found to reduce the growth rate of positive appreciation but enhance that of negative self-consciousness, whereas extraversion was discovered to positively affect the growth rate of stress-resistance faith. According to these results, suggestions are made for the reference of relevant actors.

1. 王麗雲、潘慧玲(2000)。教師彰權益能的概念與實施策略。教育研究集刊，44，173-199。
   連結：
2. 吳家碧(2011)。創造人格特質在自我效能與內在動機對國小健體領域教師創意教學之探析。育德科大學報，29，1-16。
   連結：
3. 吳家碧(2011)。創造人格特質在自我效能與內在動機對國小健體領域教師創意教學之探析。育德科大學報，29，1-16。
   連結：
4. 姚如芬(2006)。成長團體之「成長」－小學教師數學教學專業之探究。科學教育學刊，14(3)，309-331。
   連結：
5. 洪久賢、洪榮昭、林麗娟、蔡長艷(2007)。影響教師創意教學因素之研究－以綜合活動領域為例。師大學報：教育類，52(2)，49-71。
   連結：
6. 洪素蘋、黃宏宇、林珊如(2008)。重要他人回饋影響創意生活經驗？以模式競爭方式檢驗創意自我效能與創意動機的中介效果。教育心理學報，40(2)，303-322。
   連結：
7. 張景媛、呂玉琴、何縕琪、吳青蓉、林奕宏(2002)。多元思考教學策略對國小教師數學教學之影響暨教師專業成長模式之建構。教育心理學報，33(2)，1-22。
   連結：
8. 郭奕龍(2005)。教師的創造力發展課程實施成效之研究。資優教育研究，5(1)，93-109。
   連結：
9. 陳玉樹、郭銘茜(2013)。四向度成就目標對教師創意教學表現之影響：創意自我效能的中介效果與團隊學習行為的跨層級調節效果檢定。教育科學研究期刊，58(3)，85-120。
   連結：
10. 陳亮光(2008)。建置對外華語文師資培育創意教學課程增進教師創造力之研究。中原華語文學報，1，143-172。
    連結：
11. 陳燕嬌、范熾文(2007)。花蓮縣國民小學教師專業成長之研究。學校行政，49，189-210。
    連結：
12. 曾崇賢、段曉林、靳知勤(2011)。探究教學的專業成長歷程－以十位國中科學教師的觀點為例。科學教育學刊，19(2)，143-168。
    連結：
13. 劉宗明、黃德祥(2008)。國中教師人格特質與教學效能之研究。臺北市立教育大學學報：教育類，39(2)，1-33。
    連結：
14. 劉國兆(2008)。從人力資本觀點探討國小教師在職進修制度實施之問題。花蓮教育大學學報，27，161-175。
    連結：
15. 鄭博真(2011)。我國幼兒教師創造力人格特質與創造力教學行為之研究。高雄師大學報：教育類，31，71-98。
    連結：
16. 蕭佳純(2015)。教師人格特質、復原力與創意教學關聯之研究：多層次調節式中介效果的探討。特殊教育研究學刊，40(1)，85-115。
    連結：
17. 蕭佳純(2012)。國小學生內在動機、學科知識與創造力表現關聯之研究：教師創造力教學的調節效果。特殊教育研究學刊，37(3)，89-113。
    連結：
18. 蕭佳純(2014)。國小學童參與科展的歷程、內在動機與科技創造力成長的縱貫性分析。教育實踐與研究，27(2)，33-66。
    連結：
19. 羅巧玲、魏美惠(2012)。中部地區幼兒教師創造力人格特質與教學效能之相關研究。教育科學期刊，12(1)，149-178。
    連結：
20. Amabile, T. M.(1996).Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity.Oxford, UK:Westview Press.
21. Arzi, H. J.,White, R. T.(2008).Change in teachers' knowledge of subject matter: A 17-year longitudinal study.Science Education,92(2),221-251.
22. Bandura, A.(1986).Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice Hall.
23. Bandura, A.(1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.New York, NY:W. H. Freeman and Company.
24. Barrick, M. R.,Mount, M. K.(1991).The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis.Personality Psychology,44(1),1-26.
25. Benedek, M.,Fink, A.,Neubauer, A. C.(2006).Enhancement of ideational fluency by means of computer-based training.Creativity Research Journal,18(3),317-328.
26. Birdi, K. S.(2005).No idea? Evaluating the effectiveness of creativity training.Journal of European Industrial Training,29(2),102-111.
27. Chan, S.,Yuen, M.(2014).Personal and environmental factors affecting teachers' creativityfostering practices in Hong Kong.Thinking Skills and Creativity,12,69-77.
28. Chang, C.-P.,Chuang, H.-W.,Bennington, L.(2011).Organizational climate for innovation and creative teaching in urban and rural schools.Quality & Quantity,45(4),935-951.
29. Chen, G.,Gully, S. M.,Eden, D.(2001).Validation of a new general self-efficacy scale.Organizational Research Methods,4(1),62-83.
30. Choi, S.,Ramsey, J.(2009).Constructing elementary teachers' beliefs, attitudes, and practical knowledge through an inquiry-based elementary science course.School Science and Mathematics,109(6),313-324.
31. Costa, P. T., Jr.,McCrae, R. R.(1985).The NEO personality inventory: Manual form S and form R.Odessa, FL:Psychological Assessment Resources.
32. Cramond, B.,Matthews-Morgan, J.,Bandalos, D.,Zuo, L.(2005).A report on the 40-year follow-up of the Torrance test of creative thinking: Alive and well in the new millennium.Gifted Child Quarterly,49(4),283-291.
33. Donche, V.,Van Petegem, P.(2009).The development of learning patterns of student teachers: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study.Higher Education,57(4),463-475.
34. Fenwick, T. J.(2004).Teacher learning and professional growth plans: Implementation of a provincial policy.Journal of Curriculum and Supervision,19(3),259-282.
35. Fitzmaurice, G. M.,Laird, N. M.,Ware, J. H.(2004).Applied longitudinal analysis.Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley & Sons.
36. Gelade, G. A.(1997).Creativity in conflict: The personality of the commercial creative.Journal of Genetic Psychology,158(1),67-78.
37. Gong, Y.,Huang, J.-C.,Farh, J.-L.(2009).Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy.Academy of Management Journal,52(4),765-778.
38. Gruber, H. E.,Wallace, D. B.(2001).Creative work: The case of Charles Darwin.American Psychologist,56(4),346-349.
39. Hofer, M.,Grandgenett, N.(2012).Track development in teacher education: A longitudinal study of preservice teachers in a Secondary MA Ed. Program.Journal of Research on Technology in Education,45(1),83-106.
40. Jamil, F. M.,Downer, J. T.,Pianta, R. C.(2012).Association of pre-service teachers' performance, personality, and beliefs with teacher self-efficacy at program completion.Teacher Education Quarterly,39(4),119-138.
41. Jaussi, K. S.,Randel, A. E.,Dionne, S. D.(2007).I am, I think I can, and I do: The role of personal identity, self-efficacy, and cross-application of experiences in creativity at work.Creativity Research Journal,19(2-3),247-258.
42. Keys, P. M.(2007).A knowledge filter model for observing and facilitating change in teachers' beliefs.Journal of Educational Change,8(1),41-60.
43. Khourey-Bowers, C.,Simonis, D. G.(2004).Longitudinal study of middle grades chemistry professional development: Enhancement of personal science teaching self-efficacy and outcome expectancy.Journal of Science Teacher Education,15(3),175-195.
44. LePine, J. A.,Van Dyne, L.(2001).Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with big five personality characteristics and cognitive ability.Journal of Applied Psychology,86(2),326-336.
45. Raudenbush, S. W.,Bryk, A. S.(2002).Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
46. Scott, G.,Leritz, L. E.,Mumford, M. D.(2004).The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review.Creativity Research Journal,16(4),361-388.
47. Slepkov, H.(2008).Teacher professional growth in an authentic learning environment.Journal of Research on Technology in Education,41(1),85-111.
48. Snijders, T.,Bosker, R.(1999).Multilevel analysis.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
49. Şukran, T.(2011).Pre-service primary education teachers' changing attitudes towards teaching: A longitudinal study.European Journal of Teacher Education,34(1),81-97.
50. Swars, S. L.,Smith, S. Z.,Smith, M. E.,Hart, L. C.(2009).A longitudinal study of effects of a developmental teacher preparation program on elementary prospective teachers' mathematics beliefs.Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,12(1),47-66.
51. Tierney, P.,Farmer, S. M.(2004).The Pygmalion process and employee creativity.Journal of Management,30(3),413-432.
52. Tierney, P.,Farmer, S. M.(2002).Creative self-efficacy: Its potential antecedents and relationship to creative performance.Academy of Management Journal,45(6),1137-1148.
53. 吳璧如(2005)。教師效能感的縱貫性研究：以幼教職前教師為例。教育與心理研究，28(3)，383-408。
54. 汪美香、黃炳憲(2012)。專業技能與創造力的關聯：創意自我效能中介角色。南台學報，37(4)，1-14。
55. 周麗華(2010)。臺北市國小教師專業發展評鑑實施效應之研究。市北教育學刊，37，103-125。
56. 林偉文(2011)。創意教學與創造力的培育─以「設計思考」為例。教育資料與研究，100，53-74。
57. 林碧芳(2012)。創意教學自我效能感量表在兩岸中小學教師之測量恆等性檢驗。創造學刊，3(1)，53-69。
58. 林碧芳、邱皓政(2008)。創意教學自我效能感量表之編製與相關研究。教育研究與發展期刊，4(1)，141-170。
59. 林碧芳、趙長寧、邱皓政(2010)。中小學教師創意教學效能與內在動機模式之檢驗－一項中介效果的驗證。創造學刊，1(1)，65-92。
60. 林麗芳、陳安秀(2011)。短期在職進修對高職教師專業成長之成效探討。大安高工學報，22，109-116。
61. 孫志麟(2009)。建立信心：教師自我效能七部曲。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:學富=Pro-Ed。
62. 教育部(2012)。師資培育白皮書。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:作者=Author。
63. 蔡明昌(2001)。中學教師自我導向學習準備度與其在職進修學習成效關係之研究。教育研究資訊，9(4)，1-26。
64. 謝俊義(2010)。HLM 多層次線性分析：理論、方法與實務。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:鼎茂圖書=Tingmao。

1. 陳南希(2021)。A Study on the Innovation Perceptions of Daily Practices of Early Childhood Teachers in Mainland China。教育科學研究期刊，66(1)，275-296。
2. 胡正申(2020)。社會心理學課程應用體驗與反思教學之研究。長庚人文社會學報，13(1)，107-151。
3. 許育齡(2021)。再探教師效能感發展：導入第二波正向心理辯證思維的可能進路。輔導季刊，57(3)，15-26。
4. 蘇少祖,戴凱欣,陳柏熹,洪榮昭(2019).Revolutionary Drawing: Measuring Adaptive and Innovative Creativity.教育科學研究期刊,64(3),143-168.
5. 蕭佳純(2023)。教師創意教學信念動態發展歷程之研究：從師資生階段到畢業後兩年的縱貫性調查。特殊教育研究學刊，48(1)，61-95。