國中教育會考英語科聽力測驗實施的回沖效應初探

A Pilot Study of the Washback Effect of the Incorporation of English Listening Test in the Comprehensive Assessment Program for Junior High School Students

10.6209/JORIES.201906_64(2).0008

曾芬蘭(Fen-Lan Tseng)；游羽萱(Yu-Xuan You)；蔡逸凡(I-Fan Tsai)；陳柏熹(Po-Hsi Chen)

回沖效應 ； 國中教育會考英語科聽力測驗 ； 教學策略 ； English listening test of the comprehensive assessment program for junior high school students ； teaching strategies ； washback effect

教育科學研究期刊

64卷2期（2019 / 06 / 01）

219 - 252

繁體中文

本研究探討國中教育會考實施英語科聽力測驗如何改變國中英語教學，並透過訪談近年來大幅減少英語聽力「待加強」能力等級學生人數比例之學校教師，歸納其提升學生英語聽力學習效益的教學方式。首先，透過問卷調查國中英語教師的教學是否根據國中教育會考英語科聽力測驗試題的命題方式進行調整，並比較國中英語教師在國中基本學力測驗時期與國中教育會考時期的教學方式，調查結果顯示：一、兩時期的課程教材仍以課內教材為主，但國中教育會考時期教師的教學素材更趨向多元，課外教材的使用比例增加，教材電子書的使用比例大幅提升；二、兩時期教學時間仍以單字、文法、閱讀最多，但國中教育會考時期閱讀、聽力、口說的授課時間均增加；三、國中教育會考時期定期評量中含聽力的比例比國中基本學力測驗時期高約近10%。由此可知，國中教育會考英語科聽力測驗實施確實對國中英語教學產生回沖效應。接著篩選2015～2017年國中教育會考英語科聽力測驗「待加強」能力等級學生比例下降最多的學校，透過訪談這些學校的英語科教師，歸納其共同教學策略，如分組合作學習、英語聽力理解策略教學、差異化教學、精熟學習、注重發音與口說等，並予以介述，以提供其他國中英語科教師參考。

This study investigates the effects of the incorporation of English listening test in the comprehensive assessment program for junior high school students (CAP henceforth) on the teaching in junior high school classrooms. Attention is also given to the teaching strategies or methods that the interviewed teachers believe to help improve students' listening comprehension. Through questionnaires, this study explores the differences of high school English teachers' overall approaches to teaching, and further compares their teaching strategies and assessment approaches in the period of the basic competence test for junior high school students with those in the period of the CAP. The main findings are as follows: First, teachers employed textbooks as the main source for instruction for both periods, with more additional extracurricular and electronic materials in the period of CAP. Secondly, for both periods, teachers spent most time in the instruction of vocabulary, grammar, and reading; however, the overall time allocation for the teaching of reading, listening, and speaking is increased with the incorporation of the listening comprehension test. Thirdly, listening comprehension assessment was included as part of the regular midterms and finals more than 10% in the period of CAP. The findings of our study indicated there was positive washback effect with the incorporation of English listening test. The above findings are further complemented with the interviews with the high school English teachers of the 14 selected schools whose students' scores for the CAP English listening test have significantly improved from 2015 to 2017. By presenting several common teaching strategies that are shared by the interviewed teachers of the sampled schools, this study offers some suggestions for effective approaches to teaching English listening.

1. Liao, Y.-F.(2016).Investigating the score dependability and decision dependability of the GEPT listening test: A multivariate generalizability theory approach.English Teaching & Learning,40(1),79-111.
   連結：
2. Lin, L.,Yang, M.(2017).Intertextuality in spoken discourse in business communication: Learners’ enactment of discourse roles.English Teaching & Learning,41(1),63-89.
   連結：
3. 宋曜廷, Y.-T.,周業太, Y.-T.,曾芬蘭, F.-L.(2014)。十二年國民基本教育的入學考試與評量變革。教育科學研究期刊，59(1)，1-32。
   連結：
4. 曾芬蘭, F.-L.,鍾長宏, C.-H.,陳世玉, S.-Y.,張銘秋, M.-C.(2018)。國中課室素養導向標準本位評量的設計與應用：以英語科閱讀為例。教育科學研究期刊，63(4)，119-155。
   連結：
5. 12年國教國中會考加考英聽（2012，4月20日）。蘋果日報。取自https://tw.appledaily.com/ headline/daily/20120420/34173011【There will be English listening tests of the comprehensive assessment program for junior high school students. (2012, April 20). Apple Daily. Retrieved from https://tw.appledaily.com/headline/daily/20120420/34173011】
6. Alderson, J. C.,Wall, D.(1993).Does washback exist?.Applied Linguistics,14(2),115-129.
7. Bailey, K. M.(1996).Working for washback: A review of the washback concept in language testing.Language Testing,13(3),257-279.
8. Chamberlain, D.(Ed.),Baumgardner, R. J.(Ed.)(1988).ESP in the classroom: Practice and evaluation (ELT Documents 128).London, UK:Modern English.
9. Chen, C.(2015).Taipei, Taiwan,National Taipei University of Technology.
10. Chen, C.-Y.(2016).Hualien, Taiwan,National Dong Hwa University.
11. Chen, L.-F.(2011).Changhua, Taiwan,National Changhua University of Education.
12. Cheng, L.,Curtis, A.(2004).Washback or backwash: A review of the impact of testing on teaching and learning.Washback in language testing: Research contexts and methods,Mahwah, NJ:
13. Chou, J.-C.(2016).Taipei, Taiwan,National Taipei University of Education.
14. Davies, A.,Brown, A.,Elder, C.,Hill, K.,Lumley, T.,McNamara, T.(1999).Dictionary of language testing 7, studies in language testing.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
15. Ho, Y.-H.(2017).Taipei, Taiwan,National Taiwan Normal University.
16. Hughes, A.(2003).Testing for language teachers.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
17. Jackson, P. W.(Ed.)(1992).Handbook of research on curriculum: A project of the American educational research association.New York, NY:Macmillan.
18. Li, H.-Y.(2015).Changhua, Taiwan,National Changhua University of Education.
19. Lin, Y.-T.(2009).Taipei, Taiwan,National Chengchi University.
20. Messick, S.(1996).Validity and washback in language testing.Language Testing,13(3),241-256.
21. Noble, A. J.,Smith, M. L.(1994).Old and new beliefs about measurement-driven reform: The more things change, the more they stay the same.Los Angeles, CA:National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
22. Pan, L.-H.(2017).Tainan, Taiwan,Tainan University of Technology.
23. Pan, Y.-C.,Newfields, T.(2012).Tertiary EFL proficiency graduation requirements in Taiwan: A study of washback on learning.Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching,9(1),108-122.
24. Saif, S.(2006).Aiming for positive washback: A case study of international testing assistants.Language Testing,23(1),1-34.
25. Salahshour, F.,Sharifi, M.,Salahshour, N.(2013).The relationship between language learning strategy use, language proficiency level and learner gender.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,70,634-643.
26. Salehi, H.,Yunus, M. M.(2012).The washback effect of the Iranian Universities entrance exam: Teachers’ insights.GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies,12(2),609-628.
27. Shohamy, E.,Donitsa-Schmidt, S.,Ferman, I.(1996).Test impact revisited: Washback effect over time.Language Testing,13(3),299-317.
28. Taylor, L.(2005).Washback and impact.ELT Journal,59(2),154-155.
29. Tomlinson, C. A.(2014).The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
30. Tomlinson, C. A.(2004).How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classroom.Alexandria, VA:Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
31. Vandergrift, L.(1997).The comprehension strategies of second language (French) listeners: A descriptive study.Foreign Language Annals,30(3),387-409.
32. Vernon, P. E.(1956).The measurement of abilities.Oxford, UK:University of London Press.
33. Wang, C.-H.(2015).Taipei, Taiwan,National Chengchi University.
34. Wang, S.-M.(2015).Taipei, Taiwan,Ming Chuan University.
35. 江禹嬋（2012，4月20日）。國中會考增非選、英聽作文都要考。大紀元報。取自http://www. epochtimes.com.tw/n26360/國中會考增非選──英聽作文都要考.html【Chiang, Y.-C. (2012, April 20). There will be open-ended questions and English listening and writing tests of the Comprehensive Assessment Program for Junior High School Students. Epoch Times. Retrieved from http://www.epochtimes.com.tw/n26360/國中會考增非選──英聽作文都要考.html】
36. 吳清山（2013）。差異化教學與學生學習。國家教育研究院電子報，38。取自https://epaper. naer.edu.tw/print.php?edm_no=38&content_no=1011【Wu, C.-S. (2013). Differentiated instruction and its impact on students’ learning. E-Paper about National Academy for Educational Research, 38. Retrieved from https://epaper.naer.edu.tw/print.php?edm_no=38&content_no= 1011】
37. 范郁涵, Y.-H.(2014)。高雄市=Kaohsiung, Taiwan，國立高雄師範大學碩士論文=A thesis for the degree of Master, National University of Kaohsiung。
38. 國立臺灣師範大學心理與教育測驗研究發展中心（2018）。107年國中教育會考問與答。取自https://cap.nace.edu.tw/files.html【The Research Center for Psychological and Educational Testing, National Taiwan Normal University. (2018). Q&A about the 2018 comprehensive assessment program for junior high school students. Retrieved from https://cap.nace.edu.tw/files.html】
39. 國立臺灣師範大學心理與教育測驗研究發展中心（2014）。教育會考與國中基測比較表。取自http://cap.ntnu.edu.tw/background.html【The Research Center for Psychological and Educational Testing, National Taiwan Normal University. (2014). The comparison and contrast chart between comprehensive assessment program for junior high school students and the basic competence test for junior high school students. Retrieved from http://cap.ntnu.edu.tw/back ground.html】
40. 張家銘, C.-M.(2015)。臺南市=Tainan, Taiwan，康寧大學碩士論文=A thesis for the degree of Master, University of Kang Ning。
41. 教育部（2017）。國民小學及國民中學學生成績評量準則。取自http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/ LawContent.aspx?id=FL008949【Ministry of Education. (2017). Assessment criteria for high school and elementary school students. Retrieved from http://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=FL008949】
42. 教育部（2018）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要國民中小學暨普通型高級中等學校語文領域─英語文。取自https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-14113,c639-1.php?Lang=zh-tw【Ministry of Education. (2018). Twelve-year compulsory education curriculum outline of language area — English. Retrieved from https://www.naer.edu.tw/files/15-1000-14113,c639-1.php?Lang=zh-tw】
43. 傅秋英, Q.-Y.(2007)。高雄市=Kaohsiung, Taiwan，國立中山大學碩士論文=A thesis for the degree of Master, National Sun Yat-sen University。
44. 賀道啟, T.-C.(2006)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學碩士論文=A thesis for the degree of Master, National Taiwan Normal University。
45. 廖佩莉, P.-L.(2013)。倒流效應：香港全港性系統評估（TSA）對小學中國語文科教師的影響。教育研究月刊，228，86-102。

1. 張銘秋(Ming-Chiu Chang);黃瓅瑩(Li-Ying Huang);陳佳蓉(Chia-Jung Chen);陳柏熹(Po-Hsi Chen);曾芬蘭(Fen-Lan Tseng)(2022)。國中教育會考數學科的回沖效應初探。教育科學研究期刊。67(1)。227-254。