技術型高中工業類科學生科學素養內涵之建構

Development of Scientific Literacy Indicators for Students in the Industrial Sector of Vocational Senior High Schools

10.6209/JORIES.202012_65(4).0007

許綺婷(Chi-Ting Hsu)；譚克平(Hak-Ping Tam)

工業類科 ； 技術型高中 ； 科學素養 ； 德菲調查法 ； industrial sector ； vocational senior high school ； scientific literacy ； Delphi survey

教育科學研究期刊

65卷4期（2020 / 12 / 01）

203 - 240

繁體中文

科學素養研究歷時已久，惟缺針對技術型高中學生所需科學素養之相關探討。有鑑於此，本研究之目的為發展技術型高中工業類科學生科學素養的向度與指標。透過文獻探討與專家諮詢，初步提出適合技術型高中工業類科學生的科學素養內涵架構，再透過兩回合的德菲（Delphi）調查法，徵詢28位學者及41位技術型高中教師對該架構的意見。經統計分析德菲調查的結果，再配合專家會議後達成共識，修正並確立該技術型高中工業類科學生的科學素養架構。此架構共有五個向度，包括具備基本的科學知識、運用基本科學探究與溝通的能力以解決問題、運用科學思考的能力於日常生活中、應用科學知識與方法於所在職域中、具備對科學的適當態度與行為意向。文末基於研究結果提出了關於技術型高中課程內容設計的建議。

Scientific literacy has been a topic of research for several decades. However, very few studies have directly focused on clarifying the content of scientific literacy for students in vocational senior high schools. To fill this research gap, in this study, a comprehensive set of scientific literacy indicators was developed for students from the industrial sector of vocational senior high schools in Taiwan. This objective was achieved through an extensive literature review and consultation with science educators who are experts of scientific literacy. Subsequently, the study presented a tentative framework suitable for students in the industrial sector. Comments on the appropriateness of the framework were collected from 28 scholars and 41 vocational high school teachers through two rounds of Delphi survey. Subsequently, statistics were compiled, and the framework was finalized through two rounds of consensus meetings with experts familiar with science education and vocational education. The following five dimensions were identified: possessing basic scientific knowledge, engaging in basic scientific inquiry and communicating in order to solve problems, applying scientific thinking to solve problems encountered in daily life, applying scientific knowledge and methods at the workplace, as well as holding an appropriate attitude and behavioral disposition towards sciences. On the basis of our findings, several suggestions concerning the development of suitable curricula for students in the industrial sector of vocational senior high schools are presented.

1. 洪振方, J.-F.(2010)。思考導向的探究式學習對國二學生科學探究能力的影響。科學教育學刊，18(5)，389-415。
   連結：
2. 范斯淳, S.-C.,游光昭, K.-C.(2016)。科技教育融入 STEM 課程的核心價值與實踐。教育科學研究期刊，61(2)，153-183。
   連結：
3. 陳冠利, K.-L.,劉湘瑤, S.-Y.,陳柏熹, P.-H.,黃書涵, S.-H.(2015)。以情境式試題評量中學生能源素養。教育科學研究期刊，60(2)，167-196。
   連結：
4. 黃茂在, M.-T.,吳敏而, M.-E.(2016)。科學素養與課程統整。教育脈動，5，1-16。
   連結：
5. 黃銘福, M.-F.,黃毅志, Y.-J.(2014)。台灣地區出身背景、國中學業成績與高中階段教育分流之關聯。教育實踐與研究，27(2)，67-98。
   連結：
6. 靳知勤, C.-C.(2007)。科學教育應如何提升學生的科學素養─台灣學術精英的看法。科學教育學刊，15(6)，627-646。
   連結：
7. 靳知勤, C.-C.(2009)。中等科學師資培育機構評鑑指標之發展研究。科學教育學刊，17(4)，275-292。
   連結：
8. 賴香如, H.-R.,李碧霞, P.-H.,卓俊辰, J.-C.,呂昌明, C.-M.,溫婉玉, W.-Y.,周維倫, W.-L.(2010)。透過現職教師建構國中健康與體育學習領域之自尊教學指標。教育科學研究期刊，55(1)，127-154。
   連結：
9. Abell, S. K.(ed.),Lederman, N. G.(ed.)(2007).Handbook of research on science education.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
10. Adler, M.,Ziglio, E.(1996).Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi Method and its application to social policy and public health.London, UK:Jessica Kingsley.
11. Altun-Yalçin, S.,Açisli, S.,Turgut, Ü.(2011).Determining the levels of pre-service science teachers’ scientific literacy and investigating effectuality of the education faculties about developing scientific literacy.Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences,15,783-787.
12. American Association for the Advancement of Science(2007).Atlas of science literacy (Vol. 2).Washington, DC:Author.
13. American Association for the Advancement of Science(1993).Benchmarks for science literacy.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
14. American Association for the Advancement of Science(2001).Atlas of science literacy (Vol. 1).Washington, DC:Author.
15. American Association for the Advancement of Science(1989).Science for all Americans.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
16. Bingle, W. H.,Gaskell, P. J.(1994).Scientific literacy for decision making and the social construction of scientific knowledge.Science Education,78(2),185-201.
17. Boujaoude, S.(2002).Balance of scientific literacy themes in science curricula: The case of Lebanon.International Journal of Science Education,24(2),139-156.
18. Bybee, R. W.(1997).Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practical action.Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann.
19. Choi, K.,Lee, H.,Shin, N.,Kim, S.-W.,Krajcik, J.(2011).Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st Century.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,48(6),670-697.
20. Colucci-Gray, L.,Camino, E.,Barbiero, G.,Gray, D.(2006).From scientific literacy to sustainability literacy: An ecological framework for education.Science Education,90(2),227-252.
21. Day, S. B.(ed.)(1975).Communication of scientific information.Basel, Switzerland:S. Karger.
22. DeBoer, G. E.(2000).Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,37(6),582-601.
23. European Commission. (2007). Key competences for lifelong learning: European reference framework. Retrieved from http://www.erasmusplus.org.uk/file/272/download
24. Feinstein, N.(2011).Salvaging science literacy.Science Education,95(1),168-185.
25. Fensham, P. J.(2011).Globalization of science education: Comment and a commentary.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,48(6),698-709.
26. Ford, C.,Yore, L. D.,Anthony, R. J.(1997).,未出版
27. Gardner, P. L.(1975).Attitudes to science: A review.Studies in Science Education,2(1),1-41.
28. Howes, E. V.,Lim, M.,Campos, J.(2009).Journeys into inquiry-based elementary science: Literacy practices, questioning, and empirical study.Science Education,93(2),189-217.
29. International Technology and Engineering Educators Association. (2020). A brief history of ITEEA. Retrieved from https://www.iteea.org/About/History.aspx
30. International Technology Education Association(2000).Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology.Reston, VA:Author.
31. International Technology Education Association(2006).Technology literacy for all: A rationale and structure for the study of technology.Reston, VA:Author.
32. Koballa, T.,Kemp, A.,Evans, R.(1997).The spectrum of scientific literacy.The Science Teacher,64(7),27-31.
33. Kolstø, S. D.(2001).Scientific literacy for citizenship: Tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues.Science Education,85(3),291-310.
34. Laugksch, R. C.(2000).Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview.Science Education,84(1),71-94.
35. Lawshe, C. H.(1975).A quantitative approach to content validity.Personnel Psychology,28(4),563-575.
36. Linstone, H. A.(Ed.),Turoff, M.(Ed.)(2002).The Delphi method: Techniques and applications.Boston, MA:Addison-Wesley.
37. Matthews, M.(Ed.)(2014).International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching.Dordrecht, NL:Springer.
38. McComas, W. F.(Ed.)(1998).The nature of science in science education: Rationales and strategies.Dordrecht, NL:Kluwer Academic.
39. Miller, J. D.(1983).Scientific literacy: A conceptual and empirical review.Daedalus,112(2),29-48.
40. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine(2016).Science literacy: Concepts, contexts, and consequences.Washington, DC:The National Academies Press.
41. National Research Council(2000).Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
42. National Research Council(1996).National science education standards.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
43. National Research Council(2013).Next generation science standards: For states, by states.Washington, DC:The National Academies Press.
44. National Research Council(2012).A framework for K-12 science education: Practice, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas.Washington, DC:The National Academies Press.
45. National Science Teachers Association(1982).National Science Teachers Association. (1982). Science-technology-society: Science education for the 1980s (NSTA position statement). Washington, DC: Author..
46. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2006).Assessing scientific, reading and mathematical literacy: A framework for PISA 2006.Paris, France:Author.
47. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2015).Draft science framework.Paris, France:Author.
48. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development(2010).PISA 2009 assessment framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science.Paris, France:Author.
49. Pella, M. O.,O’Hearn, G. T.,Gale, C. W.(1966).Referents to scientific literacy.Journal of Research in Science Teaching,4(3),199-208.
50. Pierce, C.(2012).The promissory future(s) of education: Rethinking scientific literacy in the era of biocapitalism.Educational Philosophy and Theory,44(7),721-745.
51. Ramaley, J. A.,Olds, B. M.,Earle, J.(2005).Becoming a learning organization: New directions in science education research at the National Science Foundation.Journal of Science Education and Technology,14(2),173-189.
52. Roth, W. M.(2007).Toward a dialectical notion and praxis of scientific literacy.Journal of Curriculum Studies,39(4),377-398.
53. Shamos, M. H.(1995).The myth of scientific literacy.New Brunswick, NJ:Rutgers University Press.
54. Skulmoski, G. J.,Hartman, F. T.,Krahn, J.(2007).The Delphi method for graduate research.Journal of Information Technology Education: Research,6,1-21.
55. Strauss, A.,Corbin, J.(1998).Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
56. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (1982). Curriculum development in technical and vocational education: A methodology guide. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000089024
57. World Economic Forum(2018).The future of jobs report 2018.Geneva, Switzerland:Centre for the New Economy and Society, World Economic Forum.
58. Yore, L. D.(2012).Science literacy for all: More than a slogan, logo, or rally flag!.Issues and challenges in science education research: moving forward,Dordrecht, NL:
59. 吳明雄, M.-H.,許碧珊, P.-S.,張德正, T.-J.,張可立, K.-L.(2009)。高職高技術創造力學生團隊之創造歷程。教育與心理研究，32(2)，1-25。
60. 佘曉清（編）, H.-C.(ed.),林煥祥（編）, H.-S.(ed.)(2017).PISA 2015 臺灣學生的表現.新北市=New Taipei City, Taiwan:心理=Psychological.
61. 紀惠英, H.-Y.,林煥祥, H.-S.(2009)。從 PISA 測驗結果看九年一貫課程成效與高中職學生成績的差異。教育政策論壇，12(1)，1-39。
62. 教育部（編）,國立臺灣師範大學（編）(2006).九年一貫課程自然與生活科技學習領域科學素養的內涵與解析.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:作者=Author.
63. 教育部（2011）。十二年國民基本教育實施計畫（核定本）。取自 http://12basic.tn.edu.tw/UpLoadFiles/C41B163A2A.pdf 【Ministry of Education. (2011). Implementation plan of 12-year basic education (approved version). Retrieved from http://12basic.tn.edu.tw/UpLoadFiles/C41B163A2A.pdf】
64. 教育部=Ministry of Education(2013).教育部提升國民素養專案計畫報告書.臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:教育部提升國民素養專案辦公室=Project Office of Improving Citizen Literacy, Ministry of Education.
65. 教育部（2014）。十二年國民基本教育課程綱要總綱。臺北市：作者。【Ministry of Education. (2014). The general curriculum guidelines of 12-year basic education. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
66. 教育部（2008b）。職業學校群科課程綱要。臺北市：作者。【Ministry of Education. (2008b). Vocational school group curriculum guidelines. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
67. 教育部（2009d）。職業學校群科課程綱要暨設備基準一機械群。臺北市：作者。【Ministry of Education. (2009d). Vocational school group curriculum guidelines and equipment benchmark-Mechanical engineering group. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
68. 教育部（2009c）。職業學校群科課程綱要暨設備基準一電機與電子群。臺北市：作者。【Ministry of Education. (2009c). Vocational school group curriculum guidelines and equipment benchmark-Electrical engineering and electronic engineering group. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
69. 教育部（2009a）。職業學校群科課程綱要暨設備基準一土木建築群。臺北市：作者。【Ministry of Education. (2009a). Vocational school group curriculum guidelines and equipment benchmark-Civil engineering and architecture group. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
70. 教育部（2009b）。職業學校群科課程綱要暨設備基準一動力機械群。臺北市：作者。【Ministry of Education. (2009b). Vocational school group curriculum guidelines and equipment benchmark-Power mechanical engineering group. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
71. 教育部（2008a）。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要（自然與生活科技學習領域）。臺北市：作者。【Ministry of Education. (2008a). Grade 1-9 curriculum guidelines “science and technology”. Taipei, Taiwan: Author.】
72. 黃台珠（編）, T.-C.(ed.),蔡俊彥（編）, C.-Y.(ed.),陳忠志（編）, J.-C.(ed.),李育諭（編）, Y.-Y.(ed.)(2012)。國科會計畫執行成果報告國科會計畫執行成果報告,高雄市=Kaohsiung, Taiwan:中山大學公民素養推動研究中心=The Research Center for Promoting Civic Scientific Literacy, National Yat-sen University。
73. 廖年淼, N.-M.(2002)。高中職畢業生就業競爭力之長期比較分析。技術及職業教育雙月刊，71，37-43。