高中科學班畢業生之追蹤研究：大學學習表現與生涯發展之探討

Follow-Up Study on College Learning Performance and Career Development of Science Class Graduates

10.6209/JORIES.202103_66(1).0006

張靖卿(Ching-Ching Chang)；于曉平(Hsiao-Ping Yu)

大學學習表現 ； 生涯發展 ； 科學班畢業生 ； 追蹤研究 ； college learning performance ； career development ； science class graduates ； follow-up study

教育科學研究期刊

66卷1期（2021 / 03 / 01）

173 - 202

繁體中文

本研究旨在追蹤調查高中就讀科學班的學生，探討其進入大學後的學習表現與其生涯發展情形，同時調查數理資優班與普通班自然組的畢業學生，以比較不同班型與有無特殊表現學生間的差異。本研究利用普查方式調查2012～2015年畢業四屆九校科學班學生，總計750人，回收454份，回收率達60.5％。數理資優班與普通班自然組分別回收346份與727份問卷，回收率為31.7％與56.8％。自編問卷內容包括課業學習、活動參與和大學學習情形，以及生涯發展之調查。研究結果發現，科學班學生進入大學後在學業表現和學術活動參與上表現良好，且未來以希望取得博士學位者居多。無論在同儕互動與資源、主動提問與探究，以及自主學習與反思等大學學習與能力提升上，科學班或數理資優班學生均顯著優於普通班自然組畢業生；科學班與數理資優班學生之生涯計畫與準備也較普通班自然組學生更為積極肯定。然而，在非學術性活動參與上，科學班與其他兩組畢業生並沒有差異，亦即科學班學生並未因投入學術活動而忽略服務與休閒活動的參與。三組學生未來想從事的職業均以工程領域與醫學居多。具特殊表現的科學班畢業生有較佳的學業表現，以及較高的生涯期望與抱負。最後，本研究對後續研究方向與科學班學生的生涯輔導提出相關建議，以供參考。

This study followed up on the experiences of science class graduates in their college learning and career development and investigated to the extent to which their experiences differed from those who enrolled in math- and science-gifted programs or regular classes focusing on science during high school. A survey research was conducted with all science class graduates from 2012 to 2015 (N = 750) as well as their peers from math- and science-gifted programs and regular classes focusing on science. The response rates for science classes, math- and science-gifted programs, and regular classes focusing on science were 60.5% (N = 454), 31.7% (N = 346), and 56.8% (N = 727), respectively. The questionnaire contained items regarding academic performance, academic and nonacademic activity participation, in-class performance, and career development. The main results were as follows: (1) Compared to their peers, science class graduates exhibited higher academic performance and more academic activity participation, with most of them planning to pursue a doctoral degree. (2) Compared with their regular class peers, both science class graduates and math-and science-gifted program graduates demonstrated higher in-class performance and better career development. (3) No between-group differences were observed in participation in nonacademic activities-indicating that science class graduates could successfully balance their academic and leisure time. (4) All the three groups hoped to pursue a career in engineering or medicine. (5) Science class graduates who received science awards during high school exhibited higher academic performance and career aspirations. The current results have several implications for future research and career counseling for science class students.

1. Hsu, H.-L.,Chen, H.-J. H.,Lin, W.-T.(2019).Quality discussion and high-level comprehension: An analysis of Taiwanese college students.Journal of Educational Media and Library Sciences,56(1),107-130.
   連結：
2. 于曉平, H.-P.,張靖卿, C.-C.,凌美璦, M.-A.(2019)。高中科學班畢業生之追蹤研究：高中學習經驗探討。教育科學研究期刊，64(4)，1-29。
   連結：
3. 王秀槐, H.-H.,陳珍德, J.-D.(2019)。問世間「生涯」為何物？臺灣大學生生涯概念原型分析研究。教育科學研究期刊，64(2)，39-68。
   連結：
4. 吳淑敏, S.-M.(2009)。傑出女性科學家生涯發展歷程之探討。特殊教育研究學刊，34(1)，75-103。
   連結：
5. 吳淑禎, S.-C.(2018)。生涯韌力：大學青年的生涯逆境知覺及其因應策略之研究。教育科學研究期刊，63(3)，197-230。
   連結：
6. 郭靜姿, C.-C.,林美和, M.-H.,張靖卿, C.-C.,胡寶玉, P.-Y.,簡維君, W.-C.,謝佳男, C.-N.,周佩蓉, P.-J.(2009)。高中資優班畢業女性談資優教育之影響。特殊教育學報，29，87-110。
   連結：
7. 陳慧娟, H.-J.,簡洧晴, W.-C.(2020)。大學生選課後悔與動機干擾研究：檢驗後悔因應策略的中介效果與社會支持的調節效果。教育科學研究期刊，65(2)，277-312。
   連結：
8. 趙珮晴, P.-C.,余民寧, M.-N.(2018)。未來職業意圖受「情境」影響？以社會認知生涯理論分析TIMSS 2011年數學資料。教育科學研究期刊，63(7)，231-255。
   連結：
9. 普通型高級中等學校科學班辦理要點（2017）。https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent_aspx?id= FL048020 【Implementation Directions Governing the Science Class in General High School. (2017). https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent_aspx?id=FL048020】
10. Bleske-Rechek, A.,Lubinski, D.,Benbow, C. P.(2004).Meeting the educational needs of special populations: Advanced placement’s role in developing exceptional human capital.Psychological Science,15(4),217-224.
11. Chang, C.-C.,Chou, P.-N.,Liang, C.(2018).Using ePortfolio-based learning approach to facilitate knowledge sharing and creation of college students.Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,34(1),30-41.
12. Colangelo, N.,Kerr, B. A.(1990).Extreme academic talent: Profiles of perfect scorers.Journal of Educational Psychology,82(3),404-409.
13. Hodge, K. A.,Kemp, C. R.(2006).Recognition of giftedness in the early years of school: Perspectives of teachers, parents, and children.Journal for the Education of the Gifted,30(2),164-204.
14. Jung, J. Y.(2019).The career decisions of gifted students and other high ability groups.Routledge.
15. Kirst, M. W.,Bracco, K. R.(2004).Bridging the great divide: How the K-12 and postsecondary split hurts students, and what can be done about it?.From high school to college. Improving opportunities for success in post-secondary education
16. Kolitch, E. R.,Brody, L. E.(1992).Mathematics acceleration of highly talented students: An evaluation.Gifted Child Quarterly,36(2),78-86.
17. Lin, Y.-T.,Chen, M.-P.,Chang, C.-H.,Chang, P.-C.(2017).Exploring the peer interaction effects on learning achievement in a social learning platform based on social network analysis.International Journal of Distance Education Technologies,15(3),65-85.
18. Montgomery, J. L.(1992).Factors that influence the career aspirations of mathematically precocious females.Asian Conference on Giftedness: Growing Up Gifted and Talented
19. Nelson, M. A.,Smith, S. W.(2001).External factors affecting gifted girls’ academic and career achievements.Intervention in School and Clinic,37(1),19-22.
20. Neuman, W. L.(2006).Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approach.Pearson Education.
21. Perrone, K. M.,Perrone, P. A.,Ksiazak, T. M.,Wright, S. L.,Jackson, Z. V.(2007).Self-perception of gifts and talents among adults in a longitudinal study of academically talented high-school graduates.Roeper Review: A Journal on Gifted Education,29(4),259-264.
22. Peterson, J. S.,Canady, K.,Duncan, N.(2012).Positive life experiences: A qualitative, cross-sectional, longitudinal study of gifted graduates.Journal for the Education of the Gifted,35(1),81-99.
23. Peterson, J.,Duncan, N.,Canady, K.(2009).A longitudinal study of negative life events, stress, and school experiences of gifted youth.Gifted Child Quarterly,53(1),34-49.
24. Siegle, D.,Wilson, H. E.,Little, C. A.(2013).A sample of gifted and talented educators’ attitudes about academic acceleration.Journal of Advanced Academics,24(1),27-51.
25. Southern, W. T.,Jones, E. D.(2004).Types of acceleration: Dimensions and issues.A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students
26. Stubotnik, R. F.(Ed.),Arnold, K. D.(Ed.)(1994).Beyond Terman: Contemporary longitudinal studies of giftedness and talent.Ablex.
27. Swiatek, M. A.(1993).A decade of longitudinal research on academic acceleration through the study of mathematically precocious youth.Roeper Review: A Journal on Gifted Education,15(3),120-124.
28. Swiatek, M. A.,Benbow, C. P.(1991).Ten-year longitudinal follow-up of ability-matched accelerated and unaccelerated gifted students.Journal of Educational Psychology,83(4),528-538.
29. Terman, L. M.,Oden, M.(1959).Genetic studies of genius.Stanford University Press.
30. Terman, L. M.,Oden, M.(1959).Genetic studies of genius.Stanford University Press.
31. Terman, L. M.,Oden, M.(1959).Genetic studies of genius.Stanford University Press.
32. Terman, L. M.,Oden, M.(1959).Genetic studies of genius.Stanford University Press.
33. Terman, L. M.,Oden, M.(1959).Genetic studies of genius.Stanford University Press.
34. Wang, Y.-L.,Tsai, C.-C.(2019).Grade level differences in high school students’ conceptions of and motives for learning science.Research in Science Education,49,1213-1229.
35. Yu, H.-P.,Chang, C.-C.,Jen, E.(2017).Policy and practice in science education for the gifted in Taiwan.Policy and practice in science education for the gifted: Approaches from diverse national contexts
36. Yu, L.-C.,Lee, C.-W.,Pan, H.-I.,Chou, C.-Y.,Chao, P.-Y.,Chen, Z.-H.,Tseng, S.-F.,Chan, C.-L.,Lai, K.-R.(2018).Improving early prediction of academic failure using sentiment analysis on self-evaluated comments.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,34(4),358-365.
37. 于曉平, H.-P.(2002)。雙親在資優生生涯發展中的角色之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，23，141-162。
38. 于曉平, H.-P.(2013)。,科技部=Ministry of Science and Technology。
39. 王文科, W.-K.(1994).資優生成年後之社會成就水準、生活適應及其相關因素之研究.國立高雄師範大學特殊教育中心=Special Education Center of National Kaohsiung Normal University.
40. 王金蒂, C.-T.(2010)。國立臺北教育大學=National Taipei University of Education。
41. 王保進, B.-J.(2015).中文視窗版SPSS與行為科學研究.心理=Psychological.
42. 王裕德、曾鈴惠（2011）。國立臺中女中資優班畢業學生追蹤調查實證研究。http://project.tcgs.tc. edu.tw/gifted/【Wang, Y.-D., & Zeng, L.-H. (2011). An empirical study on the follow-up survey of female students in the National Taichung Girl’s High School. http://project.tcgs.tc.edu.tw/gifted/】
43. 吳武典, W.-T.,陳昭地, J.-D.(1999)。我國參與國際物理與化學奧林匹亞競賽學生的追蹤研究─環境影響之探討。特殊教育研究學刊，17，297-324。
44. 吳武典, W.-T.,陳昭地, J.-D.(1998)。我國參與國際數學奧林匹亞競賽學生的追蹤研究─環境影響之探討。特殊教育研究學刊，16，347-366。
45. 林幸台, H.-T.(1997)。,科技部=Ministry of Science and Technology。
46. 林幸台, H.-T.(1993)。高中資賦優異學生生涯發展歷程之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，9，191-214。
47. 林寶貴, G. B.-G.,郭靜姿, C.-C.,吳淑敏, S.-M.,廖永堃, Y.-K.,嚴嘉明, C.-M.(1998)。高中語文資優生進入大學後之追蹤研究。特殊教育研究學刊，16，401-426。
48. 邱皓政, H.-J.(2019).量化研究與統計分析：SPSS與R資料分析範例解析.五南=Wu-Nan.
49. 教育部=Ministry of Education(2013).教育部人才培育白皮書.
50. 莊佩珍, P.-Z.(1994)。國立彰化師範大學=National Changhua Normal University。
51. 郭生玉, S.-Y.(2012).心理與教育研究法：量化、質性與混合研究方法.精華=Jing-Hua.
52. 郭奕龍, Y.-L.,張靖卿, C.-C.(2008)。教師準備好了嗎？從教師態度談縮短修業年限的實施。資優教育季刊，107，1-7。
53. 郭淑娟, S.-J.(1996)。國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
54. 郭靜姿, C.-C.(2019)。,教育部國民及學前教育署=K-12 Education Administration, Ministry of Education。
55. 陳文英, W.-I.(2009)。國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
56. 陳明印, M.-Y.(1989)。國立高雄師範大學=National Kaohsiung Normal University。
57. 陳長益, C.-Y(1993)。臺北地區中學資優學生生涯發展之調查研究。特殊教育研究學刊，9，215-232。
58. 陳昭地, J.-D.,張殷榮, Y.-J.(1998)。,國立臺灣師範大學科學教育中心=Science Education Center of National Taiwan Normal University。
59. 陳昭儀, Z.-Y.(1991)。我國傑出發明家之人格特質創造歷程及生涯發展之研究。特殊教育研究學刊，7，211-229。
60. 彭森明, S.-M.(2016)。評論建置與維護大型資料庫，以協助瞭解教育政策與措施執行成效以及規劃革新策略。臺灣教育評論月刊，5(7)，1-5。
61. 曾晏慧, Y.-H.(2004)。國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
62. 蔡彥誼, Y.-i(2013)。臺北市立教育大學=National Taipei University of Education。
63. 魏明通, M.-T.(1994)。,科技部=Ministry of Science and Technology。

1. Chi-Ping Deng(2022)。Emic Interest-Based Classification and Interest Model of College Majors in Taiwan。教育心理學報，54(2)，461-482。
2. 林淑君,王麗斐(2022)。愛在流轉：某偏鄉國中傳承式生涯輔導方案之實施與成效。教育心理學報，54(2)，385-410。
3. 歐亭妤,郭靜姿,吳舜文(2022)。高中藝術才能資優學生學習適應及課程滿意度之研究。教育心理學報，54(2)，255-281。