學校管理模式與學生偏差行為關係之研究：以教師教學投入與教學支援為中介變項

Relationship Between School Management and Student Deviant Behavior: Pedagogical Input from Teachers and Teaching Support as Mediating Variables

10.6209/JORIES.202109_66(3).0001

陳玉娟(Yu-Chuan Chen)

教師教學投入 ； 教學支援 ； 學生偏差行為 ； 學校管理模式 ； pedagogical input from teachers ； teaching support ； student deviant behavior ； school management

教育科學研究期刊

66卷3期（2021 / 09 / 01）

1 - 30

繁體中文

本研究目的係在釐清學校管理模式、教師教學投入、教學支援及學生偏差行為的內涵，進而驗證此四個變項之間的關係、確認本研究所建構之結構方程模式與觀察資料間的適配程度與模式是否成立。為了達成上述研究目的，研究者利用經濟合作暨發展組織（Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, OECD）於2015年進行之實證調查活動，請學校校長或是由校長所指定之學校人士，依目前所服務學校的實際狀況進行填答，共計回收有效問卷14,530份。研究者挑選符合變項定義之題項為衡量變項，利用IBM SPSS Statistic 22.0統計軟體進行描述性統計、探究性因素分析及信度分析，並利用AMOS進行結構方程模式驗證，以瞭解本研究所建構之方程模式是否適配。研究結果發現，本研究的七項假設皆成立，且建構之結構方程模式達到適配標準。綜言之，研究支持：一、學校管理模式對教師教學投入、教學支援及學生偏差行為有直接影響；二、教師教學投入對學生偏差行為具有直接影響效果；三、教學支援對於學生偏差行為亦具有直接影響效果；四、教師教學投入與教學支援亦扮演中介變數角色，學校管理模式可以利用前述兩者作為中介變數，間接影響學生偏差行為表現狀況。立基於上述研究結果發現，本研究提出相關建議供參。

This study examined the implications of school management, pedagogical input from teachers, teaching support, and student deviant behavior to construct a structural equation model and validating it using with observational data. The researcher used the empirical data provided in 2015 by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The researcher asked the school principal or a person designated by the principal to complete a questionnaire, and 14,530 valid questionnaires were retrieved. The OECD PISA 2015 School Questionnaire data were used to select topics that conformed to the definitions of the measurement variables. IBM SPSS Statistic 22.0 was used for descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis, and reliability testing. SPSS AMOS was used for validation of the structural equation model in terms of goodness of fit. The results validated the seven proposed hypotheses and indicated that the developed structural equations achieved good model fit. Relevant conclusions and recommendations are presented herein on the basis of the research findings.

1. 吳和堂、鍾明翰（2011）。國小實習教師的角色知覺、工作投入與專業成長之因果關係研究。教育心理學報，43（2），419-438。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20100618.1【Wu, H.-T., & Chung, M.-H. (2011). The causality among role perception, job involvement and professional growth. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 43(2), 419-438. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.20100618.1】
   連結：
2. 吳武典（1997）。國中偏差行為學生學校生活適應之探討。教育心理學報，29，25-49。https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.19970901.2 【Wu, W.-T. (1997). School adjustment of junior high students with deviant behaviors. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 29, 25-49. https://doi.org/10.6251/BEP.19970901.2】
   連結：
3. 宋宥賢、李佩珊、張聖杰（2018）。初任國民中小學專任輔導教師職前培訓方案的參與經驗與需求評估之初探研究。中華輔導與諮商學報，51，217-262。https://doi.org/10.3966/172851862018040051007 【Sung, Y.-H., Lee, P.-S., & Chang, S.-C. (2018). The perspectives of novice school counselors in Taiwan elementary and secondary schools for pre-service training programs. Chinese Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 51, 217-262. https://doi.org/10.3966/172851862018040051007】
   連結：
4. 林漢唐、陳慧娟（2016）。家長網路管教、學校投入與青少年危險網路行為之關係：家庭凝聚力之調節效果分析。教育科學研究期刊，61（4），205-242。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(4).08 【Lin, H.-T., & Chen, H.-J. (2016). Relationships between parental internet intervention, school engagement, and risky online behaviors among adolescents: The moderatoring role of family cohesion. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 61(4), 205-242. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2016.61(4).08】
   連結：
5. 范熾文（2004）。學校人力資源管理內涵之建構。學校行政，30，1-15。https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.200403.0001 【Fan, C.-W. (2004). Study on constructing human resource management of schools. School Administrators, 30, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.6423/HHHC.200403.0001】
   連結：
6. 陳玉娟（2018）。大學品牌權益、學生認同與學生就業力關係之研究。教育政策論壇，21（3），1-32。https://doi.org/10.3966/156082982018082103001 【Chen, Y.-J. (2018). The relationship among brand equity, student identify, and student employability in universities. Educational Policy Forum, 21(3), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.3966/156082982018082103001】
   連結：
7. 陳幸仁（2012）。以微觀政治觀點探討教師專業發展評鑑之推動。臺灣教育評論月刊，1（7），14-16。https://doi.org/10.6791/TER.201205.0014 【Chen, H.-J. (2012). To study the promotion of teacher professional development evaluation from a micro-political viewpoint. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 1(7), 14-16. https://doi.org/10.6791/TER.201205.0014】
   連結：
8. 陳柏霖、洪兆祥、余民寧（2013）。網路閱讀態度、網路閱讀行為及網路閱讀素養之橫斷面研究。教育科學研究期刊，58（3），23-50。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2013.58(3).02 【Chen, P.-L., Hung, C.-H., & Yu, M.-N. (2013). Cross-sectional study of the relationships among E-reading attitude, E-reading behavior, and E-reading literacy. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 58(3), 23-50. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2013.58(3).02】
   連結：
9. 陳貞吟、張楓明、郭俊豪（2018）。高中生知覺教師教學效能、學業自我效能與班級偏差行為關聯性之探討。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊，10（2），1-42。https://doi.org/10.29751/JRDP.201812_10(2).0001 【Chen, Z.-Y., Chang, F.-M., & Guo, J.-H. (2018). The relationship between senior high school students’ perception of teachers’ efficacy, academic self-efficacy, and class deviant behavior. Journal of Research in Delinquency and Prevention, 10(2), 1-42. https://doi.org/10.29751/JRDP.201812_10(2).0001】
   連結：
10. 黃文三、黃馨德、沈碩彬（2019）。高雄公立高中職校長服務領導、教師工作投入與學校效能之徑路模式探析。人文社會科學研究：教育類，13（1），49-74。https://doi.org/10.6618/HSSRP.201903_13(1).3 【Huang, W.-S., Huang, X.-D., & Shen, S.-P. (2019). A path model analysis on principal service leadership, teachers’ job involvement, and school effectiveness in public vocational and senior high schools in Kaohsiung City. NPUST Humanities and Social Sciences Research: Pedagogy, 13(1), 49-74. https://doi.org/10.6618/HSSRP.201903_13(1).3】
    連結：
11. 黃志灯、林惠芳、洪福源（2018）。國小教師時間觀點、教師學業樂觀與教師工作投入之關係研究。運動與遊憩研究，13（2），93-115。https://doi.org/10.29423/JSRR.201812_13(2).08 【Huang, C.-T., Lin, H.-F., & Hong, F.-Y. (2018). A study of the relationships among time perspective, academic optimism and work engagement of elementary school teachers. Journal of Sport and Recreation Research, 13(2), 93-115. https://doi.org/10.29423/JSRR.201812_13(2).08】
    連結：
12. 黃玫玉、林惠雅（2012）。國中青少年知覺導師管教行為與其在校偏差行為之相關研究。輔仁民生學誌，18（2），145-166。https://doi.org/10.29440/FJJHE.201212.0008 【Huang, M.-Y., & Lin, H.-Y. (2012). An investigation of relationships between adolescent perceptions of teachers’ discipline behaviors and deviant behaviors in school. Fu Jen Journal of Human Ecology, 18(2), 145-166. https://doi.org/10.29440/FJJHE.201212.0008】
    連結：
13. 黃寶園、周莎涵、陳淑觀、張起梅、吳水仙、陳秋蓮（2008）。臺中市幼兒園所教師知覺園所長領導風格與教師工作投入關係之研究。臺中教育大學學報：教育類，22（1），51-73。https://doi.org/10.7037/JNTUE.200806.0051 【Huang, B.-Y., Jou, S.-H., Chen, S.-G., Chang, C.-M., Wu, S.-S., & Chen, C.-L. (2008). A study on the relationship between the leadership of the preschool principals and the job involvement of teachers in Taichung City. Journal of National Taichung University of Education: Education, 22(1), 51-73. https://doi.org/10.7037/JNTUE.200806.0051】
    連結：
14. 葉東興、吳明隆（2010）。高雄縣國中教師知覺校長情境領導、組織溝通與教師工作投入關係之研究。正修通識教育學報，7，79-112。https://doi.org/10.29966/CHTSCYHP.201006.0004 【Ye, D.-S., & Wu, M.-L. (2010). A study on the relationships among the awareness of junior high school teachers in Kaohsiung County on the principal’s situational leadership and organizational communication and the teacher’s job involvement. Cheng-Shiu General Education Journal, 7, 79-112. https://doi.org/10.29966/CHTSCYHP.201006.0004】
    連結：
15. 潘慧玲（2017）。從學校變革觀點探析學習領導。學校行政，110，1-23。https://doi.org/10.3966/160683002017070110001 【Pan, H.-L. W. (2017). Investigating leadership for learning from the perspective of school change. School Administrators, 110, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3966/160683002017070110001】
    連結：
16. 潘慧玲、陳文彥（2018）。校長促進教師專業學習的槓桿：校長學習領導對教師課堂教學研究影響之中介模式分析。教育研究集刊，64（3），79-121。https://doi.org/10.3966/102887082018096403003 【Pan, H.-L. W., & Chen, W.-Y. (2018). The leverage for principals to promote teacher professional learning: Analyzing a mediated-effects model regarding the impact of principal leadership for learning on lesson study. Bulletin of Educational Research, 64(3), 79-121. https://doi.org/10.3966/102887082018096403003】
    連結：
17. 賴威廷（2017）。論我國偏遠地區學校經營之困境—以學校行政人員觀點。學校行政，110，118-139。https://doi.org/10.3966/160683002017070110006 【Lia, W.-T. (2017). Investigating the predicament of remote school management in Taiwan－ A viewpoint of school administrators. School Administrators, 110, 118-139. https://doi.org/10.3966/160683002017070110006】
    連結：
18. 戴伸峰、翁惠瑜（2018）。國中教師之控制信念對學生偏差行為引發師生衝突情境之教師因應策略影響。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊，10（2），89-121。https://doi.org/10.29751/JRDP.201812_10(2).0003 【Tai, S.-F., & Weng, H.-Y. (2018). Junior high school teachers’ locus of control and the strategies toward teacher-student conflict resulted from the deviant behaviors of students. Journal of Research in Delinquency and Prevention, 10(2), 89-121. https://doi.org/10.29751/JRDP.201812_10(2).0003】
    連結：
19. 謝文全（2002）。學校本位管理的實施與困境。教育研究集刊，48（2），1-36。https://doi.org/10.6910/BER.200206_(48-2).0001 【Hsieh, W.-C. (2002). The implementation and difficulties of school-based management. Bulletin of Educational Research, 48(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.6910/BER.200206_(48-2).0001】
    連結：
20. 龔心怡、李靜儀（2015）。影響國中經濟弱勢學生之學業表現與中輟傾向之因素：以「脈絡—自我—行動—結果」之動機發展自我系統模式為取向。教育科學研究期刊，60（4），55-92。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(4).03 【Kung, H.-Y., & Lee, C.-Y. (2015). Influence of academic achievement and dropout on economically disadvantaged students: An investigation of the “Context-Self-Action-Result” self-system model of motivational development. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 60(4), 55-92. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.2015.60(4).03】
    連結：
21. Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
    連結：
22. Arnold, D. H., McWilliams, L., & Arnold, E. H. (1998). Teacher discipline and child misbehavior in day care: Untangling causality with correlational data. Developmental Psychology, 34(2), 276-287. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.34.2.276
    連結：
23. Ayllón, S., Alsina, Á., & Colomer, J. (2019). Teachers’ involvement and students’ self-efficacy: Keys to achievement in higher education. PloS One, 14(5), e0216865. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216865
    連結：
24. Björklund, C., Magnusson, M., & Palmér, H. (2018). Teachers’ involvement in children’s mathematizing - Beyond dichotomization between play and teaching. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 26(4), 469-480. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2018.1487162
    連結：
25. Bossert, S. T., Dwyer, D. C., Rowan, B., & Lee, G. V. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 34-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X82018003004
    連結：
26. Chen, Y.-G., Cheng, J.-N., Liang, C.-M., & Sato, M. (2012). Some factors in deviant behaviors of elementary school students in Taiwan and Japan. Social Behavior and Personality, 40(4), 623-638. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2012.40.4.623
    連結：
27. Delaney, J. G. (1997). Principal leadership: A primary factor in school-based management and school improvement. NASSP Bulletin, 81(586), 107-111. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263659708158613
    連結：
28. Earnshaw, V. A., Rosenthal, L., Carroll-Scott, A., Peters, S. M., McCaslin, C., & Ickovics, J. R. (2014). Teacher involvement as a protective factor from the association between race-based bullying and smoking initiation. Social Psychology of Education, 17, 197-209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-014-9250-1
    連結：
29. Efstratopoulou, M. A., Janssen, R., & Simons, J. (2019). Children’s deviant behavior in primary education: Comparing physical educator’s implicit theory with diagnostic criteria. Journal of Attention Disorders, 23(3), 246-256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087054712449479
    連結：
30. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
    連結：
31. Huizinga, T., Handelzalts, A., Nieveen, N., & Voogt, J. M. (2014). Teacher involvement in curriculum design: Need for support to enhance teachers’ design expertise. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 46(1), 33-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2013.834077
    連結：
32. Lodahl, T. M., & Kejnar, M. (1965). The definition and measurement of job involvement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 49(1), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021692
    連結：
33. Skedsmo, G., & Huber, S. G. (2018). Teacher evaluation: The need for valid measures and increased teacher involvement. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 30, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-018-9273-9
    連結：
34. Spilt, J. L., Leflot, G., & Colpin, H. (2019). Teacher involvement prevents increases in children’s depressive symptoms: Bidirectional associations in elementary school. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 47(2), 359-367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-018-0441-7
    連結：
35. 周愫嫻（2001）。愛上學的孩子，不會變壞嗎？論學校因素與青少年偏差行為之關係。應用心理研究，11，93-115。 【Jou, S.-S. (2001). Can a youth love to go to school and yet behave delinquently? A study on schooling and juvenile delinquency. Research in Applied Psychology, 11, 93-115.】
36. 林正文（1993）。兒童行為觀察與輔導─行為治療的輔導取向。五南。 【Lin, Z.-W. (1993). Child behavior observation and counseling: Counseling orientation of behavior therapy. Wu-Nan.】
37. 香港教育統籌局（2006）。何謂校本管理？https://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/tc/sch-admin/sbm/sbm-forms-references/emb_cn_leaflet.pdf 【Education and Manpower Bureau, Hong Kong. (2006). What is school-based management? https://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/tc/sch-admin/sbm/sbm-forms-references/emb_cn_leaflet.pdf】
38. 張雲龍（2016）。家庭與學校知覺影響高中職生偏差行為之探討。輔導與諮商學報，38（1），61-82。 【Chang, Y.-L. (2016). A study on the influence of the family and school perception for senior high school students’ deviant behavior. The Journal of Guidance & Counseling, 38(1), 61-82.】
39. 教育部（2016）。學生常見偏差行為類別、預防及處理作為。http://210.59.16.247/htdocs/%E8%A1%8C%E6%94%BF%E5%96%AE%E4%BD%8D/ymmil/doc/20170216-%E9%98%B2%E6%B2%BB%E9%9C%B8%E5%87%8C/4-%E5%AD%B8%E7%94%9F%E5%B8%B8%E8%A6%8B%E5%81%8F%E5%B7%AE%E8%A1%8C%E7%82%BA.pdf 【Ministry of Education. (2016). Student deviant behavior categories, prevention and handling actions. http://210.59.16.247/htdocs/%E8%A1%8C%E6%94%BF%E5%96%AE%E4%BD%8D/ymmil/doc/20170216-%E9%98%B2%E6%B2%BB%E9%9C%B8%E5%87%8C/4-%E5%AD%B8%E7%94%9F%E5%B8%B8%E8%A6%8B%E5%81%8F%E5%B7%AE%E8%A1%8C%E7%82%BA.pdf】
40. 陳木金、邱馨儀、張維倩、林惠煌（2013，12月14日）。以學定教的校長教學領導模式。「兩岸三地校長學」學術研討會，臺北市，臺灣。 【Chen, M.-J., Chou, S.-Y., Chang, W.-C., & Lin, H.-H. (2013, December 14). Principal instructional leadership model: Learning orientation in taught [Paper presentation]. The Conference on Principals in Hong Kong, Taiwan and Mainland China, Taipei, Taiwan.】
41. 陳世育（2014）。教室內的國王如何推動班級經營。臺灣教育評論月刊，3（10），75-77。 【Chen, S.-Y. (2014). How does the king in the classroom promote class management? Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 3(10), 75-77.】
42. 陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵（2005）。多變量分析方法─統計軟體應用。五南。 【Chen, C.-C., Cherng, B.-L., Chen, S.-F., & Liu, T.-C. (2005). Multivariate analysis－ Application of statistical software. Wu-Nan.】
43. 陳俊生、林新發（2003）。學校本位管理及其實施成效評析。國立臺北師範學院學報，16（1），379-412。 【Chen, J.-S., & Lin, X.-F. (2003). Comment on effects of school-based management: Theory and practice. Journal of National Taipei Teachers College, 16(1), 379-412.】
44. 陳清溪（2000）。啟智班教師教學支援需求與教學自我效能之研究（未出版碩士論文）。國立彰化師範大學。 【Chen, C.-H. (2000). The study of teaching support needs and teaching self-efficacy of teachers who teaching students with mental retardation [Unpublished master’s thesis]. National Changhua University of Education.】
45. 陳寬裕、王正華（2013）。結構方程模式分析實務：AMOS的運用。五南。 【Chen, K.-Y., & Wang, C.-H. (2013). Structural equation modeling: The application of AMOS. Wu-Nan.】
46. 陳寬裕、王正華（2017）。論文統計分析實務：SPSS與AMOS的運用。五南。 【Chen, K.-Y., & Wang, C.-H. (2017). The application of SPSS and AMOS. Wu-Nan.】
47. 黃芳銘（2007）。結構方程模式：理論與應用（第五版）。五南。【Hwang, F.-M. (2007). Structural equation modeling: Theory and application (5th ed.). Wu-Nan.】
48. 黃建榮（2016）。直銷商的道德銷售行為、會員信任、滿意與購後行為之關聯性研究。直銷管理評論，2（2），61-84。 【Huang, C.-J. (2016). Relationships among direct distributors’ ethical selling behaviors, members’ trust, satisfaction and behavioral consequences. Direct Selling Management Review, 2(2), 61-84.】
49. 楊孟華、趙雅慧（2014）。國中體育教師工作投入與創意教學之關係研究—以雲嘉地區為例。休閒運動期刊，13，63-72。 【Yang, M.-H., & Zhao, Y.-H. (2014). The relationships between job involvement and creative teaching of junior high school physical education teachers: A case of Yunlin and Chiayi area. Leisure & Exercise, 13, 63-72.】
50. 鄭怡君、蔡俊傑（2016）。Bootstrap中介效果結構方程模式分析。體育學系系刊，15，102-114。 【Cheng, Y.-C., & Tsai, J.-J. (2016). Introduction to Bootstrap mediated effect with structural equation modeling. Journal of NTUSPE, 15, 102-114.】
51. Castetter, W. B., & Young, I. P. (2004). Human resource function in educational administration (8th ed.). Pearson.
52. Feitler, F. C., & Tokar, E. (1982). Getting a handle on teacher stress: How bad is the problem? Educational Leadership, 39(6), 456-458.
53. Fu, C.-S. (2015). The effect of emotional labor on job involvement in preschool teachers: Verifying the mediating effect of psychological capital. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(3), 145-156.
54. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate data analysis (6th ed.). Prentice Hall.
55. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R., & Black, W. (1998). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). Prentice Hall.
56. Hargreaves, A. (2001). Emotional geographies of teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1056-1080.
57. Mardia, K. V. (1985). Mardia’s test of multinormality. In S. Kotz & N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistical sciences (Vol. 5, pp. 217-221). John Wiley.
58. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015 database. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/2015database/
59. Swanepoel, C. (2008). The perceptions of teachers and school principals of each other’s disposition towards teacher involvement in school reform. South African Journal of Education, 28(1), 39-51.
60. Tolegen, M. A., Seriev, B. A., Akhatov, U. A., Taubayev, B. R., & Balashov, T. T. (2016). Social and legal aspects of the educational support of adolescents with deviant behavior. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 11(11), 4768-4781.
61. Vettenburg, N. (1989). The role of the school in the evolution of the deviant behavior of youngsters. Tijdschrift Voor Sociologie, 10(3-4), 615-642.

1. 郭玲玲(Ling-Ling Kueh);洪瑄(Hsuan Hung);董旭英(Yuk-Ying Tung)(2021)。從Hirschi社會連結觀點探究學校因素對青少年吸菸行為之影響。教育科學研究期刊。66(4)。103-132。