國小資優生道德認知對新冠疫情病患態度之現況與其關聯：以對新冠疫情之情緒為調節變項

Effects of the Moral Cognition of Gifted Elementary School Students on Their Attitudes Toward COVID-19: Exploring the Moderating Effects of Emotions

10.6209/JORIES.202212_67(4).0005

洪欣妤(Shin-Yu Hung)；潘裕豐(Yu-Fong Pan)

新冠肺炎 ； 資優生 ； 道德認知 ； 態度 ； COVID-19 ； gifted student ； moral cognition ； attitude

教育科學研究期刊

67卷4期（2022 / 12 / 01）

143 - 175

英文

本研究旨在探討國小資優生的道德認知、在真實情境的新冠肺炎疫情下對疫情與病患的態度，以及疫情下情緒的現況與差異性，並分析其道德認知與對病患態度之相關及探究其預測情形。本研究以北區國小資優生515人與普通生372人共887人為研究對象，共使用「行為界定問題測驗」、「對新冠肺炎疫情情緒量表」、「新冠肺炎病患態度量表」為研究工具，進行資料蒐集與分析處理。研究之結果如下：一、不同學生類別、不同年級與不同性別之學生在道德認知表現上資優生與普通生無明顯差異；二、不同學生類別、不同年級與不同性別之學生在情緒上的表現在疫情下，普通生「相信」、「害怕」、「驚訝」、「悲傷」高於資優生，中年級資優生「害怕」、「驚訝」、「悲傷」及「討厭」較高年級明顯，而普通班男生「悲傷」之情緒高於女生；三、不同身分、年級與性別之資優生在疫情情境下，對疫情與病患之態度高於普通生，資優生態度高於普通生，高年級資優生與普通生比中年級有較佳的態度；四、新冠肺炎疫情與病患態度之預測及調節效果資優生的道德認知能預測態度，情緒在道德認知和病患態度間不具有調節效果。

The aim of this study was to explore the effects of the moral cognition of gifted elementary schools students on their attitudes toward COVID-19. The study further investigated the changes in their emotions during the pandemic and the moderating effects of their emotions on the relationship between their moral cognition and attitudes toward patients with COVID-19. Various factors influence the moral cognition of children, such as age, sex, intelligence level, and personality. Moreover, their surrounding environments, particularly home and school environments, strongly affect their moral cognition. Therefore, various studies have explored relevant factors, such as education level, role replacement, peer relationship, family economic status, family structure, family emotion, religious belief, and sociocultural background. Nevertheless, the question regarding the attitudes of gifted children with outstanding potential toward moral issues should be explored. Lovecky (1997) indicated that gifted children are highly concerned about moral issues since childhood and that they have an excellent understanding of moral issues. Compared with their peers with a relatively low level of intelligence, gifted children have an improved understanding of fairness, justice, and responsibility toward he self and others (Gross, 1993), and this thus engenders high levels of moral sensitivity (Piechowski, 1991). Therefore, the question of whether the levels of these students' moral perceptions vary depending on grade, sex, or sociocultural identity warrants exploration. Gifted students differ from others intellectually, socially, emotionally, and physically; however, their ability to cognitively understand moral issues is higher than their ability to emotionally adjust to such issues (Clark, 2002/2007). Accordingly, they need opportunities to discuss moral issues around them and promote their moral growth (Lovecky, 1997). Epidemics exert strong negative effects on the general public; this fact invoked curiosity in the research fraternity regarding the effects of epidemics on gifted students belonging to different grades, sexes, and sociocultural identities. Questions arose regarding the effects of emotions on the moral perceptions of gifted students and whether such effects further affect the students' moral behaviors and attitudes. Studies on moral education in gifted students have not reported any major outcomes; this might be because of the lack of an association between moral cognition and moral practice (Liu, 2002). From an educational perspective, studies have explored the efforts of schools in educating children and constructing their moral cognition; gifted students perform better in making ethical choices than do other students. The COVID-19 may be the first real-life pandemic situation experienced by young students. Therefore, students must receive information related to health and epidemic prevention. The question of whether the attitudes of gifted and ordinary elementary school students vary depending on various factors (grade, sex, and sociocultural identity) in a real setting must be explored. Moreover, whether cognition and attitude are related remains to be determined. Whether the levels of students' moral cognition can help predict their attitudes toward epidemics and diseases also warrants clarification. Accordingly, on the basis of the theory of moral cognition development in children, the present study investigated the current status of moral cognition levels, emotions, and attitudes toward epidemics and patients in gifted and ordinary students and compared the findings between the two cohorts. The study findings may serve as a reference for designing ethics courses for gifted students with special needs in order to cultivate their sense of social responsibility and civic awareness and cultivate the virtues of knowing, loving, and doing good. This study included a total of 887 elementary school students (gifted, 515; ordinary, 372). Three research tools - the Behavior Defining Questions Test, Epidemic and Patient Attitude Scale, and Emotion Scale - were used for data collection and analysis. The results revealed no significant differences between gifted and ordinary students in terms of moral cognitive performance. Regarding the epidemic-related emotions of students belonging to various grades and sexes, this study determined that the ordinary students expressed higher levels of belief, fear, surprise, and sadness than did the gifted students; middle- and higher-grade gifted students expressed fear, surprise, sadness, and disgust; and boys expressed higher levels of sadness than did girls. The levels of moral attitudes toward epidemics and patients were more prominent in the gifted students than in the ordinary students. Upper-grade students exhibited improved attitudes compared with middle-grade students. Furthermore, emotions exerted no moderating effects on the relationship between moral cognition and epidemic-related attitudes among the gifted elementary students. On the basis of the findings, this study proposes the following recommendations: 1. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, individuals may experience slight mood changes due to psychological adjustment to the new normal. In the present study, the students had different perspectives of COVID-19 and thus experienced different emotions. Future studies may investigate the suitable approach and time point for evaluating emotions. The relationship between moral attitudes and behaviors remains to be clarified in an actual classroom setting. Qualitative studies may be conducted to investigate this relationship. 2. In terms of moral cognition and attitudes toward the pandemic and patients, middle-grade gifted students appear to experience more negative emotions than do others; this may pose a considerable psychological burden on them. Thus, teachers must provide psychological support and counseling to gifted students with different needs and teach them to actively process and analyze situational information to help them devise strategies for stress relief. 3. Enhancing the belief and positive expectation of students regarding social issues may help improve their attitudes toward moral issues, thus improving their ethical behaviors.

1. 沈六, L.(2001)。道德歸因論。公民訓育學報，10，1-28。
   連結：
2. 沈六, L.(2002)。道德發展的家庭脈絡因素。公民訓育學報，11，1-37。
   連結：
3. 徐美苓, M.-L.,陳瑞芸, R.-Y.,張皓傑, H.-J.,賴奕帆, Y.-F.,林佳韻, J.-Y.(2006)。愛滋新聞閱讀與對感染者與病患的態度以針對年輕族群的訊息設計實驗為例。新聞學研究，87，1-49。
   連結：
4. 陳勇祥, Y.-X.,賴翠媛, C.-Y.(2017)。不同教育階段之學生參與服務學習的動機與成效研究。資優教育季刊，143，13-22。
   連結：
5. 陳鳳如, F.-G.,黃漢龍, H.-L.(2010)。臺中市國小學生的道德發展現況及相關影響因素之研究。臺中教育大學學報：教育類，24(1)，79-106。
   連結：
6. 劉秀嫚, S.-M.,李琪明, C.-M.,陳延興, Y.-H.,方志華, C.-H.(2015)。品德教育現況及因應十二年國教課程改革之調查研究。教育科學研究期刊，60(2)，79-109。
   連結：
7. Boehm, L.,Nass, M. L.(1962).Social class difference in conscious development.Child Development,33(3),565.
8. Breckler, S. J.(1984).Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,47(6),1191-1205.
9. Choi, Y.-J.,Han, H.,Dawson, K. J.,Thoma, S. J.,Glenn, A. L.(2019).Measuring moral reasoning using moral dilemmas: Evaluating reliability, validity, and differential item functioning of the behavioural defining issues test (bDIT).European Journal of Developmental Psychology,16(5),622-631.
10. Clark、 B.,花敬凱（譯）, J.-K.(Trans.)(2007).啟迪資優─如何開發孩子的潛能心理.心理=Psychological.
11. Colangelo, N.(Ed.),Davis, G. A.(Ed.)(1991).Handbook of gifted education.Allyn & Bacon.
12. Dewey, J. (1909). The moral principles in education. Houghton Mifflin.
13. Dubey, S.,Ray, B. K.,Ghosh, R.,Chatterjee, S.,Finsterer, J.,Lahiri, D.,Biswas, R.(2020).Thunderclap headache and hemiparesis as presenting manifestation of adult moyamoya disease.Medical Journal of Dr. D.Y.,14(5),575-576.
14. Durkheim, E.,Wilson, E. K.(Trans.),Schnurer, H.(Trans.)(1961).Moral education: A study in the theory and application of the sociology of education.Free Press of Glencoe.
15. Galbraith, J.(1985).The eight great gripes of gifted kids: Responding to special needs.Roeper Review: A Journal on Gifted Education,8(1),15-18.
16. Gilligan, C.(1982).Why should a woman be more like a man?.Psychology Today,June,68-77.
17. Gross, M. U. M.(1993).Exceptionally gifted children.Routledge.
18. Han, H.,Glenn, A. L.,Dawson, K. J.(2019).Evaluating alternative correction methods for multiple comparison in functional neuroimaging research.Brain Sciences,9(8),198.
19. Hoffman, M.(Ed.),Hoffman, L.(Ed.)(1964).Review of child development research.Russell Sage.
20. Kuhl, J.(Ed.),Beckmann, J.(Ed.)(1985).Action-control: From cognition to behavior.Springer.
21. Lee, S. Y.,Olszewski-Kubilius, P.(2006).The emotional intelligence, moral judgment, and leadership of academically gifted adolescents.Journal for the Education of the Gifted,30,29-67.
22. Lewis, M.(Ed.),Haviland-Jones, J. M.(Ed.)(2000).Handbook of emotions.Guilford.
23. Lickona, T.(Ed.)(1976).Moral development and behavior: Theory and research and social issues.Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
24. Love, H.(2019).Beginning with Stigma.A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies,25(1),33-38.
25. Lovecky, D. V.(1997).Identity development in gifted children: Moral sensitivity.Roeper Review,20(2),90-94.
26. Mosher, R.(Ed.)(1980).Moral education: A first generation of research and develop.Praeger.
27. Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co.
28. Plutchik, R.(Ed.),Kellerman, H.(Ed.)(1980).Emotion: Theory, research, and experience: Vol. 1. Theories of emotion.Academic.
29. Reimer, J. B.(1977).Harvard University.
30. Rest, J. R.(1986).Moral development: Advances in research and theory.Praeger.
31. Rest, J. R.(1979).Development in judging moral issues.University of Minnesota Press.
32. Rest, J.,Cooper, D.,Coder, R.,Masanz, J.,Anderson, D.(1974).Judging the important issues in moral dilemmas-An objective test of development.Developmental Psychology,10(4),491-501.
33. Roeper, A.,Silverman, L. K.(2009).Giftedness and moral promise.Morality, ethics, and gifted minds
34. Silberman, M. A.,Snarey, J.(1993).Gender differences in moral development during early adolescence: The contribution of sex-related variations in maturation.Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social,12,163-171.
35. Silverman, L. K.(2009).The measurement of giftedness.The international handbook on giftedness
36. Simmons, C. H.,Zumpf, C.(2011).The gifted child: Perceived competence, prosocial moral reasoning and charitable donations.The Journal of Genetic Psychology,147(1),97-105.
37. Sliverman, L. K.(1994).The moral sensitivity of gifted children and the evolution of society.Roeper Review: A Journal on Gifted Education,17(2),110-116.
38. Stern, R. A.,Rosenbaum, J.,White, R. F.,Morey, C. E.(1991).Clinical validation of a visual analogue dysphoria scale for neurologic patients.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology,13,106.
39. 林秀治, X.-Z.(2010)。國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
40. 林沄萱, Y.-X.(2015)。由華人的面子問題探討精神病患的污名。耕莘學報，13，5-12。
41. 林鴻泰, H.-T.(2005)。國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。
42. 張春興, C.-X.(2003).心理學原理.東華=Donghua.
43. 張春興, C.-X.(1997).社會及行為科學研究法.東華=Donghua.
44. 教育部（2013）。重編國語辭典修訂本。http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/cbdic/【Ministry of Education. (2013). The revised version of the Mandarin dictionary was re-edited. http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/cbdic/】
45. 陳英豪, Y.-H.(1981)。從青年道德認知的發展談感化教育。社會福利，13，15-22。
46. 溫世頌, S.-S.(2012).心理學導論.三民=Sanmin.
47. 詹棟樑, D.-L.(2002).後現代主義教育思潮.渤海堂=Bohai Church.
48. 劉慧慧, H.-H.(2002)。國立臺東師範學院=National Taitung Teachers College。
49. 蔡淑桂, S.-G.(1991)。國立臺灣師範大學=National Taiwan Normal University。