以PLS-SEM模型探討某大學四年級學生校園參與經驗對全人素養發展之影響

The Impact of Campus Participation Experiences on the Development of University Senior Students' Holistic Literacy: Based on PLS-SEM Model

10.6506/SAGC.201903_57(4).0003

蔡昕璋(Hsin-Chang Tsai)

校園參與經驗 ； 全人素養 ； 課室外學習經驗 ； experiences of campus participation ； holistic literacy ； extracurricular learning experience

學生事務與輔導

57卷4期（2019 / 03 / 01）

12 - 28

繁體中文

本研究旨在探討某校大四學生校園參與經驗對全人素養發展之因果關係，透過任意抽樣法抽取某校大四學生78人作為研究樣本，利用partial least square structural equation modeling（PLS-SEM）模型進行分析，並檢測其中介效果。研究發現，非正式課程、潛在課程的參與經驗對於全人素養發展皆有正向影響，且潛在課程在非正式課程及全人素養間具有中介效果存在。另外透過單因子變異數分析，發現健康狀況良好的同學，其全人素養亦高。依據研究結果，研究者建議相關人員關注學生課室外的學習經驗，並鼓勵學生多元參與、維持自身健康，以提高全人素養。

This study aims to investigate the correlation between university students' campus participation experiences and holistic literacy. The participants of this study were 78 senior university students recruited from a university in Taiwan by the convenience sampling method. Partial least square structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) was used to assess the fit of structural equation models to data, and the mediation of the hidden curriculum was examined as a latent variable. With one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), the students with better health status show a significantly higher level in holistic literacy. Based on the results, this study offers two suggestions: caring about and encouraging students to take part in informal curriculum and hidden curriculum, and promoting students' health. It is hoped that the holistic literacy of university students will improve.

1. 李育齊,劉若蘭(2014)。大學生參與五育活動、校園經驗與基本核心素養之關係研究：以國立臺灣師範大學為例。學生事務與輔導，53(2)，20-40。
   連結：
2. 鄭英耀,葉麗貞,劉昆夏,莫慕貞(2011)。大學生基本能力指標之建構。測驗學刊，58(3)，531-558。
   連結：
3. Astin, A. W.(1985).Achieving educational excellence: A critical assessment of priorities and practices in higher education.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass.
4. Bok, D.(2006).Our underachieving colleges: A candid look at how much students learn and why they should be learning more.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
5. Coplin , B.(2003).10 things employers want you to learn in college.Berkeley, CA:Ten Speed Press.
6. Gallegos Nava, R.(2001).Holistic education: Pedagogy of universal love.Brandon, VT:Foundation for Educational Renewal.
7. Hair, J. F.,Black, W. C.,Babin, B. J.,Anderson, R. E.(2010).Multivariate data analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
8. Hair, J. F.,Hult, G. T. M.,Ringle, C. M.,Sarstebt, M.(2014).A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM).Thousand Oaks:Sage.
9. Kuh, G. D. (2003). The national survey of student engagement: Conceptual framework and overview of psychometric properties. Retrieved October 11, 2014, from http://nsse.indiana.edu/pdf/psychometric_framework_2002.pdf
10. Marcoulides, G. A.(Ed.)(1998).Modern methods for business research.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
11. Miller, J. P.(1993).The holistic teacher.Toronto, Canada:OISE press.
12. Miller, J. P.(1988).The holistic curriculum.Toronto, Canada:OISE press.
13. Miller, R.(2001).Making connections to the world: Some thoughts on holistic curriculum.Encounter: Education for Meaning and Social Justice,14(4),29-35.
14. Miller, R.(1990).What are schools for? Holistic education in American culture.Brandon, VT:Holistic Education Press.
15. Miller, R.(1991).Educating the true self: Spiritual roots of the holistic worldview.Journal of Humanistic Psychology,31(4),53-67.
16. National Association of Student Personnel Administrators & American College Personnel Association. (2004). Learning reconsidered: A campus-wide focus on the student experience. Retrieved November 11, 2018, from https://www.naspa.org/images/uploads/main/Learning_Reconsidered_Report.pdf
17. Smart, J. C.(Ed.)(1985).Higher education: Handbook of theory and research.New York:Agathon.
18. Terenzini, P. T.,Springer, L.,Yaeger, P. M.,Pascarella, E. T.,Nora, A.(1996).First-generation college students: Characteristics, experiences, and cognitive development.Research in Higher Education,37(1),1-22.
19. Vinzi, V. Esposito(Ed),Chin, W. W.(Ed),Henseler, J.(Ed),Wang, H.(Ed)(2010).Handbook of Partial Least Squares.Heidelberg, Germany:Springer.
20. Wixom, B. H.,Watson, H. J.(2001).An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success.MIS Quarterly,25(1),17-41.
21. 小原国芳(1969)。全人教育論。東京:玉川大学出版部。
22. 吳清山,林天祐(2009).教育小辭書.臺北市:五南.
23. 呂俊甫(1982).發展心理與教育：全人發展與全人教育.臺北市:臺灣商務.
24. 李承傑,董旭英(2017)。偏最小平方法結構方程模型。科學發展，539，20-25。
25. 林生傳(2000).教育社會學.臺北市:巨流.
26. 邱皓政(2011)。當PLS遇上SEM：議題與對話。αβγ量化研究學刊，3(1)，20-53。
27. 教育部（編）(2010).德智體群美：五育理念與實踐.臺北市:教育部.
28. 陳幼慧(2011)。職涯共通能力（軟實力）來核指標與機制之發展。教育部大專校院就業職能計畫（UCAN）教學應用與學習成效提升研討會，臺北市:
29. 彭森明(2010).大學生學習成果評量：理論、實務與應用.臺北市:高等教育.
30. 黃孝光,曾慶豹,潘正德,蘇友端,楊坤原,林姿瑩,尤嫣嫣,李清義(2005).全人教育面面觀─理念與思維.臺北市:心理.
31. 黃政傑（編）,江惠真（編）(2009).人是什麼：生命教育.臺北市:教育部.
32. 鈴木敏正、佐藤真久(2012)。「外部のない時代」における環境教育と開発教育の実践的統一に向けた理論的考察─「持続可能で包容的な地域づくり教育（ESIC）」の提起。環境教育，21(2)，3-14。
33. 劉慧中(2010)。對「心靈教育」涵義的澄清與實行香港幼兒教育改革之關係。教育曙光，58(2)，128-135。
34. 蔡昕璋(2015)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學公民教育與活動領導學系。

1. 蔡昕璋(2020)。課室外學習經驗與基本核心能力之關係研究：以某大學三年級學生為例。學生社團學刊，8，27-48。
2. 蔡昕璋(2022)。疫情期間大學生自我調控學習、線上校園人際經驗與線上課程學習成效之關係研究：以2020年國立臺灣師範大學為例。學生事務與輔導，60(4)，11-32。