師資生參與實務社群之研究：以「幼稚園課程設計」科目為例

A Study on Communities of Practices of Student Teachers: A Case of Curriculum Design for Young Children

10.7038/JETP.201012.0002

王為國(Wei-Kuo Wang)

師資生 ； 實務社群 ； 師資培育 ； Student Teacher ； Communities of Practice ； Teacher Education

教育理論與實踐學刊

22期（2010 / 12 / 01）

1 - 28

繁體中文

本研究之研究目的為：（一）探討師資生實務社群之特色。（二）探討實務社群對師資生之學習所具有之意義。（三）探討師資生參與實務社群之歷程與遭遇。本研究之研究對象為某大學幼稚園教師教育學程修習「幼稚園課程設計」之師資生共84名。本研究之資料蒐集方法包括訪談、觀察及文件資料蒐集等。經過資料分析本研究獲得之結論為：（一）師資生參與實務社群之特色有：1.共有領域、2.共同社群、3.共學本領、4.共有默契、5.共有認同。（二）實務社群具有情境、互動與實務學習之意義，適宜具產出型的課程。（三）師資生透過實務社群來進行學習具有多種功能：1.增加對課程內容的理解、2.學習合作與人際互動、3.增進表達與溝通能力、4.培養統整與反省能力、5.減輕負擔、6.理論與實務相結合、7.共同建構與修正實務知識。（四）師資生之實務社群運作有：共同時間難以安排與社群成員參與程度不同等困難。針對上述結論，本研究提出以下建議：（一）鼓勵成員發揮自主精神。（二）社群成員可互評貢獻程度。（三）彈性之教學進度。（四）鼓勵周邊參與的師資生投入。

The goals of this study were as follows: 1) To understand the characteristics of communities of practice(CoP) of student teachers. 2) To explore learning meanings of CoP of student teachers. 3) To explore processes and experiences student teachers participating in CoP. The subjects were 84 student teachers who enrolled in Curriculum Design for Young Children. Data were collected through interviews, observation, document analysis. The conclusions of this study were as follows: 1) The characteristics of student teachers of CoP included common area, community, joint ability, agreement and identity. 2) The meanings of CoP were situated learning, mutual learning and practice learning. CoP suited with production course. 3) The advantages after student teachers participating in CoP included enhancing understanding of course content, studying collaboration and interpersonal relationship, cultivating integration and reflection abilities, mitigating task, integrating theory and practice, constructing and modifying knowledge of practice. 4) The difficulties of student teachers participating in CoP included arrangement of common time and different engagement of members. The suggestions of this study consisted of the following: encouraging member autonomy, member evaluating each other contribution, flexible teaching schedule, and encouraging members of peripheral participation to engage.

1. 王思峰、李昌雄(2005)。如何增進線上學習成效：線上實務社群的浮現觀點。中山管理評論，13(2)，749-776。
   連結：
2. 陳美玉(2005)。師資生個人知識管理及其對專業學習與發展影響之研究。師大學報：教育類，50(2)，181-202。
   連結：
3. Wenger, E. (2006). Communities of practice. Retrieved July 25, 2006, from http://www.ewenger.com/theory/index.htm.
4. Alsup, J.(2006).Teacher identity discourses: Negotiating personal and professional spaces.N.J.:L. Erlbaum Associates.
5. Ambrose, R. P.(1993).Personal narratives and Professional development.Childhood Education,69(5),274-276.
6. Armstrong, L. J.(2004).The University of Iowa.
7. Avery, L. M.(2003).Cornell University.
8. Bradley, V. L.(2004).What if we are doing this wrong?: Sequestering and a community of practice.Anthropology and Education Quarterly,35(3),345-367.
9. Carnell, E.(2007).Conceptions of effective teaching in higher education: extending the boundaries.Teaching in Higher Education,12(1),25-40.
10. Culpepper, S. M.(2004).University of Pennsylvania.
11. Dinsmore, J.,Wenger, K.(2006).Relationships in Preservice Teacher Preparation: From Cohorts to Communities.Teacher Education Quarterly,33(1),57-74.
12. Gettinger, M.,Stoiber, K. C.,Lange, J.(1999).Collaborative investigation of inclusive early education practices: A blueprint for teacher-research partnership.Journal of Early Intervention,22,257-265.
13. Greene, H.(2008).The role of socially constructed shared knowledge in learning to teach: Collaboration and reflection in a computer-mediated environment.The Teacher Educator,43(1),1-28.
14. Grossman, P.,Wineburg, S.,Woolworth, S.(2001).Toward a theory of teacher community.Teacher college record,103(6),942-1012.
15. Hara, N.(2009).Communities of practice: Fostering peer-to-peer learning and informal knowledge sharing in the work place.Berlin:Springer.
16. Hargreaves, A.,Earl, L.,Moore, S.,Manning, S.(2001).Learning to Change: teaching beyond subjects and standards.CA:Jossey-Bass Inc..
17. Hodkinson, H.,Hodkinson, P.(2004).Rethinking the concept of community of practice in relation to schoolteachers'workplace learning.International Journal of Training and Development,8(1),21-31.
18. Hoffman-Kipp, P.(2003).Model activity systems: Dialogic teacher learning for social justice teaching.Teacher Education Quarterly,2003(spring),27-39.
19. Jonassen, D. H.(ed.),Land, S. M.(ed.)(2000).Theoretical foundations of learning environments.NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
20. Lave, J.,Wenger, E.(1991).Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
21. McCann, E. P.(2003).The University of Wisconsin-Madison.
22. Palincsar, A. S.,Magnusson, Shirley J.,Marano, N.,Ford, D.,Brown, N.(1998).Designing a community of practice: Principles and practices of the GIsML community.Teaching and Teacher Education,14(1),5-19.
23. Perry, N.E.,Walton, C.,Calder, K.(1999).Teachers developing assessments of early literacy: A community of practice project.Teacher Education and Special Education,22,218-233.
24. Printy, S. M.(2002).The Ohio State University.
25. Reigeluth, C. M.(ed.)(1999).Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory.NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Sim, C.(2006).Preparing for professional experiences- incorporating pre-service teachers as communities of practice.Teaching and teacher education,22,77-83.
27. Spalding, E.,Wilson, A. H.(2006).Bowling together: Cultivating communities of practice in English and social studies teacher education.English Education,38(2),102-122.
28. Stein, D.(1998).,未出版
29. Swafford, J.(1995).I wish all my groups were like this one: Facilitating peer interaction during group work.Journal of Reading,38(8),626-631.
30. Vygotsky, L. S.(1978).Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
31. Wenger , E.,Snyder, W. M.(2001).Cultivating communities of practice.Boston:Haven Business School Press.
32. Wenger, E.,McDermott, R. A.,Snyder, W.(2002).Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge.Boston:Harvard Business School Press.
33. Zorfass, J.,Rivero, H. K.(2005).Collaboration is key: How a community of practice promotes technology integration.ournal of Special Education Technology,20(3),51-60.
34. 王為國(2007)。從實務社群談課程發展與教師專業發展。課程研究，2(2)，41-63。
35. 王為國(2008)。實務社群在師資培育之運用。教育研究月刊，170，94-106。
36. 王清思(2008)。教育理論與實務的關係：剖析杜威對師資培育的看法及其對現今的啟示。初等教育學刊，31，13-34。
37. 李麗君(2005)。師資培育在改變師資生教學信念之意義及其困難與挑戰。教育資料與研究，62，134-144。
38. 周啟葶(2006)。以學習社群促進教師專業發展之分析。中等教育，57(5)，94-113。
39. 林思伶、蔡進雄(2005)。論凝聚教師學習社群的有效途徑。教育研究月刊，132，99-109。
40. 高博銓(2009)。學校教師學習社群發展的個案研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，2(1)，61-74。

1. 江姮姬,丁一顧(2020)。臺灣教師專業學習社群實徵研究之分析與展望。教育研究與發展期刊，16(2)，135-162。
2. (2017)。大專院校服務學習課程學生學習成效分析：實踐社群觀點。中正教育研究，16(2)，71-114。
3. (2024)。知行合一：推動專業學習社群提升師資生USR實踐與反思。中等教育，75(1)，17-34。