题名

食品安全的風險溝通策略:初探專家與常民之對話與共識

并列篇名

Strategies for Risk Communication in Food Safety: Exploring Dialogue and Consensus Between Experts and Lay People

DOI

10.6123/JCRP.202001_10(1).0002

作者

李明穎(Lee, Ming-Ying);陳春富(Chen, Chun-Fu);吳宜蓁(Wu, Yi-Chen)

关键词

食品安全 ; 常民 ; 風險溝通 ; 風險治理 ; 不確定性 ; food safety ; lay people ; risk communication ; risk governance ; uncertainty

期刊名称

傳播研究與實踐

卷期/出版年月

10卷1期(2020 / 01 / 01)

页次

19 - 50

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

風險治理是對風險的結構性反應,而風險溝通是風險治理的重要環節。本研究以近年來臺灣的食品風險事件為背景,探討專家與常民對於風險不確定性的詮釋與風險溝通需求,藉由舉辦兩場焦點團體座談,提供不同利益關係人交流互動的機會,嘗試從「對話」中尋求共識,以建構具有公民參與精神的風險溝通策略,提供政府在食安風險溝通上的參考。本研究認為,在食安風險溝通中,若能擴大建立公民參與機制,將有助於共識的達成。此外,政府或專家在與常民進行食安風險溝通時,需坦承科學知識的有限性,提供關於風險不確定性的評估資訊,如此不同利益關係人方能站在同一陣線,從中建立以社會價值與信任為基礎的共識。

英文摘要

Risk governance is the structural response to risk, while risk communication is a crucial part of this response. Taking recent food safety issues in Taiwan as an example, this study aims to explore interpretations of risk uncertainty and the need for risk communication among experts and lay people. Two focus group sessions were conducted to create an interactive setting wherein different stakeholders could pursue dialogue and reach consensus. The goal of focus group interviews is to construct risk communication strategies that embody civic participation, and to provide important references for government that can be used in future risk governance and communication. The study asserts that mechanisms of civic participation are essential for achieving consensus in risk communication related to food safety. Additionally, this study suggests that both government and experts must admit the limitations of scientific knowledge regarding food safety, and provide lay people with information needed to evaluate risk uncertainty. This approach will enable the formation of an alliance of different stakeholders to develop a consensus based on social value and trust.

主题分类 社會科學 > 傳播學
参考文献
  1. 周桂田(2004)。獨大的科學理性與隱沒(默)的社會理性之「對話」—在地公眾、科學專家與國家的風險文化探討。臺灣社會研究季刊,56,1-63。
    連結:
  2. 周桂田(2005)。知識、科學與不確定性—專家與科技系統的『無知』如何建構風險。政治與社會哲學評論,13,131-180。
    連結:
  3. 周桂田,徐健銘(2014)。塑化風險社會—塑化劑風暴背後之管制脈絡與結構分析。臺灣社會研究季刊,95,109-177。
    連結:
  4. 林昱梅(2015)。論食品安全管理法制中之預防原則:以歐盟與臺灣為中心。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,44,1036-1162。
    連結:
  5. 邱玉蟬,游絲涵(2016)。食品安全事件的風險建構與溝通:新聞媒體 VS. 政府。中華傳播學刊,30,179-220。
    連結:
  6. 范玫芳,邱智民(2011)。英國基因改造作物與食品公共辯論:公民參與科技政策模式之評估。公共行政學報,41,103-134。
    連結:
  7. 陳思穎,吳宜蓁(2007)。食品污染新聞報導內容與品質之研究—以 2005年「戴奧辛鴨蛋」與「孔雀石綠石斑魚」為例。臺灣公共衛生雜誌,26,49-57。
    連結:
  8. 黃浩榮(2003)。風險社會下的大眾媒體:公共新聞學作為重構策略。國家發展研究,3(1),99-147。
    連結:
  9. 謝君蔚,徐美苓(2011)。媒體再現科技發展與風險的框架與演變:以基因改造食品新聞為例。中華傳播學刊,20,143-179。
    連結:
  10. Adam, B.,van Loon, J.(2000).Introduction: Repositioning risk: The challenge for social theory.The risk society and beyond: Critical issues for social theory,London, UK:
  11. Arkin, E. B.(1989).Translation of risk information for the public: Message development.Effective risk communication: The role and responsibility of government and nongovernment organizations,Boston, MA:
  12. Besley, J. C.,Nisbet, M.(2013).How scientists view the public, the media and the political process.Public Understanding of Science,22,644-659.
  13. Callon, M.(1999).The role of lay people in the production and dissemination of scientific knowledge.Science, Technology and Society,4,81-94.
  14. Collins, H. M.,Evans, R.(2002).The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience.Social Studies of Science,32,235-296.
  15. Conway, T.,Ward, M.,Lewis, G.,Bernhardt, A.(2007).Internet crisis potential: The importance of a strategic approach to marketing communications.Journal of Marketing Communications,13,213-228.
  16. Einsiedel, E.,Thorne, B.(1999).Public responses to uncertainty.Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science,Mahwah, NJ:
  17. Eldridge, J.,Kitzinger, J.,Philo, G.,Reilly, J.(1998).The re-emergence of BSE: The impact on public beliefs and behaviour.Risk and Human Behaviour Newsletter,3,6-10.
  18. Fischer, F.(2009).Democracy and expertise.New York, NY:Oxford University Press.
  19. Fischhoff, B.(1985).Managing risk perceptions.Issues in Science and Technology,2(1),83-96.
  20. Frewer, L. J.,Hunt, S.,Brennan, M.,Kuznesof, S.,Ness, M.,Ritson, C.(2003).The views of scientific experts on how the public conceptualize uncertainty.Journal of Risk Research,6,75-85.
  21. Frewer, L. J.,Miles, S.,Brennan, M.,Kuznesof, S.,Ness, M.,Ritson, C.(2002).Public preferences for informed choice under conditions of risk uncertainty.Public Understanding of Science,11,363-372.
  22. Funtowicz, S. O.,Ravetz, J. R.(1992).Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science.Social theories of risk,Westport, CT:
  23. Furnham, A.(1988).Lay theories: Everyday understanding of problems in the social sciences.New York, NY:Pergamon.
  24. Giddens, A.(1990).The consequences of modernity.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
  25. Hansen, J.,Holm, L.,Frewer, L.,Robinson, P.,Sandøe, P.(2003).Beyond the knowledge deficit: Recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks.Appetite,41,111-121.
  26. Heath, R. L.,Gay, C. D.(1997).Risk communication: Involvement, uncertainty, and control’s effect on information scanning and monitoring by expert stakeholders.Management Communication Quarterly,10,343-372.
  27. Hinchliffe, S.(2001).Indeterminacy in-decisions: Science, policy and politics in the BSE (bovine spongiform encephalopathy) crisis.Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers,26,182-204.
  28. Irwin, A.(Ed.),Wynne, B.(Ed.)(1996).Misunderstanding of science.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University of Press.
  29. Jansen, T.,Claassen, L.,van Kamp, I.,Timmermans, D. R. M.(2019).Understanding of the concept of ‘uncertain risk.’ A qualitative study among different societal groups.Journal of Risk Research,22,658-672.
  30. Jasanoff, S.(1993).Bridging the two cultures of risk analysis.Risk Analysis,13,123-129.
  31. Johnson, B. B.,Slovic, P.(1998).Lay views on uncertainty in environmental health risk assessment.Journal of Risk Research,1,261-279.
  32. Kasperson, R. E.,Kasperson, J. X.(1996).The social amplification and attenuation of risk.The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,545,95-105.
  33. Kettler, S.,Kennedy, M.,McNamara, C.,Oberdörfer, R.,O’Mahony, C.,Schnabel, J.(2015).Assessing and reporting uncertainties in dietary exposure analysis: Mapping of uncertainties in a tiered approach.Food and Chemical Toxicology,82,79-95.
  34. Krimsky, S.(Ed.),Golding, D.(Ed.)(1992).Social theory of risk.Westport, CT:Praeger.
  35. Leach, M.,Scoones, I.(2005).Science and citizenship in a global context.Science and citizens: Globalization and the challenge of engagement,London, UK:
  36. Linnerooth-Bayer, J.(Ed.),Löfstedt, R. E.(Ed.),Sjöstedt, G.(Ed.)(2001).Transboundary risk management.London, UK:Earthscan.
  37. Lundgren, R. E.,McMakin, A. H.(2009).Risk communication: A handbook for communicating environmental, safety, and health risks.Hoboken, NJ:John Wiley & Sons.
  38. Lupton, D.(1999).Risk and sociocultural theory: New directions and perspectives.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
  39. Markon, M.-P. L.,Crowe, J.,Lemyre, L.(2013).Examining uncertainties in government risk communication: Citizens’ expectations.Health, Risk & Society,15,313-332.
  40. Miles, S.,Frewer, L. J.(2003).Public perception of scientific uncertainty in relation to food hazards.Journal of Risk Research,6,267-283.
  41. Miller, S.(2001).Public understanding of science at the crossroads.Pubic Understanding of Science,10,115-120.
  42. Nelkin, D.(Ed.)(1992).Controversy: Politics of technical decisions.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
  43. Nisbet, M. C.,Brossard, D.,Kroepsch, A.(2003).Framing science: The stem cell controversy in an age of press/politics.The International Journal of Press/Politics,8,36-70.
  44. Nisbet, M. C.,Scheufele, D. A.(2009).What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions.American Journal of Botany,96,1767-1778.
  45. Nowotny, H.,Scott, P.,Gibbons, M.(2001).Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty.Cambridge, UK:Polity.
  46. Nucci, M. L.,Cuite, C. L.,Hallman, W. K.(2006).When good food goes bad: Television network news and the spinach recall of 2006.Science Communication,31,238-265.
  47. Nucci, M. L.,Kubey, R.(2007)."We begin tonight with fruits and vegetables": Genetically modified food on the evening news 1980–2003.Science Communication,29,147-176.
  48. Pidgeon, N.,Simmons, P.,Sarre, S.,Henwood, K.,Smith, N.(2008).The ethics of socio-cultural risk research.Health, Risk & Society,10,321-329.
  49. Powell, D.,Leiss, W.(1997).Mad cows and mother’s milk: The perils of poor risk communication.Montreal, Canada:McGill-Queen’s University’s Press.
  50. Renn, O.(Ed.),Walker, K. D.(Ed.)(2008).Global risk governance: Concept and practice using the IRGC framework.Geneva, Switzerland:Springer.
  51. Retzbach, A.,Maier, M.(2015).Communicating scientific uncertainty: Media effects on public engagement with science.Communication Research,42,429-456.
  52. Sandman, P. M.(2012).Responding to community outrage: Strategies for effective risk communication.
  53. Singer, E.,Endreny, P. M.(1993).Reporting on risk.New York, NY:Russell Sage Foundation.
  54. Slovic, P.(Ed.)(2000).The perception of risk.London, UK:Earthscan.
  55. Verbeke, W.,Frewer, L. J.,Scholderer, J.,De Brabander, H. F.(2007).Why consumers behave as they do with respect to food safety and risk information.Analytica Chimica Acta,586,2-7.
  56. Wiener, J. B.(Ed.),Rogers, M. D.(Ed.),Hammitt, J. K.(Ed.),Sand, P. H.(Ed.)(2011).The reality of precaution: Comparing risk regulation in the United States and Europe.Washington, DC:RFF Press.
  57. Wynne, B.(2002).Risk and environment as legitimatory discourses of technology: Reflexivity inside out?.Current Sociology,50,459-477.
  58. Yearley, S.(2000).Making systematic sense of public discontents with expert knowledge: Two analytical approaches and a case study.Public Understanding of Science,9,105-122.
  59. 吳宜蓁(2011)。運用網路社交媒體於風險溝通—以 2009–2010 年臺灣政府H1N1 防疫宣導為例。傳播與社會學刊,15,125-160。
  60. 吳宜蓁,李明穎(2017)。公眾框架與科學民主化之實踐—餿水油事件的新聞內容分析。傳播與文化,16,66-103。
  61. 李丁讚(1997)。公共論述、社會學習與基進民主:對「食物中毒」現象的一些觀察。臺灣社會研究季刊,25,1-32。
  62. 李明穎(2011)。科技民主化的風險溝通:從毒奶粉事件看網路公眾對科技風險的理解。傳播與社會學刊,15,161-185。
  63. 李政賢(譯),廖志恒(譯),林靜如(譯),Flick, U.(2015).質性研究導論.臺北,臺灣:五南.
  64. 周桂田(2014).風險社會典範轉移:打造為公眾負責的治理模式.臺北,臺灣:遠流.
  65. 周桂田,徐健銘(2015).從土地到餐桌上的恐慌:揭露與理解我們的食品安全到底哪裡出了錯.臺北,臺灣:商周.
  66. 胡幼慧(1996).質性研究:理論、方法及本土女性研究實例.臺北,臺灣:巨流.
  67. 范玫芳,陳俞燕(2009)。預警原則在塑化劑管制之應用:政策利害關係人觀點分析。法政學報,22,39-72。
  68. 祝平一(2008)。日常生活的崩解:毒奶、風險與信任。科技、醫療與社會,7,9-12。
  69. 陳向明(2016).社會科學質的研究.臺北,臺灣:五南.
  70. 傅偉光(2012)。食品安全之健康風險評估資料庫之建立與應用。農業生技產業季刊,30,39-41。
  71. 楊智元(2009)。國立臺灣大學國家發展研究所。
被引用次数
  1. 簡伶朱,賈培娟,陳怡樺,莊媖智,江椿彬,丁心恬(2022)。嬰幼兒母親對食品安全相關之政府信任及風險感知與其採用避險行為之路徑分析:以台北市某教學醫院為例。台灣公共衛生雜誌,41(1),36-50。