主管威權領導與員工含蓄性建言關係之研究：主管意圖歸因與親信關係的調節效果

The moderating effect of the supervisory intentional attribution of subordinates and confidant/ chinxin relationship on Chinese supervisor's authoritarian leadership and employee implicit voice

10.6285/MIC.202303_12(1).0005

張淑卿(Shu-Ching Chang)；陳孔麒(Kung-Chi Chen)；倪雅婷(Ya-Ting Ni)；林鈺祺(Yu-Qi Lin)

威權領導 ； 含蓄性建言 ； 主管意圖歸因 ； 親信關係 ； Authoritarian leadership ； Implicit voice ； Intentional attribution ； Confidant/Chinxin relationship

管理資訊計算

12卷1期（2023 / 03 / 01）

49 - 63

繁體中文;英文

主管威權領導在華人組織中普遍存在且具有十分重要的地位，也是家長式領導三元論中相當重要的一部分。在過去的很多研究中，主管威權領導對員工建言具有阻礙作用，但對於員工的含蓄性建言的探討比較少見。因此，本研究試圖探討主管威權領導與員工含蓄性建言的關係，並探討員工對主管的意圖歸因和員工與主管間之親信關係程度是否會調節主管威權領導與員工含蓄性建言間之關係。本研究採用問卷調查的方式，以中國大陸企業組織中的員工作為研究對象，回收375份問卷，有效問卷363份。研究結果顯示，主管威權領導與員工含蓄性建言有顯著的正向關係。員工對主管的真誠歸因負向調節員工含蓄性建言與威權領導間之關係；員工對主管的操弄歸因正向調節員工含蓄性建言與威權領導間之關係。此外，信任關係負向調節威權領導與員工含蓄性建言間的關係。

The authoritarian leadership is common and has a very important position in Chinese organizations, at the same time, it is an important part of the paternalistic leadership. In many studies in the past, the authoritarian leadership has hindered the employee's voice behavior, but it is rare to discuss about the implicit voice of employees. Therefore, this study attempts to explore the relationship between the authoritarian leadership and the employee's implicit voice, and finds whether the moderating effect of the supervisory intentional attribution of subordinates and confidant/ chinxin relationship on Chinese supervisor's authoritarian leadership and employee implicit voice. This study used questionnaires to survey employees in the Chinese mainland organizations, collected 375 questionnaires and 363 valid questionnaires. The results of the study show that there is a significant positive relationship between the supervisory authoritarian leadership and the employee's implicit voice. Authentic attribution of leadership behavior negatively regulates the relationship between the employee's implicit voice and authoritarian leadership; manipulative attribution of leadership behavior is positively adjusted. In addition, trustworthy relationship negatively regulates the relationship between authoritarian leadership and implicit voice.

1. 李庭閣,嚴國晉,費吳琛,蔡佩容(2021)。家長式領導與部屬建言行為之關係：深層演出與表層演出之角色。人力資源管理學報，21(2)，75-99。
   連結：
2. 樊景立,鄭伯壎(2000)。華人組織的家長式領導：一項文化觀點的分析。本土心理學研究，13，126-180。
   連結：
3. 諸承明,謝東榮(1998)。組織中親信關係形成因素之研究─以銀行業為實證對象。亞太管理評論，4(1)，79-92。
   連結：
4. 鄭伯壎,周麗芳,樊景立(2000)。家長式領導：三元模式的建構與測量。本土心理學研究，14，3-64。
   連結：
5. 鄭伯壎,姜定宇(2000)。華人組織中的主管忠誠：主位與客位概念對員工效能的效果。本土心理學研究，14，65-113。
   連結：
6. Aiken, L. S.,West, S. G.,Reno, R. R.(1991).Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions.the united stated, America:Susan McElroy.
7. Avolio, B. J.,Gardner, W. L.(2005).Authentic leadership development: Getting to the root of positive forms of leadership.The leadership quarterly,16(3),315-338.
8. Brykman, K. M.,Maerz, A. D.(2022).How leaders inspire voice: The role of voice climate and team implicit voice theories.Journal of Business and Psychology,1-19.
9. Chiaburu, D. S.,Marinova, S. V.,Van Dyne, L.(2008).Should I do it or not? AN initial model of cognitive processes predicting voice behaviors.Academy of Management Proceedings,2008(1),1-6.
10. Dasborough, M. T.,Ashkanasy, N. M.(2002).Emotion and attribution of intentionality in leader-member relationships.The Leadership Quarterly,13(5),615-634.
11. Detert, J. R.,Edmondson, A. C.(2011).Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work.Academy of management journal,54(3),461-488.
12. Dyne, L. V.,Ang, S.,Botero, I. C.(2003).Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs.Journal of management studies,40(6),1359-1392.
13. Ellis, A. P.,Porter, C. O.,Mai, K. M.(2022).The impact of supervisor–employee self‐protective implicit voice theory alignment.Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology,95(1),155-183.
14. Ferris, G. R.,Bhawuk, D. P.,Fedor, D. F.,Judge, T. A.(1995).Organizational politics and citizenship: Attributions of intentionality and construct definition.Attribution theory: An organizational perspective
15. Green, S. G.,Mitchell, T. R.(1979).Attributional processes of leaders in leader-member interactions.Organizational behavior and human performance,23(3),429-458.
16. Heider, F.(1958).The psychology of interpersonal relations.London, England:Hillsdale.
17. Kelley, H. H.,Michela, J. L.(1980).Attribution theory and research.Annual review of psychology,31(1),457-501.
18. Knuth, R.(2004).The negative uses of power.Principal Leadership,5(3),44-49.
19. Lee, W. R.,Choi, S. B.,Kang, S. W.(2021).How leaders’ positive feedback influences employees’ innovative behavior: The mediating role of voice behavior and job autonomy.Sustainability,13(4),1901.
20. Nyberg, D.(1994).The varnished truth: Truth telling and deceiving in ordinary life.the united stated, America:University of Chicago Press.
21. Redding, S. G.,Whitley, R. D.(1990).Beyond bureaucracy: Towards a comparative analysis of forms of economic resource co-ordination and control.Capitalism in contrasting cultures,20,79-104.
22. Silin, R. H.(1976).Leadership and values: The organization of large-scale Taiwanese enterprises.Harvard Univ Asia Center.
23. Van Dyne, L.,LePine, J. A.(1998).Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity.Academy of Management journal,41(1),108-119.
24. Westwood, R.(1997).Harmony and patriarchy: The cultural basis for' paternalistic headship' among the overseas Chinese.Organization studies,18(3),445-480.
25. Wu, J.,Du, Y.(2022).Linking abusive supervision to promotive and prohibitive voice behavior: testing the mediating roles of work engagement and negative reciprocity.International journal of environmental research and public health,19(9),5498.
26. Wu, T. Y.,Liu, Y. F.,Hua, C. Y.,Lo, H. C.,Yeh, Y. J.(2020).Too unsafe to voice? Authoritarian leadership and employee voice in Chinese organizations.Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources,58(4),527-554.
27. Wu, X.,Ma, F.(2022).How Chinese employees’ voice behavior is motivated: the role of perceived over qualification.Frontiers in Psychology,13
28. Zheng, Y.,Graham, L.,Farh, J. L.,Huang, X.(2021).The impact of authoritarian leadership on ethical voice: A moderated mediation model of felt uncertainty and leader benevolence.Journal of Business Ethics,170(1),133-146.
29. 吳道友,高麗麗,段錦雲(2014)。工作投入如何影響員工建言：認知靈活性和權力動機的作用。應用心理學，20(1)，67-75。
30. 林行宜(1993)。臺北市，台灣大學商學研究所。
31. 段錦雲,王重鳴,鐘建安(2007)。大五和組織公平感對進諫行為的影響研究。心理科學，30(1)，19-21。
32. 段錦雲,淩斌(2011)。中國背景下員工建言行為結構及中庸思維對其的影響。心理學報，43(10)，1185-1197。
33. 段錦雲,鐘建安(2005)。組織中的進諫行為。心理科學，28(1)，69-71。
34. 戚樹誠(1996)。探索主管的親信關係。中山管理評論，4(1)，1-15。
35. 戚樹誠,林行宜(1993)。企業高階主管親信關係之研究。中華民國管理科學學報，11(2)，281-312。
36. 符純潔,淩文輇,張軍成(2015)。內隱建言理論：員工沉默的新解釋。商業經濟與管理，282(4)，24-31。
37. 郭建志(2009)。嘉義縣，中正大學心理學研究所。
38. 鄭伯壎(1995)。差序格局與華人組織行為。本土心理學研究，3，142-219。
39. 鄭伯壎(1995)。家長權威與領導行為之關係：一個台灣民營企業主持人的個案研究。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，79，119-173。
40. 鄭曉濤,柯江林,石金濤,鄭興山(2008)。中國背景下員工沉默的測量以及信任對其的影響。心理學報，40(2)，219-227。