台灣高薪100指數成分股在經營績效與股利之探討

Discussion on Business Performance and Dividends of Constituent Stocks of Taiwan HC 100 Index

10.6285/MIC.202307/SP_01_12.0003

林佳靜(Chia-Ching Lin)；陳逸昌(Yih-Chang Chen)

高薪100指數 ； 經營績效 ； 股利政策 ； 決策樹 ； Taiwan HC 100 Index ； Corporate Business Performance ； Dividend Policy ； Decision Tree

管理資訊計算

12卷特刊1（2023 / 07 / 01）

22 - 32

繁體中文;英文

本研究以2021年台灣證券交易所公告之「台灣高薪100指數」成分股為研究對象，依據各成分股之所屬產業，依照資本額去配對出一家非成分股企業做為對照組企業。利用平均數差異t檢定探討高薪100指數成分股與配對出來的非指數成分股在經營績效與股利政策上是否有所差異。實證發現，高薪100指數成分股在市值、資產總額、股東權益、每股淨值、營收、毛利、淨利、EPS、ROE與ROA之表現皆優於非成分股的配對企業，但在負債總額卻高於非成分股之配對企業。在股利政策方面，高薪100指數成分股在現金股利與現金殖利率之發放較配對樣本為佳，但在股票股利與股票殖利率則是較配對企業為低。從決策樹之分類規則結果得知，影響台灣高薪100指數成分股之關鍵因素中，最重要的預測變項是毛利，其次是現金殖利率，接著是ROA，最後則是現金股利與EPS。

The object of this study is the constituent stocks of the "Taiwan HC 100 Index" announced by the Taiwan Stock Exchange in 2021. According to the industry of each constituent stock and the amount of capital, a non-constituent company is matched as a control group. Using the mean difference t-test to explore whether there are differences in the operating performance and dividend policy between Taiwan HC 100 Index constituent stocks and the paired non-index constituent stocks. The results found that the constituent stocks of Taiwan HC 100 Index perform better than their non-constituent counterparts in terms of market value, total assets, shareholder equity, net value per share, revenue, gross profit, net profit, EPS, ROE, and ROA , but the total liabilities are higher than those of their non-constituent counterparts. Taiwan HC 100 Index constituents pay better cash dividends and cash yields than the matching samples, but lower than the matching companies in terms of stock dividends and stock yields. According to the results of the classification rules from the decision tree, the most important predictive variable of Taiwan HC 100 Index constituent stocks is gross profit, followed by cash yield, followed by ROA, and finally cash dividends and EPS.

1. 方妙玲(2008)。高階主管薪資與財務績效及社會績效之關聯性：代理理論及利害關係人理論觀點。企業管理學報，77，48-81。
   連結：
2. 杜榮瑞,陳煬楊,黃馨儀(2019)。企業社會責任績效與 CEO 薪酬的關係。當代會計，20(1)，1-28。
   連結：
3. 高惠松,詹照潔(2013)。不景氣時期之高階經理人薪酬結構與公司未來績效。東吳經濟商學學報，80，81-117。
   連結：
4. Banker, R. D.,Darrough, M. N.,Huang, R.,Plehn-Dujowich, J. M.(2013).The relation between CEO compensation and past performance.The Accounting Review,88(1),1-30.
5. Callan, S. J.,Thomas, J. M.(2011).Executive compensation, corporate social responsibility, and corporate financial performance: a multi‐equation framework.Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,18(6),332-351.
6. Fabrizi, M.,Mallin, C.,Michelon, G.(2014).The role of CEO’s personal incentives in driving corporate social responsibility.Journal of Business Ethics,124(2),311-326.
7. Hill, Charles W.,Hansen, Gary(1989).Institutional holdings and corporate R&D intensity in research intensive industries.Academy of Management Best Papers roceedings
8. McGuire,Oehmichen,Wolff,Hilgers(2019).Do Contracts Make Them Care? The Impact of CEO Compensation Design on Corporate Social Performance.Journal of Business Ethics,157(2),375-390.
9. Mishra, C. S.,McConaughy, D. L.,Gobeli, D. H.(2000).Effectiveness of CEO pay-for-performance.Review of Financial Economics,9(1),1-13.
10. Quinlan, J. R.(1993).C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning.San Francisco, CA:Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
11. Quinlan, J.R.(1979).Discovering Rules by Induction from Large Collections of Examples. Expert Systems in the Micro Electronic Age.Edinburgh University Press.
12. 高玉芬,洪維廷,羅綺雲(2013)。人力資本對組織經營績效之影響。萬能商學學報，18，143-159。
13. 莊蕎安(2018)。另起風潮的社會責任投資有利可圖？。會計研究月刊，389，84-88。
14. 蕭文姃,陳政位,馬佑祥(2020)。企業社會責任投入程度對金融機構經營績效之影響。龍華科技大學學報，39，127-144。
15. 謝秉芯,戴錦周,賴煒曾(2020)。善盡企業社會責任對高階經理人薪酬和公司績效的影響－聯立方程式模型之應用。當代商管論叢，5(1)，51-70。
16. 聶之珩(2014)。全球首創臺灣高薪 100 指數-高薪 100，幸福企業旺旺來，員工高薪樂開懷。證券服務，629，106-107。