题名

臉書社團功能在技職體系回流教育應用之研究:使用者觀感與線上行為之分析

并列篇名

The Study of the Application of Facebook Group in Recurrent Vocational Education: Analysis of Users’ Perceptions and Online Usage Behavior

DOI

10.6137/RECT.2015.111.01

作者

楊淇淯(Chi-Yu Yang);于富雲(Fu-Yun Yu)

关键词

回流教育 ; 技職教育 ; 科技接受模式 ; 媒體豐富度 ; 臉書社團 ; Recurrent education ; Vocational education ; Technology acceptance model ; Media richness theory ; Facebook group

期刊名称

教育傳播與科技研究

卷期/出版年月

111期(2015 / 08 / 31)

页次

1 - 24

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究旨探討技職體系假日回流教育班學生對臉書社團功能的使用觀感及參與者(教師與學生)的線上發文、閱讀、回文等使用行為。採問卷調查法及線上行為分析,經一整學期資訊科技融入教學活動,36 位參與者在期末問卷各題項勾選情形與描述性文字回應等量化與質化資料分析,發現4 項主要結果:一、參與學生對臉書社團作為不同教學用途之滿意度達顯著正面的看法;二、多數學生認同臉書社團下不同功能具學習助益性;三、參與學生對臉書社團功能做為教學輔助工具多持有正面情意感受與觀感;四、臉書社團功能的主要用途為跳脫傳統學習的時空限制,學習更便利與有效;分享討論,增加學習的深度與廣度;多媒體嵌融功能,有助於學習意義化與情境化的建立。另外,經由參與教師與學生的線上使用資料分析,發現5 項重要結果:一、臉書社團各功能有其運用需求,然各功能使用情形確有不同;二、教師與學生不同身分對臉書社團不同功能的使用情形確有不同;三、部分功能感知與行為呈現一致的現象,然部分功能有個人經驗感知與行為兩者間存在不一致的情形;四、教師配合教學在不同單元的發文情形較趨一致,然學生則出現不同單元發文情形差異較大的現象;五、教師與學生多能就發文進行閱讀,然能進一步回文的情形有待提升,以提升個人知識網路結構的精緻化。文末,根據研究發現,提出本研究限制以及教學與未來研究建議。

英文摘要

This study aimed to explore the perceptions and online usage behavior of undergraduate students enrolling in recurrent vocational education with regard to the use of Facebook Group in instruction and learning. A total of 36 students participated for a whole semester. Data sources included participants’ response to an end-of-session questionnaire (including Likert scale, checklist, open-ended question types) and online usage data (in terms of posting, reading and replying). Four major findings were obtained, based on descriptive statistics, inferential statistics and constant comparison method done on the data collected via the questionnaire. First, one-group t-test revealed that the participants felt significantly positively about the use of Facebook Group to support different aspects of teaching practices. Second, the majority of participants agreed with the learning supportiveness of various functions offered in Facebook Group. Third, participants generally exhibited positive affective responses toward the use Facebook Group in instruction and learning. Fourth, the main functions of Facebook Group, as revealed in participants’ descriptive comments, were convenience and efficacy with it’s time and space-independence; promotion of the depth and breadth of knowledge acquisition with its ease of information-sharing among group-members; and enabling meaningfulness and learning contextualization with its multimedia inclusion capability. Five more findings were obtained from participants’ online usage data. First, the use of Facebook Group’s various functions varied. Second, the use of Facebook Group’s various functions varied between teachers and students. Third, inconsistencies existed between students’ perceived usefulness and actual online usage. Fourth, postings in different units remained consistent for the teacher, but varied for students. Fifth, reading postings was quite prevalent for the teacher and students alike, yet replying to postings was less frequent and could be expected more in light of its educational value for knowledge construction. Limitations of this study and suggestions for instruction and future studies are offered.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. Wu, W. S.(2008).The application of Moodle on an EFL collegiate writing environment.Journal of Education and Foreign Languages and Literature,7,45-56.
    連結:
  2. 朱斌妤、黃仟文、翁少白(2008)。以科技接受模式探討即時交通資訊系統之使用意願。電子商務學報,10(1),173-200。
    連結:
  3. 陳欣蘭(2008)。技專校院辦理高齡者回流教育之可行性研究。明新學報,34(1),323-334。
    連結:
  4. 陳煜璋、吳佳純、黃菱鈺(2013)。社群網站之認知關鍵多數與資訊豐富度於學習滿意度之影響─以Facebook 為例為例。電子商務研究,11(3),269-288。
    連結:
  5. 蔡培村、武文瑛(2007)。我國回流教育政策發展回顧與檢討。教育實踐與研究,20(1),91-118。
    連結:
  6. Facebook (2015)。建立帳號註冊須知。上網日期2015 年1 月15 日,取自https://www.facebook.com/help/345121355559712/
  7. 鄭緯荃(2014)。Facebook 公布2014 年第一季財報,營收達25 億美元。上網日期2014 年4 月24 日, 取自http://www.bnext.com.tw/article/view/id/31941
  8. Acquisti, A.,Gross, R.(2006).Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing and privacy on the Facebook.6th Workshop on Privacy Enhancing Technologies,Cambridge, UK:
  9. Bassili, J. N.(2008).Media richness and social norms in the choice to attend lectures or to watch them online.Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia,17,453-475.
  10. Bosch, T. E.(2009).Using online social networking for teaching and learning: Facebook use at the University of Cape Town.Communication: South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research,35,185-200.
  11. Cain, J.(2008).Online social networking issues within academia and pharmacy education.American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education,72(1),10.
  12. Daft, R. L.,Lengel, R. H.(1983).Information richness. A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design.College Station, TX:Department of Management, Texas A&M University.
  13. Davis, F. D.(1989).Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology.MIS Quarterly,13,319-340.
  14. Davis, F. D.,Bagozzi, R. P.,Warshaw, P. R.(1989).User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models.Management Science,35,982-1003.
  15. Dennis, A. R.,Kinney, S. T.(1998).Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality.Information Systems Research,9,256-274.
  16. Dwyer, C.,Hiltz, S. R.,Passerini, K.(2007).Trust and privacy concern within social networking sites: A comparison of Facebook and MySpace.Americas Conference on Information Systems,Keystone, CO:
  17. Fewkes, A. M.,McCabe, M.(2012).Facebook: Learning tool or distraction?.Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education,28(3),92-98.
  18. Gray, K.,Annabell, L.,Kennedy, G.(2010).Medical students' use of Facebook to support learning: Insights from four case studies.Medical Teacher,32,971-976.
  19. Joinson, A. N.(2008).Looking at, looking up or keeping up with people? Motives and use of Facebook.SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems,Florence, Italy:
  20. Jong, B. S.,Lai, C. H.,Hsia, Y. T.,Lin, T. W.,Liao, Y. S.(2014).An exploration of the potential educational value of Facebook.Computers in Human Behavior,32,201-211.
  21. Kabilan, M. K.,Ahmad, N.,Abidin, M. J. Z.(2010).Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education?.The Internet and Higher Education,13,179-187.
  22. Kross, E.,Verduyn, P.,Demiralp, E.,Park, J.,Lee, D. S.,Lin, N.,Ybarra, O.(2013).Facebook use predicts declines in subjective well-being in young adults.PLOS One,8(8),e69841.
  23. Lee, M. K. O.,Cheung, C. M. K.,Chen, Z.(2007).Understanding user acceptance of multimedia messaging services: An empirical study.Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,58,2066-2077.
  24. Lim, K. H.,Benbasat, I.(2000).The effect of multimedia on perceived equivocality and perceived usefulness of information systems.MIS Quarterly,42(3),449-471.
  25. Mazer, J. P.,Murphy, R. E.,Simonds, C. J.(2007).I'll see you on "Facebook": The effects of computer-mediated teacher selfdisclosure on student motivation, affective learning, and classroom climate.Communication Education,56,1-17.
  26. Park, N.,Lee, S.(2014).College students' motivations for Facebook use and psychological outcomes.Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media,58,601-620.
  27. Pempek, T. A.,Yermolayeva, Y. A.,Calvert, S. L.(2009).College students' social networking experiences on Facebook.Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,30,227-238.
  28. Shih, R. C.(2011).Can Web 2.0 technology assist college students in learning English writing? Integrating Facebook and peer assessment with blended learning.Australasian Journal of Educational Technology,27,829-845.
  29. Valenzuela, S.,Park, N.,Kee, K. F.(2009).Is there social capital in a social network site? Facebook use and college students' life Satisfaction, trust, and participation.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication,14,875-901.
  30. Venkatesh, V.,Bala, H.(2008).Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions.Decision Sciences,39,273-315.
  31. Wang, J.,Lin, C. F. C.,Yu, W. C. W.,Wu, E.(2013).Meaningful engagement in facebook learning environments: Merging social and academic lives.Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education,14,302-322.
  32. Wang, Q.,Woo, H. L.,Quek, C. L.,Yang, Y.,Liu, M.(2012).Using the Facebook group as a learning management system: An exploratory study.British Journal of Educational Technology,43,428-438.
  33. 李世忠、趙倩筠、葉盈秀(2011)。Moodle教學平臺視覺介面之設計。自由軟體與教育科技研討會論文集
  34. 陳玉婷、蔡立元(2009)。從科技接受模式觀點探討資訊科技融入學習。臺南科大學報人文管理類,28,217-236。
  35. 黃益松(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。中華大學工業工程與管理研究所。
被引用次数
  1. 蕭佳純(Chia-Chun Hsiao)(2023)。以整合型科技接受模式探討國小教師參與網路學習社群對專業成長影響之研究:以使用行為、組織信任為中介變項。教育研究與發展期刊。19(2)。79-111。