校長領導對學校效能影響模式之探析

Exploring the Effect of Principal's Leadership on School Effectiveness: The Building and Analysis of Models

10.6713/BEEM.201101_(7).0001

吳勁甫(Jin-Fu Wu)

校長領導 ； 學校效能 ； 模式建立 ； principal's leadership ； school effectiveness ； model building

教育經營與管理研究集刊

7期（2011 / 01 / 01）

1 - 25

繁體中文

在教育領導研究上，校長領導對學校效能之影響一直為研究的核心議題，且已累積相當豐碩的研究成果。相較於國外，國內研究在校長領導對學校效能影響模式及統計分析策略上的認識較為薄弱。因之，有關此一主題的研究數量雖多，但多數仍偏向採取「直接」效果模式來詮釋校長領導與學校效能的關係。為擴展研究之視角，加深吾人對此研究主題之理解，本研究乃藉由文獻的蒐整，針對校長領導對學校效能影響之模式（直接、前置、中介、調節以及交互效果）、模式之統計分析方法，以及相關研究實例加以剖析，期盼經本研究之探討後，能有助日後研究之進展。

The exploration for the relationship between principal's leadership and school effectiveness has been a critical issue in the field of educational leadership. In contrast with researchers in other countries, most of Taiwan's researchers usually use direct effect model to explain the relationship between principal's leadership and school effectiveness; however, direct effect model is too simple to elucidate the complex relation between leadership and effectiveness. In addition to direct effect model, researchers could adopt antecedent effect, mediated effect, moderated effect, and reciprocal effect model to interpret the relationships between variables. The aim of this study is to clarify the building and testing of models to contribute to the development of the research topic about principal's leadership and school effectiveness.

1. 吳勁甫(2003)。校長領導與學校效能關係之探討─研究結果的回顧。學校行政雙月刊，27，52-62。
   連結：
2. 李新民、陳密桃(2007)。組織公民行為的因素結構與影響因素：巢狀因素結構與階層線性模式的分析。高雄師大學報：教育與社會科學類，22，69-91。
   連結：
3. 林俊瑩、吳裕益(2007)。家庭因素、學校因素對學生學業成就的影響─階層線性模式的分析。教育研究集刊，53(4)，107-144。
   連結：
4. 邱皓政(2007)。脈絡變數的多層次潛在變數模式分析：口試評分者效應的多層次結構方程模式應用。中華心理學刊，49(4)，383-405。
   連結：
5. 陳俊瑋(2010)。國中教師集體效能感、教師自我效能感及教師組織公民行為關聯之研究：多層次中介效果之分析。當代教育研究，18(2)，29-69。
   連結：
6. 陳順利(2007)。學校效能階層模式建構之探究。學校行政雙月刊，49，16-44。
   連結：
7. 黃芳銘、溫福星(2007)。模式化學習型學校：多層次驗證性因素分析取向。測驗學刊，54(1)，197-222。
   連結：
8. 溫福星、邱皓政(2009)。組織研究中的多層次調節式中介效果：以組織創新氣氛、組織承諾與工作滿意的實證研究為例。管理學報，26(2)，189-211。
   連結：
9. 蕭佳純、胡夢鯨(2007)。影響成人教育工作者知識管理能力因素之跨層次分析。教育學刊，29，1-36。
   連結：
10. 蕭佳純、董旭英(2007)。教師參與團隊學習行為之跨層次分析：層級線性模式之應用。師大學報：教育類，52(3)，65-89。
    連結：
11. Aguinis, H.(2004).Regression analysis for categorical moderators.New York:Guilford.
12. Aiken, L. S.,West, S. G.(1991).Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
13. Antonakis, J.(ed.),Cianciolo, A. T.(ed.),Sternberg, R. J.(ed.)(2004).The nature of leadership.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
14. Baron, R. M.,Kenny, D. A.(1986).The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51(6),1173-1182.
15. Bass, B. M.,Riggio, R. E.(2006).Transformational Leadership.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Bauer, D. J.,Preacher, K. J.,Gil, K. M.(2006).Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: New procedures and recommendations.Psychological Methods,11(2),142-163.
17. Beretvas, S. N.,Furlow, C. F.(2006).Evaluation of an approximate method for synthesizing covariance matrices for use in meta-analytic SEM.Structural Equation Modeling,13(2),153-185.
18. Boyan, N.(ed.)(1988).Handbook of research in educational administration.New York:Longman.
19. Bush, T.(ed.),Bell, L.(ed.),Bolam, R.(ed.),Glatter, R.(ed.),Ribbins, P.(ed.)(1999).Educational management: Redefining theory, policy and practice.London:Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd..
20. Cheung, M. W. L.(2008).A model for integrating fixed-, random-, and mixed-effects meta-analyses into structural equation modeling.Psychological Methods,13(3),182-202.
21. Cheung, M. W. L.,Au, K.(2005).Applications of multilevel structural equation modeling to cross-cultural research.Structural Equation Modeling,12(4),598-619.
22. Cheung, M. W. L.,Chan, W.(2005).Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: A two-stage approach.Psychological Methods,10(1),40-64.
23. Cheung, M. W. L.,Chan, W.(2009).A two-stage approach to synthesizing covariance matrices in meta-analytic structural equation modeling.Structural Equation Modeling,16(1),28-53.
24. Cheung, M. W. L.,Leung, K.,Au, K.(2006).Evaluating multilevel models in cross- cultural research: An illustration with social axioms.Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,37(5),522-541.
25. Chin, J. M. C.(2007).Meta-analysis of transformational school leadership effects on school outcomes in Taiwan and the USA.Asia Pacific Education Review,8(2),166-177.
26. Cohen, J.,Cohen, P.,West, S. G.,Aiken, L. S.(2003).Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
27. Edwards, J. R.,Lambert, L. S.(2007).Methods for integrating moderation and mediation: A general analytical framework using moderated path analysis.Psychological Methods,12(1),1-22.
28. Fairchild, A. J.,MacKinnon, D. P.(2009).A general model for testing mediation and moderation effects.Prevention Science,10(2),87-99.
29. Furlow, C. F.,Beretvas, S. N.(2005).Meta-analytic methods of pooling correlation matrices for structural equation modeling under different patterns of missing data.Psychological Methods,10(2),227-254.
30. Goldstein, H.,Bonnet, G.,Rocher, T.(2007).Multilevel structural equation models for the analysis of comparative data on educational performance.Journal of Educational Behavioral Statistics,32(3),252-286.
31. Griffith, J.(2002).Is quality/effectiveness an empirically demonstrable school attribute? Statistical aids for determining appropriate levels of analysis.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,13(1),91-122.
32. Hallinger, P.,Heck, R. H.(1996).Reassessing the principal's role in school effectiveness: A review of empirical research, 1980-1995.Educational Administration Quarterly,32(1),5-44.
33. Hallinger, P.,Heck, R. H.(1998).Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,9(2),157-191.
34. Hallinger, P.,Leithwood, K.(1996).Culture and educational administration: A case of finding out what you don't know you don' t know.Journal of Educational Administration,34(5),98-116.
35. Hancock, G. R.(ed.) ,Mueller, R. O.(ed.)(2006).Structural equation modeling: A second course.Greenwich, CT:Information Age Publishing.
36. Hancock, G. R.(ed.),Mueller, R. O.(ed.)(2006).Structural equation modeling: A second course.Greenwich, CT:Information Age Publishing.
37. Heck, R. H.(2000).Examining the impact of school quality on school outcomes and improvement :A value-added approach.Educational Administration Quarterly,36(4),513-552.
38. Heck, R. H.,Thomas, S. L.(2009).An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques.New York:Routledge.
39. Hedges, L. V.,Olkin, I.(1985).Statistical methods for meta-analysis.New York:Academic Press.
40. Hill, P. W.,Rowe, K. J.(1998).Modelling student progress in studies of educational effectiveness.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,9(3),310-333.
41. Hill, P. W.,Rowe, K. J.(1996).Multilevel modelling in school effectiveness.chool Effectiveness and School Improvement,7(1),1-34.
42. Hox, J.(2010).Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications.New York:Routledge.
43. Hoy, W. K.,Miskel, C. G.(2001).Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice.New York:McGraw-Hill.
44. Hunter, J. E.,Schmidt, F. L.(2004).Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
45. Jaccard, J.,Jacoby, J.(2010).Theory construction and model-building skills: A practical guide for social scientists.New York:Guilford Press.
46. James, L. R.,Mulaik, S. A.,Brett, J. M.(2006).A tale of two methods.Organizational Research Methods,9(2),233-244.
47. Kaplan, D.(2009).Structural equation modeling: Foundations and extensions.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
48. Kline, R. B.(2010).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York:Guilford Press.
49. Lance, C. E.(ed.),Vandenberg, R. J.(ed.)(2009).Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Doctrine, verity, and fable in the organizational and social sciences.New York:Routledge.
50. Leithwood, K.(ed.),Chapman, J.(ed.),Corson, D.(ed.),Hallinger, P.(ed.),Weaver-Hart, A.(ed.)(1996).The international handbook of educational leadership and administration.New York:Kluwer.
51. Lipsey, M. W.,Wilson, D. B.(2001).Practical meta-analysis.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
52. MacKinnon, D. P.(2008).Introduction to statistical mediation analysis.New York:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
53. MacKinnon, D. P.,Lockwood, C. M.,Hoffman, J. M.,West, S. G.,Sheets, V.(2002).A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects.Psychological Methods,7(1),83-104.
54. Maeyer, S. D.,Rymenans, R.,Petegem, P. V.,Bergh, H. V. D.,Rijlaarsdam, G.(2007).Educational leadership and pupil achievement: The choice of a valid conceptual model to test effects in school effectiveness research.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,18(2),125-145.
55. Marsh, H. W.,Wen, Z.,Hau, K-T.(2004).Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction.Psychological Methods,9(3),275-300.
56. Marzano, R. J.,Waters, T.,McNulty, B. A.(2005).School leadership that works: From research to results.Alexandria, VA:ASCD.
57. Mathieu, J. E.,Taylor, S. R.(2007).A framework for testing meso-mediational relationships in organizational behavior.Journal of Organizational Behavior,28,141-172.
58. Mathieu, J. E.,Taylor, S. R.(2006).Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in organizational behavior.Journal of Organizational Behavior,27,1031-1056.
59. Muller, D.,Judd, C. M.,Yzerbyt, V. Y.(2005).When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,89(6),852-863.
60. Muthén, B. O.(1994).Multilevel covariance structure analysis.Sociological Methods and Research,22,376-398.
61. Preacher, K. J.,Hayes, A. F.(2008).Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.Behavior Research Methods,40(3),879-891.
62. Preacher, K. J.,Zyphur, M. J.\Zhang, Z.(2010).A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation.Psychological Methods,15(3),209-233.
63. Rosenthal, R.(1991).Meta-analytic procedures for social research.Beverly Hill, CA:Sage.
64. Shrout, P. E.,Bolger, N.(2002).Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations.Psychological Methods,7(4),422-445.
65. Teddlie, C.(ed.),Reynolds, D.(ed.)(2000).The international handbook of school effectiveness research.New York:Falmer Press.
66. Thorpe, G.(2006).Multilevel analysis of PISA 2000 reading results for the United Kingdom using pupil scale variables.School Effectiveness and School Improvement,17(1),33-62.
67. Witziers, B.,Bosker, R. J.,Kruger, M. L.(2003).Educational leadership and student achievement: The elusive search for an association.Educational Administration Quarterly,39(3),398-425.
68. Yukl, G.(2010).Leadership in organizations.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
69. Zhang, Z.,Zyphur, M. J.,Preacher, K. J.(2009).Testing multilevel mediation using hierarchical linear models: Problems and solutions.Organizational Research Method,12(4),695-719.
70. 方杰、張敏強、邱皓政(2010)。基於階層線性理論的多層級中介效應。心理科學進展，18(8)，1329-1338。
71. 吳勁甫(2008)。博士論文(博士論文)。台北市，國立政治大學教育學系。
72. 李仁豪(2007)。博士論文(博士論文)。台北市，國立政治大學教育學系。
73. 李茂能(2009)。圖解AMOS在學術研究之應用。台北市:五南。
74. 李懿芳、江芳盛(2008)。有效的學校領導對數學學習成就之影響：以TIMSS 2003台灣調查資料為例。教育政策論壇，11(2)，107-130。
75. 林明地(2000)。校長領導的影響：近三十年來研究結果的分析。國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學，10(2)，232-254。
76. 邱皓政、溫福星(2007)。脈絡效果的階層線性模型分析：以學校組織創新氣氛與教師創意表現為例。教育與心理研究，30(1)，1-35。
77. 柳士順、凌文輇(2009)。多重中介模型及其應用。心理科學，32(2)，433-435。
78. 秦夢群(2010)。教育領導：理論與應用。台北市:五南。
79. 秦夢群、吳勁甫、濮世緯(2007)。校長轉型、交易領導與教師工作滿意關係之後設分析。教育與心理研究，30(4)，27-55。
80. 高新建(1997)。階層線性模式在內屬結構教育資料上的應用：以數學學習機會為例。國家科學委員會研究彙刊：人文及社會科學，7(4)，597-611。
81. 高新建、吳幼吾(1997)。階層線性模式在內屬結構教育資料上的應用。教育研究資訊，5(2)，31-50。
82. 張芳全(2010)。多層次模型在學習成就之研究。台北市:心理。
83. 張盈霏(2006)。博士論文(博士論文)。台北市，國立政治大學教育研究所。
84. 郭志剛譯(2008)。階層線性模式：資料分析方法與應用。台北市:五南。
85. 陳正昌、程炳林、陳新豐、劉子鍵(2005)。多變量分析方法─統計軟體應用。台北市:五南。
86. 陳順宇(2007)。結構方程模式：AMOS操作。台北市:心理。
87. 陳曉萍編、徐淑英編、樊景立編、鄭伯壎編(2008)。組織與管理研究的實證方法。台北市:華泰。
88. 黃宗顯(2008)。學校領導：新理論與實踐。台北市:五南。
89. 溫忠麟、吳艷(2010)。潛變量交互效應建模方法演變與簡化。心理科學進展，18(8)，1306-1313。
90. 溫忠麟、侯杰泰、馬什赫伯特(2003)。潛變量交互效應分析方法。心理科學進展，11(5)，593-599。
91. 溫忠麟、侯杰泰、張雷(2005)。調節效應與中介效應的比較和應用。心理學報，37(2)，268-274。
92. 溫忠麟、張雷、侯杰泰(2006)。有中介的調節變量和有調節的中介變量。心理學報，38(3)，448-452。
93. 溫忠麟、張雷、侯杰泰、劉紅云(2004)。中介效應檢驗程序及其應用。心理學報，36(5)，614-620。
94. 溫福星(2006)。階層線性模式：原理、方法與應用。台北市:雙葉書廊。
95. 溫福星、邱皓政(2011)。多層次模式方法論：階層線性模式的關鍵問題與試解。新北市:αβγ實驗室。
96. 葉連祺(2004)。鳥瞰教育領導理念之叢林：教育領導理念之初步綜觀。教育研究月刊，124，96-108。
97. 劉軍編(2008)。管理研究方法︰原理與應用。北京市:中國人民大學出版社。
98. 鄭燕祥(2003)。教育領導與改革：新範式。台北市:高等教育。
99. 賴志峰(2010)。學校領導新議題：理論與實踐。台北市:高等教育。

1. 吳勁甫(Jin-Fu Wu)(2023)。教學領導、分布式領導和學校氣氛對教師工作滿意的直接和調節作用：基於TALIS 2018臺灣國民中學資料之多層次分析。教育研究與發展期刊。19(1)。31-70。