數學臆測探究教學對商職學生數學學習成就與動機之影響

Influences of Conjecturing-Inquiry Teaching on Commercial Vocational High School Students' Achievements and Motivation towards Mathematics Learning

10.6278/tjme.20151001.003

秦爾聰(Erh‐Tsung Chin)；劉致演(Chih‐Yen Liu)；張克旭(Ke‐Hsu Chang)；段曉林(Hsiao‐Lin Tuan)

探究教學 ； 數學臆測 ； 學習成就 ； 學習動機 ； inquiry teaching ； mathematical conjecturing ； learning achievement ； learning motivation

臺灣數學教育期刊

2卷2期（2015 / 10 / 01）

53 - 83

繁體中文

本研究旨於探討數學臆測探究教學策略對於商職二年級學生數學學習動機及學習成就的影響。研究設計採準實驗研究之不等組前後測設計；資料收集及分析採量為主質為輔的方式進行。兩個案班級各39人，隸屬同一任課教師，為中部某公立家商二年級學生。實驗組採臆測探究教學，控制組則維持傳統講述式教學；研究時程共歷經一整個學年。評量學生數學學習動機工具為數學學習動機問卷，檢驗學生學習成效工具為六次段考成績。研究結果發現，臆測探究教學組學生動機提升與傳統教學組學生間存在顯著差異，學習成就雖未存在顯著差異卻呈現穩定成長的態勢。顯示在臆測探究教學環境脈絡下，學生願意主動參與學習、採用不同策略解決問題、重視數學學習價值，在精熟目標導向引導下期許自己是高自我效能的學習者，進而在學習成就上呈現穩定成長的狀態。

This study aims to investigate the influences of conjecturing-inquiry teaching on commercial vocational high school students' achievements and motivation toward mathematics learning. The quasi-experimental research with nonequivalent pretest-posttest control group design is adopted. There are thirty-nine students of each of the two groups, which are grade ten and taught by the same mathematics teacher from a public vocational high school in the middle of Taiwan. The conjecturing-inquiry teaching has been adopted in the experimental group for a whole academic year, while the traditional expository teaching in the control group. The instrument for examining students' motivation toward mathematics learning is the ＂Students' Motivation toward Mathematics Learning Questionnaire＂, and for assessing students' learning achievements the six school sectional examinations. The research results indicate that the students of the experimental group show significantly higher motivation toward mathematics learning than those of the control group. Although there is no significant difference between their learning achievements, the students of the experimental group have made steady progress in the six school sectional examinations during the whole academic year. Therefore, it seems to reveal that, under the conjecturing-inquiry teaching environment, students are more willing to get involved in their learning actively, to try different strategies to solve mathematics problems, to value the importance of mathematics learning, and to consider themselves as a learner of high self-efficacy under the goal of mastery. Besides, they are able to make steady progress in their mathematics learning as well.

1. 鄭如雯(2009)。芬蘭與台灣高職教育之比較。學校行政，59，216-232。
   連結：
2. 教育部（2012）。「找對方向-技職不可限量」技職教育政策與發展。臺北：作者。
3. Lin, F. L. (2006, December). Designing mathematics conjecturing activities to foster thinking and constructing actively. Keynote speech presented at the Progress report of the APEC project: Collaborative Studies on Innovations for Teaching and Learning Mathematics in Different Cultures (II)- Lesson Study focusing on Mathematical Thinking, Tsububa, Japan..
4. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
5. Ames, C.(1992).Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology,84(3),261-271.
6. Bandura, A.(1997).Self-efficacy: The exercise of control.New York, NY:W.H. Freeman.
7. Baroody, A. J.(1993).Problem solving, reasoning, and communication, K-8: Help children think mathematically.New York, NY:Macmillan.
8. Baxter, J. A.,Williams, S.(2010).Social and analytic scaffolding in middle school mathematics: Managing the dilemma of telling.Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education,13,7-26.
9. Broasi, R.(1992).Learning mathematics through inquiry.Portsmouth, NJ:Heinemann..
10. Brophy, J.(1998).Motivating students to learn.Madison, WI:McGraw-Hill.
11. Buchler, J.(Ed.)(1955).Philosophical writings of Peirce.New York, NY:Dover.
12. Cañadas, M. C.,Deulofew, J.,Figuerias, L.,Reid, D.,Yevdokimov, O.(2007).The conjecturing process: perspectives in theory and implications in practice.Journal of Teaching and Learning,5(1),55-72.
13. Cheung, K. C.(1988).Outcomes of schooling: Mathematics achievement and attitudes towards mathematics learning in Hong Kong.Educational Studies in Mathematics,19(2),209-219.
14. Cobb, P.,Wood, T.,Yackel, E.,Nicholls, J.,Wheatley, G.,Trigatti, B.,Perlwitz, M.(1991).Assessment of a problem-centered second-grade mathematics project.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,22(1),3-29.
15. Cobb, P.,Wood, T.,Yackel, E.,Perlwitz, M.(1992).A follow-up assessment of a second-grade problem-centered mathematics project.Educational Studies in Mathematics,23(5),483-504.
16. Davis, P. J.,Hersh, R.,Marchisotto, E. A.(1995).The mathematical experience.Boston, MA:Birkhauser.
17. Duda, J. L.,Nicholls, J. G.(1992).Dimensions of achievement motivation in schoolwork and sport.Journal of Educational Psychology,84(3),290-299.
18. Dweck, C. S.(1986).Motivational processes affecting learning.American Psychologists,41(10),1040-1048.
19. Ernest, P.(1991).The philosophy of mathematics education.Basingstoke, UK:Falmer Press.
20. Fernandez, C.,Yoshida, M.(2004).Lesson study: A Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
21. Gravemeijer, K.(1997).Commentary solving word problems: A case of modelling?.Learrning and Instruction,7(4),389-397.
22. Hannula, M. S.(2006).Motivation in mathematics: Goals reflected in emotions.Educational studies in mathematics,63(2),165-178.
23. Jaworski, B.(1994).Investigating mathematics teaching: A constructivist enquiry.London, UK:Falmer Press.
24. Kent, B.(1997).The interconnectedness of Peirce's diagrammatic thought.Studies in the logic of Charles Sanders Peirce,Indianapolis, IN:
25. Kilpatrick, J.(1987).What constructivism might be in mathematics education.Proceedings of the eleventh conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education,Montreal, Canada:
26. Köller, O.,Baumert, J.,Schnabel, K.(2001).Does interest matter? The relationship between academic interest and achievement in mathematics.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,32(5),448-470.
27. Kwon, O. N.,Park, J. S.,Park, J. H.(2006).Cultivating divergent thinking in mathematics through an open-ended approach.Asia Pacific Educational Review,7(1),51-61.
28. Lakatos, I.(1976).Proofs and refutations: The logic of mathematical discovery.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
29. Lepper, M. R.(1988).Motivational considerations in the study of instruction.Cognition and Instruction,5(4),289-309.
30. Lester, F. K.(Ed.)(2007).Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning: A project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Charlotte, NC:Information Age Publishing.
31. Lin, Y. G.,McKeachie, W. J.,Kim, Y. C.(2001).College student intrinsic and/or extrinsic motivation and learning.Learning and Individual Differences,13(3),251-258.
32. Ma, X.,Xu, J.(2004).Determining the causal ordering between attitude toward mathematics and achievement.American Journal of Education,110(3),256-280.
33. Mason, J.(Ed.),Burton, L.(Ed.),Stacey, K.(Ed.)(2010).Thinking mathematically.Harlow, England:Pearson Education Limited.
34. Meyer, M.(2010).Abduction-A logical view of investigation and initiating processes of discovering mathematical coherences.Educational Studies in Mathematics,74(2),185-205.
35. Middleton, J. A.(1995).A study of intrinsic motivation in the mathematics classroom: A personal constructs approach.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,26(3),254-279.
36. Middleton, J. A.,Spanias, P. A.(1999).Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalizations, and criticisms of the research.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,30(1),65-88.
37. Morrone, A. S.,Harkness, S. S.,D'Ambrosio, B.,Caulfield, R.(2004).Patterns of instructional discourse that promote the perception of mastery goals in a social constructivist mathematics course.Educational Studies in Mathematics,56(1),19-38.
38. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(1989).Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA:Author.
39. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(2000).Principles and standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA:Author.
40. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics(1991).Professional standards for teaching mathematics.Reston, VA:Author.
41. National Research Council(1989).Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of matheamtics education.Washington, DC:National Academy Press.
42. Pintrich, P. R.,Schunk, D. H.(2002).Motivation in education: Theory, research and applications.Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Merrill.
43. Pirie, S.,Kieren, T.(1992).Creating constructivist environments and constructing creative mathematics.Educational Studies in Mathematics,23(5),505-528.
44. Polya, G.(1954).Mathematics and plausible reasoning.Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press.
45. Reynolds, A. J.,Walberg, H. J.(1992).A structural model of science achievement and attitude: An extension to high school.Journal of Educational Psychology,84(3),371-382.
46. Sansone, C.(Ed.),Harackiewicz, J. M.(Ed.)(2000).Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance.New York, NY:Academic Press.
47. Schiefele, U.,Csikszentmihalyi, M.(1995).Motivation and ability as factors in mathematics experience and achievement.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,26(2),163-181.
48. Schwartz, J. L.(Ed.),Yerushalmy, M.(Ed.),Wilson, B.(Ed.)(1993).The geometric supposer: What it is a case of?.Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
49. Siegel, J.,Borasi, R.,Fonzi, J.(1998).Supporting students' mathematical inquiries through reading.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,29(4),378-413.
50. Simon, M. A.(1995).Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,26(2),114-145.
51. Singh, K.,Granville, M.,Dika, S.(2002).Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement.The Journal of Educational Research,95(6),323-332.
52. Skemp, R. R.(1976).Relational understanding and instrumental understanding.Mathematics Teaching,77,20-26.
53. Stacey, K.(1989).Finding and using patterns in linear generalizing problems.Educational Studies in Mathematics,20(2),147-164.
54. Strauss, A.,Corbin, J. M.(1990).Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques.Newbury Park, CA:Sage.
55. Tuan, H. L.,Chin, C. C.,Shieh, S. H.(2005).The development of a questionnaire to measure students' motivation towards science learning.International Journal of Science Education,27(6),639-654.
56. von Glasersfeld, E.(Ed.)(1991).Radical constructivism in mathematics education.Dordrecht, The Netherlands:Kluwer.
57. Yackel, E.,Cobb, P.(1996).Sociomathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics.Journal for Research in Mathematics Education,27(4),458-477.
58. 王雅玲、秦爾聰(2008)。實施探究教學對學生數學焦慮的影響。台灣數學教師電子期刊，15，41-57。
59. 余鴻穎(2006)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市，臺北科技大學技術及職業教育研究所。
60. 紀雅芳、溫媺純(2008)。5E 學習環融入數學探究教學對國中生學習動機之影響。台灣數學教師電子期刊，13，1-12。
61. 秦爾聰、劉致演、尤昭奇(2015)。探討七年級學生在以臆測為中心的數學探究教學脈絡下其數學素養展現情形。臺灣數學教師，36(1)，1-16。

1. 顏郁玲,陸偉明(2023)。學校教師因素對國三生數學成就之跨層次影響：考量參與數學補習的國中生個人因素。清華教育學報，40(1)，1-43。