國小教師教學熱忱與教學幸福感之研究：以幽默感為中介變項

The Study Relationships between Teaching Enthusiasm and Teaching Well-being of the Elementary School Teachers: Sense of Humor as Mediator

10.6902/JNTUST.202212_9(2).0006

邱紹一(Shao-I Chiu)；林純怡(Chun-Yi Lin)；胡秀媛(Hsiu-Yuan Hu)

國小教師 ； 教學熱忱 ； 幽默感 ； 教學幸福感 ； 中介效果 ； primary school teachers ； sense of humor ； teaching enthusiasm ； teaching well-being ； mediator

中科大學報

9卷2期（2022 / 12 / 01）

103 - 122

繁體中文

本研究的目的在探討國小教師教學熱忱、幽默感、教學幸福感之現況與關係。另外，本研究也分析了幽默感在教學熱忱對教學幸福感的中介效果影響。本研究採問卷調查法，採用三個量表作為施測，包含「幽默感量表」、「教學熱忱量表」、「教學幸福感量表」，以花蓮縣452位小學教師為樣本收集研究，並以SPSS 20.0版之統計套裝軟體進行項目分析、因素分析、信效度分析、現況分析、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關分析、路徑分析等統計方式進行資料分析，本研究結果發現如下：國小教師在幽默感現況中得分最高者為「欣賞與期許」；教學熱忱現況中得分最高者為「師生互動」；教學幸福感現況中得分最高者為「專業表現」。國小資訊、健體、藝文領域教師在教學幸福感上高於國語、數學領域教師。國小教師幽默感、教學熱忱、教學幸福感，任兩個變項皆達顯著正相關。國小教師的幽默感、教學熱忱皆對教學幸福感有正向的直接影響效果。幽默感在教學熱忱與教學幸福感之間具有部份中介效果。本研究依據研究結果對教師、學校及後續研究者提出建議。

The main purpose of this study was to explored the current situation, and the relevance among sense humor, teaching enthusiasm and teaching well-being of primary school teachers. In addition, the study also analyzed the mediation of Sense Humor between teaching enthusiasm and teaching well-being of primary school teachers. This study adopted the questionnaire method. Three scales were used for the study that including ＂Sense Humor Scale＂, ＂Teaching Enthusiasm Scale＂, and ＂Teaching Well-being Scale＂. The study was conducted through the survey techniques and participators were 452 teachers from Hualien County. The data analysis included descriptive statistics, factor analysis, reliability analysis, t-test, Pearson product-moment correlation, multi regression analysis and path analysis of the SPSS 20.0. The research result as the followings: Elementary school teachers had the highest score of sense of humor as ＂Appreciation and Expectation＂; the highest score of teaching enthusiasm as ＂Teacher-student Interaction＂; the highest score of teaching well-being as ＂Professional Performance＂. Teachers who teaching fields of information, fitness, arts and literature have higher teaching well-being than the fields of Mandarin and mathematics in elementary schools. ＂Elementary school teachers＂ sense of humor, teaching enthusiasm, and teaching well-being were positive correlated. The sense of humor and teaching enthusiasm of elementary school teachers had positive direct effect on teaching well-being. Sense of humor had partial mediating effect between teaching enthusiasm and teaching well-being. Based on the findings, this study presents specific recommendations for teachers, schools and future research.

1. 吳莉芬,張乃文,潘雪幸(2018)。幸福感之概念分析。長庚護理，29(4)，533-541。
   連結：
2. 李素珍(2015)。臺北市，臺北市立大學。
   連結：
3. 李新民,陳密桃,謝青曇(2007)。職場幽默與心理健康之相關研究：以幼兒教師為例。教育心理學報，38(4)，375-396。
   連結：
4. 張志銘,賴永僚,蕭雅分,詹正豐(2015)。國小高年級學童休閒運動效益、社會支持與及幸福感之關係。中原體育學報，7，58-72。
   連結：
5. 教育部重編國語辭典修訂本（2020）。熱忱釋義及相似詞。取自http://dict.revised.moe.edu.tw/cgibin/cbdic/gsweb.cgi?ccd=oomwWQ&o=e0&sec=sec1&op=v&view=0-1
6. Alsop, S.(2015).The ‘humour’ element in engineering lectures across cultures: An apporach to pragmatic annotation.Language and Computers,79,337-361.
7. Bakar, F.,Kumar, V.(2019).The use of humour in teaching and learning in higher education classrooms: Lecturers’ perspectives.Journal of English for Academic Purposes,40,15-25.
8. Buss, D. M.(2000).The evolution of happiness.American Psychologist,55,15-23.
9. Capel, S.(Ed.),Piotrowski, S.(Ed.)(2000).Issues in physical education.London:Falmer.
10. Chapman, A. J.,Foot, H. C.(1996).Humor and laughter: Theory, research and applications.London:Wiley & Sons, Ltd..
11. Diener, E.(1984).Subjective well-being.Psychological Bulletin,95,542-575.
12. Findler, L.,Jacoby, A. K.,Gabis, L.(2016).Subjective happiness among mothers of children with disabilities: The role of stress, attachment, guilt and social support.Research in Developmental Disabilities,55,44-54.
13. Fischer, J.(1992).Springfield College.
14. Jesus, S. N.,Conboy, J.(2001).A stress management course to prevent teacher distress.The International Journal of Education Management,10(1),41-49.
15. Kunter, M.,Frenzel, A.,Nagy, G.,Baumert, J.,Pekrun, R.(2011).Teacher enthusiasm: Dimensionality and context specificity.Contemporary Educational Psychology,36(4),289-301.
16. Lovorn, M.,Holaway, C.(2015).Teachers' perceptions of humour as a classroom teaching, interaction, and management tool.European Journal of Humour Research,3(4),24-35.
17. Martin, R. A.,Lefcourt, H. M.(1983).Sense of humor as a moderator of the relation between stressors and moods.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,45(6),1313-1324.
18. Nazareth, J.(1988).The Psychology of Military Humor.New Delhi:Lonor.
19. Patricia, H.(2001).Finding allies: Sustaining teachers’ health and well being.Phi Delta Kappan,82(9),706-711.
20. Patricia, S.(1985).Enthusiasm awareness in the experimental classroom.Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises,12,41-44.
21. Patrick, B. C.,Hisley, J.,Kempler, T.(2000)."What’s everybody so excited about?" The effects of teacher enthusiasm on student intrinsic motivation and vitality.Journal of Experimental Education,68(3),217-236.
22. Schulte, P.,Vainio, H.(2010).Well-being at work- Overview and perspective.Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health,36(5),422-429.
23. White, M. A.(2019).Academic course evaluations in health sciences can be a joke: A cross-sectional examination of whether students appreciate a professor’s sense of humor.American Journal of Health Education,50(6),398-404.
24. 方美滿(2017)。彰化縣，中州科技大學。
25. 王昱人,藍天雄(2019)。運用幸福感促進工作績效研究。中華管理發展評論，8(1)，9-23。
26. 王瀞儀(2013)。新竹市，中華大學。
27. 何湘菱(2014)。臺南市，國立臺南大學。
28. 吳宇昌(2003)。台北縣，輔仁大學。
29. 吳旭萍(2014)。臺北市，臺北市立大學。
30. 吳明隆,涂金堂(2009).SPSS 與統計應用分析.臺北:五南圖書.
31. 呂亦璿(2018)。基隆市，國立臺灣海洋大學。
32. 巫石吉（2005）。名人的幽默【新聞群組】。取自http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/5/9/7/n1044315.htm
33. 李秉親(2018)。基隆市，國立臺灣海洋大學。
34. 林志鈞,陳建銘(2019)。教師之幽默感、壓力知覺、自我效能對教學創新之影響。樹德科技大學學報，21(1)，113-141。
35. 林展緒(2016)。臺北市，銘傳大學。
36. 林雯祈(2018)。基隆市，國立臺灣海洋大學。
37. 姚玉鳳(2010)。新竹市，國立新竹教育大學。
38. 洪宗煥(2021)。彰化縣，大葉大學。
39. 洪雅倫(2016)。臺東縣，國立臺東大學。
40. 張采源(2015)。桃園市，元智大學。
41. 莊淑芬(2018)。高雄市，國立高雄師範大學。
42. 陳文長(2005)。桃園市，國立體育學院。
43. 陳建銘(2018)。彰化縣，大葉大學。
44. 陳毓端(2002)。臺中市，國立臺中師範學院。
45. 陳瑾(2011)。臺北市，國立臺灣師範大學。
46. 陸洛(1996)。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫成果報告,行政院國家科學委員會。
47. 彭盈婕(2014)。臺中市，朝陽科技大學。
48. 黃玉萍(2013)。屏東縣，國立屏東教育大學。
49. 黃厚富(2017)。臺南市，台灣首府大學。
50. 黃惠玲(2008)。新竹市，國立新竹教育大學。
51. 簡文忠(2016)。嘉義縣，國立中正大學。