英文摘要
|
The purpose of the research is to establish a ranking system on international journals in the field of education through peer review and bibliometrics. First, we conduct a questionnaire survey of Taiwanese scholars to ascertain their opinions of various international journals. Secondly, we analyze the bibliography of the top educational journals in Taiwan to see how often articles were cited within the past five years. Thirdly, we collected journal lists from the Institute for Scientific Information and used the impact factor as one of our major criteria. Finally, we combined the outcome of impact factor, peer review from Taiwanese scholars, and the TSSCI citation frequency to rank these international journals into four levels. Through the study we suggested that there needs to be more evaluation of international journals by means of multiple academic evaluation methods, continuing evaluation of international journal rankings, further development of non-SSCI evaluation methods, getting Taiwanese scholars more familiar with non-SSCI international journals, a follow-up analysis of international journal rankings in the sub-fields of education, and creating a database for a citation index of international educational journals in Taiwan.
|
参考文献
|
-
黃毅志、吳武典、馬信行、郭實渝、曾進興、黃秀霜、劉淑蓉(2004)。國內教育學門學術期刊評比研究。教育研究集刊,50(3),145-175。
連結:
-
Aksnes, D. W.,Teat, R. E.(2004).Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: A comparative study at a Norwegian university.Research Evaluation,13(1),33-41.
-
Arunachalam, K.,Manorama, K.(1988).Are citation-based quantitative techniques adequate for measuring science on the periphery?.Scientometrics,15(5-6),393-408.
-
Bordens, M.,Fernandez, M. T.,Gomez, I.(2002).Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country.Scientometrics,53(2),195-206.
-
Conceptual framework for the evaluation of university research in Europe
-
Carmines, E. G.,Zeller, R. A.(1979).Reliability and validity assessment.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
-
Cole, S.,Cole, S. R.(1967).Scientific output and recognition.American Sociological Review,32,377-390.
-
Cole, S.,Cole, S. R.(1968).Visibility and the structural bases of awareness of scientific research.American Sociological Review,33,397-413.
-
Fernández-Cano, A.,Bueno, A.(2002).Multivariate evaluation of Spanish educational research journals.Scientometrics,55(1),87-102.
-
Garfield, B.,Welljams-Dorof, A.(1992).Of Nobel class: A citation perspective on high impact research authors.Current Comments,33,116-126.
-
Garfield, B.,Welljams-Dorof, A.(1992).Of Nobel class: A citation perspective on high impact research authors.Current Comments,35,127-136.
-
Koenig, M. E. D.(1983).Bibliometric indicators versus expert opinion in assessing research performance.Journal of the American Society for information Science,34,136-145.
-
Kruytbosch, C. E.,D. Evered,S. Harnet (Eds.)(1989).The evaluation of scientific research.Chichester, NY:John Wiley & Sons.
-
MacRoberts, M. H.,MacRoberts, B. R.(1996).Problems of citation analysis.Scientometrics,36,435-444.
-
Makino, J.(1998).Productivity of research groups: Relation between citation analysis and reputation within research communities.Scientometrics,43(1),87-93.
-
Martin, B. R.(1996).The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research.Scientometrics,36,343-362.
-
Meho, L. I.,Sonnenwald, D. H.(2000).Citation ranking versus peer evaluation of senior faculty research performance: A case study of Kurdish scholarship.Journal of the American Society for information Science,51(2),123-138.
-
Nederhof, A. J.,A. F. J. van Raan (Ed.)(1988).Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology.New York:North-Holland.
-
Norris, M.,Oppenheim, C.(2003).Citation counts and the research assessment exercise V: Archaeology and the 2001 RAE.Journal of Documentation,59(6),719-726.
-
Oppenheim, C.(1995).The Correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings for British library and information science university department.Journal of Documentation,51(1),18-27.
-
Osareh, F.,Wilson, C. S.,M. D. E. Koenig,A. Bookstein (Eds.)(1995).Scientific productivity and impact of the third world countries: A citation study.Proceedings of the fifth biemial conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics,Medford, NJ:
-
Raan, A. F.(1996).Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises.Scientometrics,36(3),399-401.
-
Rinia, E. J.,van Leewen, T. N.,van Vuren, H. G.,van Raan, A. F. J.(1998).Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria evaluation of condensed matter physics in the Netherlands.Research Policy,27,95-107.
-
Review of research assessment
-
Seglen, P. O.(1998).Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research.Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica,69,224-229.
-
Sen, B. K.(1992).Documentation note: Normalized impact factor.Journal of Documentation,48(3),319.
-
Thomas, P. R.,Watkins, D. S.(1998).Institutional research rankings via bibliometric analysis and direct peer review: A comparative case study with policy implications.Scientometrics,41(3),335-355.
-
王保進(2004)。多變量分析:套裝程式與資料分析。臺北市:高等教育。
-
馬信行(1999)。國內教育相關期刊排序。國科會研究彙刊:人文興社會科學,9(2),234-253。
-
高建民(2004)。學術期刊評選制度與教育學門重要國際期刊概況。教育資料與研究,62,145-166。
-
章英華、黃毅志、呂寶靜(2000)。臺灣地區社會學、社會福利與社會工作專業期刊排序。臺灣社會學刊,23,103-139。
-
傅雅秀(1999)。以同儕評審或科學計量的方法進行學術評估。資訊傳播與圖書館學,6(2),31。
-
劉京玫(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市,國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所。
-
劉益東(1998)。問題譜系比較評議法:同行評議方法新探。自然辯證法研究,14(10),31。
-
蔡明月(1987)。書目計量學。教育資料與圖書館學,24(3),262。
|