题名

教育學門國際期刊評比之研究

并列篇名

The Study of Evaluation of International Journals in the Field of Education

DOI

10.6910/BER.200706_(53-2).0001

作者

楊深坑(Shen-Keng Yang);鄭勝耀(Sheng-Yao Cheng);馬信行(Hsen-Hsing Ma);黃慕萱(Mu-Hsuan Huang);謝伸裕(Shen-Yu Hsieh);楊正誠(Cheng-Cheng Yang)

关键词

國際期刊排名 ; 教育學門 ; 同儕審查 ; 書目計量 ; SSCI ; international journal ranking ; the field of education ; peer review ; bibliometrics ; SSCI

期刊名称

教育研究集刊

卷期/出版年月

53:2期(2007 / 06 / 30)

页次

1 - 40

内容语文

繁體中文

中文摘要

本研究旨在透過同儕審查與書目計量兩種學術期刊的評比方法,針對教育學門的國際期刊進行評比與分級,做為臺灣教育學術界進行學術評審之用。首先,使用問卷調查法,蒐集國內學者對於教育學門國際期刊的評比;其次,使用書目計量分析方法,分析國內、外教育期刊引用情形,國外部分以ISI的JCR影響係數為主,國內部分則分析近5年教育學門優良期刊的外文參考文獻引用情形;最後,合併國內學者評價、影響係數及國內教育TSSCI期刊引用次數等3項指標,經由群集分析將教育學門的國際期刊分為4級。本研究除將教育學門國際期刊分為4級之外,亦提出以下6項建議:國際期刊評比宜採取多元學術評鑑方法、教育學門國際期刊應進行後續的追蹤評鑑、發展非SSCI國際期刊的評鑑方法、提升國內學者對於非SSCI國際期刊的熟悉度、未來國際期刊評比研究可區分次領域進行深入評比、國內教育學門學術期刊應建立引用資料庫。

英文摘要

The purpose of the research is to establish a ranking system on international journals in the field of education through peer review and bibliometrics. First, we conduct a questionnaire survey of Taiwanese scholars to ascertain their opinions of various international journals. Secondly, we analyze the bibliography of the top educational journals in Taiwan to see how often articles were cited within the past five years. Thirdly, we collected journal lists from the Institute for Scientific Information and used the impact factor as one of our major criteria. Finally, we combined the outcome of impact factor, peer review from Taiwanese scholars, and the TSSCI citation frequency to rank these international journals into four levels. Through the study we suggested that there needs to be more evaluation of international journals by means of multiple academic evaluation methods, continuing evaluation of international journal rankings, further development of non-SSCI evaluation methods, getting Taiwanese scholars more familiar with non-SSCI international journals, a follow-up analysis of international journal rankings in the sub-fields of education, and creating a database for a citation index of international educational journals in Taiwan.

主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 黃毅志、吳武典、馬信行、郭實渝、曾進興、黃秀霜、劉淑蓉(2004)。國內教育學門學術期刊評比研究。教育研究集刊,50(3),145-175。
    連結:
  2. Aksnes, D. W.,Teat, R. E.(2004).Peer reviews and bibliometric indicators: A comparative study at a Norwegian university.Research Evaluation,13(1),33-41.
  3. Arunachalam, K.,Manorama, K.(1988).Are citation-based quantitative techniques adequate for measuring science on the periphery?.Scientometrics,15(5-6),393-408.
  4. Bordens, M.,Fernandez, M. T.,Gomez, I.(2002).Advantages and limitations in the use of impact factor measures for the assessment of research performance in a peripheral country.Scientometrics,53(2),195-206.
  5. Conceptual framework for the evaluation of university research in Europe
  6. Carmines, E. G.,Zeller, R. A.(1979).Reliability and validity assessment.Beverly Hills, CA:Sage.
  7. Cole, S.,Cole, S. R.(1967).Scientific output and recognition.American Sociological Review,32,377-390.
  8. Cole, S.,Cole, S. R.(1968).Visibility and the structural bases of awareness of scientific research.American Sociological Review,33,397-413.
  9. Fernández-Cano, A.,Bueno, A.(2002).Multivariate evaluation of Spanish educational research journals.Scientometrics,55(1),87-102.
  10. Garfield, B.,Welljams-Dorof, A.(1992).Of Nobel class: A citation perspective on high impact research authors.Current Comments,33,116-126.
  11. Garfield, B.,Welljams-Dorof, A.(1992).Of Nobel class: A citation perspective on high impact research authors.Current Comments,35,127-136.
  12. Koenig, M. E. D.(1983).Bibliometric indicators versus expert opinion in assessing research performance.Journal of the American Society for information Science,34,136-145.
  13. Kruytbosch, C. E.,D. Evered,S. Harnet (Eds.)(1989).The evaluation of scientific research.Chichester, NY:John Wiley & Sons.
  14. MacRoberts, M. H.,MacRoberts, B. R.(1996).Problems of citation analysis.Scientometrics,36,435-444.
  15. Makino, J.(1998).Productivity of research groups: Relation between citation analysis and reputation within research communities.Scientometrics,43(1),87-93.
  16. Martin, B. R.(1996).The use of multiple indicators in the assessment of basic research.Scientometrics,36,343-362.
  17. Meho, L. I.,Sonnenwald, D. H.(2000).Citation ranking versus peer evaluation of senior faculty research performance: A case study of Kurdish scholarship.Journal of the American Society for information Science,51(2),123-138.
  18. Nederhof, A. J.,A. F. J. van Raan (Ed.)(1988).Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology.New York:North-Holland.
  19. Norris, M.,Oppenheim, C.(2003).Citation counts and the research assessment exercise V: Archaeology and the 2001 RAE.Journal of Documentation,59(6),719-726.
  20. Oppenheim, C.(1995).The Correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings for British library and information science university department.Journal of Documentation,51(1),18-27.
  21. Osareh, F.,Wilson, C. S.,M. D. E. Koenig,A. Bookstein (Eds.)(1995).Scientific productivity and impact of the third world countries: A citation study.Proceedings of the fifth biemial conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics,Medford, NJ:
  22. Raan, A. F.(1996).Advanced bibliometric methods as quantitative core of peer review based evaluation and foresight exercises.Scientometrics,36(3),399-401.
  23. Rinia, E. J.,van Leewen, T. N.,van Vuren, H. G.,van Raan, A. F. J.(1998).Comparative analysis of a set of bibliometric indicators and central peer review criteria evaluation of condensed matter physics in the Netherlands.Research Policy,27,95-107.
  24. Review of research assessment
  25. Seglen, P. O.(1998).Citation rates and journal impact factors are not suitable for evaluation of research.Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica,69,224-229.
  26. Sen, B. K.(1992).Documentation note: Normalized impact factor.Journal of Documentation,48(3),319.
  27. Thomas, P. R.,Watkins, D. S.(1998).Institutional research rankings via bibliometric analysis and direct peer review: A comparative case study with policy implications.Scientometrics,41(3),335-355.
  28. 王保進(2004)。多變量分析:套裝程式與資料分析。臺北市:高等教育。
  29. 馬信行(1999)。國內教育相關期刊排序。國科會研究彙刊:人文興社會科學,9(2),234-253。
  30. 高建民(2004)。學術期刊評選制度與教育學門重要國際期刊概況。教育資料與研究,62,145-166。
  31. 章英華、黃毅志、呂寶靜(2000)。臺灣地區社會學、社會福利與社會工作專業期刊排序。臺灣社會學刊,23,103-139。
  32. 傅雅秀(1999)。以同儕評審或科學計量的方法進行學術評估。資訊傳播與圖書館學,6(2),31。
  33. 劉京玫(2001)。碩士論文(碩士論文)。臺北市,國立臺灣大學圖書資訊學研究所。
  34. 劉益東(1998)。問題譜系比較評議法:同行評議方法新探。自然辯證法研究,14(10),31。
  35. 蔡明月(1987)。書目計量學。教育資料與圖書館學,24(3),262。
被引用次数
  1. (2015).Education Research Organizations, Research Policies, and the Construction of Quality-Standards: The Relationship between Research and Practice in Japan.比較教育,78,96-135.
  2. (2016)。各國教育研究審查機制之評析。比較教育,80,1-26。
  3. (2018)。中文新聞傳播學術期刊的評估。傳播與社會學刊,46,183-213。