探析專業學習社群的展化學習經驗與課程創新行動－－活動理論取徑

Exploring the Expansive Learning and Curriculum Innovation of a Professional Learning Community: An Approach of Activity Theory

10.6910/BER.201106_(57-2).0002

陳佩英(Pei- Ying Chen)；曾正宜(Jeng- Yi Tzeng)

活動理論 ； 展化學習 ； 專業學習社群 ； 探究教學 ； activity theory ； expansive learning ； professional learning community ； inquiry-based learning

教育研究集刊

57:2期（2011 / 06 / 30）

39 - 84

繁體中文

政策目標導入可衍生新的需求，促進教師成長和課程革新。本文應用活動理論和展化學習，揭示高瞻目標引發教師社群之專業成長、社群和課程與教學創新行動之間的辯證關係。本文採個案研究法，主要透過訪談、焦點團體討論、文件分析等方式蒐集資料。研究發現，計畫活動系統因高瞻目標而形成，主體為學校研究團隊，工具則為集體活動之重要中介。工具包括會議、教案與關鍵性問題等，為團隊建立共識和完成任務的重要憑藉。工具的發展涉及活動系統中的衝突與矛盾，矛盾成為集體目標發展的動力，透過社群專業增能、研討、教案設計與修正和反思等，團隊的展化學習歷程得以開展。此外，由大學支援提供的鄰近發展區，搭起教師專業知能發展的鷹架，將挑戰、衝突等不一致的矛盾狀態，轉為社群學習的驅力機制。社群行動的協商與跨科合作，深化團隊展化學習的場域，使個體的專業成長和社群的任務達成相輔相成。

Policy-based initiatives can encourage professional development and curriculum innovation. By means of in-depth interviews, focus group interviews, and document analyses, this case study investigated the interplay among professional growth, construction of professional learning community, and innovative teaching in a high school team for ＂the high scope program.＂ On the basis of the activity theory and the expansive learning model, the findings showed that to accomplish the policy objectives of the program, a program activity system emerged, which precipitated the formation of the aforementioned interplay. The artifacts generated in this system included meetings, lesson plans, and critical questions. They helped solve contradictions among the entities of program activities. The team also built a platform for collegial discussion, question analyses, lesson plan design and revision, and reflection. The process demonstrated the expansive learning cycle of the team that integrated individual actions into collective activities. The outcomes of such a cycle included mastery of inquiry-based teaching methods and creation of curriculum modules for innovative teaching. The university scholar s provided scaffolds of challenges and conflicts to facilitate the professional development of the team. Through negotiations and constructive actions in the professional learning community, the team engaged in boundary-crossing collaboration which constantly pushed the team's epistemic horizon, and thus fostered individual as well as collective professional growth.

1. 陳佩英、焦傳金(2009)。分散式領導與專業學習社群之建構：一所高中教學創新計畫的個案研究。教育科學研究集刊，54(1)，55-86。
   連結：
2. 黃志賢、林福來(2008)。利用活動理論分析臺灣泰雅族國中生的數學學習並設計教學活動。科學教育學刊，16(2)，147-169。
   連結：
3. Ahonen, H.,Virkkunen, J.(2003).Shared challenge for learning: Dialogue between management and front-line workers in knowledge management.International Journal of Information Technology and Management,2(1-2),59-84.
4. Albrow, M.(1990).Globalization, knowledge and society.London:Sage.
5. Creswell, J. W.(2005).Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research.Upper Saddle River, NJ:Merrill Prentice Hall.
6. Engeström, Y.(2008).From teams to knots: Activity-theoretical studies of collaboration and learning at work.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
7. Engeström, Y.(1987).Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research.Helsinki, Finland:Orienta-Konsultit.
8. Engeström, Y.(Ed.),Miettinen, R.(Ed.),Punamaki, R.-L.(Ed.)(1999).Perspectives on activity theory.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
9. Engeström, Y.,Kerosuo, H.,Kajamaa, A.(2007).Beyond discontinuity: Expansive orgamizational learning remembered.Management Learning,38(3),319-336.
10. Engeström, Y.,Sannino, A.(2010).Studies of expansive learning: Foundations, findings and future challenges.Educational Research Review,5,1-24.
11. Fenwick, T. J.(2004).Learning in portfolio work: Anchored innovation and mobile identity.Studies in Continuing Education,26(2),229-245.
12. FitzSimons, G. E.(2003).Using Engeström's expansive learning framework to analyze a case study in adult mathematics education.Literacy & Numeracy Studies,12(2),47-63.
13. Foot, K.(2001).Cultural-historical activity theory as practical theory: Illuminating the development of a conflict monitoring network.Communication Theory,11(1),56-83.
14. Ford, D.(1991).The school principal and Chicago school reform: Principal's early perceptions of reform initiatives.Chicago:Chicago Panel on Public school Policy and Finance.
15. Fullan, M.(2007).The new meaning of educational change.New York:Teachers College Press.
16. Giddens, A.(2000).Runaway world: How globalization is reshaping our lives.London:Routledge.
17. Giddens, A.(1990).The consequences of modernity.Cambridge, UK:Polity Press.
18. Hargreaves, A.(1994).Changing teachers, changer times: Teachers' work and culture in the postmodern age.London:Cassell.
19. Harris, A.(Ed.),Bennett, N.(Ed.)(2004).School effectiveness and school improvement.New York:Continuum.
20. Hill, R.,Capper, P.,Wilson, K.,Whatman, R.,Wong, K.(2007).Workplace learning in the New Zealand apple industry network: A new co-design method for government "practice making".Journal of Workplace Learning,19(6),359-376.
21. Johnson, B. M.(1990).Teachers at work: Achieving success in our schools.New York:Basic Books.
22. Kazlauskas, A.,Crawford, K.(2007).Learning what is not yet there: Knowledge mobilization in a communal activity.Learning and socio-cultural theory: Exploring modern Vygotskian perspectives international workshop
23. Langemeyer, I.(2006).Contradictions in expansive learning: Towards a critical analysis of self-dependent forms of learning in relation to contemporary socio-technological change.Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung,7(1)
24. Leithwood, K.,Jantzi, D.,Steinbach, R.(2000).Changing leadership for changing times.Bristol, PA:Open University Press.
25. Llewellyn, D.(2005).Teaching high school science through inquiry: A case study approach.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
26. Llewellyn, D.(2002).Inquire within: Implementing inquiry-based science standards.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
27. Louis, K. S.(Ed.),Kruse, S.(Ed.),Associates(Ed.)(1995).Professionalism and community: Perspectives on reforming urban schools.Long Oaks, CA:Corwin.
28. Makino, Y.(2007).The third generation of e-learning: Expansive learning mediated by a weblog.International Journal of Web Based Communities,3(1),16-31.
29. Murphy, J.(Ed.),Louis, K. S.(Ed.)(1994).Reshaping the principalship:Insights form transformational reform efforts.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
30. Neuman, W. L.(1997).Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches.Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.
31. Pereira-Querol, M.,Seppanen, L.(2009).Learning as changes in activity systems: The emergence of on-farm biogas production for carbon credits.Outlook on Agriculture,38(2),147-155.
32. Sannino, A.,Daniels, H.,Gutierrez, K. D.(2009).Learning and expanding with activity theory.New York:Cambridge University Press.
33. Seeger, F.(Ed.),Voigt, J.(Ed.),Waschescio, U.(Ed.)(1998).The culture of the mathematics classroom.Cambridge, UK:Cambridge University Press.
34. Sergiovanni, T. J.(2000).The lifeworld of leadership: Creating culture, community. and personal meaning in our schools.San Francisco:Jessey-Bass.
35. Sfard, A.(1998).On two metaphors of learning and the dangers of choosing just one.Educational Researcher,27(2),4-13.
36. Stoll, L.,Bolam, R.,McMahon, A.,Wallace, M.,Thomas, S.(2006).Professional learning communities: A review of the literature.Journal of Educational Change,7(4),221-258.
37. Toiviainen, H.(2007).Inter-organizational learning across levels: An object-oriented approach.Journal of Workplace Learning,19(6),343-358.
38. Virkkunen, J.,Ahonen, H.(2004).Transforming learning and knowledge creation on the shop floor.International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management,4(1),57-72.
39. Vygotsky, L. S.(1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press.
40. Yamagata-Lynch, L. C.,Haudenschild, M. T.(2009).Using activity systems analysis to identify inner contradictions in teacher professional development.Teaching and Teacher Education,25,507-517.
41. Yamagata-Lynch, L. C.,Smaldino, S.(2007).Using activity theory to evaluate and improve K-12 school and university partnerships.Evaluation and Program Planning,30,364-380.
42. Yamazumi, K.(Ed.),Engeström,Y.(Ed.),Daniels, H.(Ed.)(2005).New learning challenges: Going beyond the industrial age system of school and work.Osaka, Japan:Kansai University Press.
43. Yin, R. K.(1994).Case study research: Design and methods.Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
44. 林志宜(2009)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，淡江大學教育科技學系碩士在職專班=Tamkang University。
45. 林怡君(2010)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣科技大學應用外語系=National Taiwan University of Science and Technology。
46. 林郁婷(2010)。新竹市=Hsinchu, Taiwan，國立交通大學英語教學研究所=National Chiao Tung University。
47. 唐昇志(2002)。花蓮市=Hualien, Taiwan，國立花蓮師範學院教育研究所=National Dong Hwa University Meilun Campus。
48. 張淑玲(2005)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立臺灣師範大學數學系=National Taiwan Normal University。
49. 陳向明(2002)。社會科學質的研究。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:五南=Wunan。
50. 陳宏雄(2010)。國立交通大學英語教學研究所碩士論文。新竹市=Hsinchu, Taiwan:國立交通大學英語教學研究所=National Chiao Tung University。
51. 劉宜汶(2010)。新竹市=Hsinchu, Taiwan，國立交通大學英語教學研究所=National Chiao Tung University。
52. 潘淑滿(2003)。質性研究：理論與運用。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:心理=Psychological。
53. 鄭燕祥(2006)。教育範式轉變：效能保證。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:高等教育=Higher Education。
54. 鄭燕祥(2004)。教育領導與改革：新範式。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:高等教育=Higher Education。

1. 陳斐卿,張芷瑄(2020)。教師集體課程創新：轉化能動性概念工具的再探究。課程與教學，23(1)，93-116。
2. 陳斐卿,張芷瑄(2022)。學校推動綠能園遊會的內隱矛盾與轉化：活動理論取徑。中等教育，73(2)，55-76。
3. 洪承宇,王淳瑩(2021)。新制師資培育課程基準下的課程發展：「合作教學」與「教師專業社群」融入「教育實踐課程」設計。當代教育研究季刊，29(2)，33-60。
4. 許燕萍、高翠鴻、林佩璇(2016)。差異化教學的矛盾與轉化：活動理論觀。中等教育，67(4)，7-20。
5. 黃茂在、吳敏而(2016)。探索十二年國教自然科學教科書的設計原則─以「熱傳播」單元為例。教科書研究，9(2)，69-100。
6. 簡菲莉、陳佩英(2018)。一所高中學校轉型之歷程研究：活動理論取徑。教育研究與發展期刊，14(3)，65-100。
7. 林佩璇(2017)。矛盾趨動擴展學習：差異化教學的實踐轉化。課程與教學，20(4)，117-150。
8. 林佩璇(2019)。教學活化，活化教學：文化歷史活動理論觀。課程與教學，22(1)，17-37。
9. 林盈均(2019)。國小教師擴展學習歷程之研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，12(2)，1-27。
10. 潘慧玲、張素貞、沈靜濤(2013)。專業學習社群在教師專業發展評鑑中介下的發展：一所國中個案研究。教育研究與發展期刊，9(2)，145-174。
11. 蕭佳純(2021)。創造力教學對學生學習行為、學習動機影響之研究：兼論教師信任、參與專業學習社群對創造力教學之影響。教育科學期刊，20(2)，69-94。
12. 蕭佳純(2022)。學校支持對教師創造力教學行為影響之研究：角色認定與專業學習社群的多層次中介分析。教育理論與實踐學刊，46，1-29。
13. 詹惠雪,黃曰鴻(2020)。教師對素養導向課程設計的理解與實踐反思。課程與教學，23(3)，29-58。
14. (2016)。「高中優質化輔助方案」學校層級政策執行指標建構之研究。中正教育研究，15(2)，81-124。
15. (2016)。分散式領導與民主學習社群之建構：社區大學創新計畫的行動研究。臺灣教育社會學研究，16(1)，89-126。
16. (2016)。活動理論觀點下國小師資生數學課程轉化的阻力與助力。教育學報，44(2)，51-79。
17. (2019)。技術型高級中等學校教師專業學習社群運作歷程與實施成效個案研究。教育政策論壇，22(4)，81-128。
18. (2024)。朝向問題化的設計思考—意義驅動課程評鑑引導設計。教育科學研究期刊，69(1)，207-239。
19. (2024)。地方政府建構教師持續專業發展支持系統的個案分享。學校行政，152，269-311。
20. (2024)。探究科技領域課程在實踐上的挑戰：文化歷史活動理論視角。數位學習科技期刊，16(1)，31-55。
21. (2024)。以教師實踐社群實作單元教學研究發展學校本位課程的想像：活動理論的分析。學校行政，150，35-69。