题名

運用「小老師」任務於特教師培素養導向課程之教學行動研究

并列篇名

An Action Research of Implementing "Little Teacher" Project in Competence-based Curriculum of Pre-service Teacher Training in Special Education

DOI

10.53106/102887082023036901002

作者

林秀錦(Hsiu-Chin Lin)；呂金燮(Chin-Hsieh Lu)

关键词

合作學習 ； 師資培育 ； 特殊教育 ； 務實取向 ； 專業素養 ； cooperative learning ； teacher education ； special education ； realist approach ； competence-based

期刊名称

教育研究集刊

卷期/出版年月

69:1期（2023 / 03 / 31）

页次

43 - 81

内容语文

繁體中文;英文
中文摘要

本研究從特殊教育師資培育的觀點，探究教學者為回應特教師資生統計課程學習的挑戰，以「小老師」任務促進師資生的合作學習與涵養特殊教育專業素養的教學行動歷程。本教學行動研究是一個長期持續性的教學調整歷程，乃以質性取向為探究方法，從教學者的問題意識開始，持續與文獻和多元資料對話，整合教學行動的脈絡與意義。研究歷程邀請110學年度修課的師資生參與團體焦點座談，共有兩組12位師資生參與，為本研究主要資料來源，輔以教學者觀察紀錄與省思以及師資生的教學回饋等文件資料。研究結果發現，「小老師」任務不但強化了師資生重視統計的理解，同時也提供特教師資生多元動態的合作學習經驗與重新詮釋「小老師」意義的機會。最後，從務實取向的觀點討論「小老師」任務的啟發，並從專業素養導向的挑戰省思整體教學行動的意義。
英文摘要

The purpose of this study was to investigate the processes and challenges of implementing a "Little Teacher" project in a competence-based statistics curriculum of pre-service teacher training in special education. In order to enhance student teachers' understanding of statistics concepts, promote cooperative learning and professional competence in special education, the instructor went through three stages of adjusting "Little Teacher" project over four years. Based on the qualitative approach of action inquiry, 12 student teachers from the 110 academic year were invited to participate in the study. The data were mainly collected through focus group interviews and supplemented by documentary data such as teacher observation records, reflections, and teacher-student feedback. The results showed that the "Little Teacher" project not only reinforced students' understanding of the key concepts of statistics; but also provided a variety of dynamic collaborative learning experiences and opportunities to reinterpret the meaning of teachers in special education. Finally, the inspiration of the "Little Teacher" project from a realist approach perspective was discussed along with reflection on the teacher's role regarding the challenges of competence-based teacher education in special education.
主题分类 社會科學 > 教育學
参考文献
  1. 吳清山（2018）。素養導向教師教育內涵建構及實踐之研究。教育科學研究期刊，63（4），261-293。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0009[Wu, C.-S. (2018). Construction and practice of competency-based teacher education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(4), 261-293. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0009]
    連結：
  2. 符碧真（2018）。素養導向國教新課綱的師資培育：國立臺灣大學「探究式—素養導向的師資培育」理想芻議。教育科學研究期刊，63（4），59-87。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0003[Fwu, B.-J. (2018). Teacher preparation in response to competence-based curriculum reform for K-12 education: National Taiwan University’s proposal of inquiry-based and competence-based teacher education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 63(4), 59-87. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.201812_63(4).0003]
    連結：
  3. 溫嘉榮、施文玲、鄧朱雅（2005）。運用同儕教練與合作學習終導入數位化教學的師資培訓之研究。教育學刊，25，103-126。https://doi.org/10.6450/ER.200512.0103[Wen, J.-R., Shih, W.-L., & Deng, Z.-Y. (2005). Using peer coaching and cooperative learning into teachers education with the integration of digital instruction. Educational Review, 25, 103-126. https://doi.org/10.6450/ER.200512.0103]
    連結：
  4. 陳殷哲、賴素珍（2022）。建構師資培育生教學成熟度模式之研究。當代教育研究季刊，30（2），1-47。https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202206_30(2).0001[Chen, Y.-C., & Lai, S.-C. (2022). Constructing a capability maturity model for teacher education students. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 30(2), 1-47. https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202206_30(2).0001]
    連結：
  5. 湯家偉、王俐淳（2021）。《教師專業素養指引與師資職前教育課程基準》實施之影響、挑戰與因應：中等師資培育機構之觀點。當代教育研究季刊，29（2），61-94。https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202106_29(2).0003[Tang, C.-W., & Wang, L.-C. (2021). The influence, challenges and coping strategies of the “standard for pre-service teacher education curriculum” from the perspective of secondary school teacher education institutions. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 29(2), 61-94. https://doi.org/10.6151/CERQ.202106_29(2).0003]
    連結：
  6. 黃嘉莉、陳學志、王俊斌、洪仁進（2020）。師資職前教師專業素養與課程基準之建構及其運用。教育科學研究期刊，65（2），1-35。https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2).0001[Huang, J.-L., Chen, H.-C., Wang, C.-P., & Hung, J.-C. (2020). Construction and application of teacher professional standards and curriculum baseline for preservice teacher education. Journal of Research in Education Sciences, 65(2), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.6209/JORIES.202006_65(2).0001]
    連結：
  7. 楊琬琳、蔡天怡（2018）。合作學習情境中師資培育生教案發展之協作資訊行為。圖書資訊學刊，16（1），109-139。https://doi.org/10.6182/jlis.201806_16(1).109[Yang, W.-L., & Tsai, T.-I. (2018). Preservice teachers’ collaborative information behavior while developing curriculum in cooperative learning contexts. Journal of Library and Information Studies, 16(1), 109-139. https://doi.org/10.6182/jlis.201806_16(1).109]
    連結：
  8. 王俊斌（2021）。師資培育課程基準改革之後：素養導向、能力發展與新教師專業。台灣教育研究期刊，2（6），55-77。[Wang, C.-P. (2021). After the curriculum benchmark reform of teacher education: Competencies-orientation, capabilities approach, and new teacher profession. Journal of Taiwan Education Studies, 2(6), 55-77.]
  9. 王為國（2007）。從實務社群談課程發展與教師專業發展。課程研究，2（2），41-63。[Wang, W.-K. (2007). Cultivating communities of practice for curriculum development and teacher professional development. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 2(2), 41-63.]
  10. 梁碧明、連君瑋（2011）。良師典範：優秀特教教師的教師角色與教師信念之探究。教育與多元文化研究，5，41-81。[Liang, P.-M., & Lien, C.-W. (2011). A study of roles and beliefs for excellent special education teachers. Journal of Educational and Multicultural Research, 5, 41-81.]
  11. 教育部（2019）。中華民國教師專業素養指引—師資職前教育階段暨師資職前教育課程基準。作者。[Ministry of Education. (2019). Guidelines for teachers’ professional quality in the Republic of China – Stages of teachers’ pre-service education and curriculum benchmarks of teachers’ pre-service education. Author.]
  12. 黃政傑、林佩璇（1996）。合作學習。五南。[Hwang, J.-J., & Lin, P.-H. (1996). Cooperative learning. Wu-Nan Books.]
  13. 楊智穎（2020）。教師專業素養導向師資培育課程革新的現況與議題分析：學校層級的探討。台灣教育研究期刊，1（6），39-60。[Yang, J.-Y. (2020). The professional competency of teachers in teacher education reform’s status quo and issue analysis: The study of school’s level. Journal of Taiwan Education Studies, 1(6), 39-60.]
  14. Arató, F. (2013). Towards a complex model of cooperative learning. Da Investigação às Práticas, 3(1), 57-79. https://doi.org/10.25757/invep.v3i1.28
  15. Assen, J. H., & Otting, H. (2022). Teachers’ collective learning: To what extent do facilitators stimulate the use of social context, theory, and practice as sources for learning? Teaching and Teacher Education, 114, 103702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103702
  16. Bruner, J. (1996). Culture of education. Harvard University.
  17. Burns, M. K., VanDerHeyden, A. M., & Jiban, C. L. (2006). Assessing the instructional level for mathematics: A comparison of methods. School Psychology Review, 35(3), 401-418. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2006.12087975
  18. Cohen, E. G., Brody, C. M., & Sapon-Shevin, M. (Eds.). (2004). Teaching cooperative learning: The challenge for teacher education. State University of New York Press.
  19. Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 76(8), 597-604.
  20. DeFour, R. (2004). What is a “professional learning community”? Educational Leadership, 61(8), 6-11.
  21. Dewey, J. (1963). Experience and education. Collier Books.
  22. Erfan, A., & Torbert, B. (2015). Collaborative developmental action inquiry. In H. Bradbury (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of action research (pp. 64-75). https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473921290
  23. Gardner, J. (Ed.). (2012). Assessment and learning. Sage.
  24. Koenen, A.-K., Borremans, L. F. N., De Vroey, A., Kelchtermans, G., & Split, J. L. (2021). Strengthening individual teacher-child relationships: An intervention study among student teachers in special education. Frontiers in Education, 6, 769573. https://doi.org/103389/feduc.2021.769573
  25. Korthagen, F. A. J., & Kessels, J. P. A. M. (1999). Linking theory and practice: Changing the pedagogy of teacher education. Educational Researcher, 28(4), 4-17. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X028004004
  26. Lave, J. (1991). Situating learning in communities of practice. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 63-82). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10096-003
  27. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Harvard University Press.
  28. Nissilä, S.-P., Karjalainen, A., & Koukkari, M. (2022). It is the shared aims, trust and compassion that allow people to prosper: Teacher educators’ lifelong learning in competencebased education. European Journal of Education Research, 11(2), 965-980. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.2.965
  29. Van Manen, M. (2016). The tact of teaching: The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness. Routledge.
  30. Valli, L., & Rennert-Ariev, P. (2002). New standards and assessments? Curriculum transformation in teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(2), 201-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270110093625
  31. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University.
  32. Wesselink, R., Biemans, H. J. A., Gulikers, J., & Mulder, M. (2017). Models and principles for designing competence-based curricula, teaching, learning and assessment. In M. Mulder (Ed.), Competence-based vocational and professional education: Bridging the worlds of work and education (Vol. 23, pp. 533-553). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41713-4_25
print cancel