組織支持、有效專業發展活動、專業發展正向影響與教師工作滿意度關係之研究

The Relationship Between Organizational Support, Effective Professional Development, Positive Effects of Professional Development, and Job Satisfaction

10.6869/THJER.201912_36(2).0003

謝紫菱(Tzu-Ling Hsieh)

有效專業發展活動 ； 專業發展正向影響 ； 教師工作滿意度 ； 組織支持 ； effective professional development ； positive effects of professional development ； teacher job satisfaction ； organizational support

清華教育學報

36卷2期（2019 / 12 / 31）

91 - 122

繁體中文

本研究主要目的在瞭解組織支持、有效專業發展活動、專業發展正向影響與教師工作滿意度之間的關係。研究以分層隨機選取臺北市國小、國中與高中共1,042位教師；階層迴歸分析結果顯示，學校考評、有效專業發展活動與專業提升對教師工作滿意度皆有正向且顯著之預測力；另結構方程模式分析則發現，組織支持對於有效專業發展活動的進行、提升教師知覺教師專業發展正向影響的程度皆有正向關聯，而教師知覺教師專業發展正向影響的程度則對於教師工作滿意度有正向關聯。此外，組織支持可以透過有效專業發展活動，對教師專業發展正向影響產生正向的間接效果。

The goal of this study is to understand the relationship between organizational support, effective professional development, positive effects of professional development, and job satisfaction. The research sample consists of 1,042 teachers from elementary, junior high, and senior high schools in Taipei. The analysis, conducted through hierarchical regression, finds that school appraisal, effective professional development, and positive effects of teachers positively predict job satisfaction. An analysis through structural equation modeling shows that organizational support is positively related to job satisfaction through the positive effects of professional development. Organizational support also has a positive relationship on effective professional development. Additionally, this study provides practical suggestions for schools and educational administrations, as well as for future studies.

1. 張素貞, S.-C.,李俊湖, J.-F.(2014)。教師專業發展評鑑方案成效評估之研究。教育資料與研究，114，95-124。
   連結：
2. 劉鎮寧, J.-N.,吳子宏, Z.-H.,邱世杰, S.-J.(2015)。臺灣與中國大陸國小教師專業發展政策與實施現況之分析研究。師資培育與教師專業發展期刊，8(3)，53-73。
   連結：
3. Anderson, J. C.,Gerbing, D. W.(1988).Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach.Psychological Bulletin,103(3),411.
4. Bagozzi, R. P.,Yi, Y.(1988).On the evaluation of structural equation models.Academic of Marketing Science,16,76-94.
5. Banerjee, N.,Stearns, E.,Moller, S.,Mickelson, R. A.(2017).Teacher job satisfaction and student achievement: The roles of teacher professional community and teacher collaboration in schools.American Journal of Education,123(2),203-241.
6. Brennen, A. M. (2001). A comprehensive paper on staff development. Retrieved from http://www.soencouragement.org/comprehensive-paper-on-staff developmemt.htm
7. Brill, S.,McCartney, A.(2008).Stopping the revolving door: Increasing teacher retention.Politics & Policy,36(5),750-774.
8. Browne, M. W.(1984).Asymptotic distribution free methods in analysis of covariate structure analysis.British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology,37,62-83.
9. Buchanan, J.(2012).Telling tales out of school: Exploring why former teachers are not returning to the classroom.American Journal of Education,56(2),205-220.
10. Canrinus, E. T.,Helms-Lorenz, M.,Beijaard, D.,Buitink, J.,Hofman, A.(2012).Self-efficacy, job satisfaction, motivation and commitment: Exploring the relationships between indicators of teachers’ professional identity.European Journal of Psychology of Education,27(1),115-132.
11. Cohen, J.,McCabe, L.,Michelli, N. M.,Pickeral, T.(2009).School climate research, policy, practice, and teacher education.Teachers College Record,111(1),180-213.
12. Desimone, L. M.(2009).Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures.Educational Researcher,35(3),181-199.
13. Desimone, L. M.,Porter, A. C.,Garet, M. S.,Yoon, K. S.,Birman, B. F.(2002).Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,24(2),81-112.
14. Drolet, M.,Arcand, I.(2013).Positive development, sense of belonging, and support of peers among early adolescents: Perspectives of different actors.International Education Studies,6(4),29-38.
15. Fisher, D. L.,Fraser, B. J.(1991).School climate and teacher professional development.South Pacific Journal of Teacher Education,19(1),17-32.
16. Garet, M. S.,Porter, A. C.,Desimone, L.,Birman, B. F.,Yoon, K. S.(2001).What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers.American Educational Research Journal,38,915-945.
17. Gimbel, P. A.,Lopes, L.,Greer, E. N.(2011).Perceptions of the role of the school principal in teacher professional growth.AASA Journal of Scholarship and Practice,7(4),19-31.
18. Good, T. L.,Brophy, J. E.(1997).Looking in classrooms.New York, NY:Longman.
19. Grossman, T.,Hirsch, E.(2009).Grossman, T., & Hirsch, E. (2009). State policies to improve teacher professional development (Issue Brief).Washington, DC: NGA Center for Best Practices..
20. Guskey, T. R.(2000).Evaluating professional development.Thousand Oaks, CA:Corwin Press.
21. Jones, E. T.(2016).Memphis, Tennessee,The University of Memphis.
22. Jöreskog, K. G. (1999). How large can a standardized coefficient be? Retrieved from http://www.ssicentral.com/lisrel/techdocs/HowLargeCanaStandardizedCoefficientbe.pdf
23. Kline, R. B.(2011).Principles and practice of structural equation modeling.New York, NY:Guilford Press.
24. Maruyama, G. M.(1998).Basics of structural equation modeling.Thousand Oasks, CA:Sage.
25. McFarlan, E. S.(2014).Raleigh, North Carolina,North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
26. Mushayikwa, E.,Lubben, F.(2009).Self-directed professional development-hope for teachers working in deprived environments?.Teaching & Teacher Education,25(3),375-382.
27. Olsson, U. H.,Foss, T.,Troye, S. V.,Howell, R. D.(2000).The performance of ML, GSL, and WLS estimation in structural equation modeling under conditions of misspecification and nonmorality.Structural Equation Modeling,7(4),557-595.
28. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development(2013).TALIS 2008 technical report.Paris, France:Author.
29. Penuel, W. R.,Fishman, B. J.,Yamaguchi, R.,Gallagher, L. P.(2007).What makes professional development effective? Strategies that foster curriculum implementation.American Educational Research Journal,44,921-958.
30. Rhoades, L.,Eisenberger, R.,Armeli, S.(2001).Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support.Journal of Applied Psychology,86,825-836.
31. Sims, C. R.(2017).Memphis, Tennessee,The University of Memphis.
32. Slater, S. F.,Olson, E. M.,Hult, G. T. M.(2006).The moderating influence of strategic orientation on the strategy formation capability-performance relationship.Strategic Management Journal,27(12),1221-1231.
33. Stewart, C.(2014).Transforming professional development to professional learning.Journal of Adult Education,43(1),28-33.
34. Tanaka, J. S.(1987).How big is big enough? Some size and goodness of fit in structural equation models with latent variables.Child Development,58,134-146.
35. Teaching and Learning International Survey(2013).TALIS 2013 results: An international perspective on teaching and learning.
36. Villano, M.(2008).Five on five: A dialogue on professional development.T.H.E. Journal,35(3),40-46.
37. Wagner, T. (2003, November 21). Beyond testing: The 7 disciplines for strengthening instruction. Education Week. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/ew/articles/2003/11/21/11wagner.h23.html
38. Wei, R. C.,Darling-Hammond, L.,Adamson, F.(2010).,Dallas, TX:National Staff Development Council.
39. 丁一顧, Y.-K.,江姮姬, H.-J.,吳宜蓉, Y.-R.(2018)。校長同儕式領導與教師專業學習社群關係之研究。教育政策論壇，21(2)，97-129。
40. 李政穎, Z.-Y.(2003)。臺中市=Taichung, Taiwan，國立臺中教育大學=National Taichung University of Education。
41. 李茂能, M.-N.(2011).圖解AMOS在學術研究之應用.臺北市=Taiepi, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan.
42. 林鈺棻, Y.-F.(2007)。新北市=New Taipei City, Taiwan，輔仁大學=Fu Jen Catholic University。
43. 洪麗卿, L.-C.,黃純敏, C.-M.(2012)。美國麻州中小學教師評鑑制度研究及其對臺灣的啟示。教育資料集刊，54，175-205。
44. 孫志麟, C.-L.(2004)。開啟專業學習的新視窗：教師的知識管理。教育研究月刊，126，5-18。
45. 張明輝, M.-H.(1999).學校教育與行政革新研究.臺北市=Taiepi, Taiwan:師大書苑=Lucky Bookstore.
46. 張德銳, D.-R.(2003)。我國中小學教師評鑑的規劃與推動策略。教育資料與研究，53，1-12。
47. 教育部（2016）。教師專業發展評鑑將於106學年度起轉型為教師專業發展支持系統。取自https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=55BD57743E88E277【Ministry of Education. (2016). Teacher evaluation for professional development will transform to the support system of teacher professional development. Received from https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=55BD57743E88E277】
48. 曾文鑑, W.-J.,郭碧玄, B.-X.,陳雯玲, W.-L.(2014)。新竹縣教師專業發展行政運作、教師實踐與成長介入之模式初探。新竹縣教育研究集刊，14，61-92。
49. 黃光國, G.-G.(1983)。臺灣地區企業組織型態與員工工作士氣。中央研究院民族學研究所集刊，56，145-193。
50. 黃芳銘, F.-M.(2006).結構方程模式：理論與應用.臺北市=Taiepi, Taiwan:五南=Wu-Nan.
51. 黃政傑, J.-J.(1996)。從課程的角度看教師專業發展。教師天地，83，13-17。
52. 黃嘉莉, J.-L.(2014)。,臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan:臺北市政府教育局=The Department of Education。
53. 潘慧玲, H.-L.,王麗雲, L.-Y.,張素貞, S.-J.,吳俊憲, J.-Z.,鄭淑惠, S.-H.(2010)。教育部委託專案研究成果報告教育部委託專案研究成果報告,教育部=Ministry of Education。
54. 蔡培村, P.-T.(1985)。臺北市=Taipei, Taiwan，國立政治大學=National Chengchi University。

1. 劉乙儀(2021)。幼兒園教師素質之分析－以大數據為例。學校行政，134，118-137。
2. 蕭佳純(2023)。自我效能、學校環境因素對國小教師參與專業發展活動影響之研究。學校行政，145，107-131。
3. (2021)。臺北市優質學校之個案研究：以專業發展為例。教育研究月刊，332，4-21。
4. (2023)。國小自然科學領域教師SCCT滿意度模式之研究：以TIMSS 2019臺灣資料為例。教育研究與實踐學刊，70(2)，25-51。